Abstract
The present study aimed to shed light on students’ appraisal and reported learning gains in two differently-tutored learning environments (i.e. directively and facilitatively tutored). In order to investigate this, a quasi-experimental study was set up in the context of a clinical skills learning environment. Not only were participating students asked to rate their appraisal of the tutored learning environment, but they were also interviewed in-depth about their learning gains and experiences within both tutored learning environments. Results showed that directively-tutored students were more positive about the tutored learning environment. With regard to experienced learning gains, it was found that, although both groups of students experienced practical learning gains, only facilitatively-tutored students acknowledged gains in their clinical understanding. Also, in terms of deep-level learning and self-efficacy beliefs, different trends between both groups emerged. Finally, diverse approach-specific strengths and drawbacks were experienced by students. While directively-tutored students were generally more positive about their learning environment, facilitatively-tutored students were more critical about their peer tutors’ approach to tutoring because this led to a lack of clarity and overview. Nevertheless, these latter students reported more deep-level learning and thinking. The current results urge educators to take into account several practical implications, both with respect to peer tutors and to students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, D., Gosling, A., Weinman, J., & Marteau, T. (1997). The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study. Sociology, 31, 597–606.
Ashwin, P. (2003). Peer support: Relations between the context, process and outcomes for the students who are supported. Instructional Science, 31, 159–173.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Beasley, C. (1997). Students as teachers: The benefits of peer tutoring. In R. Pospisil & L. Willcoxson (Eds.), Learning through teaching (pp. 21–30). Proceedings of the 6th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, Murdoch University, February 1997. Perth: Murdoch University. http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf1997/beasley.html.
Berghmans, I., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2011, August 30–September). The effects of two contrasting approaches to peer tutoring on students’ learning. Paper presented at the 14th biennial conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Exeter.
Berghmans, I., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2012a, April). The added value of facilitative tutoring for students’ learning taking students’ prior knowledge into account. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.
Berghmans, I., Neckebroeck, F., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2012b). A typology of approaches to peer tutoring: Unraveling peer tutors’ behavioural strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education. doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0136-3
Budé, L., Imbos, T., van de Wiel, M. W. J., Broers, N. J., & Berger, M. P. F. (2009). The effect of directive tutor guidance in problem-based learning of statistics on students’ perceptions and achievement. Higher Education, 47, 23–36.
Budé, L., van de Wiel, M. W. J., Imbos, T., & Berger, M. P. F. (2011). The effect of directive tutor guidance on students’ conceptual understanding of statistics in problem-based learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 309–324.
Capstick, S., & Fleming, H. (2004, January). The learning environment of peer assisted learning. Paper presented at the Peer Assisted Learning conference. Retrieved from http://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/library/local-assets/guest-visitor/docs/capstick-fleming.pdf.
Chi, M. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271–315.
Chi, M., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471–533.
Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237–248.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Oxford, UK: Routledge Publishers.
Collins, H. M. (1985). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Dart, B., & Clarke, J. (1991). Helping students become better learners: A case study in teacher education. Higher Education, 22, 317–335.
De Smet, M., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2010). Studying thought processes of online peer tutors through stimulated-recall interviews. Higher Education, 59, 645–661.
De Smet, M., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2008). Blending asynchronous discussion groups and peer tutoring in higher education: An exploratory study of online peer tutoring behaviour. Computers & Education, 50, 207–223.
Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Janssen-Noordman, A., & Wolfhagen, H. A. P. (2006). Can students differentiate between PBL tutors with different tutoring deficiencies? Medical Teacher, 28(6), 156–161.
Duran, D., & Monereo, C. (2005). Styles and sequences of cooperative interaction in fixed and reciprocal peer tutoring. Learning and Instruction, 15, 179–199.
Elen, J., & Lowyck, J. (2000). Instructional metacognitive knowledge: A qualitative study on conceptions of freshmen about instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 421–444.
Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment: Introduction to this special issue. Higher Education, 22, 201–204.
Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33.
Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (2005). Research on teacher-student relationships and learning environments: Context, retrospect and prospect. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 103–109.
Glynn, L., MacFarlane, A., Kelly, M., Cantillon, P., & Murphy, A. (2006). Helping each other to learn—A process evaluation of peer assisted learning. BMC Medical Education, 6(18), 6–18.
Graesser, A., Baggett, W., & Williams, K. (1996). Question-driven explanatory reasoning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 517–531.
Graesser, A., & Person, N. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104–137.
Graesser, A., Person, N., & Magliano, J. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 495–522.
Haist, S., Wilson, J., Fosson, S., & Brigham, N. (1997). Are fourth-year medical students effective teachers of the physical examination to first-year medical students. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12, 177–181.
Hendry, G. D., Ryan, G., & Harris, J. (2003). Group problems in problem-based learning. Medical Teacher, 25, 609–616.
Hurley, K. F., McKay, D. W., Scott, T. M., & James, B. M. (2003). The supplemental instruction project: Peer devised and delivered tutorials. Medical Teacher, 25, 404–407.
Issenberg, S. B., & McGaghie, W. C. (2002). Clinical skills training. Practice makes perfect. Medical Education, 36, 210–211.
Kember, D., & Kwan, P. K. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 469–490.
King, A. (1997). ASK to THINK-TEL WHY: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 32, 221–235.
King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 87–115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychology, 41(2), 75–86.
Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 285–298.
Loke, A., & Chow, F. (2007). Learning partnership. The experience of peer tutoring among nursing students: A qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 237–244.
Lonka, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (1996). Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology. Higher Education, 31, 5–24.
Lowyck, J., Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2004). Instructional conceptions: Analysis from an instructional design perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 429–444.
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist, 52, 1187–1197.
Mayo, W. P., Donnelly, M. B., & Schwartz, R. W. (1995). The characteristics of the ideal problem-based learning tutor in clinical medicine. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 18(2), 124–136.
Morgan, D. (1993). Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research, 3, 112–121.
Ortlipp, M. (2008). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report, 13, 695–705.
Parr, J., & Townsend, M. (2002). Environments, processes, and mechanisms in peer learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 403–423.
Pata, K., Sarapuu, T., & Lehtinen, E. (2005). Tutor scaffolding styles of dilemma solving in network-based role-play. Learning and Instruction, 15, 571–587.
Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129–150.
Rangachari, P. K., & Crankshaw, D. J. (1996). Beyond facilitation: The active tutor in a problem-based course. Biochemical Education, 24, 192–195.
Rasku-Puttonen, H., Eteläpelto, A., Häkkinen, P., & Arvaja, M. (2002). Teacher’s instructional scaffolding in an innovative ICT-based history-learning environment. Journal of Teacher Development, 6, 269–288.
Roscoe, R., & Chi, M. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 534–574.
Rosé, C. P., Moore, J. D., VanLehn, K., & Allbritton, D. (2001). A comparative evaluation of socratic versus didactic tutoring. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 897–902). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sawyer, S. J., Sylvestre, P. B., Girard, R. A., & Snow, M. H. (1996). Effects of supplemental instruction on mean test scores and failure rates in medical school curricula. Academic Medicine, 70, 708–714.
Solomon, P., & Crowe, J. (2001). Perceptions of student peer tutors in a problem-based learning programme. Medical Teacher, 23, 181–186.
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2008). Students’ experiences with contrasting learning environments: The added value of students’ perceptions. Learning Environments Research, 11, 83–109.
Topping, K. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in higher and further education: A typology and review of literature. Higher Education, 32, 321–345.
Topping, K. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25, 631–645.
Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (2001). Peer assisted learning: A framework for consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 113–132.
van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2010). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education: A review. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95–108.
VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T., & Baggett, W. B. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognition and Instruction, 21, 209–249.
Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., Sierens, E., Luyckx, K., & Lens, W. (2009). Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 671–688.
Vermetten, Y. J., Vermunt, J. D., & Lodewijcks, H. G. (2002). Powerful learning environments? How university students differ in their response to instructional measures. Learning and Instruction, 12, 263–284.
Weidner, T., & Popp, J. (2007). Peer assisted learning and orthopaedic evaluation pyschomotor skills. Journal of Athletic Training, 42(1), 113–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berghmans, I., Michiels, L., Salmon, S. et al. Directive versus facilitative peer tutoring? A view on students’ appraisal, reported learning gains and experiences within two differently-tutored learning environments. Learning Environ Res 17, 437–459 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-014-9168-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-014-9168-8