Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Children and Young People who have Sexually Harmful Behaviours: From Fixed to Transformative Risk Assessment

  • Published:
Liverpool Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Risk, risk assessment and risk management have become central to contemporary policies and practices in criminal justice, with consequences for those who apply and receive such approaches. It has been argued that risk has been the key organising principle of contemporary correctional practice and offender management, and that actuarial risk in particular has taken on a hegemonic dominance that supersedes other models of governance, such as welfare and disciplinary forms of regulation. This article focuses on the construction and deployment of two assessment frameworks for young people with sexually harmful behaviour to illustrate the epistemological differences between a clinical/actuarial guided approach and that of constructing safety. It identifies current theorising about risk/technologies as being within a neo-liberal political and governance agenda and the opportunities for moving from a fixed to a transformative risk subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Webb (2006).

  2. Feeley and Simon (1994, pp. 173–201).

  3. Young (1999, pp. 87–407).

  4. Rose (1998, pp. 177–195).

  5. Giddens (1998, pp. 23–34).

  6. Beck (1992).

  7. Stalker (2003, pp. 211–233).

  8. Craddock (2001).

  9. Bonta (1996).

  10. Hudson (2003).

  11. Maurutto and Hannah-Moffat (2006, pp. 438–454, 441).

  12. Kemshall (2003).

  13. O’Malley (2004).

  14. Kemshall (1998).

  15. Andrews and Bonta (1989).

  16. Maurutto and Hannah-Moffat (ibid., pp. 443–444).

  17. Maurutto and Hannah-Moffat (ibid., p. 444).

  18. Rose (ibid.).

  19. Kemshall (2002).

  20. Mair (2004).

  21. Police and Criminal Evidence Act (1984).

  22. Cowburn (2006, pp. 159–176).

  23. Hood et al. (2002, pp. 371–194).

  24. Hackett (2004).

  25. Print et al. (2001).

  26. AIM (2007).

  27. Silver and Miller (2002, pp. 138–161).

  28. Myers (2007a, pp. 365–377).

  29. World Health Organisation (1992).

  30. Pitts (2001, pp. 3–16).

  31. Webster et al. (2006, pp. 7–22).

  32. Muncie (2004).

  33. McNeill (2003, pp. 146–162).

  34. Ungar et al. (2007, pp. 287–310).

  35. Smith (2004, pp. 34–52).

  36. Rutter (1999, pp. 1919–1944).

  37. Douglas (1992).

  38. Webb (ibid.).

  39. Parton and O’Byrne (2000).

  40. Myers (2007b).

  41. Milner (2001).

  42. Wittgenstein (1968).

  43. Milner and Myers (2007).

  44. Turnell and Edwards (1999).

  45. Myers (2005, pp. 97–112).

  46. Jenkins (1990).

  47. Milner and O’Byrne (2002).

  48. De Jong and Berg (2002).

  49. De Shazer (1988).

  50. Friedlander and Stockman (1983, pp. 637–643).

References

  • AIM. 2007. AIM2 initial model of initial assessment. Manchester: AIM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D., and D. Bonta. 1989. The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinatti: Andersons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 1992. Risk society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, J. 1996. Risk/needs assessment and treatment. In Choosing correctional options that work: defining the demand and evaluating the supply, ed. T. Harland, 18–32. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowburn, M. 2006. Constructive work with male sex offenders. In Constructive work with offenders, ed. K. Gorman, M. Gregory, M. Hayles, and N. Parton, 159–176. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craddock, G. 2001. Risk, morality and child protection: technologising social work, in technologies of uncertainty workshop. Ithaca: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, P., and I.K. Berg. 2002. Interviewing for solutions, 2nd ed. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Shazer, S. 1988. Clues: investigating solutions in brief therapy. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. 1992. Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, M., and J. Simon. 1994. Actuarial justice: the emergence of new criminal law. In The futures of criminology, ed. D. Nelken, 173–201. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, M.L., and S.J. Stockman. 1983. Anchoring and publicity effects in clinical judgement. Journal of Clinical Psychology 39 (40): 637–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1998. Risk society: the context of British politics. In The politics of risk society, ed. J. Franklin, 23–34. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, S. 2004. What works with children and young people with sexually harmful behaviours?. Barkingside: Barnardo’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R., S. Shute, M. Feilzer, and A. Wilcox. 2002. Sex offenders emerging from long-term imprisonment: a study of their long-term reconviction rates and of parole members’ judgement of their risk. British Journal of Criminology 42: 371–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. 2003. Justice in the risk society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A. 1990. Invitations to responsibility. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. 1998. Risk and probation practice. Aldershot: Aldgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. 2002. Risk, social policy and welfare. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. 2003. Understanding risk in criminal justice. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, G. (ed.). 2004. What matters in probation. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurutto, R., and K. Hannah-Moffat. 2006. Assembling risk and the restructuring of penal control. British Journal of Criminology 46: 438–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, F. 2003. Desistence focused probation practice. In Moving probation forward: evidence, arguments and practice, ed. W. Chui and M. Nellis, 146–162. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J. 2001. Women and social work: narrative approaches. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J., and S. Myers. 2007. Working with violence: policies and practices in risk assessment and management. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J., and P. O’Byrne. 2002. Brief counselling: narratives and solutions. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muncie, J. 2004. Youth and crime, 2nd ed. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. 2005. A signs of safety approach to assessing children with sexually concerning or harmful behaviour. Child Abuse Review 14: 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. 2007a. (De)Constructing the risk categories in the AIM assessment model for children with sexually harmful behaviour. Children and Society 21: 365–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. 2007b. Solution-focused approaches. Lyme Regis: Russell House Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P. 2004. Risk, uncertainty, government. London: The Glasshouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton, N., and P. O’Byrne. 2000. Constructive social work. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, J. 2001. Korrectional karaoke: new labour and the zombification of youth justice. Youth Justice 1–2: 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Print, B., T. Morrison, and J. Henniker. 2001. An inter-agency assessment framework for young people who sexually abuse: principles, processes and practicalities. In Juveniles and children who sexually abuse: frameworks for assessment (2nd ed) ed. M.C. Calder, 271–281. Lyme Regis: Russell House Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. 1998. Governing risky individuals: the role of psychiatry in new regimes of control. Psychiatry, Psychology and the Law 5: 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. 1999. Resilience concepts and findings: implications for family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy 21: 1919–1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E., and L.L. Miller. 2002. A cautionary note on the use of actuarial risk assessment tools for social control. Crime and Delinquency 48: 138–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. 2004. The uses and abuses of positivism. In What matters in probation, ed. G. Mair, 34–52. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalker, K. 2003. Managing risk and uncertainty in social work; a literature review. Journal of Social Work 3: 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnell, A., and S. Edwards. 1999. Signs of safety: a solution and safety oriented approach to child protection casework. London: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungar, M., M. Brown, L. Liebenberg, R. Othman, W.M. Kwong, M. Armstrong, and J. Gilgun. 2007. Unique pathways to resilience across cultures. Adolescence 42: 287–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S.A. 2006. Social work in a risk society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C., R. MacDonald, and M. Simpson. 2006. Predicting criminality? Risk factors, neighbourhood influence and desistance. Youth Justice 6: 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1968. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation. 1992. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. 1999. Cannibalism and bulimia: patterns of social control in late modernity. Theoretical Criminology 3 (4): 87–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Myers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Myers, S. Children and Young People who have Sexually Harmful Behaviours: From Fixed to Transformative Risk Assessment. Liverpool Law Rev 29, 51–66 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-008-9035-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-008-9035-8

Keywords

Navigation