Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental simulations of effects of surface roughness level of TBC on overall effectiveness of film cooling under typical vane environment

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The principle of selection of surface roughness level of thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) at turbine film-cooled vanes is unclear. In this work, the universal turbine vane flow environment was characterized by the proper combinations of different wall curvatures and streamwise pressure gradients. To achieve the direct measurements of overall effectiveness, a conjugate film cooling model with simulated TBCs was established by matching the hot-side Biot numbers of actual materials. The surface roughness levels were set in a range for TBC design stage. The measurements displayed the detailed trends in overall effectiveness of metal and TBC with the surface roughness level, wall curvature, streamwise pressure gradient, and cooling air flowrate. The roughness effect on overall effectiveness was complicated by the wall curvature, due to generating different jet mechanisms. When the engine Ra changes from 0.2 to 14 μm, the variations of metal overall effectiveness can be controlled below 15% at different walls. Overall, to improve the protection ability to metal, the smoother TBC is suggested to spray at the flat wall, while, at the convex and concave walls, the proper roughness of TBC can be considered in the near-hole region under the acceptable stress level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Bi:

Biot number (−)

D :

Inlet diameter of film-hole (mm)

H :

Wall thickness (mm)

h :

Heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)

K :

Acceleration parameter (−)

k :

Thermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1)

k s :

Sand roughness (μm)

P :

Pitch of film-holes (mm)

R :

Radium of wall curvature (mm)

Ra:

Centerline average roughness (μm)

Re:

Reynolds number (−)

S :

Curvature coordinate (−)

T :

Temperature (K)

U :

Mean velocity (m s1)

u :

Component of velocity (m s1)

Y :

Spanwise coordinate (−)

Z :

Vertical coordinate

α :

Inclination angle (°)

:

Relative deviation (%)

ρ :

Fluid density (kg m3)

τ :

TBC effectiveness (−)

ϕ :

Metal overall effectiveness

av:

Area-averaged

c :

Cooling air

m :

Metal

∞:

Mainstream

APG:

Adverse pressure gradient

BR:

Blowing ratio

CVP:

Counter-rotating vortex pair

DR:

Density ratio

FC:

Film cooling

FPG:

Favorable pressure gradient

SPG:

Streamwise pressure gradient

TBC:

Thermal barrier coating

ZPG:

Zero pressure gradient

References

  1. Bogard DG, Thole KA. Gas turbine film cooling. J Propul Power. 2006;22(2):249–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wright LM, Malak MF, Crites DC, Morris MC, Yelavkar V, Bilwani R. Review of platform cooling technology for high pressure turbine blades. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo. 2014; GT2014-s26373.

  3. Wang F, Pu J, Wang J, Xia W. Numerical investigation of effects of blockage, inclination angle and hole-size on film cooling effectiveness at concave surface. J Turbomach. 2021;143: 021007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Colón S, Ricklick M, Nagy D, Lafleur A. Geometric Effects of thermal barrier coating damage on turbine blade temperatures. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo. 2019; GT2019-90886.

  5. Krishna Anand VG, Parammasivam KM. Thermal barrier coated surface modifications for gas turbine film cooling: a review. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2021;146(2):545–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Long Y, Chen X, Wang Y, Weng Y. Conjugate flow and heat transfer analysis between segmented thermal barrier coatings and cooling film. Int J Therm Sci. 2021;167:107003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cai Z, Hong H, Peng D, Zhao X, Wang W, Liu Y, Cao Z. A numerical study of the influence of interface morphology on the stress behavior in thermal barrier coatings near an inclined film-cooling hole. Ceram Int. 2020;46(11):18142–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Town J, Straub D, Black J, Thole KA, Shih TI-P. State-of-the-art cooling technology for a turbine rotor blade. J Turbomach. 2018;140:071007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bunker RS. Gas turbine cooling: moving from macro to micro cooling. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo. 2013; GT 2013-94277.

  10. Mensch A, Thole KA. Overall effectiveness of a blade endwall with jet impingement and film cooling. J Eng Gas Turbines Power. 2014;136(3):031901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sweeney PC, Rhodes JF. An infrared technique for evaluating turbine airfoil cooling designs. J Turbomach. 2000;122(1):170–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mensch A, Thole KA. Conjugate heat transfer analysis of the effects of impingement channel height for a turbine blade endwall. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2015;82:66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang W, Pu J, Wang JH, Wu WL, Wang M. An experimental investigation on cooling characteristics of a vane laminated end-wall with axial-row layout of film-holes. Appl Therm Eng. 2019;148:953–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pu J, Wang W, Wang J, Wu W, Wang M. Experimental study of free-stream turbulence intensity effect on overall cooling performances and solid thermal deformations of vane laminated end-walls with various internal pin-fin configurations. Appl Therm Eng. 2020;173:115232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen Q, Hu P, Pu J, Wang JH. Sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization of double-ceramic-layers thermal barrier system. Ceram Int. 2019;45:17224–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maikell J, Bogard D, Piggush J, Kohli A. Experimental simulation of a film cooled turbine blade leading edge including thermal barrier coating effects. J Turbomach. 2011;133:011014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Davidson FT, KistenMacher DA, Bogard DG. Film cooling with a thermal barrier coating: round holes, craters, and trenches. J Turbomach. 2014;136:041007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart WR, KistenMacher DA, Bogard DG. Effects of TBC thickness on an internally and film cooled model turbine vane. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo. 2014; GT2014-27117.

  19. Mensch A, Thole KA, Craven BA. Conjugate heat transfer measurements and predictions of a blade endwall with a thermal barrier coating. J Turbomach. 2014;136:2167–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang X, Pu J, Wang J, Qu Y, He J. Sensitivity analysis of internal layout and coating thickness to overall cooling performances of laminated cooling configurations with surface thermal barrier coatings. Appl Therm Eng. 2020;181:116020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Horner MJ, Yoon C, Furgeson M, Oliver TA, Bogard DG. Experimental and computational investigation of internal and film cooling designs incorporating a thermal barrier coating. J Turbomach. 2022;144(9):091001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stripf M, Schulz A, Wittig S. Surface roughness effects on external heat transfer of a hp turbine vane. J Turbomach. 2005;127(1):200–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bons J. A review of surface roughness effects in gas turbines. J Turbomach. 2010;132(2):021004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt DL, Bogard DG. Effects of freestream turbulence and surface roughness on film cooling. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo. 1996; GT 1996-462.

  25. Rutledge JL, Robertson D, Bogard DG. Degradation of film cooling performance on a turbine vane suction side due to surface roughness. J Turbomach. 2006;128:547–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bunker RS. Separated and combined effect of surface roughness and turbulence intensity on vane heat transfer. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo. 1997;GT 1997-135.

  27. Bacci T, Picchi A, Lenzi T, Facchini B, Innocenti L. Effect of surface roughness and inlet turbulence intensity on a turbine nozzle guide vane external feat transfer: experimental investigation on a literature test case. J Turbomach. 2021;143:041006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moore JD, Yoon C, Bogard DG. Surface curvature effects on film cooling performance for shaped holes on a model turbine blade. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo. 2019;GT2019-91476.

  29. Schwarz SG, Goldstein RJ, Eckert ERG. The influence of curvature on film cooling performance. J Turbomach. 1991;113(3):472–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Qin Y, Li X, Ren J, Jiang H. Effects of compound angle on film cooling effectiveness with different streamwise pressure gradient and convex curvature. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2015;86:482–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Coletti F, Elkins CJ, Eaton JK. An inclined jet in crossflow under the effect of streamwise pressure gradients. Exp Fluids. 2013;54:1589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ligrani P, Goodro M, Fox M, Moon HK. Full-coverage film cooling: film effectiveness and heat transfer coefficients for dense hole arrays at different hole angles, contraction ratios, and blowing ratios. J Heat Transfer. 2013;135(3):031707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lutum E, von Wolfersdorf J, Semmler K, Dittmar J, Weigand B. An experimental investigation of film cooling on a convex surface subjected to favorable pressure gradient flow. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2001;45:939–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jones WP, Launder BE. Some properties of sink-flow turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech. 1972;56(2):337–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kalghatgi P, Acharya S. Modal analysis of inclined film cooling jet flow. J Turbomach. 2014;136:81007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou W, Peng D, Wen X, Liu Y, Hu H. Unsteady analysis of adiabatic film cooling effectiveness behind circular, shaped, and sand-dune-inspired film cooling holes: measurement using fast-response pressure-sensitive paint. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;125:1003–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project is supported by Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Contract No. 2108085ME176) and Shenyang Aero-engine Institute of Aero Engine Corporation of China. The authors are grateful to Dr. Yi Jin and Dr. An-feng Shi at Experimental Center of Engineering and Material Sciences, USTC for their guidance with infrared thermal imaging technique.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Pu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pu, J., Zhang, T., Shuai, X. et al. Experimental simulations of effects of surface roughness level of TBC on overall effectiveness of film cooling under typical vane environment. J Therm Anal Calorim 148, 10251–10267 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12409-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12409-5

Keywords

Navigation