Skip to main content
Log in

Rhythms of Law: Aboriginal Jurisprudence and the Anthropocene

  • Published:
Law and Critique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On 1 December 2019, over one hundred Aboriginal nations performed ancestral and creation dances in synchrony across the Australian continent. One of the communities that danced was the Anaiwan nation from the north-eastern region of New South Wales, Australia. Since 2014 I have been working with Anaiwan people in a collaborative activist research project, creating and maintaining an Aboriginal community garden on the fringes of my hometown of Armidale as a site for land reclamation and decolonising, multispecies research. The community garden is adjacent to the site of the old East Armidale Aboriginal Reserve, where over one hundred dispossessed Aboriginal people were forced to live on the municipal town garbage depot in the mid-twentieth century. This paper positions both the Nation Dance 2019 movement, and the Armidale Aboriginal Community Garden, as rhythmic events that activate Aboriginal Law and sovereignty that is held enduring in the land but that has been buried alive by the settler-colonial state. Focusing on the tensions between deep Indigenous ancestral temporality and colonial territoriality, I argue that the emergence of the Anthropocene reveals a dangerous dissonance between the rhythms of Aboriginal Law patterned through present-day Australian environments and the grid-based structures of colonial governance imposed upon them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For more information about decolonising history at the Armidale Aboriginal Community Garden see Wright (2019).

  2. The word ‘humpy’ comes from the Jagera language, and refers to a small temporary shelter traditionally made out of branches and bark, but following invasion and colonisation it may refer to any temporary building made from available material, including corrugated iron, canvas, metal drums etc.

References

  • Ahoy, Colin. 2018. Interview with Barbara Ahoy, Lorina Barker, Laszlo Szabo, Beth O’Loughlin and Kate Wright. Armidale NSW. [Transcript with the author].

  • Alfred, Taiake, and Jeff Corntassel. 2005. Being Indigenous: Resurgences against contemporary colonialism. In Wasáse: Indigenous pathways of action and freedom, ed. Taiake Alfred, 597–614. Peterborough: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Heritage College Dictionary, 3rd Edn. 1993. Boston & New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

  • Armidale Express. 1957. House for Aborigines seen as successful community project. 23 January, p. 6.

  • Armiero, Marco, and Massimo De Angelis. 2017. Anthropocene: Victims, narrators and revolutionaries. South Atlantic Quarterly 116 (2): 345–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. 1969. Theses on the philosophy of history. In Illuminations, ed. Hannah Arendt, 253–264. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Christine F. 2011. The land is the source of the law: A dialogical encounter with Indigenous jurisprudence.London & New York: Routledge.

  • Blatman-Thomas, Naama. 2019. Reciprocal repossession: Property as land in urban Australia. Antipode 51 (5): 1395–1415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomley, Nicholas. 2013. Performing property: Making the world. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence XXXVI 1: 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.

  • Clayton-Dixon, Callum. 2019. Surviving New England: A history of Aboriginal resistance and resilience through the first forty years of the colonial apocalypse. Armidale: Anaiwan Language Revival Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Patsy, and Margaret Somerville. 1990. Ingelba and the five black matriarchs. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLoughrey, Elizabeth M. 2019. Allegories of the Anthropocene. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolan, Alwyn. 2019. Nation Dance statement. https://zh-cn.facebook.com/NITVAustralia/videos/alwyn-doolan-nation-dance/2531725903548341/

  • Doolan, Alwyn, and Jaja Dare. 2020. Yarnin with Alwyn Doolan. Decolonise: A podcast about Black sovereignty. Indigitube. https://www.indigitube.com.au/album/5ea0d943b8ff1a57795d0e31. Accessed 20 July 2020.

  • Ferber Environment and Waste. 2014. Preliminary and detailed site investigation 201 Canambe Road, Armidale.

  • Franklin, Margaret-Ann. 1995. Assimilation in action: The Armidale story. Armidale: University of New England Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammage, Bill. 2011. The biggest estate on earth: How Aborigines made Australia. Sydney, Melbourne, Auckland & London: Allen & Unwin.

  • Graham, Mary. 2008. Some thoughts about the philosophical underpinnings of Aboriginal worldviews. Australian Humanities Review 45: 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Steve. 2019. First Nation people dance to begin a cultural healing process. Armidale Express, 2 December 2019. https://www.armidaleexpress.com.au/story/6520799/anaiwan-nation-part-of-nation-dance/. Accessed 20 July 2020.

  • Hage, Ghassan. 2017. Is racism an environmental threat? Cambridge & Malden: Polity.

  • Howitt, Richie. 2006. Scales of coexistence: Tackling the tension between legal and cultural landscapes in post-Mabo Australia. Macquarie Law Journal 6: 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Rhys. 2012. Fire-stick farming. Fire Ecology 8 (3): 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Sarah. 2017. Smoke, curtains and mirrors: The production of race through time and title registration. Law and Critique 28 (1): 87–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, Marcia. 1996. What do we mean by wilderness? Wilderness and terra nullius in Australian Art. The Sydney Papers 8 (1): 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Doreen. 2006. Landscape as a provocation: Reflections on moving mountains. Journal of Material Culture 11 (1–2): 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, Lynn, and Dorion Sagan. 2000. What is life?. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreton-Robinson, Aileen. 2015. The white possessive: Property, power and Indigenous sovereignty. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Morgan, Cassandra. 2019. Prime Minister Scott Morrison refuses meeting with ‘Message Stick Walker’ Alwyn Doolan. The Canberra Times, 16 August 2019. https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/6331924/scott-morrison-refuses-meeting-with-message-stick-walker/digital-subscription/. Accessed 20 July 2020.

  • Mowaljarlai, David, and Jutta Malnic. 1993. Yorro Yorro. Broome: Magabala Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muecke, Stephen. 1999. The sacred in history. Humanities Research 1 (1): 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muecke, Stephen. 2019. The world began with a sound. In Energies in the Arts, ed. Douglas Kahn, 47–56. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir, Cameron. 2014. The broken promise of agricultural progress: An environmental history. Oxon & New York: Routledge.

  • Neale, Timothy. 2018. Digging for fire: Finding control on the Australian continent. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 5 (1): 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, Bruce. 2014. Dark emu: Aboriginal Australia and the birth of agriculture. Broome: Magabala Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria. 2015. Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care. Social Studies of Science 45 (5): 691–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese, Joseph. 2015. Forensic ecologies of occupied zones and geographies of dispossession: Gaza and Occupied East Jerusalem. Borderlands 14 (1): 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinart, Hugo. 2016. About a stone: Some notes on geologic conviviality. Environmental Humanities 8 (1): 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolls, Eric. 1981. A million wild acres: 200 years of man and an Australian forest. Melbourne: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Deborah Bird. 1992. Dingo makes us human: Life and land in an Aboriginal Australian culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Deborah Bird. 1996. Nourishing terrains: Australian Aboriginal views of landscape and wilderness. Canberra: Australian Heritage Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Deborah Bird. 2000. To dance with time: A Victoria River Aboriginal study. The Australian Journey of Anthropology 11 (3): 287–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Deborah Bird. 2004. Reports from a wild country: Ethics for decolonisation. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovelli, Carlo. 2018. The order of time. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandilands, Cate. 2017. Plantasm: Vegetal participation and imagination. Participatory Environmental Humanities Workshop, University of New South Wales: Sydney https://vimeo.com/228007887. Accessed 22 July 2020

  • Simpson, Leanne. 2014. Land as pedagogy: Nishnaabeg intelligence and rebellious transformation. Decolonization: Indigineity, Education and Society 3 (3): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen, Victor. 2019. Putting the people back into the country. In Decolonizing research: Indigenous storywork as methodology, eds. Jo-ann Archibald, Q’um Q’um Xiiem, Jenny Bol Jun Lee-Morgan and Jason De Santolo, 224–238. London: Zed Books.

  • Swain, Tony. 1993. A place for strangers: Towards a history of Australian Aboriginal Being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Zoe. 2016. Relationships. Theorizing the Contemporary. Society for Contemporary Anthropology: Fieldsights. At: https://culanth.org/fieldsights/relationships. Accessed 28 August 2020.

  • Todd, Zoe, and Heather Davis. 2017. On the importance of a date, or, decolonising the Anthropocene. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies16(4):761–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale, Richard. 2015. Interview. Armidale Aboriginal Community Garden.

  • Watson, Irene. 2002. Buried alive. Law and Critique 13 (3): 253–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, Kyle P. 2018. Indigenous science (fiction) for the Anthropocene: Ancestral dystopias and fantasies of climate change crises. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 1 (1–2): 224–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Kate. 2019. Place remembered: Unearthing hidden histories in Armidale Aboriginal Community Garden. Australian Humanities Review 65: 20–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusoff, Kathryn. 2018. A billion black Anthropocenes or none. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge and thank Uncle Colin Ahoy, Aunty Pat Cohen, Uncle Richard Vale, Uncle Steve Widders and the Nēwara Aboriginal Corporation for their help with this research and with the Armidale Aboriginal Community Garden itself. Thank you to the Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society in Munich, particularly Carson Fellows Ajit Menon, Anna Pilz, Anna Varga, Bettina Stoetzer, Danielle Scheil, Louis Warren, Ron Doel, Sevgi Mirakova, Stephen Hasley and Tom Lekan, whose helpful feedback and stimulating ideas helped me to write this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate Wright.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wright, K. Rhythms of Law: Aboriginal Jurisprudence and the Anthropocene. Law Critique 31, 293–308 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-020-09279-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-020-09279-3

Keywords

Navigation