Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Parallel Historical Path of Company and Labour Law

  • Published:
Liverpool Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper explores the conceptual foundations of the legal principles that govern the operation of company and labour law. The paper argues that far from seeing the doctrinal architecture of company and labour law as a product of apolitical and objective rules a paradigm shift is required. The rule book conception of law is a misguided methodological framework. In sharp contrast to that methodology this paper avers the legal principles governing company and labour law must be viewed through the prism of the sovereignty of property rights. In effect, the viewpoint that law is an autonomous domain is eschewed in this paper. Instead the historical, social and economic forces directing legal developments in two crucial fields are illuminated. The upshot is a study illustrating the dialectical bond that exists between company and labour law. The paper is divided into three parts. The first part examines the way prescriptive law is the keystone of labour law. The role of the control test and implied terms are scrutinized in order to illuminate the way that the common law of employment facilitates the hegemony of managerial prerogatives. Apolitical legalism plays no role in this sphere of law. The second part considers the juridical forms that entrench the power of shareholders and managers in the modern company. In this sphere of law the courts sanction facilitative law by prioritizing the voluntarist assumptions of business people. The curve of legal reasoning in company law is dominated by the courts treating the leading personnel in companies as the personification of economic relations. The owners and administrators of capital are regarded as occupying the commanding heights of the economy, and are given judicial support to choose their own constitutional arrangements. Shareholders and directors are vested with a large degree of autonomy and discretion that is translated into the capacity to opt in and out of the regulatory web. The final part sums up the factors that underpin the triumph of the prescriptive and facilitative law that dominates labour and company law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Posner (2008), p. 8.

  2. Ibid., p. 9.

  3. Posner (1969) 21. 3 Stanford Law Review p. 636, fn 191.

  4. Posner (1986), p. 495. Posner (1975) 53 Texas Law Review pp. 763–764.

  5. Posner, “The Economic Approach,” p. 760.

  6. Thompson (1990), p. 262.

  7. Polanyi (1971).

  8. Atiyah (1979). Friedman (1965).

  9. Fox (1974), p. 181.

  10. Wightman (1996), p. 2.

  11. Contract Law in America, p. 20.

  12. Tool and Samuels (1989), p. 3.

  13. Seidman (1989), p. 18.

  14. Collins (2003), p. 3.

  15. Ibid., p. 4.

  16. A scholarly and lucid defence of legalism inspired by support for the judicial methodology of Sir Owen Dixon can be found in Gava (2002) 26 Melbourne University Law Review p. 566.

  17. Kahn-Freund (1972), p. 8.

  18. Davis (1966), p. 40.

  19. Ibid., p. 39.

  20. Ibid., p. 40.

  21. Wedderburn (1993) 109 The Law Quarterly Review p. 245.

  22. Ibid., p. 259.

  23. Lane (1974), p. 38.

  24. Ibid., p. 248.

  25. Quoted in Wedderburn (1986), p. 19.

  26. Hill (1996), p. 234.

  27. Ibid.

  28. Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract, pp. 388–389.

  29. Ibid., p. 389.

  30. (1855) 4 E. and B. 570 at 578 or 119 E. R. 209 at 212.

  31. (1858) 27 L. J. M. C. 207.

  32. Deakin and Wilkinson (2006), p. 90. Also see Kahn-Freund (1951) 14 The Modern Law Review p. 505.

  33. (1858) 27 L. J. M. C. 207.

  34. (1880) LR 6 QBD 530, 532–533.

  35. [1947] 1 D.L.R. 161, 169.

  36. [1953] 1 Q.B. 248, 295. In Australia a multiple indicia test was developed. It prioritized the control factor. See Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Co Pty Ltd. (1986) 160 CLR 16, 25.

  37. The Law of the Labour Market, p. 95.

  38. Vettori (2007), p. 12.

  39. (1952) 85 CLR 237.

  40. Ibid., pp. 299–300.

  41. Ibid.

  42. Ibid.

  43. Justice Kirby (2004), p. 90.

  44. Ibid., p. 91.

  45. Ibbetson (1999), p. 294.

  46. How Judges Think, p. 369.

  47. Selznick (1969), p. 132.

  48. The Law of the Labour Market, p. 62.

  49. (1845) 14 M. and W. 112.

  50. Beyond Contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations, p. 188.

  51. (1829) 9 B and C 896; 109 ER 333.

  52. Ibid., p. 900.

  53. Ibid.

  54. ER, p. 335.

  55. Ibid.

  56. B and C 896 at 901.

  57. (1858) 5 C. B. (NS) 236.

  58. Smith (1992) 3 (1) The Economic and Labour Relations Review p. 107.

  59. (1858) 5 C. B. (NS) 236 at 246. 141 E. R. 94.

  60. Turner v Mason (1845) 14 M. and W. 112; Laws v London Chronicle (Indicator Newspapers) Ltd. [1959] 1 W. L. R. 698.

  61. Boston Deep Sea Fishing Co. v Ansell (1888) 39 Ch. D. 339; Robb v Green [1895] 2 Q. B. 315 at 320; Wessex Dairies v Smith [1935] 2 K.B 80 at 84.

  62. Amber Size and Chemical Co. v Menzel [1913] 2 Ch.239; Faccenda Chicken Ltd. v Fowler [1986] 1 All E.r. 617.

  63. Secretary of State for Employment v Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen(No2) [1972] 2 QB 455.

  64. Harmer v Cornelius (1858) 5 C.B. (NS) 236; Lister v Romford Ice and Cold Storage [1957] A.C. 555.

  65. (1889) 14 P. D. 64 at 68.

  66. Law, Society, and Industrial Justice, p. 131, Collins (1986) 15 (1) The Industrial Law Journal p. 1.

  67. Anderman (2004), p. 105.

  68. Freedland (2003), p. 104.

  69. [1979] IRLR 84 (EAT).

  70. [1981] ICR 666 (EAT).

  71. Brodie (2004) 33 The Industrial Law Journal pp. 349–350. Riley (2006) 29 (1) University of New South Wales Law Journal pp. 166, 174.

  72. Grantham (1998) 57 (3) Cambridge Law Journal p. 557.

  73. Gamble and Kelly (2000), p. 29; For a study that pinpoints the fraught dialectics of the law and the infant years of the railway industry see: Kostal (1994).

  74. Harvey (1984), pp. 137, 155.

  75. The Political Economy of the Company, p. 31.

  76. Cottrell (1980), p. 44.

  77. Hirst (1979), p. 140. Ireland (2010) 34 Cambridge Journal of Economics p. 843.

  78. Hunt (1969) p. 127.

  79. Ibid., p. 117. Harris (2000), p. 233.

  80. Industrial Finance, p. 47. The Development of the Business Corporation in England, p. 118.

  81. The Development of the Business Corporation in England, p. 122.

  82. Gower (1969), p. 45.

  83. McQueen (2009), p. 46.

  84. Ibid.

  85. Ibid.

  86. Smith (1986), p. 109.

  87. The Limits to Capital, p. 146.

  88. Ibid., p. 147.

  89. Ireland (1999) 62 The Modern Law Review, p. 41.

  90. (1837) 2 Y and C Ex 268.

  91. Ireland, “Company Law,” p. 41; Grantham, ‘The Doctrinal Basis,” p. 563.

  92. Ireland, “Company Law,” p. 42.

  93. Redmond (2009), pp. 38, 119.

  94. Ireland, “Company Law,” p. 43; Automatic Self-Cleansing Filter Syndicate Co.Ltd. v Cunninghame [1906] 2 Ch 34.

  95. Herman (1982), p. 7; Hill (2000) 48 American Journal of Comparative Law, p. 47.

  96. Grantham, “The Doctrinal Basis,” p. 573.

  97. Ireland (2000), p. 150.

  98. Berle and Means (1962), p. 338. Grantham, “The Doctrinal Basis,” p. 573.

  99. Stokes (1986), p. 160.

  100. Industrial Finance, p. 41.

  101. A Social History, p. 45.

  102. Ibid., p. 164.

  103. Ibid., p. 51.

  104. Ibid., p. 10.

  105. Ibid., pp. 115, 195.

  106. Hobsbawm (1975), p. 217.

  107. Quoted by Mayanja (2007) 20 Australian Journal of Corporate Law, p. 163.

  108. Industrial Finance, pp. 57–58.

  109. Ibid., p. 61.

  110. A Social History, p. 163.

  111. Ibid., p. 166.

  112. Ibid.

  113. Ibid., p. 165.

  114. Industrial Finance, p. 64.

  115. A Social History, p. 251.

  116. Ibid.

  117. Industrial Finance, p. 66.

  118. A Social History, p. 251.

  119. Industrial Finance, p. 68.

  120. (1872) LR 5 HL 480, at 486–487.

  121. (1884) 25 Ch D 752.

  122. Ibid., at 767–768.

  123. [1899] 2 Ch 392 at 435.

  124. [1925] Ch 407 at 427.

  125. Quoted in Finch (1992) 55 (2) The Modern Law Review, p. 200.

  126. Davies (2008), p. 478.

  127. [1991] B. C. L. C. 1027.

  128. Ibid.

  129. Principles of Modern Company Law, p. 491.

  130. Ibid., p. 490.

  131. Parkinson (1996), pp. 76–77.

  132. [1942] Ch 304.

  133. Ibid, p. 306.

  134. Cook v Deeks [1916] 1 AC 554 at 563; See also Mayanja, “Promoting Enhanced Enforcement,” p. 179.

  135. Company Law and Legal Theory, p. 173.

  136. Ibid.

  137. Principles of Modern Company Law, p. 510.

  138. (1883) 23 Ch. D 654. See also Parke v Daily News Ltd. [1962] Ch. 927.

  139. Ibid., p. 673.

  140. Bottomley and Forsyth (2007), p. 314.

  141. Ibid. Quoted in Bottomley, Forsyth.

  142. Ibid. Quoted in Bottomley, Forsyth.

  143. Principles of Modern Company Law, p. 518.

  144. Industry and Empire, p. 217.

  145. Ibid., p. 216.

  146. Ibid., p. 217.

  147. Mayanja, Promoting Enhanced Enforcement, p. 160.

References

  • Anderman, S. 2004. Termination of employment: whose property rights? In The future of labour law, ed. C. Barnard, S. Deakin, and G.S. Morris. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah, P. 1979. The rise and fall of freedom of contract. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A.A., and G.C. Means. 1962. The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomley, S., and A. Forsyth. 2007. The new corporate law: Corporate social responsibility and employees’ interests. In The new corporate accountability, ed. D. McBarnet, A. Voiculescu, and T. Campbell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, D. 2004. Protecting dignity in the workplace: The vitality of mutual trust and confidence. The Industrial Law Journal 33: 349–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. 1986. Market power, bureaucratic power, and the contract of employment. The Industrial Law Journal 15(1): 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. 2003. The law of contract. London: LexisNexis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, P.L. 1980. Industrial finance 1830–1914. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P.L. 2008. Gower and Davies’, principles of modern company law. London: Sweet and Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D.B. 1966. The problem of slavery in western culture. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, S., and F. Wilkinson. 2006. The law of the labour market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, V. 1992. Company directors: who cares about skill and care? The Modern Law Review 55(2): 200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A. 1974. Beyond contract: work, power and trust relations. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedland, M. 2003. The personal employment contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, L.M. 1965. Contract law in America. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

  • Gamble, A., and G. Kelly. 2000. The politics of the company. In The political economy of the company, ed. J. Parkinson, A. Gamble, and G. Kelly. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gava, J. 2002. Law reviews: good for judges, bad for law schools? Melbourne University Law Review 26: 566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, L.C.B. 1969. The principles of modern company law. London: Stevens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grantham, R. 1998. The doctrinal basis of the rights of company shareholders. Cambridge Law Journal 57(3): 557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. 2000. Industrializing English law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 1984. The limits to capital. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E.S. 1982. Corporate control, corporate power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. 1996. Liberty against the law. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. 2000. Vision and revisions of the shareholder. American Journal of Comparative Law 48: 47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. 1979. On law and ideology. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E.J. 1975. Industry and empire. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, B.C. 1969. The development of the business corporation in England 1800-186. New York: Russell and Russell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibbetson, D.J. 1999. A historical introduction to the law of obligations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, P. 1999. Company law and the myth of shareholder ownership. The Modern Law Review 62: 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, P. 2000. Defending the rentier: corporate theory and the reprivatisation of the public company. In The political economy of the company, ed. J. Parkinson, A. Gamble, and G. Kelly. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, P. 2010. Limited liability, shareholder rights and the problem of corporate irresponsibility. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34: 843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn-Freund, O. 1951. Servants and independent contractors. The Modern Law Review 14: 505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn-Freund, O. 1972. Labour and the law. London: Stevens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, M. 2004. Judicial activism. London: Sweet and Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostal, R.W. 1994. Law and English railway capitalism 1825–1875. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, T. 1974. The union makes us strong: the British working class its politics and trade unionism. London: Arrow Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayanja, J. 2007. Promoting enhanced enforcement of directors’ fiduciary obligations: the promise of public law sanctions. Australian Journal of Corporate Law 20: 163.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, R. 2009. A social history of company law. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, J.E. 1996. Corporate power and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 1971. The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. 1969. Natural monopoly and its regulation. Stanford Law Review 21(3): 636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. 1975. The economic approach to law. Texas Law Review 53: 763–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. 1986. Economic analysis of law. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. 2008. How judges think. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, P. 2009. Companies and securities law. Sydney: Thomson Reuters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. 2006. The evolution of the contract of employment post workchoices. University of New South Wales Law Journal 29(1): 166, 174.

  • Seidman, R.B. 1989. Contract law, the free market, and state intervention: a jurisprudential perspective. In State, society and corporate power, ed. M.R. Tool, W.J. Samuels. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

  • Selznick, P. 1969. Law, society, and industrial justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1986. The wealth of nations books I–III. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.F. 1992. An uneven playing field: the contract of employment and labour market regulation. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 3(1): 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, M. 1986. Company law and legal theory. In Legal theory, common law, ed. W. Twining. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E.P. 1990. Whigs and hunters. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tool, M.R., and W.J. Samuels (eds.). 1989. State, society and corporate power. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vettori, S. 2007. The employment contract and the changed world of work. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedderburn, L. 1986. The worker and the law. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedderburn, L. 1993. Companies and employees: common law or social dimension. The Law Quarterly Review 109: 245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wightman, J. 1996. Contract: a critical commentary. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Carrigan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carrigan, F. The Parallel Historical Path of Company and Labour Law. Liverpool Law Rev 32, 19–48 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-011-9088-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-011-9088-y

Keywords

Navigation