Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency improvement in a class of survival models through model-free covariate incorporation

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In randomized clinical trials, we are often concerned with comparing two-sample survival data. Although the log-rank test is usually suitable for this purpose, it may result in substantial power loss when the two groups have nonproportional hazards. In a more general class of survival models of Yang and Prentice (Biometrika 92:1–17, 2005), which includes the log-rank test as a special case, we improve model efficiency by incorporating auxiliary covariates that are correlated with the survival times. In a model-free form, we augment the estimating equation with auxiliary covariates, and establish the efficiency improvement using the semiparametric theories in Zhang et al. (Biometrics 64:707–715, 2008) and Lu and Tsiatis (Biometrics, 95:674–679, 2008). Under minimal assumptions, our approach produces an unbiased, asymptotically normal estimator with additional efficiency gain. Simulation studies and an application to a leukemia study show the satisfactory performance of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagdonavicius V, Hafdi M, Nikulin M (2004) Analysis of survival data with cross-effects of survival functions. Biostatistics 5: 415–425

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet S (1983) Analysis of survival data by the proportional odds model. Stat Med 2: 273–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox D (1972) Regression model and life-tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 34: 187–220

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garbow B, Hillstrom K, More J (1980) Minpack project. Argonne National Laboratory, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Grouin JM, Day S, Lewis J (2004) Adjustment for baseline covariates: an Introductory Note. Stat Med 23: 697–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauck WW, Anderson S, Marcus SM (1998) Should we adjust for covariates in nonlinear regression analyses of randomized trials?. Control Clin Trials 19: 249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess K (1994) Assessing time-by-covariate interactions in proportional hazards regression models using cubic spline functions. Stat Med 13: 1045–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh F (2001) On heteroscedastic hazards regression models: Theory and Application. J R Stat Soc B 63: 63–79

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koch GG, Tangen CM, Jung JW, Amara IA (1998) Issues for covariance analysis of dichotomous and ordered categorical data from randomized clinical trials and non-parametric strategies for addressing them. Stat Med 17: 1863–1892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesaffre E, Senn S (2003) A note on non-parametric ANCOVA for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials. Stat Med 22: 3586–3596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu X, Tsiatis A (2008) Improving the efficiency of the log-rank test using auxiliary covariates. Biometrika 95: 674–679

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson L, Jewell N (1991) Some surprising results about covariate adjustment in logistic regression models. Int Stat Rev 59(2): 227–240

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Senn S (1989) Covariate imbalance and random allocation in clinical trials. Stat Med 8: 467–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton R (1969) Algorithm 347, an efficient algorithm for sorting with minimial storage. Commun ACM 12(3): 185–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangen CM, Koch GG (1999) Nonparametric analysis of covariance for hypothesis testing with logrank and Wilcoxon scores and survival-rate estimation in a randomized clinical trial. J Biopharm Stat 9: 307–338

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiatis A (2006) Semiparametric theory and missing data. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tsimberidou AM, O’Brien S, Khouri I, Giles F, Kantarjian H, Champlin R, Wen S, Do K, Smith S, Lerner S, Freireich E, Keating MJ (2006) Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with Richter’s Syndrome treated with chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy with or without stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol 24: 2343–2351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verweij J, van Houlwelingen H (1995) Time dependent effects of fixed covariates in Cox regression. Biometrics 51: 1550–1556

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wickramaratne P, Holford T (1989) Confounding in epidemiologic studies response. Biometrics 45: 1319–1322

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Prentice R (2005) Semiparametric analysis of short-term and long-term hazard ratios with two-sample survival data. Biometrika 92: 1–17

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng D, Lin D (2007) Maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric models with censored data (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 69: 507–564

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Tsiatis A, Davidian M (2008) Improving efficiency of inferences in randomized clinical trials using auxiliary covariates. Biometrics 64: 707–715

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanya P. Garcia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garcia, T.P., Ma, Y. & Yin, G. Efficiency improvement in a class of survival models through model-free covariate incorporation. Lifetime Data Anal 17, 552–565 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-011-9195-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-011-9195-z

Keywords

Navigation