Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 1206–1214 | Cite as

Women’s Autonomy and Unintended Pregnancy Among Currently Pregnant Women in Bangladesh

  • Mosfequr RahmanEmail author


This paper examines the net effect of women’s autonomy on their pregnancy intention status among currently pregnant Bangladeshi women. This study is based on data from the Bangladesh Demographic Health Survey, 2007 (BDHS). A subset of interviews from currently pregnant women (718) were extracted from 10,146 married women of reproductive age. The BDHS 2007 used a pre-tested, structured questionnaire to collect sociodemographic, women’s empowerment, and pregnancy information. Associations between unintended pregnancy and explanatory variables were assessed using bivariate analysis. Logistic regression was used to assess the net effect of women’s autonomy on current pregnancy intention status after controlling for other variables. Results indicate that women’s autonomy is a significant predictor of unintended pregnancy after adjusting for other factors. A unit increase in the autonomy scale decreases the odds of unintended pregnancy by 16%. Besides autonomy, our results also indicate that current age, number of children ever born, age at marriage, religion, media access, and contraceptive use exert strong influences over unintended pregnancy. Women who have ever used contraceptives are 82% more likely to classify their current pregnancies as unintended compared with women who are non-users of contraceptives. Improvement in women’s autonomy and effective and efficient use of contraceptives may reduce unintended pregnancies as well as improve reproductive health outcomes.


Women’s autonomy Unintended pregnancy Decision-making Ever use of contraception Bangladesh 



The author wish to thank Sonia Rahman for her support in writing and polishing the language of the manuscript.


  1. 1.
    WHO. (2000). Women of South-East Asia: A health profile. New Delhi: Regional office for South-East Asia, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Mitra and Associates, ORC Macro. (2009). Bangladesh demographic and health survey 2007. Dhaka, Bangladesh and Calverton, Ml: National Institute of Population Research and Training, Mitra and Associates, and ORC Macro.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caldwell, B. (2000). The first generation to control family size: a microstudy of the causes of fertility decline in a rural area of Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 31(3), 239–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Simmons R, Mita R (1995). Women’s status and family planning in Bangladesh: An analysis of focus group data. University of Michigan and The Population Council.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bustan, M. N., & Coker, A. L. (1994). Maternal attitude toward pregnancy and the risk of neonatal death. American Journal of Public Health, 84(3), 411–414.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Conde-Agudelo, A., & Belizán, J. M. (2000). Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: Cross sectional study. BMJ, 321(7271), 1255–1259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Konje, J., Obisesan, K., & Ladipo, O. (1992). Health and economic consequences of septic induced abortion. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 37(3), 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marsiglio, W., & Mott, F. L. (1988). Does wanting to become pregnant with a first child affect subsequent maternal behaviors and infant birth weight? Journal of Marriage and Family, 50(4), 1023–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sable, M. R., Spencer, J. C., Stockbauer, J. W., et al. (1997). Pregnancy wantedness and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Differences by race and Medicaid status. Family Planning Perspectives, 29(2), 76–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eggleston, E., (Ed.) (1998). Unintended pregnancy and use of prenatal care in Ecuador. Annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, 1998 November 15–19; Washington DC.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Joyce, T., & Grossman, M. (1990). Pregnancy wantedness and the early initiation of prenatal care. Demography, 27(1), 1–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sable, M. R., Stockbauer, J. W., Schramm, W. F., et al. (1990). Differentiating the barriers to adequate prenatal care in Missouri, 1987–1988. Public Health Reports, 105(6), 549–555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Butler, P. (2003). In J. Khanna (Ed.), Progress in reproductive health research (Vol. 62). World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eggleston, E. (1999). Determinants of unintended pregnancy among women in Ecuador. International Family Planning Perspectives, 25(1), 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Basu, A. M. (1999). Fertility decline and increasing gender imbalance in India, including a possible south Indian turnaround. Development and Change, 30(2), 237–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dyson, T., & Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fikree, F. F., & Pasha, O. (2004). Role of gender in health disparity: The South Asian context. BMJ, 328(7443), 823–826.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Becker, S., Fonseca-Becker, F., & Schenck-Yglesias, C. (2006). Husbands’ and wives’ reports of women’s decision-making power in Western Guatemala and their effects on preventive health behaviors. Social Science and Medicine, 62(9), 2313–2326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bloom, S. S., Wypij, D., & Das Gupta, M. (2001). Dimensions of women’s autonomy and the influence on maternal health care utilization in a north Indian city. Demography, 38(1), 67–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ghuman, S. J., Lee, H. J., & Smith, H. L. (2006). Measurement of women’s autonomy according to women and their husbands: Results from five Asian countries. Social Science Research, 35(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    MacKinnon, C. A. (1983). Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: Toward feminist jurisprudence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 8(4), 635–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pallitto, C. C., & O’Campo, P. (2005). Community level effects of gender inequality on intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy in Colombia: Testing the feminist perspective. Social Science and Medicine, 60(10), 2205–2216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Abadian, S. (1996). Women’s autonomy and its impact on fertility. World Development, 24(12), 1793–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Al Riyami, A., Afifi, M., & Mabry, R. M. (2004). Women’s autonomy, education and employment in Oman and their influence on contraceptive use. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(23), 144–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hogan, D. P., Berhanu, B., & Hailemariam, A. (1999). Household organization, women’s autonomy, and contraceptive behavior in southern Ethiopia. Studies in Family Planning, 30(4), 302–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Saleem, S., & Bobak, M. (2005). Women’s autonomy, education and contraception use in Pakistan: A national study. Reproductive Health, 2(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gupta, M. D. (1995). Life course perspectives on women’s autonomy and health outcomes. American Anthropologist, 97(3), 481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ghuman, S. J. (2003). Women’s autonomy and child survival: A comparison of muslims and non-muslims in four Asian countries. Demography, 40(3), 419–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shroff, M., Griffiths, P., Adair, L., et al. (2009). Maternal autonomy is inversely related to child stunting in Andhra Pradesh, India. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 5(1), 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bhatia, J., & Cleland, J. (1995). Determinants of maternal care in a region of South India. Health Transition Review, 5(1), 127–142.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Matsumura, M., & Gubhaju, B. (2001). Women’s status, household structure and the utilization of maternal health services in Nepal. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 16(1), 23–44.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mistry, R., Galal, O., & Lu, M. (2009). Women’s autonomy and pregnancy care in rural India: A contextual analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 69(6), 926–933.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mullany, B. C., Hindin, M. J., & Becker, S. (2005). Can women’s autonomy impede male involvement in pregnancy health in Katmandu, Nepal? Social Science and Medicine, 61(9), 1993–2006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Woldemicael, G., & Tenkorang, E. Y. (2010). Women’s autonomy and maternal health-seeking behavior in Ethiopia. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(6), 988–998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Adhikari, R., Soonthorndhada, K., & Prasartkul, P. (2009). Correlates of unintended pregnancy among currently pregnant married women in Nepal. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 9(1), 17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brown, S. S., & Eisenberg, L. (1995). The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rutstein, S. (2008). The DHS wealth index: Approaches for rural and urban areas. Calverton, MD: Macro International.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rutstein, S., & Johnson, K. (2004). The DHS wealth index (DHS comparative Reports No. 6). Calverton, MD: ORC Macro.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Okonofua, F. E., Odimegwu, C., Ajabor, H., et al. (1999). Assessing the prevalence and determinants of unwanted pregnancy and induced abortion in Nigeria. Studies in Family Planning, 30(1), 67–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., Hosseini-Chavoshi, M., Aghajanian, A., et al. (2004). Unintended pregnancies in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Levels and correlates. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 19(1), 27–38.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Goto, A., Yasumura, S., Reich, M. R., et al. (2002). Factors associated with unintended pregnancy in Yamagata, Japan. Social Science and Medicine, 54(7), 1065–1079.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Caldwell, J. C. (1986). Routes to low mortality in poor countries. Population and Development Review, 12(2), 171–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Oni, G., & McCarthy, J. (1990). Contraceptive knowledge and practice in Ilorin, Nigeria: 1983–1988. Studies in Family Planning, 21(2), 104–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Westoff, C. F., & Rodriguez, G. (1995). The mass media and family planning in Kenya. International Family Planning Perspectives, 21(1), 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Blanc, A. K., Curtis, S. L., & Croft, T. N. (2002). Monitoring contraceptive continuation: Links to fertility outcomes and quality of care. Studies in Family Planning, 33(2), 127–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jain, A. (1999). Should eliminating unmet need for contraception continue to be a program priority? International Family Planning Perspectives, 25, 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyKanazawa Medical UniversityUchinada, Kohoku, IshikawaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Population Science and HRDUniversity of RajshahiRajshahiBangladesh

Personalised recommendations