Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Continuing Relevance of the Convention?

  • Published:
Law and Critique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Barry and Goodin (1992); see, in particular chapter 2, and the chapter by Strange.

  2. See, for example, Article 63 TFEU, or the Doha round of the WTO.

  3. See, for full details, Everson (2013).

  4. See the law laid down in the European Court of Justice Case of Viking, Case C-438/05 (2007) and Case C-341/05 (2007).

  5. See, for the distinction, Lindahl (2004), 29: 461.

References

  • Barry, Brain, and R.E. Goodin (eds.). 1992. Free movement: Ethical issues in the transnational migration of people and money. Pennsylvania: Harvester-Wheatsheaf and Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dublin Convention, (Dublin Regulation) EU Regulation No. 604/2013.

  • European Court of Justice Case of Viking, Case C-438/05, International Transport Workers’ Federation, Finnish Seamen’s Union v. Viking Line ABP, OÜ Viking Line Eesti, 2007 E.C.R. I-1079.

  • European Court of Justice Case C-341/05, Laval un Partneri Ltd v Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundet, Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundets avdelning 1, Byggettan and Svenska Elektrikerförbundet, 2007 E.C.R. I-11767.

  • Everson, Michelle. 2013. The fault of (European) law in (political and social) economic crisis. Law and Critique 24(2): 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, Hans. 2004. Finding a place for freedom, security and justice: The European Union’s claim to territorial unity. European Law Review 29: 461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1992. Ethics and the movement of money: Realist approaches. In Free movement: Ethical issues in the transnational migration of people and money, ed. B. Barry, and R.E. Goodin. Pennsylvania: Harvester-Wheatsheaf and Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU), Article 63.

  • UNHRC Convention and Protocol relating to the status of refugees. 1951. (1951 Refugee Convention).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HX, UK

    Michelle Everson

Authors
  1. Michelle Everson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Everson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Everson, M. The Continuing Relevance of the Convention?. Law Critique 27, 9–12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-015-9174-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-015-9174-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation