Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the ground aggregate paste (GAP) test for aggregate alkali–silica reactivity screening

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the potential of a laboratory test for the screening of aggregate reactivity to alkali–silica reaction (ASR) through phase analysis of the phases developed in ground aggregate paste (GAP) specimens subjected to accelerated ageing. GAPs were prepared using two aggregates categorised as non-reactive and potentially reactive by standard expansion test methods and were aged at 40, 60 and 80 °C in 1 M NaOH solution over periods up to 84 days. Phase development was monitored using TG, XRD and FTIR, and the reactivity was correlated with quartz and calcium hydroxide consumption. The data demonstrate that this test has the potential to be developed as a screening test, based on the correlation of phase consumption with Australian standard expansion test reactivity categorisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fournier B, Berube MA. Alkali–aggregate reaction in concrete: a review of basic concepts and engineering implications. Can J Civ Eng. 2000;27(2):167–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rajabipour F, Giannini E, Dunant C, Ideker JH, Thomas MDA. Alkali–silica reaction: current understanding of the reaction mechanisms and the knowledge gaps. Cem Concr Res. 2015;76:130–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ichikawa T. Alkali–silica reaction, pessimum effects and pozzolanic effect. Cem Concr Res. 2009;39(8):716–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Saha AS, Khan MNN, Sarker PK, Shaikh FA, Pramanik A. The ASR mechanism of reactive aggregates in concrete and its mitigation by fly ash: a critical review. Constr Build Mater. 2018;171:743–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Šachlová Š, Přikryl R, Pertold Z. Alkali–silica reaction products: comparison between samples from concrete structures and laboratory test specimens. Mater Charact. 2010;61(12):1379–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hou X, Struble LJ, Kirkpatrick RJ. Formation of ASR gel and the roles of C–S–H and Portlandite. Cem Concr Res. 2004;34:1683–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawamura M, Iwahori K. ASR gel composition and expansive pressure in mortars under restraint. Cem Concr Compos. 2004;26:47–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas MDA. The effect of supplementary cementing materials on alkali–silica reaction: a review. Cem Concr Res. 2011;41(12):1224–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. HB79:2015, Alkali Aggregate reaction—Guidelines on minimising the risk of damage to concrete structures in Australia. 2015, Standards Australia.

  10. Sirivivatnanon V, Mohammadi J, South W. Reliability of new Australian test methods in predicting alkali silica reaction of field concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2016;126:868–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. AS1141.60.1:2014, Methods for sampling and testing aggregates, Method 60.1: Potential alkali–silica reactivity—Accelerated mortar bar method. 2014, Standards Australia.

  12. AS1141.60.2:2014, Concrete prism test for assessment of alkali silica reaction in concrete aggregate. 2014, Standards Australia.

  13. Thomas M, Fournier B, Folliard K, Ideker J, Shehata M. Test methods for evaluating preventive measures for controlling expansion due to alkali–silica reaction in concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2006;36:1842–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fernandes I, Hooton D, Andiç-Çakır Ö. Assessing aggregates for alkali–aggregate reaction potential. Constr Mater. 2016;168:172–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lindgård J, Rønning TF, Fournier B, Thomas MDA. Alkali–aggregate reaction: performance testing, exposure sites and regulations. Constr Mater. 2016;169:189–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chatterji S. Chemistry of alkali–silica reaction and testing of aggregates. Cement Concr Compos. 2005;27:788–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bérubé M-A, Fournier B. Canadian experience with testing for alkali–aggregate reactivity in concrete. Cement Concr Compos. 1993;15:27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. RILEM Recommended Test Method: AAR-4.1: detection of potential alkali–reactivity − 60°C test method for aggregate combinations using concrete prisms. In: Nixon PJ, Simms I, editors, RILEM recommendations for the prevention of damage by alkali–ggregate reactions in new concrete structures. State-of-the-Art Reports of the RILEM Technical Committee 219-ACS, vol. 17, pp. 99–116, 2016.

  19. Kim T, Olek J. Effects of sample preparation and interpretation of thermogravimetric curves on calcium hydroxide in hydrated pastes and mortars. Transp Res Rec. 2012;2290:10–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Martín-Garrido M, Martínez-Ramírez S. CO2 adsorption on calcium silicate hydrate gel synthesized by double decomposition method. J Therm Anal Calc. 2020;9:9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09374-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Glasser LSD, Kataoka N. The chemistry of alkali aggregate reaction. Cem Concr Res. 1981;11:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge UTS CareerHub, the Australian Research Council Research Hub for Nanoscience Based Construction Materials Manufacturing (NANOCOMM) and Cement, Concrete and Aggregates Australia (CCAA) for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Thomas.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boyd-Weetman, B., Thomas, P. Assessment of the ground aggregate paste (GAP) test for aggregate alkali–silica reactivity screening. J Therm Anal Calorim 142, 1635–1641 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09768-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09768-8

Keywords

Navigation