Adams, E. W. (1965). A logic of conditionals. Inquiry, 8, 166–197.
Google Scholar
Ameel, E., & Storms, G. (2006). From prototypes to caricatures: Geometrical models for concept typicality. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 402–421.
Google Scholar
Asher, N., & Morreau, M. (1995). What some generic sentences mean. In G. Carlson & F. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 300–339). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 629–654.
Google Scholar
Barth, E. (1971). De Logica van de Lidwoorden in de Traditionele Filosofie. Leiden: Universitaire Pers Leiden.
Google Scholar
Bernardo, J. M. (1979). Expected information as expected utility. Annals of Statistics, 7, 686–690.
Google Scholar
Bordalo, P., Coffman, K., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2016). Stereotypes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 1753–1794.
Google Scholar
Burnett, R., Medin, C., Ross, N., & Blok, S. (2005). Ideal is typical. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 3–10.
Google Scholar
Cahill, L., Babinsky, R., Markowitsch, H., & McGaugh, J. (1995). The amygdala and emotional memory. Nature, 377, 295–296.
Google Scholar
Carlson, G. (1977). Reference to kinds in English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Chatlosh, D., Neunaber, D., & Wasserman, E. (1985). Response-outcome contingency: Behavioral and judgmental effects of appetitive and aversive outcomes with college students. Learning and Motivation, 16, 1–34.
Google Scholar
Cheng, P., & Holyoak, K. (1995). Adaptive systems as intuitive statisticians: Causality, contingency, and prediction. In J. Meyer & H. Roitblat (Eds.), Comparative approaches to cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Cheng, P. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367–405.
Google Scholar
Cimpian, A., Brandone, A., & Gelman, S. (2010). Generic statements require little evidence for acceptance but have powerful implications. Cognitive Science, 34, 1452–1482.
Google Scholar
Cobreros, P., Egré, P., Ripley, D., & van Rooij, R. (2012). Tolerant, classical, strict. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2012(41), 347–385.
Google Scholar
Cohen, A. (1999). Think generic! The meaning and use of generic sentences. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Google Scholar
Cohen, A. (2001). On the generic use of indefinite singulars. Journal of Semantics, 18, 183–209.
Google Scholar
Cohen, A. (2004a). Existential generics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 137–168.
Google Scholar
Cohen, A. (2004b). Generics and mental representations. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 529–556.
Google Scholar
Crupi, V., Fitelson, B., & Tentori, K. (2008). Probability, confirmation, and the conjunction fallacy. Thinking and Reasoning, 14, 182–199.
Google Scholar
Declerck, R. (1996). The manifold interpretation of generic sentences. Lingua, 68, 149–188.
Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London: Faber and Faber.
Google Scholar
Eckardt, R. (1999). Normal objects, normal worlds, and the meaning of generic sentences. Journal of Semantics, 16, 237–278.
Google Scholar
Fernando, T., & Kamp, H. (1996). Expecting many. In T. Galloway & J. Spence (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth conference on semantic and linguistic theory (pp. 53–68). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Google Scholar
Geurts, B. (1985). Generics. Journal of Semantics, 4, 247–255.
Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (1996). On narrow norms and vague heuristics. Psychological Review, 103, 592–596.
Google Scholar
Good, I. (1950). Probability and the Weighing of Evidence. London: Griffin.
Google Scholar
Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 227–247.
Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. (2010). Ideology, generics, and common ground. In C. Witt (Ed.), Feminist metaphysics: Essays on the ontology of sex, gender and the self (pp. 179–207). Dordrecht: Springer.
Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. (2014). The normal, the natural and the good: Generics and ideology. Politica & Societa, 3, 365–392.
Google Scholar
Hoeltje, M. (2017). Generics and ways of being normal. Linguistics and Philosophy, 40, 101–118.
Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.
Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 49–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Straus and Giroux, New York: Farrar.
Google Scholar
Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Klein, E. (1980). The semantics of positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 1–45.
Google Scholar
Krifka, M., Pelletier, F., Carlson, G., ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G., & Link, G. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In G. Carlson & F. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 1–124). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Krifka, M. (2007). Negated anonyms: Creating and filling the gap. In U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics (pp. 163–177). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Krifka, M. (2013). Definitional generics. In A. Mari, C. Beyssade, & F. Del Prete (Eds.), Genericity (pp. 372–389). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Kripke, S. (1972/80). Naming and necessity. In: D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of natural language (pp. 253–355, 763–769). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Lagnado, D. A., & Shanks, D. (2002). Probability judgment in hierarchical learning: A conflict between predictiveness and coherence. Cognition, 83, 81–112.
Google Scholar
Lawler, J. (1973). Studies in English generics, University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics.
Leslie, S. J. (2008). Generics: Cognition and acquisition. The Philosophical Review, 117, 1–47.
Google Scholar
Leslie, S. J. (2013). Essence and natural kinds: When science meets preschooler intuition. In T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology (Vol. 4, pp. 108–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Leslie, S. J., Khemlani, S., & Glucksberg, S. (2011). Do all ducks lay eggs? The generic overgeneralization effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 15–31.
Google Scholar
Lynch, E. B., Coley, J. D., & Medin, D. L. (2000). Tall is typical: Central tendency, ideal dimensions, and graded category structure among tree experts and novices. Memory & Cognition, 28, 41–50.
Google Scholar
Malamud, S. (2012). The meaning of plural definites: A decision-theoretic approach. Semantics and Pragmatics, 5, 1–48.
Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1986). Application of circumscription to formalize common-sense knowledge. Artificial Intelligence, 28, 89–116.
Google Scholar
McCauley, C., Stitt, C. L., & Segal, M. (1980). Stereotyping: From prejudice to prediction. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 195–208.
Google Scholar
Newel, B., Lagnado, D., & Shanks, D. (2007). Straight Choices. The psychology of decision making. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Nickel, B. (2009). Generics and the ways of normality. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, 629–648.
Google Scholar
Nickel, B. (2012). Dutchmen are good sailors: Generics and gradability. In A. Mari, C. Beyssade, & F. Del Prete (Eds.), Genericity (pp. 390–405). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Palmeri, T., & Nosofsky, R. (2001). Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effect in ill-defined perceptual categorization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54, 197–235.
Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Inc.
Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Pelletier, F., & Asher, N. (1997). Generics and defaults. In J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), Handbook of logic and language (pp. 1125–1177). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Google Scholar
Pierce, W. D., & Cheney, C. D. (2004). Behavior analysis and learning (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Google Scholar
Reiter, R. (1987). Nonmonotonic reasoning. In J. F. Traub, N. J. Nilsson, & B. J. Grosz (Eds.), Annual review of computer science (pp. 147–186). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Inc.
Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. (1968). Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 66, 15.
Google Scholar
Rescorla, R., & Wagner, A. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. Black & W. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328–350.
Google Scholar
Schneider, D. (2004). The psychology of stereotyping. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Schubert, L., & Pelletier, F. (1987). Problems in the representation of the logical form of generics, plurals and mass nouns. In E. LePore (Ed.), New direction in semantics (pp. 357–371). London: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Seeley, T. (1985). Honeybee ecology: a study of adaptation in social life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Shanks, D. (1990). Connectionism and the learning of probabilistic concepts. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 209–237.
Google Scholar
Shanks, D. (1995). The psychology of associative learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Shep, M. C. (1958). Shall we count the living or the dead? New England Journal of Medicine, 259, 1210–1214.
Google Scholar
Skyrms, D. B. (1980). Causal Necessity. A pragmatic investigation of the necessity of laws. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 1–12.
Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Pragmatics (Vol. 9, pp. 315–332). New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Sterken, R. K. (2015). Generics in context. Philosopher’s Imprint, 15, 1–30.
Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, J., & Griffiths, T. (2001). The rational basis of representativeness. In J. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1036–1041).
Tentori, N., Chater, N., & Crupi, V. (2016). Judging the probability of hypotheses versus the impact of evidence. Cognitive Science, 40, 758–778.
Google Scholar
Tessler, M., & Goodman, N. (2019). The language of generalization. Psychological Review, 126(3), 395–436.
Thomas, L., & LaBar, K. (2008). Fear relevancy, strategy use, and probabilistic learning of cue-outcome associations. Learning and Memory, 15, 777–784.
Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1980). Causal schemas in judgments under uncertainty. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (pp. 49–72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
van Harmelen, M. (2017). On the acceptance of generic sentences. Bachelor thesis, University of Amsterdam.
van Rooij, R. (2003). Questioning to resolve decision problems. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 727–763.
Google Scholar
van Rooij, R. (2004). Utility, informativity and protocols. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 33, 389–419.
Google Scholar
van Rooij, R., & Schulz, K. (2019). Conditionals, causality and conditional probability. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 28, 55–71.
Google Scholar
van Rooij, R., & Schulz, K. (to appear). A causal power theory of generics. Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy.
Veltman, F. (1996). Defaults in update semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25, 221–261.
Google Scholar