Abstract
An experimental study has been done to evaluate the thermo-hydraulic performance of solar air heater having roughness element over the absorber plate in the form of a winglet type vortex generator. LCT technique is used to measure the Nusselt number over the absorber surface for Reynolds number (Re) of 3000–22,000 and roughness parameters such as relative roughness pitch (P/e) of 5–12, angle of attack (α) ranges of 30°–75° and relative roughness width (W/w) of 3–7. The Nusselt number and friction factor with this roughness are compared with smooth surface for similar flow condition. The maximum enhancement in Nusselt number and friction factor are obtained to be 2.91 and 2.85 times that of smooth surface, respectively. The optimum values of the roughness parameters are evaluated based on the thermo-hydraulic performance parameter criterion. The optimum roughness parameters obtained as the relative roughness pitch (P/e) of 8, angle of attack (α) of 60° and relative roughness width (W/w) of 5. The maximum value of the thermo-hydraulic performance parameter (THPP) is observed to be 2.95.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A P :
-
Area of the collector, m2
- A orifice :
-
Orifice plate cross-sectional area, m2
- C d :
-
Coefficient of discharge
- C p :
-
Specific heat of air, J kg−1 K−1
- D h :
-
Duct hydraulic diameter, m
- e :
-
Height of the rib, m
- f :
-
Friction factor
- H :
-
Duct depth, m
- HIS:
-
Hue, saturation and intensity
- h :
-
Heat transfer coefficient, W m−2 K−1
- k :
-
Thermal conductivity of air, W m−1 K−1
- LCT:
-
Liquid crystal thermography
- L d :
-
Absorber plate length, m
- m :
-
Mass flow rate, kg s−1
- Nu:
-
Nusselt number
- P atm :
-
Atmospheric pressure
- Pr:
-
Prandtl number
- P/e :
-
Relative roughness pitch
- Q :
-
Heat transfer rate, W
- RGB:
-
Red, green and blue
- Re:
-
Reynolds number
- TLC:
-
Thermo-chromic liquid crystal
- T a :
-
Ambient temperature, °C
- T mf :
-
Air mean bulk temperature, °C
- T i :
-
Air temperature (inlet), °C
- T o :
-
Air temperature (outlet), °C
- T LC :
-
Surface temperature measured by TLC sheet, °C
- V a :
-
Velocity of air, m s−1
- w :
-
Width of rib, m
- W :
-
Duct width, m
- W/w :
-
Relative roughness width, m
- ∆P d :
-
Test section pressure drop, Pa
- ∆P o :
-
Pressure drop along with orifice plate, Pa
- α :
-
Angle of attack
- ν :
-
Kinematic viscosity
- μ :
-
Dynamic viscosity
- ρ :
-
Density
- β :
-
Orifice to pipe diameter ratio
- ξ :
-
Thermo-hydraulic performance parameter
- r:
-
Roughened surface
- s:
-
Smooth surface
References
Prasad K, Mullick SC. Heat transfer characteristics of a solar air heater used for drying purposes. Appl Energy. 1983;13:83–93.
Prasad BN, Saini JS. Effect of artificial roughness on heat transfer and friction factor in a solar air heater. Sol Energy. 1988;41:6555–60.
Saini SK, Saini RP. Development of correlations for Nusselt number and friction factor for solar air heater with roughened duct having arc-shaped wire as artificial roughness. Sol Energy. 2008;82(12):1118–30.
Jain SK, Agrawal GD, Mishra R. Experimental investigation of the thermo-hydraulic performance of the solar air heater having arc-shaped ribs with multiple gaps. ASME J Thermal Sci Eng Appl 2020;12(1).
Kumar A, Saini RP, Saini JS. Experimental investigation on heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics of air flowing a rectangular duct with multi V-shaped rib with gap roughness on the heated plate. Sol Energy. 2012;86(6):1733–49.
Lanjewar A, Bhagoria JL, Sarviya RM. Heat transfer and friction in solar air heater duct with W-shaped rib roughness on absorber plate. Energy. 2011;36(7):4531–41.
Momin AME, Saini JS, Solanki SC. Heat transfer and friction in solar air heater duct with V-shaped rib roughness on absorber plate. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2002;45(16):3383–96.
Sahu MM, Bhagoria JL. Augmentation of heat transfer coefficient by using 90° broken transverse ribs on absorber plate of solar air heater. Renew Energy. 2005;30(13):2057–63.
Aharwal KR, Gandhi BK, Saini JS. Experimental investigation on heat transfer enhancement due to a gap in an inclined continuous rib arrangement in a rectangular duct of solar air heater. Renew Energy. 2008;33:585–96.
Caliskan S. Experimental investigation of heat transfer in a channel with new winglet-type vortex generators. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2014;78:604–14.
Sari A, Sadi M, Shafiei Sabet G, Mohammadiun M, Mohammadiun H. Experimental analysis and exergetic assessment of the solar air collector with delta winglet vortex generators and baffles. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2021;145(3):867–85.
Layek A, Saini JS, Solanki SC. Effect of chamfering on heat transfer and friction characteristics of solar air heater having absorber plate roughened with compound turbulators. Renew Energy. 2009;34(5):1292–8.
Promvonge P, Khanoknaiyakarn C, Kwankaomeng S, Thianpong C. Thermal behavior in solar air heater channel fitted with combined rib and delta winglet. Int Commun Heat Mass Tran. 2011;38:749–56.
Bekele A, Mishra M, Dutta S. Performance characteristics of solar air heater with surface mounted obstacles. Energy Converse Manag. 2014;85:603–11.
Alam T, Saini RP, Saini JS. Experimental investigation on heat transfer enhancement due to V-shaped perforated block in a rectangular duct of solar air heater. Energy Convers Manag. 2014;81:374–83.
Singh S, Chander S, Saini JS. Investigations on thermo-hydraulic performance due to flow-attack-angle in V-down rib with a gap in a rectangular duct of the solar air heater. Appl Energy. 2012;97:907–12.
Kumar A, Layek A. Nusselt number and fluid flow analysis of solar air heater having transverse circular rib roughness on absorber plate using LCT and computational technique. Therm Sci Eng Progr. 2019;14:100398.
Kumar A, Layek A. Thermo-hydraulic performance of solar air heater having twisted rib over the absorber plate. Int J Therm Sci. 2018;133:181–95.
Kumar A, Layek A. Heat transfer measurement in a rectangular channel of solar air heater with winglet-type ribs using liquid crystal thermography. ASME J Therm Sci Eng Appl. 2021;14(4):041006.
Kumar A, Layek A. Nusselt number and friction characteristics of a solar air heater that has a winglet type vortex generator in the absorber surface. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2020;23:110204.
ASHRAE Standard 93-97, Method of testing to determine the Thermal performance of solar collector, ASHRAE; 1977, 93-97:1–34.
Stasieka J, Stasieka A, Jewartowskia M, Collins MW. Liquid crystal thermography and true color digital image processing. Optic Laser Technol. 2006;38:243–56.
Webb RL, Eckert ERG, Goldstein RJ. Generalized heat transfer and friction correlation for tubes with repeated rib roughness. Int J Heat Mass Tran. 1971;14:601–17.
McAdams WH. Heat transmission. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1942.
Kays WM, Perkin H. Forced convection internal flow in ducts. In: Rohsenow WM, Hartnett IV, editors. Handbook of heat transfer. McGraw-Hill; 1985.
Coleman HW, Steele WG. Experimentation and uncertainty analysis for engineers. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1999.
Acknowledgements
The authors thankfully appreciated SERB, DST, Govt. of India for allowing financial support in instigating the experimental-based research work in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, NIT Durgapur, India, File. No SERB-DST Grant: EEQ/2018/001012, dated: 26/02/2019.
Funding
Funding was provided by Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology (SB/EMEQ-314/2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix AU: Uncertainty analysis
Appendix AU: Uncertainty analysis
The error of all the measured values leads to achieving some amount of uncertainty in results for the collected data. The uncertainty of an evaluated parameter may be computed as [26]:
where, \(\delta f_{\text{e}}\), total error encountered for the parameters,\(\delta {x}_{j}\), each parameter error, \(\frac{{\partial f_{\text{e}} }}{{\partial x_{j} }}\) known as sensitivity coefficient. The sampling procedure for the relevant data are shown below:
Thermo-physical properties of air are represented as:
ρa = 1.174 kg m−3.
Sl. no. | Measured data | Values |
---|---|---|
1 | Absorber plate length/mm, Ld | 1240 mm |
2 | Duct width/mm, W | 160 mm |
3 | Duct height/mm, H | 40 mm |
4 | Diameter of pipe/mm, dp | 80 mm |
5 | Diameter of orifice meter/mm, do | 40 mm |
6 | Orifice meter pressure head, Δho | 11.3 cm of H2O |
7 | Pressure drop*(test section)/Pa, ΔPd | 18 Pascal |
8 | Inlet air temperature/°C, Ti | 25.25 °C |
9 | Outlet air temperature/°C, To | 29.87 °C |
10 | Temperature rise, ΔT | 4.62 °C |
11 | Mean air temperature/°C, Tmf | 27.56 °C |
12 | Mean plate temperature/°C, Tlc | 40.55 °C |
13 | Mass flow rate of air/ kg s−1, ṁ | 0.0404 kg s−1 |
14 | Heat transfer to air/W, Qconv | 187.84 W |
15 | Heat transfer coefficient/ W m−2 K, h | 70.61 W m−2 K |
16 | Friction factor, fr | 0.01889 |
17 | Nusselt number, Nu | 172.03 |
AU.1: Duct hydraulic diameter, D h
where W = 160 mm, H = 40 mm.
Dh = 64 mm
Using Eq. (AU.0);
= 0.1%
AU.2: Duct area, A duc
Aduc = WH = 6400 mm2
= 40 mm
= 160 mm.
Using Eq. (AU.0);
= 0.1288%
AU.3: Area of absorber plate, AP
AP = WLd.
\(\frac{\partial {A}_{\text{p}}}{\partial W}={L}_{\text{d}}\) = 1240 mm.
\(\frac{\partial {A}_{\text{p}}}{\partial {L}_{\text{d}}}=W\) = 160 mm.
Using Eq. (AU.0);
AU.4: Orifice throat area, A ori
Aori = \(\left( {\frac{\pi }{4}D_{0}^{2} } \right)\) = 1256.6 mm2.
Derivatives was written as:
Using Eq. (AU.0);
= 0.25%
AU.5: Mass flow rate,\(\mathop {\varvec{m}}\limits^{*}\)
\(\mathop m\limits^{*}\) = fn [Cd, Aori, Patm, To, (∆P) o].
Using Eq. (AU.0);
As δCd/Cd = 1.6%
δAori/Aori = 0.25%
δ (∆P)o/(∆P)o = (0.001/1108.53).
δ \(\mathop m\limits^{*}\)/\(\mathop m\limits^{*}\) = 0.01683 = 1.68%
AU.6: Air density, ρ a
Using Eq. (AU.0);
Substituting the values of
and
AU.7: Velocity of air, V a
Using Eq. (AU.0);
AU.8: Heat transfer, Q conv
Using Eq. (AU.0);
AU.9: Heat transfer coefficient, h
Using Eq. (AU.0);
AU.10: Nusselt number, Nu
Nusselt number is calculated by,
Using Eq. (AU.0);
As, δka = 0.00001 W/mK,
AU.11: Reynolds number, Re
Reynolds number evaluated by;
Using Eq. (AU.0);
As δµ = 0.001 N-s/m2,
AU.12: Friction factor, f r
The friction factor is written as;
Using Eq. (AU.0);
Sl. no | Parameters | Values | Uncertainty % |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mass flow of air, \(\mathop m\limits^{*}\) kg/s | 0.0053–0.0404 | 1.68–3.01 |
2 | Heat transfer coefficient, h, W/m2 K | 9.12–70.61 | 3.12–6.56 |
3 | Nusselt number, Nu | 22.02–172.03 | 3.12–6.00 |
4 | Friction factor, fr | 0.01888–0.04149 | 3.91–6.45 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, A., Layek, A. Thermo-hydraulic performance of solar air heater having winglet type roughness element. J Therm Anal Calorim 147, 10481–10495 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-022-11286-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-022-11286-8