In linguistics, the dominant approach to the semantics of plurals appeals to mereology. However, this approach has received strong criticisms from philosophical logicians who subscribe to an alternative framework based on plural logic. In the first part of the article, we offer a precise characterization of the mereological approach and the semantic background in which the debate can be meaningfully reconstructed. In the second part, we deal with the criticisms and assess their logical, linguistic, and philosophical significance. We identify four main objections and show how each can be addressed. Finally, we compare the strengths and shortcomings of the mereological approach and plural logic. Our conclusion is that the former remains a viable and well-motivated framework for the analysis of plurals.
Armstrong, D.M. (1997). A world of states of affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bale, A.C., & Barner, D. (2009). The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 26(3), 217–252.
Beall, J., Glanzberg, M., & Ripley, D. (2018). Formal theories of truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ben-Yami, H. (2013). Higher-level plurals versus articulated reference, and an elaboration of salva veritate. dialectica, 67(1), 81–102.
Boolos, G. (1984). To be is to be a value of a variable (or to be some values of some variables). Journal of Philosophy, 81(8), 430–449.
Bunt, H.C. (1979). Ensembles and the formal semantic properties of mass terms. In Pelletier, F.J. (Ed.) Mass terms: some philosophical problems (pp. 249–277). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Carnap, R. (1952). Meaning postulates. Philosophical Studies, 3 (2), 65–73.
Carrara, M., & Moltmann, F. (2016). Introduction. In Carrara, M., Arapinis, A., & Moltmann, F. (Eds.) Unity and plurality: Logic, philosophy, and linguistics (pp. vii–xv). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Champollion, L. (2017). Parts of a whole: Distributivity as a bridge between aspect and measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Champollion, L. (2019). Distributivity in formal semantics. Annual Review of Linguistics, 5(1), 289–308.
Chierchia, G. (1998). Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of semantic parameter. In Rothstein, S. (Ed.) Events and grammar (pp. 53–104). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Chierchia, G. (2010). Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese, 174(1), 99–149.
Cotnoir, A., & Varzi, A. (Forthcoming). Mereology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davidson, D. (1967). The logical form of action sentences. In Rescher, N. (Ed.) The logic of decision and action (pp. 81–95). Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
Dowty, D., Wall, R.E., & Peters, S. (1981). Introduction to Montague semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Enderton, H.B. (2002). A mathematical introduction to logic. San Diego: Academic Press.
Florio, S. (2014). Untyped pluralism. Mind, 123(490), 317–337.
Florio, S., & Linnebo, Ø. (Forthcoming). The many and the one: A philosophical study of plural logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
French, R. (2016). An argument for the ontological innocence of mereology. Erkenntnis, 81, 683–704.
Gillon, B.S. (1992). Towards a common semantics for English count and mass nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15, 597–639.
Gillon, B.S. (2012). Mass terms. Philosophy Compass, 7(10), 712–730.
Goodman, N., & Quine, W.V. (1955). Steps toward a constructive nominalism. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12(4), 105–122.
Halbach, V. (2010). Axiomatic theories of truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Higginbotham, J. (1998). On higher-order logic and natural language. In Smiley, T. (Ed.) Philosophical logic (pp. 1–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Higginbotham, J. (2000). On events in linguistic semantics. In Pianesi, F., & Varzi, A. (Eds.) Speaking of events (pp. 49–79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hovda, P. (2009). What is classical mereology? Journal of Philosophical Logic, 38, 55–82.
Ionin, T., & Matushansky, O. (2018). Cardinals. The syntax and semantics of cardinal-containing expressions. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Krämer, S. (2014). Semantic values in higher-order semantics. Philosophical Studies, 168, 709–724.
Krifka, M. (1989). Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In R. Bartsch, R., van Benthem, J., & van Emde Boas, P. (Eds.) Semantics and contextual expression (pp. 75–115). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Krifka, M. (1998). The origins of telicity. In Rothstein, S. (Ed.) Events and grammar (pp. 191–235). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Landman, F. (1989). Groups, I. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 559–605.
Landman, F. (1991). Structures for semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Landman, F. (2000). Events and plurality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Landman, F. (2020). Iceberg semantics for mass nouns and count nouns. A new framework for Boolean semantics. New York: Springer International Publishing.
Larson, R., & Segal, G. (1995). Knowledge of meaning: An introduction to semantic theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lasersohn, P. (1995). Plurality, conjunction and events. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Laycock, H. (2006). Words without objects. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Leonard, H.S., & Goodman, N. (1940). The calculus of individuals and its uses. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 5(2), 45–55.
Lewis, D. (1991). Parts of classes. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Link, G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In Bäuerle, R., Schwarze, C., & von Stechov, A. (Eds.) Meaning, use and the interpretation of language (pp. 303–323). Belin: De Gruyter.
Link, G. (1998). Algebraic semantics in language and philosophy. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Linnebo, Ø. (2003). Plural quantification exposed. Nouŝ, 37(1), 71–92.
Linnebo, Ø. (2006). Sets, properties, and unrestricted quantification. In Rayo, A., & Uzquiano, G. (Eds.) Absolute generality (pp. 149–178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Linnebo, Ø. (2017). Plural quantification. In Zalta, E.N. (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/plural-quant/.
Linnebo, Ø., & Rayo, A. (2012). Hierarchies ontological and ideological. Mind, 121(482), 269–308.
Massey, G.J. (1976). Tom, Dick, and Harry, and all the King’s men. American Philosophical Quarterly, 13(2), 89–107.
McKay, T.J. (2006). Plural predication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McKay, T.J. (2015). Stuff and coincidence. Philosophical Studies, 172, 3081–3100.
Meadows, T. (2016). Sets and supersets. Synthese, 193, 1875–1907.
Moltmann, F. (1997). Parts and wholes in semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moltmann, F. (2017). A plural reference interpretation of three-dimensional syntactic trees. In Halpert, C., Kotek, H., & van Urk, C. (Eds.) A pesky set: Papers for David Pesetsky (pp. 103–109). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Montague, R. (1974). The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In Thomason, R.H. (Ed.) Formal philosophy. Selected papers of Richard Montague (pp. 247–270). London: Yale University Press.
Nicolas, D. (2002). La distinction entre noms massifs et noms comptables. Aspects linguistiques et conceptuels. Leuven: Editions Peeters.
Nicolas, D. (2007). Can mereological sums serve as the semantic values of plurals? Working paper. Open archive HAL. https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00176868.
Nicolas, D. (2008). Mass nouns and plural logic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, 211–244.
Nicolas, D. (2018). The logic of mass expressions. In Zalta, E.N. (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/logic-massexpress/.
Oliver, A., & Smiley, T. (2001). Strategies for a logic of plurals. Philosophical Quarterly, 51(204), 289–306.
Oliver, A., & Smiley, T. (2016). Plural logic, Second edition, revised and enlarged. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pearson, H. (2011). A new semantics for group nouns. In Byram Washburn, M., McKinney-Bock, K., Varis, E., Sawyer, A., & Tomaszewicz, B. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 160–168). Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Pelletier, J.F., & Schubert, L. (2003). Mass expressions. In Gabbay, D.M., & Guenthner, F. (Eds.) Handbook of philosophical logic, (Vol. 10, pp. 249–335). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Pontow, C., & Schubert, R. (2006). A mathematical analysis of theories of parthood. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 59(1), 107–138.
Quine, W.V. (1986). Philosophy of logic, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W.V.O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rayo, A. (2002). Word and objects. Noûs, 36(3), 436–464.
Rayo, A. (2006). Beyond plurals. In Rayo, A., & Uzquiano, G. (Eds.) Absolute Generality (pp. 220–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rayo, A., & Uzquiano, G. (1999). Toward a theory of second-order consequence. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 40(3), 315–325.
Resnik, M. (1988). Second-order logic still wild. Journal of Philosophy, 85(2), 75–87.
Rieppel, M. (2015). Pluralities and plural logic. Analysis, 55(3), 504–514.
Rothstein, S. (2017). Semantics for counting and measuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schein, B. (1993). Plurals and events. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Schwarzschild, R. (1996). Pluralities. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schwarzschild, R. (2006). The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases. Syntax, 9(1), 67–110.
Sharvy, R. (1980). A more general theory of definite descriptions. Philosophical Review, 89(4), 607–624.
Simons, P. (1987). Parts: A study in ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sutton, P.R., & Filip, A. (2016). Mass/count variation: a mereological, two-dimensional semantics. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, 11, 1–45.
Tarski, A. (1935a). Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen. Studia Philosophica, 1, 261–405. (Translated as “The concept of truth in formalized languages” in A. Tarski, 1983, Logic, semantics, metamathematics. Papers from 1923 to 1938, translated by J. H. Woodger, second ed., edited and introduced by J. Corcoran, pp. 152–278, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company).
Tarski, A. (1935b). Zur Grundlegung der Boole’schen Algebra I. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 24, 177–98. (Translated as “On the foundations of Boolean algebra” in A. Tarski, 1956, Logic, semantics, metamathematics. Papers from 1923 to 1938, translated by J. H. Woodger, second ed., edited and introduced by J. Corcoran, pp. 320–341, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company).
Varzi, A. (2014). Counting and countenancing. In Cotnoir, A.J., & Baxter, D.L.M. (Eds.) Composition as identity (pp. 47–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Varzi, A. (2019). Mereology. In Zalta, E.N. (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/mereology/.
Wellwood, A. (2019). The meaning of more. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williamson, T. (1998). Indefinite extensibility. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 55(1), 1–24.
Williamson, T. (2003). Everything. Philosophical Perspectives, 17(1), 415–465.
Yi, B.-U. (1999). Is two a property? Journal of Philosophy, 96 (4), 163–190.
Yi, B.-U. (2005). The logic and meaning of plurals. Part I. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 34, 459–506.
Yi, B.-U. (2006). The logic and meaning of plurals. Part II. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 35, 239–288.
Yi, B.-U. (2016). Quantifiers, determiners, and plural constructions. In Carrara, M., Arapinis, A., & Moltmann, F. (Eds.) Unity and plurality: Logic, philosophy, and linguistics (pp. 121–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
For helpful comments and discussion, we would like to thank Francesca Boccuni, Andrea Borghini, Colin Caret, Dick Carter, Hana Filip, Brendan Gillon, Simon Hewitt, Thomas Hofweber, David Liebesman, Øystein Linnebo, Manuel Rebuschi, Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra, Ian Rumfitt, Barry Schein, Stewart Shapiro, Eric Snyder, Peter Sutton, Timothy Williamson, Sandro Zucchi, and two anonymous referees. We would also like to thank the audiences at the following venues: ESSLLI 2017, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Institute of Philosophy in London, Tokyo Forum for Analytic Philosophy, Università di Milano, Université de Lorraine, University of Oxford, and Yonsei University. Salvatore Florio’s research was partly funded by a Leverhulme Research Fellowship. David Nicolas acknowledges the support provided by the grant ANR-17-EURE-0017 and by a Distinguished Visiting Fellowship from the Institute of Advanced Studies at the University of Birmingham.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Florio, S., Nicolas, D. Plurals and Mereology. J Philos Logic 50, 415–445 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-020-09570-9
- Mass nouns
- Model theory
- Natural language semantics
- Ontological commitment
- Plural logic
- Russell’s paradox
- Truth theory