Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Propagule pressure and land-use are more important than climate for invasive bryophytes regional distributions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

The spread of invasive bryophytes in Central Europe started in the 2nd half of the twentieth century. However, still it is not known which climatic and land-use factors shape their potential niche.

Objectives

We aimed to develop regional-scale species distribution models based on climate, land-use, and distance to the earliest records (propagule pressure proxy) for Campylopus introflexus and Orthodontium lineare in Poland to test whether country-scale models will reveal differences in habitat suitability among regions.

Methods

We assessed the importance of bioclimatic variables, CORINE Land Cover types, and distance from previous introduction sites in country-scale species distribution models for two invasive bryophytes: C. introflexus and O. lineare. We collected species distribution data in Poland and we developed MaxEnt models in 2.5’ resolution (~ 5 km).

Results

Climatic variables had total importance of < 10%, land-use-related variables of 33.5% and 17.1%, and propagule pressure of 56.8% and 75.6%, for C. introflexus and O. lineare, respectively. The most important land-use types were coniferous forests and urban areas. Western and southern Poland provides more sites suitable for colonization, covering 11.2% and 19.0% of the country. Actual range saturation is 11.8% and 5.9%, respectively, indicating the early stage of studied species invasions.

Conclusions

We provided species distribution models for invasive bryophytes, accounting for climatic, land-use, and introduction history variables. The impact of anthropogenic land-use types indicated the importance of disturbance as the driver of studied species invasion. This is important for early detection, spread prevention, and management of studied species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J Appl Ecol 43:1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhter S, McDonald MA, van Breugel P, Sohel S, Kjær ED, Mariott R (2017) Habitat distribution modeling to identify areas of high conservation value under climate change for Mangifera sylvatica Roxb. of Bangladesh. Land Use Policy 60:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anibaba QA, Dyderski MK, Jagodziński AM (2022) Predicted range shifts of invasive giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum) in Europe. Sci Total Environ 825:154053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bates JW (2008) Mineral nutrition and substratum ecology. In: Goffinet B, Shaw AJ (eds) Bryophyte Biology, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 299–356

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barkman JJ (1958) Phytosociology and ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes. Including a taxonomic survey and description of their vegetation units in Europe. Van Gorcum & Comp. N.V., Assen, Netherlands

  • Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borek D, Głowacka-Smolis K, Gustyn J, Kozera A, Kozłowska J, Marikin M et al (2020) Statistical yearbook of the Republic of Poland. GUS, Warsaw

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth TH (2018) Why understanding the pioneering and continuing contributions of BIOCLIM to species distribution modelling is important. Austral Ecol 43:852–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth TH, Nix HA, Busby JR, Hutchinson MF (2014) bioclim: the first species distribution modelling package, its early applications and relevance to most current MaxEnt studies. Divers Distrib 20:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter BE (2014) Ecology and distribution of the introduced moss Campylopus introflexus (Dicranaceae) in western North America. Mandroño 61(1):82–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieśliński S, Czyżewska K, Klama H, Żarnowiec J (1996) Epiphytes and epiphytism. In: Faliński JB, Mułenko W (eds) Cryptogamous plants in the forest communities of Białowieża National Park. Functional groups analysis and general synthesis (Project CRYPTO 3). Phytocoenosis 8 (N.S.), Archivum Geobotanicum 6, 15–35.

  • Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DAISIE (2009) Handbook of alien species in Europe. Invading nature. Springer series in invasion ecology 3. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis LT, Ah-Peng C, Aslan G, Bakalin VA, Bergamini A et al (2021) New national and regional bryophyte records, 65. J Bryol 43(1):67–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2021.1878804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T et al (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distrib 17:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Equihua M, Usher MB (1993) Impact of carpets of the invasive moss Campylopus introflexus on Calluna vulgaris regeneration. Journal of Ecology, 359–365.

  • Essl F, Dullinger S, Moser D, Steinbauer K, Mang T (2015) Macroecology of global bryophyte invasions at different invasion stages. Ecography 38(5):488–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essl F, Lambdon PW (2009) Alien bryophytes and lichens of Europe. In: Daisie (ed) Handbook of alien species in Europe. Invading nature Springer series in invasion ecology 3. Springer Science and Business Media, Dordrecht, pp 29–42

  • Essl F, Steinbauer K, Dullinger S, Mang T, Moser D (2013) Telling a different story: a global assessment of bryophyte invasions. Biol Invasions 15(9):1933–1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frahm J-P (2007) Campylopus Bridel. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (ed) Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 28, part 2. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, pp 366–376.

  • Fudali E, Szczepański M, Rusińska A, Rosadziński S, Wolski G (2009) The current distribution in Poland of some European neophytic bryophytes with supposed invasive tendencies. Acta Soc Bot Pol 78(1):73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glime JM (2017) Bryophyte ecology. Volume 1. Physiological ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/.

  • Gradstein SR, Sipman HJM (1978) Taxonomy and world distribution of Campylopus introflexus and C. pilifer (C. polytrichoides): a new synthesis. Bryologist 81(1):114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromack K, Cummins KW (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 15:133–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse T (2007) Campylopus introflexus invasion in a dune grassland: Succession, disturbance and relevance of existing plant invader concepts. Herzogia 20:305–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassel K, Söderström L (2005) The expansion of the alien mosses Orthodontium lineare and Campylopus introflexus in Britain and continental Europe. J Hattori Bot Lab 97:183–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedenäs L, Herben T, Rydin H, Söderström L (1989) Ecology of the invading moss species Orthodontium lineare in Sweden: substrate preference and interactions with other species. J Bryol 15:565–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herben T, Rydin H, Söderström L (1991) Spore establishment probability and persistence of the fugitive invading moss, Orthodontium lineare: a spatial simulation model. Oikos 60:215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ, Etten J van, Sumner M et al (2020a) raster: geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. Version 3.3-13. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster

  • Hijmans RJ, Phillips S, Elith JL (2020b) dismo: Species Distribution Modeling. Version 1.3-3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dismo

  • Hylander K (2009) No increase in colonization rate of boreal bryophytes close to propagule sources. Ecology 90(1):160–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jagodziński AM, Wierzcholska S, Dyderski MK, Horodecki P, Rusińska A, Gdula AK, Kasprowicz M (2018) Tree species effects on bryophyte guilds on a reclaimed post-mining site. Ecol Eng 110:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jukoniené I, Dobravolskaité R, Sendžikaité J, Skipskyté D, Repečkiené J (2015) Disturbed peatlands as a habitat of an invasive moss Campylopus introflexus in Lithuania. Boreal Environ Res 20:724–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiebacher T, Keller C, Scheidegger C, Bergamini A (2016) Hidden crown jewels: the role of tree crowns for bryophyte and lichen species richness in sycamore maple wooded pastures. Biodivers Conserv 25:1605–1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinck J (2010) NOBANIS—Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet—Campylopus introflexus. In Online Database of the European Network on Invasive Alien Species – NOBANIS www.nobanis.org. Accessed 03 April 2021

  • Kowarik I (1995) Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, pp 15–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Křivánek M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V (2006) Planting history and propagule pressure as predictors of invasion by woody species in a temperate region. Conserv Biol 20:1487–1498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kundzewicz ZW, Matczak P (2012) Climate change regional review: Poland. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 3(4):297–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambdon PW (2009) Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid., heath star moss (Dicranaceae, Bryophyta). In: Daisie (ed) Handbook of alien species in Europe. Invading nature Springer series in invasion ecology 3. Springer, Dordrecht, p 344

  • Lázaro-Lobo A, Evans KO, Ervin GN (2020) Evaluating landscape characteristics of predicted hotspots for plant invasions. Invas Plant Sci Manag 13:163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lázaro-Lobo A, Ramirez-Reyes C, Lucardi R, Ervin GN (2021) Multivariate analysis of invasive plant species distributions in southern US forests. Landsc Ecol 36:3539–3555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Löbel S, Snäll T, Rydin H (2006) Metapopulation processes in epiphytes inferred from patterns of regional distribution and local abundance in fragmented forest landscapes. J Ecol 94:856–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marstaller R (1993) Systematische Übersicht über die Moosgesellschaften Zentraleuropas. Herzogia 9:513–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mateo RG, Broennimann O, Petitpierre B, Muñoz J, van Rooy J, Laenen B, Guisan A, Vanderpoorten A (2015) What is the potential of spread in invasive bryophytes? Ecography 38(5):480–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer W (1952) The genus Orthodontium. Acta Bot Neerlandica 1(1):3–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milbau A, Stout JC, Graee BJ, Nijs I (2009) A hierarchical framework for integrating invasibility experiments incorporating different factors and scales. Biol Invasions 11:941–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell MS, Ignizio DA (2012) Bioclimatic predictors for supporting ecological applications in the conterminous United States. US Geol Surv Data Ser 691:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pebesma E (2018) Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data. R J 10:439–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priede A, Mežaka A (2016) Invasion of the alien moss Campylopus introflexus in cutaway peatlands. Herzogia 29(1):35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor MCF (2000) Physiological ecology. In: Shaw AJ, Goffinet B (eds) Bryophyte biology. Cambridge University Press, pp 225–247

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Křivánek M, Jarošík V (2009) Planting intensity, residence time, and species traits determine invasion success of alien woody species. Ecology 90:2734–2744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

  • Reimers H (1954) Verbreitung und Verwandschaft der europäischen Arten der Laubmoosgattung Orthodontium. Willendowia 1:275–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Repečkiené J, Salina O, Jukoniené I (2012) Microbial communities in disturbed peatlands colonized with invasive moss Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid. Polish J Ecol 60(3):503–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards PW (1963) Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid. and C. polytrichoides De Not. in the British Isles; a preliminary account. Trans Br Bryol Soc 4(3):404–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Pyšek P (2012) Naturalization of introduced plants: ecological drivers of biogeographic pattern. New Phytol 196:383–396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ros, R.M., Mazimpaka, V., Abou-Salma, U., Aleffi, M., Blockeel, T.L., Brugués, M., Cros, R.M., Dia, M.G., Dirske, G.M., Draper, I., El-Saadawi, W., Erdağ, A., Ganeva, A., Gabriel, R., González-Mancebo, J.M., Granger, C., Herrnstadt, I., Hugonnot, V., Khalil, K., Kürschner, H., Losada-Lima, A., Luís, L., Mifsud, S., Privitera, M., Puglisi, M., Sabovljević, M., Sérgio, C., Shabbara, H.M., Sim-Sim, M., Sotiaux, A., Tacchi, R., Vanderpoorten, A., Werner, O., 2013. Mosses of the Mediterranean, an annotated checklist. Cryptogamie Bryologie 34(2), 99–283

  • Rydin H (2008) Population and community ecology of bryophytes. In: Goffinet B, Shaw AJ (eds) Bryophyte biology, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 393–444

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schirmel J, Timler L, Buchholz S (2011) Impact of the invasive moss Campylopus introflexus on carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) in acidic coastal dunes at the southern Baltic Sea. Biol Invasions 13:605–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sérgio C, Garcia CA, Stow S, Martins A, Vieira C, Hespanhol H, Sim-Sim M (2018) How are anthropogenic pressures facilitating the invasion of Campylopus introflexus (Dicranaceae, Bryopsida) in mainland Portugal? Cryptogam Bryol 39(2):283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderström L (1992) Invasions and range expansions and contractions of bryophytes. In: Bates JW, Farmer AM (eds) Bryophytes and Lichens in a changing environment. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 131–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström L, Jonsson BG (1989) Spatial pattern and dispersal in the leafy hepatic Ptilidium pulcherrimum. J Bryol 15:793–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staniaszek-Kik M, Żarnowiec J (2013) Inwazyjne antropofity na murszejącym drewnie i wykrociskach w lasach Karkonoszy. Inżynieria Ekologiczna 32:156–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Størmer P (1958) Some mosses from the phytogeographical excursion 1–9 through the Armorican massive in 1954. Rev Bryol Lichénol 40(27):13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg S (2005) Larger capsules enhance short-range spore dispersal in Sphagnum, but what happens further away? Oikos 108:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes MT, Prentice IC, Cramer W (1996) A bioclimatic model for the potential distributions of North European tree species under present and future climates. J Biogeogr 23:203–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Theoharides KA, Dukes JS (2007) Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol 176:256–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wielkoobszarowa inwentaryzacja stanu lasów w Polsce. Wyniki za okres 2016–2020. [Large-scale inventory of the condition of forests in Poland. Results for the period 2016–2020.] Biuro Urządzania Lasu i Geodezji Leśnej. https://www.lasy.gov.pl/pl/nasze-lasy/polskie-lasy; access: 23.11.2021.

  • Wierzcholska S, Dyderski MK, Jagodziński AM (2020) Potential distribution of an epiphytic bryophyte depends on climate and forest continuity. Glob Planet Chang 193:103270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzcholska S, Dyderski MK, Pielech R, Gazda A, Smoczyk M, Malicki M, Horodecki P, Kamczyc J, Skorupski M, Hachułka M, Kałucka I, Jagodziński AM (2018) Natural forest remnants as refugia for bryophyte diversity in a transformed mountain river valley landscape. Sci Total Environ 640–641:954–964

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woziwoda B, Krzyżanowska A, Dyderski MK, Jagodziński AM, Stefańska-Krzaczek E (2018) Propagule pressure, presence of roads, and microsite variability influence dispersal of introduced Quercus rubra in temperate Pinus sylvestris forest. For Ecol Manage 428:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Żarnowiec J, Stebel A, Chmura D (2019) Thirty-year invasion of the alien moss Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid. in Poland (East-Central Europe). Biol Invasions 21:7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Żarnowiec J, Stebel A, Chmura D (2020) The alien moss Orthodontium lineare Schwägr. in Poland (East-Central Europe): a summary of nearly 40 years of invasion. Biol Invasions 22:1249–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was partially supported by the Institute of Dendrology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Nature Protection and Engineering of University of Bielsko-Biala, and Medical University of Silesia in Katowice (Grant No. PCN-1-098/K/O/F).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Parkowa 5, 62-035, Kórnik, Poland

    Marcin Dyderski

  2. Institute of Environmental Protection and Engineering, University of Bielsko-Biala, ul. Willowa 2, 43-309, Bielsko-Biała, Poland

    Jan Żarnowiec & Damian Chmura

  3. Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, ul. Ostrogórska 30, 41-200, Sosnowiec, Poland

    Adam Stebel

Authors
  1. Marcin Dyderski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Żarnowiec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adam Stebel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Damian Chmura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Dyderski.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dyderski, M., Żarnowiec, J., Stebel, A. et al. Propagule pressure and land-use are more important than climate for invasive bryophytes regional distributions. Landsc Ecol 37, 1871–1884 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01446-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01446-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation