Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-sited and historically layered language policy construction: parliamentary debate on the Finnish constitutional bilingualism in 1919

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Language Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we analyse the construction of Finnish constitutional bilingualism in the aftermath of gaining independence, a traumatic civil war and during the construction of a new republican polity based on regulated parliamentarism in 1917–1919. We take a multi-sited and historically informed approach to the dynamics of political discourse at the parliamentary level, analysing the discursive cycles of people, nationality and nation. We demonstrate the interconnectedness of language policy discourses with historically and spatially multi-sited and highly complex contexts and show how language policy confrontations can add important dimensions to increase our understanding of power struggles concerning other aspects of politics. Both sides of the debate utilized a set of nationalistic discourses, derived from the nineteenth century and reactivated by the discursive trends of the post-war situation. These discourses reinforced the ideas of national self-determination and the opening of politics to the people at large—though with a set of limitations to majority democracy. Indeed, the language paragraphs of the Finnish republican constitution of 1919 can be seen as a further set of minority provisions needed in search said ideals and reconstruction of normalcy after a crisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Debate turns are referred to by first initial and last name of speaker, party abbreviation, and date.

References

  • Autio, V.-M. (1998). Setälä, Emil Nestor (1864–1935). Kansallisbiografia. http://www.kansallisbiografia.fi/kb/artikkeli/500/. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.

  • Blommaert, J. (Ed.). (1999). The debate is open. In Language ideological debates (pp. 3–38). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

  • Blommaert, J. (2006). Language policy and national identity. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy (pp. 238–254). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S., & De Costa, P. (2016). Introduction: Scales analysis, and its uses and prospects in educational linguistics. Linguistics and Education, 34, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engman, M. (2016). Språkfrågan. Finlandssvenskhetens uppkomst 1812–1922. Helsingfors: Svenska Litteratursällskapet i Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, S. (2006). Contradictions of standard language in Europe: Implications for the study of publics and practices. Social Anthropology, 14(2), 163–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halonen, M., Ihalainen, P., & Saarinen, T. (2015). Diverse discourses in time and space. Historical, discourse analytical and ethnographic approaches to multi-sited language policy discourse. In M. Halonen, P. Ihalainen & T. Saarinen (Eds), Language policies in Finland and Sweden. Interdisciplinary and multisited comparisons (pp. 3–28). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen, P. K. (1978). Luokka ja kieli vallankumouksen Suomessa. Helsinki: Suomen Historiallinen Seura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, F. M. (2010). Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of time and space. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 202, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, F. (2015). Making policy connections across scales using nexus analysis. In F. Hult (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 217–231). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, F., & Hornberger, N. (2016). Revisiting orientations in language planning: Problem, right, and resource as an analytical heuristic. Bilingual Review/Revista Bilingüe, 33(3), 30–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, F., & Pietikäinen, S. (2014). Shaping discourses of multilingualism through a language ideological debate. The case of Swedish in Finland. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyvärinen, M. (2003). Valta. In M. Hyvärinen, J. Kurunmäki, K. Palonen, T. Pulkkinen (Eds.), Käsitteet liikkeessä. Suomen poliittisen kulttuurin käsitehistoria (pp. 63–113). Tampere: Vastapaino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihalainen, P. (2015). The 18th-century traditions of representation in a new age of revolution: History politics in the Swedish and Finnish parliaments, 1917–1919. Scandinavian Journal of History, 40(1), 70–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihalainen, P. (2017). The springs of democracy: National and transnational debates on constitutional reform in the British, German, Swedish and Finnish parliaments, 1917–1919. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. https://doi.org/10.21435/sfh.24.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ihalainen, P., & Saarinen, T. (submitted). Bringing language research, intellectual history and political history together in the analysis of parliamentary debates as a nexus.

  • Ihalainen, P., & Saarinen, T. (2015). Constructing ‘Language’ in language policy discourse: Finnish and Swedish legislative processes in the 2000s. In M. Halonen, P. Ihalainen & T. Saarinen (Eds), Language policies in Finland and Sweden. Interdisciplinary and multi-sited comparisons (pp. 29–56). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihalainen, P., Saarinen, T., Nikula, T., & Pöyhönen, S. (2011). Aika kielipolitiikassa. Päivälehtien nettikeskustelujen historiakäsitysten analyysi. Kasvatus & Aika, 5(3), 18–38. http://www.kasvatus-ja-aika.fi/dokumentit/aika_kielipolitiikassapaivalehtien_nettikeskustelujen_historiakasitysten_analyysi_3009111039.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2018.

  • Johnson, D. C. (2013a). Language policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C. (2013b). Positioning the language policy arbiter. Governmentality and footing in the school district of Philadelphia. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (2nd ed., pp. 116–136). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C., & Ricento, T. (2015). Methodologies of language policy research. In M. Bigelow (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 38–49). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, R. B. (1997). Language planning from practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, F. (2014). E.N. Setälä kielipoliitikkona. Virittäjä, 118(2), 281–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (2006). Begriffsgeschichten: Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latomaa, S., & Nuolijärvi, P. (2002). The language situation in Finland. Current Issues in Language Planning, 3(2), 95–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemberg, M. (1999). Procopé, Hjalmar Johan (1889–1954) Kansallisbiografia. http://www.kansallisbiografia.fi/kb/artikkeli/952/. Accessed 15 April 2017.

  • Lim, J.-H. (2010). Victimhood nationalism and history reconciliation in East Asia. History Compass, 8(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, T. (2011). Entry into conversation. Introducing ethnography and language policy. In T. McCarty (Ed.), Ethnography and language policy (pp. 1–28). Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinander, H. (2016). Nationalstaten. Finlands svenskhet 1922–2015. Helsingfors: Svenska Litteratursällskapet i Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, K. S., & Wortham, S. (2015). Analyzing language policy and social identification across heterogeneous scales. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 160–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2006). Postmodernism in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 60–76). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J. G. A. (2009). Political thought and history: Essays on theory and method. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöyhönen, S., & Saarinen, T. (2015). Constructions of bilingualism in Finnish Government programmes and a newspaper discussion site debate. Current Issues in Language Planning, 16(4), 392–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (2008). Researching historical perspectives on language, education, and ideology. In K. King (Ed.), Research methods in language and education (2nd ed., Vol. 10, pp. 41–54)., Encyclopedia of language and education New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (2014). Thinking about language: What political theorists need to know about language in the real World. Language Policy, 13(4), 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savski, K. (2016). State language policy in time and space: Meaning, transformation, recontextualisation. In E. Barakos (Eds.), Discursive approaches to language policy (pp. 51–70). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, H. F. (1996). Linguistic culture and language policy. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R. (2005). Lighting the stove. Why habitus isn’t enough. In R. Wodak (Eds.), A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis (pp. 101–117). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (2004). Nexus analysis. Discourse and the emerging Internet. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M. (1996). Monoglot ‘standard’ in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In Don Brenneis (Eds.), The matrix of language: Contemporary linguistic anthropology (pp. 284–306). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of politics (Vol. 1)., Regarding method CUP: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, W., Freeden, M., & Fernández-Sebastián, J. (2017). Conceptual history in the European space. New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, W., Gilcher-Holtey, I., & Haupt, H.-G. (2013). Writing political history today. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenius, H. (2003). Kansalainen. In M. Hyvärinen, J. Kurunmäki, K. Palonen, T. Pulkkinen (Eds.), Käsitteet liikkeessä. Suomen poliittisen kulttuurin käsitehistoria (pp. 309–362). Tampere: Vastapaino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vares, V. (1999). Estlander, Ernst (1870–1949). Kansallisbiografia. http://www.kansallisbiografia.fi/kb/artikkeli/2203/. Accessed 20 May 2017.

  • Whatmore, R. (2016). What is intellectual history?. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, T. G. (2006). The lessons of historical investigation: Implications for the study of language policy and planning. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 135–152). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Jyvaskyla, P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyvaskyla, Finland

    Taina Saarinen

  2. Department of History and Ethnology, University of Jyvaskyla, P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyvaskyla, Finland

    Pasi Ihalainen

Authors
  1. Taina Saarinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pasi Ihalainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taina Saarinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saarinen, T., Ihalainen, P. Multi-sited and historically layered language policy construction: parliamentary debate on the Finnish constitutional bilingualism in 1919. Lang Policy 17, 545–565 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-018-9474-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-018-9474-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation