Adams, E. W. (1965). A logic of conditionals. Inquiry, 8, 166–197.
Ameel, E., & Storms, G. (2006). From prototypes to caricatures: Geometrical models for concept typicality. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 402–421.
Asher, N., & Morreau, M. (1995). What some generic sentences mean. In G. Carlson & F. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 300–339). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 629–654.
Barth, E. (1971). De Logica van de Lidwoorden in de Traditionele Filosofie. Leiden: Universitaire Pers Leiden.
Bernardo, J. M. (1979). Expected information as expected utility. Annals of Statistics, 7, 686–690.
Bordalo, P., Coffman, K., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2016). Stereotypes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 1753–1794.
Burnett, R., Medin, C., Ross, N., & Blok, S. (2005). Ideal is typical. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 3–10.
Cahill, L., Babinsky, R., Markowitsch, H., & McGaugh, J. (1995). The amygdala and emotional memory. Nature, 377, 295–296.
Carlson, G. (1977). Reference to kinds in English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Chatlosh, D., Neunaber, D., & Wasserman, E. (1985). Response-outcome contingency: Behavioral and judgmental effects of appetitive and aversive outcomes with college students. Learning and Motivation, 16, 1–34.
Cheng, P., & Holyoak, K. (1995). Adaptive systems as intuitive statisticians: Causality, contingency, and prediction. In J. Meyer & H. Roitblat (Eds.), Comparative approaches to cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cheng, P. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367–405.
Cimpian, A., Brandone, A., & Gelman, S. (2010). Generic statements require little evidence for acceptance but have powerful implications. Cognitive Science, 34, 1452–1482.
Cobreros, P., Egré, P., Ripley, D., & van Rooij, R. (2012). Tolerant, classical, strict. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2012(41), 347–385.
Cohen, A. (1999). Think generic! The meaning and use of generic sentences. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Cohen, A. (2001). On the generic use of indefinite singulars. Journal of Semantics, 18, 183–209.
Cohen, A. (2004a). Existential generics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 137–168.
Cohen, A. (2004b). Generics and mental representations. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 529–556.
Crupi, V., Fitelson, B., & Tentori, K. (2008). Probability, confirmation, and the conjunction fallacy. Thinking and Reasoning, 14, 182–199.
Declerck, R. (1996). The manifold interpretation of generic sentences. Lingua, 68, 149–188.
Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London: Faber and Faber.
Eckardt, R. (1999). Normal objects, normal worlds, and the meaning of generic sentences. Journal of Semantics, 16, 237–278.
Fernando, T., & Kamp, H. (1996). Expecting many. In T. Galloway & J. Spence (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth conference on semantic and linguistic theory (pp. 53–68). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Geurts, B. (1985). Generics. Journal of Semantics, 4, 247–255.
Gigerenzer, G. (1996). On narrow norms and vague heuristics. Psychological Review, 103, 592–596.
Good, I. (1950). Probability and the Weighing of Evidence. London: Griffin.
Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 227–247.
Haslanger, S. (2010). Ideology, generics, and common ground. In C. Witt (Ed.), Feminist metaphysics: Essays on the ontology of sex, gender and the self (pp. 179–207). Dordrecht: Springer.
Haslanger, S. (2014). The normal, the natural and the good: Generics and ideology. Politica & Societa, 3, 365–392.
Hoeltje, M. (2017). Generics and ways of being normal. Linguistics and Philosophy, 40, 101–118.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 49–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Straus and Giroux, New York: Farrar.
Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
Klein, E. (1980). The semantics of positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 1–45.
Krifka, M., Pelletier, F., Carlson, G., ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G., & Link, G. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In G. Carlson & F. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 1–124). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Krifka, M. (2007). Negated anonyms: Creating and filling the gap. In U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics (pp. 163–177). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Krifka, M. (2013). Definitional generics. In A. Mari, C. Beyssade, & F. Del Prete (Eds.), Genericity (pp. 372–389). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kripke, S. (1972/80). Naming and necessity. In: D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of natural language (pp. 253–355, 763–769). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Lagnado, D. A., & Shanks, D. (2002). Probability judgment in hierarchical learning: A conflict between predictiveness and coherence. Cognition, 83, 81–112.
Lawler, J. (1973). Studies in English generics, University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics.
Leslie, S. J. (2008). Generics: Cognition and acquisition. The Philosophical Review, 117, 1–47.
Leslie, S. J. (2013). Essence and natural kinds: When science meets preschooler intuition. In T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology (Vol. 4, pp. 108–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leslie, S. J., Khemlani, S., & Glucksberg, S. (2011). Do all ducks lay eggs? The generic overgeneralization effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 15–31.
Lynch, E. B., Coley, J. D., & Medin, D. L. (2000). Tall is typical: Central tendency, ideal dimensions, and graded category structure among tree experts and novices. Memory & Cognition, 28, 41–50.
Malamud, S. (2012). The meaning of plural definites: A decision-theoretic approach. Semantics and Pragmatics, 5, 1–48.
McCarthy, J. (1986). Application of circumscription to formalize common-sense knowledge. Artificial Intelligence, 28, 89–116.
McCauley, C., Stitt, C. L., & Segal, M. (1980). Stereotyping: From prejudice to prediction. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 195–208.
Newel, B., Lagnado, D., & Shanks, D. (2007). Straight Choices. The psychology of decision making. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.
Nickel, B. (2009). Generics and the ways of normality. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, 629–648.
Nickel, B. (2012). Dutchmen are good sailors: Generics and gradability. In A. Mari, C. Beyssade, & F. Del Prete (Eds.), Genericity (pp. 390–405). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Palmeri, T., & Nosofsky, R. (2001). Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effect in ill-defined perceptual categorization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54, 197–235.
Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Inc.
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pelletier, F., & Asher, N. (1997). Generics and defaults. In J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), Handbook of logic and language (pp. 1125–1177). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Pierce, W. D., & Cheney, C. D. (2004). Behavior analysis and learning (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Reiter, R. (1987). Nonmonotonic reasoning. In J. F. Traub, N. J. Nilsson, & B. J. Grosz (Eds.), Annual review of computer science (pp. 147–186). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Inc.
Rescorla, R. A. (1968). Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 66, 15.
Rescorla, R., & Wagner, A. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. Black & W. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328–350.
Schneider, D. (2004). The psychology of stereotyping. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Schubert, L., & Pelletier, F. (1987). Problems in the representation of the logical form of generics, plurals and mass nouns. In E. LePore (Ed.), New direction in semantics (pp. 357–371). London: Academic Press.
Seeley, T. (1985). Honeybee ecology: a study of adaptation in social life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shanks, D. (1990). Connectionism and the learning of probabilistic concepts. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 209–237.
Shanks, D. (1995). The psychology of associative learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shep, M. C. (1958). Shall we count the living or the dead? New England Journal of Medicine, 259, 1210–1214.
Skyrms, D. B. (1980). Causal Necessity. A pragmatic investigation of the necessity of laws. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 1–12.
Stalnaker, R. C. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Pragmatics (Vol. 9, pp. 315–332). New York: Academic Press.
Sterken, R. K. (2015). Generics in context. Philosopher’s Imprint, 15, 1–30.
Tenenbaum, J., & Griffiths, T. (2001). The rational basis of representativeness. In J. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1036–1041).
Tentori, N., Chater, N., & Crupi, V. (2016). Judging the probability of hypotheses versus the impact of evidence. Cognitive Science, 40, 758–778.
Tessler, M., & Goodman, N. (2019). The language of generalization. Psychological Review, 126(3), 395–436.
Thomas, L., & LaBar, K. (2008). Fear relevancy, strategy use, and probabilistic learning of cue-outcome associations. Learning and Memory, 15, 777–784.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1980). Causal schemas in judgments under uncertainty. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (pp. 49–72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
van Harmelen, M. (2017). On the acceptance of generic sentences. Bachelor thesis, University of Amsterdam.
van Rooij, R. (2003). Questioning to resolve decision problems. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 727–763.
van Rooij, R. (2004). Utility, informativity and protocols. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 33, 389–419.
van Rooij, R., & Schulz, K. (2019). Conditionals, causality and conditional probability. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 28, 55–71.
van Rooij, R., & Schulz, K. (to appear). A causal power theory of generics. Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy.
Veltman, F. (1996). Defaults in update semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25, 221–261.