There are various well-known paradoxes of modal recombination. This paper offers a solution to a variety of such paradoxes in the form of a new conception of metaphysical modality. On the proposed conception, metaphysical modality exhibits a type of indefinite extensibility. Indeed, for any objective modality there will always be some further, broader objective modality; in other terms, modal space will always be open to expansion.
Correia, F. (2007). Modality, quantification, and many Vlach-operators. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 36, 473–488.
Divers, J. (2014). Modal reality and (modal) logical space. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88, 726–733.
Fine, K. (1977). Prior on the construction of possible worlds and instants, reprinted in K. Fine (Ed.) (2005) Modality and tense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fine, K. (2002). Problem of Possibilia, reprinted in K. Fine (Ed.) (2005) Modality and tense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fine, K. (2006). Relatively unrestricted quantification. In A. Rayo, & G. Uzquiano (Eds.) , Absolute generality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Forbes, G. (1992). Melia on modalism. Philosophical Studies, 68, 57–63.
Forster, T.E. (1995). Set theory with a universal set: exploring an untyped universe, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fritz, P. (2016). A purely recombinatorial puzzle, forthcoming in Noûs.
Hawthorne, J. (2006). Quantity in Lewisian metaphysics. In J. Hawthorne (Ed.) , Metaphysical essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hawthorne, J., & Uzquiano, G. (2011). How many angels can dance on the point of a needle? Transcendental theology meets modal metaphysics. Mind, 123, 317–337.
Kaplan, D. (1995). A problem in possible-world semantics. In W. Sinnot-Armstrong (Ed.) , Modality, morality, and belief: essays in honour of Ruth Barcan Marcus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kratzer, A. (2012). Modals and conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Linnebo, Ø. (2010). Pluralities and sets. Journal of Philosophy, 107, 144–164.
Melia, J. (1992). Against modalism. Philosophical Studies, 68, 35–56.
Nolan, D. (1996). Recombination unbound. Philosophical Studies, 84, 239–262.
Rayo, A. & (MS) On the Open-Endedness of Logical Space, unpublished manuscript.
Rayo, A., & Uzquiano, G. (Eds.). (2006). Absolute generality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Russell, B. (1906). On some difficulties in the theory of transfinite numbers and order types. Proceedings of The London Mathematics Society, 4, 29–53.
Salmon, N. (1989). The logic of what might have been. The Philosophical Review, 98, 3–34.
Sider, T. (2009). Williamson’s many necessary existents. Analysis, 69, 50–58.
Studd, J. (2013). The iterative conception of set: a (bi-)modal axiomatisation. The Journal of Philosophical Logic, 42, 697–725.
Studd, J. (forthcoming). Everything, more or less: a defence of generality relativism, forthcoming with Oxford University Press.
Uzquiano, G. (2003). Plural quantification and classes. Philosophia Mathematica, 11, 67–81.
Uzquiano, G. (2015). Varieties of indefinite extensibility. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 56, 147–166.
Warren, J. (2017). Quantifier variance and indefinite extensibility. Philosophical Review, 126, 81–122.
Williamson, T. (2013). Modal logic as metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williamson, T. (2016). Modal science. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 46, 453–492.
Yablo, S. (2006). Circularity and paradox. In T. Bolander, V.F. Hendricks, S.A. Pedersen (Eds.) , Self-reference. CSLI Publications.
Yu, A. (2017). A modal account of propositions. Dialectica, 71, 463–488.
Thanks to Ben Brast-Mckie, Adrian Moore, and Ted Sider for discussions about earlier versions of this paper, and to Peter Fritz and an anonymous referee for this journal for their helpful and perceptive comments. Special thanks to James Studd and Timothy Williamson for their encouragement and comments on several drafts of this paper.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.