Landscape Ecology

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 891–899 | Cite as

Effect of historic landscape change on the genetic structure of the bush-cricket Metrioptera roeseli

  • Stephanie I. J. HolzhauerEmail author
  • Klemens Ekschmitt
  • Anna-Christine Sander
  • Jens Dauber
  • Volkmar Wolters


This study investigates the impact of past and present landscape structure on the current genetic structure of the bush-cricket Metrioptera roeseli (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) in a rural landscape in Germany. Assuming that land-use types, such as grassland, arable land and forest, as well as linear structures, mainly roads, differentially affect the connectivity of the bush-cricket's habitat and therefore migration and gene flow, we correlated landscape parameters between sampling locations as derived from GIS-maps with genetic similarities between individual bush-crickets as estimated by RAPD-PCR. Fifty bush-crickets were sampled with distances between sampling locations varying between 15 m and 2 km. Corresponding landscape configurations were recorded in 8 years between 1945 and 1998. Landscape configuration 50 years ago appeared to have influenced the present genetic structure of the bush-cricket (R 2 = 0.18). Crossing roads and land use other than grassland along the transect between sampling locations tended to decrease genetic similarity, whereas grassland and parallel roads tended to increase genetic similarity between bush-crickets. Following shifts in land use during 1953–1973 the correlation between landscape and present genetic structure decreased gradually. Our study suggests that it needs time for the landscape to build a visible effect on the genetic structure of the bush-cricket population, and that this effect cannot be detected if the landscape changes faster than the genetic structure responds to it.


Genetic similarity Land-use dynamics Landscape connectivity Time lag 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berggren, Å., Carlson, A., Kindvall, O. 2001The effect of landscape composition on colonization success, growth rate and dispersal in introduced bush-crickets Metrioptera roeseli J. Animal Ecol.70663670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berggren, Å., Birath, B., Kindvall, O. 2002Effects of corridors and habitat edges on dispersal behaviourmovement rates, and movement angles in Roesel's bush-cricket (Metrioptera roeseli)Conserv. Biol.1615621569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burel, F. 1992Effect of landscape structure and dynamics on species diversity in hedgerow networksLandscape Ecol.6161174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burel, F., Baudry, J., Butet, A., Clergeau, P., Delettre, Y., Le Cœur, D., Dubs, F., Morvan, N., Paillat, G., Petit, S., Thenail, C., Brunel, E., Leveufre, J.-C. 1998Comparative biodiversity along a gradient of agricultural landscapesActa Oecol.194760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chamberlain, D.E.E., Fuller, R.J., Bunce, R.G.H., Duckworth, J.C., Shrubb, M. 2000Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and WalesJ. Appl. Ecol.37771788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coulon, A., Cosson, J.F., Angibault, M., Cargnelutti, B., Galan, M., Morellet, N., Petit, E., Aulagnier, S., Hewison, J.M. 2004Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approachMol. Ecol.1328412850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jong, J., Kindvall, O. 1991Cidadavårtbitaren Metrioptera roeseli – nykomling eller hotad relikt?Fauna Och Flora86214221Google Scholar
  8. Doyle, J.J., Doyle, J.L. 1990Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissueFocus121315Google Scholar
  9. Fahrig, L., Merriam, G. 1994Conservation of fragmented populationsConserv. Biol.85059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fuhr-Boßdorf, K., Waldhardt, R., Otte, A. 1999Effects on land-use dyanamics (1945–1998) on the potential of plant communities and species in a marginal cultural landscapeVerhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie29519530Google Scholar
  11. Gibbs, J.P. 2001Demography versus habitat fragmentation as determinants of genetic variation in wild populationsBiol. Conserv.1001520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. GIS ArcView. 1996. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute) USA.Google Scholar
  13. Goodwin, B.J. 2003Is landscape connectivity a dependent or independent variable?Landscape Ecol.18687699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gurdebeke, S., Maelfait, J.-P., Backeljau, T. 2003Contrasting allozyme and RAPD variation in spider populations from patchy forest habitatsGenetica1192734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haddad, N. 2000Corridor length and patch colonization by a butterfly, Junonia coenia Conserv. Biol.14738745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hietel, E., Waldhardt, R., Otte, A. 2004Analysing land-cover changes in relation to environmental variables in HesseGermanyLandscape Ecol.19473489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ingrisch, S. 1986The plurennial life cycles of the European Tettigoniidae (Insecta: Orthoptera), 1. The effect of temperature in embryonic development and hatchingOecologia70606616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ingrisch, S., Köhler, G. 1998Die Heuschrecken Mitteleuropas. Neue Brehm-BüchereiWestarp WissenschaftenMagdeburgGoogle Scholar
  19. Keyghobadi, N., Roland, J., Strobeck, C. 1999Influence of landscape on the population genetic structure of the alpine butterfly Parnassius smintheus (Papilionidae)Mol. Ecol.814811495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kindvall, O., Vessby, K., Berggren, Å., Hartman, G. 1998Individual mobility prevents an Allee effect in sparse populations of the bush-cricket Metrioptera roeseli: an experimental studyOikos81449457Google Scholar
  21. Landry, P.-A., Lapointe, F.-J. 2001Within-population craniometric variability of insular populations of deer micePeromyscus maniculatuselucidated by landscape configurationOikos95136146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laußmann, H. 1999Die mitteleuropäische Agrarlandschaft als Lebensraum für Heuschrecken (Orthoptera: Saltatoria)Verlag AgrarökologieBern, HannoverGoogle Scholar
  23. Legendre, P., Lapointe, F.-J., Casgrain, P. 1994Modeling brain evolution from behaviour: a permutational regression approachEvolution4814871499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Petit, S., Burel, F. 1998Effect of landscape dynamics on the metapopulation of a ground beetle (ColeopteraCarabidae) in a hedgerow networkAgric. Ecosyst. Environ.69243252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Purtauf, T., Dauber, J., Wolters, V. 2004Carabid communities in the spatio-temporal mosaic of a rural landscapeLandscape Urban Plan.67185193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramirez, M.G., Haakonsen, K.E. 1999Gene flow among habitat patches on a fragmented landscape in the spider Argiope trifasciata (Araneae: Araneidae)Heredity83580585PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. RFLPscan 2.01 User Manual 1994. Scanalytics, a division of CSPI, MAUSA.Google Scholar
  28. Rohlf, F.J. 1992NTSYSpc: Numerical Taxonomy Systemver. 2.01Exeter Publishing Ltd.Setauket, NYGoogle Scholar
  29. Schneider, S., Roessli, D., Excoffier, L. 2000Arlequin Ver. 2.000: A Software for Population Genetics Data AnalysisGenetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of GenevaSwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  30. Steiner, N., Dauber, J., Hirsch, M., Knecht, C., Otte, A., Purtauf, T., Simmering, D., Waldhardt, R., Wolters, V., Köhler, W. 2002Modellierung der Artenvielfalt in Abhängigkeit vom LandschaftsmusterBerichte über die Landwirtschaft80468481Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, P.D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K., Merriam, G. 1993Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structureOikos68571573Google Scholar
  32. Dongen, S., Backeljau, T., Matthysen, E., Dhondt, A.A. 1998Genetic population structure of the winter moth (Operophtera brumata L.) (LepidopteraGeometridae) in a fragmented landscapeHeredity8092100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vickery V.R. 1965. Factors governing the distribution and dispersal of the recently introduced grasshopperMetrioptera roeseli (eds), (Orthoptera: Ensifera). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Québec 10: 165–171.Google Scholar
  34. Waldhan, R., Simmering, D., Otte, A. 2004Estimation and prediction of plant species richness in a mosaic landscapeLandscape Ecol.19211226Google Scholar
  35. Wiens, J.A. 1986Spatial scale and temporal variation in studies of shrubsteppe birdsDiamond, J.Case, T.J. eds. Community EcologyHarper and RowNY154172Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie I. J. Holzhauer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Klemens Ekschmitt
    • 1
  • Anna-Christine Sander
    • 1
  • Jens Dauber
    • 1
  • Volkmar Wolters
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Animal EcologyJustus Liebig UniversityGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations