Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Publish (in international indexed journals) or perish: Neoliberal ideology in a Korean university

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Language Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the 1990s, universities in South Korea have participated in an aggressive movement to globalize their institutions through the medium of English by hiring English-proficient faculty. To attain tenure, faculty must publish in international indexed journals (IIJs), which results in a de facto language policy of publishing in English because most IIJs require English. Requiring faculty to publish in IIJs yields consequences on several levels. For professors, who may or may not be proficient in English academic writing, they must find time to handle teaching and administrative responsibilities, in addition to navigating academic publishing within a limited time period. This policy also serves larger agendas, notably to boost a university’s international ranking. In this paper, we examine the publishing requirements at one of South Korea’s leading universities. We approach language policy through a critique of neoliberalism to uncover how these requirements are interpreted at this university. Based on analyses of university policy documents and interviews with faculty, our research demonstrates that in this climate of heightened competition, publishing in English is sustained by monetary incentives as it is instrumental in elevating a university’s status as a reputable center of knowledge production. These findings further perpetuate the neoliberal viewpoint that the continual upgrading of oneself and, in turn, the university, will be rewarded, while negating the value of one’s publications in languages other than English, including Korean.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelmann, N., Park, S. J., & Kim, H. (2009). College rank and neo-liberal subjectivity in South Korea: The burden of self-development. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 10(2), 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammon, U. (Ed.). (2001). The dominance of English as a language of science: Effects on other languages and language communities. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braine, G. (2005). The challenge of academic publishing: A Hong-Kong perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 39(4), 707–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, A. S. (2005). Dilemmas in planning English/vernacular relations in post-colonial communities. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 418–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K.-H., & Chien, S. (Hwang, T., Trans) (2009). Knowledge production in the era of neo‐liberal globalization: Reflections on the changing academic conditions in Taiwan. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 10(2), 206–228.

  • Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2002). Language in new capitalism. Discourse and Society, 13(2), 163–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y. (2009). English or Chinese? The trade-off between local and international publication among Chinese academics in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2009). Neoliberalism, youth, and the leasing of higher education. In D. Hill & R. Kumar (Eds.), Global neoliberalism and education and its consequences (pp. 30–53). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, J., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities (pp. 35–83). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joongang Education Development Institute (JEDI). (2011). Korean university rankings 2011. http://www.jedi.re.kr/. Accessed October 10, 2011.

  • Kang, M. (2009). ‘State-guided’ university reforms and colonial conditions for knowledge production. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 10(2), 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korean Citation Index (KCI). (2011). Background and purpose. http://www.kci.go.kr/. Accessed October 10, 2011.

  • Kroskrity, P. (2001). Language ideologies. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 496–517). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, R. (2011). Questioning linguistic instrumentalism: English, neoliberalism, and language tests in Japan. Linguistics and Education, 22(3), 248–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., & Hill, D. (2009). Introduction: Neoliberal capitalism and education. In D. Hill & R. Kumar (Eds.), Global neoliberalism and education and its consequences (pp. 1–11). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. C. (2010). The rise of Asia’s universities. In Seventh annual lecture of the higher education policy institute. http://opac.yale.edu/president/message.aspx?id=91. Accessed October 12, 2011.

  • Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macedo, D. (2003). Reclaiming the language of possibility: Beyond the cynicism of neoliberalism. In D. Macedo, B. Dendrinos, & P. Gounari (Eds.), Hegemony of English (pp. 109–143). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (2011a). Internationalize or risk irrelevancy, college presidents tell Korean conference. Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/Internationalize-or-Risk/129685/. Accessed November 15, 2011.

  • McNeill, D. (2011b). After decades of building colleges, South Korea faces a lack of students. Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/After-Decades-of-Expansion/129896/ Accessed December 1, 2011.

  • Park, J. S. (2009). The local construction of a global language: Ideologies of English in South Korea. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. S. (2010). Naturalization of competence and the neoliberal subject: Success stories of English language learning in the Korean conservative press. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20(1), 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. J. (2011). Educational manager mothers: South Korea’s neoliberal transformation. In J. Song (Ed.), New millennium South Korea (pp. 101–114). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2000). English, politics, ideology: From colonial celebration to postcolonial performativity. In T. Ricento (Ed.), Ideology, politics and language policies: Focus on English (pp. 107–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, R. (2006). Language policy and linguistic imperialism. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 346–361). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, R. (2008). The linguistic imperialism of neoliberal empire. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 5(1), 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raduntz, H. (2005). The marketization of education within the global capitalist economy. In M. Apple, J. Kenway, & M. Singh (Eds.), Globalizing education: Policies, pedagogies, and politics (pp. 231–245). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (2000). Ideology, politics and language policies: Introduction. In T. Ricento (Ed.), Ideology, politics and language policies: Focus on English (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T., & Hornberger, N. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, L., Wang, W., & Xu, J. (2005). Publication culture of foreign language education journals in China. TESOL Quarterly, 39(4), 765–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C. (2009). Classifying higher education institutions in Korea: A performance-based approach. Higher Education, 57, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, K. (2011). Globalization and social inequality in South Korea. In J. Song (Ed.), New millennium South Korea (pp. 11–28). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, J. (2009). South Koreans in the debt crisis: The creation of a neoliberal welfare state. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, J. (2008). Research on education and globalization. Review of Educational Research, 78(2), 330–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. (2006). Critical theory in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 44–59). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathy Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, H., Lee, K. Publish (in international indexed journals) or perish: Neoliberal ideology in a Korean university. Lang Policy 12, 215–230 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9267-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9267-2

Keywords

Navigation