Abstract
The best-known syntactic account of the logical constants is inferentialism . Following Wittgenstein’s thought that meaning is use, inferentialists argue that meanings of expressions are given by introduction and elimination rules. This is especially plausible for the logical constants, where standard presentations divide inference rules in just this way. But not just any rules will do, as we’ve learnt from Prior’s famous example of tonk, and the usual extra constraint is harmony. Where does this leave identity? It’s usually taken as a logical constant but it doesn’t seem harmonious: standardly, the introduction rule (reflexivity) only concerns a subset of the formulas canvassed by the elimination rule (Leibniz’s law). In response, Read [5, 8] and Klev [3] amend the standard approach. We argue that both attempts fail, in part because of a misconception regarding inferentialism and identity that we aim to identify and clear up.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Fjellstad, A. (2015). How a semantics for Tonk should be. Review of Symbolic Logic, 8, 488–505.
Griffiths, O. (2014). Harmonious rules for identity. Review of Symbolic Logic, 7, 499–510.
Klev, A. (2019). The harmony of identity. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 48, 867–884.
Rahman, S. and Keiff, L. 2004. How to be a dialogician. In Logic, Thought and Action: 359–408. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Read, S. (2004). Identity and harmony. Analysis, 64, 113–119.
Read, S. (2008). Harmony and modality. In C. Dégremont, L. Kieff, & H. Rückert (Eds.), Dialogues, Logics and Other Strange Things: Essays in Honour of Shahid Rahman: 285–303. College Publications.
Read, S. (2010). General-elimination harmony and the meaning of the logical constants. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 39, 557–576.
Read, S. (2016). Harmonic inferentialism and the logic of identity. Review of Symbolic Logic, 9, 408–420. References to mildly revised online version: http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~slr/Inferentialism-Identity-amended.pdf.
Simpson, A. (1994). The Proof Theory and Semantics of Intuitionistic Modal Logic. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Steinberger, F. (2011). What harmony could and could not be. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89, 617–639.
Viganò, L. (2000). Labelled non-classical logics. Reidel.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Griffiths, O., Ahmed, A. Introducing Identity. J Philos Logic 50, 1449–1469 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09605-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09605-9