Skip to main content
Log in

Semi-parametric hybrid empirical likelihood inference for two-sample comparison with censored data

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two-sample comparison problems are often encountered in practical projects and have widely been studied in literature. Owing to practical demands, the research for this topic under special settings such as a semiparametric framework have also attracted great attentions. Zhou and Liang (Biometrika 92:271–282, 2005) proposed an empirical likelihood-based semi-parametric inference for the comparison of treatment effects in a two-sample problem with censored data. However, their approach is actually a pseudo-empirical likelihood and the method may not be fully efficient. In this study, we develop a new empirical likelihood-based inference under more general framework by using the hazard formulation of censored data for two sample semi-parametric hybrid models. We demonstrate that our empirical likelihood statistic converges to a standard chi-squared distribution under the null hypothesis. We further illustrate the use of the proposed test by testing the ROC curve with censored data, among others. Numerical performance of the proposed method is also examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brownie C, Habicht JP, Cogill B (1986) Comparing indicators of health or nutritional status. Am J Epidemiol 124: 1031–1044

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell G, Ratnaparkhi MV (1993) An application of Lomax distributions in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Comput Stat 22: 1681–1697

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SX, Hall P (1993) Smoothed empirical likelihood confidence intervals for quantiles. Ann stat 21: 1166–1181

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Claeskens G, Jing BY, Peng L, Zhou W (2003) An empirical likelihood confidence interval for an ROC curve. Can J Stat 31: 173–190

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Einmahl JHJ, McKeague IW (2003) Empirical likelihood based hypothesis testing. Bernoulli 9: 267–290

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gastwirth JL, Wang JL (1988) Control percentile test for censored data. J Stat Plan Inference 18: 267–276

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard MJ, Hinberg I (1990) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and non-normal data: an empirical study. Stat Med 9: 325–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, La Scala B (1990) Methodology and algorithms of empirical likelihood. Int Statist Rev 58: 109–127

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh F, Turnbull BW (1996) Nonparametric and semiparametric estimation of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Ann Stat 24: 25–40

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander M, Korwar RW (1982) Nonparametric Bayesian estimation of the horizontal distance between two populations. In: Gnedenko BV, Puri ML, Vincze I (eds) Nonparametric Statistical Inference I. North Holland, New York, pp 409–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein JP, Moeschberger ML (2003) Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum DG, Klein M (2005) Survival analysis: a self-learning text, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Le Cam L (1979) On a theorem of J. Hajeck. In: Jureckova (ed) Contributions to Statistics. J. Hajek Memorial Volume. Academia, Prague

  • Li G (1995) On nonparametric likelihood ratio estimation of survival probabilities for censored data. Stat Probab Lett 25: 95–104

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Tiwari RC, Wells MT (1996) Quantile comparison function in two-sample problems: With applications to comparisons of diagnostic markers. J Am Stat Assoc 91: 689–698

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Tiwari RC, Wells MT (1999) Semiparametric inference for a quantile comparison function with application to receiver operating characteristic curves. Biometrika 86: 487–502

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liang H, Zhou Y (2008) Semiparametric inference to ROC curve with censoring. Scand J Stat 35: 212–227

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Naik-Nimbalkar UV, Rajarshi MB (1997) Empirical likelihood ratio test for equality of k medians in censored data. Stat Probab Lett 34: 267–273

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Owen AB (2001) Empirical Likelihood. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pan XR, Zhou M (2002) Empirical likelihood ratio in terms of cumulative hazard function for censored data. J Multivar Anal 80: 166–188

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Qin YS (1997) Semi-parametric likelihood ratio confidence intervals for various differences of two populations. Stat Probab Lett 33:135–143

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DR, Grunkemeier GL (1975) Confidence interval estimation of survival probability for censored data. J Am Stat Assoc 70: 865–871

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Prentice R (2005) Semiparametric Analysis of Short Term and Long Term Relative Risks with Two Sample Survival Data. Biometrika 92: 1–17

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Liang H (2005) Empirical-likelihood-based semiparametric inference for the treatment effect in the two-sample problem with censoring. Biometrika 92: 271–282

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiyan Su.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Su, H., Zhou, M. & Liang, H. Semi-parametric hybrid empirical likelihood inference for two-sample comparison with censored data. Lifetime Data Anal 17, 533–551 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-011-9194-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-011-9194-0

Keywords

Navigation