Skip to main content

Mortar Bar Test for Reactive Aggregate Detection: A Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 (CSCE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 239))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 689 Accesses

Abstract

Cement industry consumes annually around 5% of total industrial energy and results in about 8% of the total global carbon dioxide emissions. Therefore, there is a burgeoning interest in finding alternative binders with lower environmental impacts. Among several promising alternatives, alkali-activated materials (AAMs) are attractive for many researchers. However, there are many concerns about the suitability and accuracy of conventional testing methods for evaluating AAM performance. One of the common concrete degradation mechanism in Quebec is the alkali-silica reaction. Many tests are available for evaluating aggregate reactivity. However, the accelerated mortar bar test is being used extensively due to its short testing duration. Therefore, this paper provides a review of the history of the mortar bar test, highlighting concerns about its feasibility for testing AAM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alaejos P, Lanza V, Bermúdez MA, Velasco A (2014) Effectiveness of the accelerated mortar bar test to detect rapid reactive aggregates (including their pessimum content) and slowly reactive aggregates. Cem Concr Res 58:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bakharev T (2005) Geopolymeric materials prepared using Class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing. Cem Concr Res 35:1224–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bérubé MA, Duchesne J, Dorion JF, Rivest M (2002) Laboratory assessment of alkali contribution by aggregates to concrete and application to concrete structures affected by alkali-silica reactivity. Cem Concr Res 32:1215–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bulteel D, Garcia-Diaz E, Vernet C, Zanni H (2002) Alkali-silica Reaction: A Method to Quantify the Reaction Degree. Cem Concr Res 32:1199–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chatterji S (1978) An accelerated method for the detection of alkali-aggregate reactivities of aggregates. Cem Concr Res 8(5):647–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Comby-Perot F, Bernard P-O, Bouchard F, Bay E-D (2009) Development and validation of a 3D computational tool to describe concrete behaviour at mesoscale. Application to the alkali–silica reaction. Comput Mater Sci 46(4):1163–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Donnell KM, Zoughi R, Kurtis KE (2013) Demonstration of microwave method for detection of alkali–silica reaction (ASR) gel in cement-based materials. Cem Concr Res 44:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernández-Jiménez A, Puertas F (2002) The alkali-silica reaction in alkali-activated granulated slag mortars with reactive aggregate. Cem Concr Res 32:1019–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fournier B, Berube MA (1991) Application of the NBRI accelerated mortar bar test to siliceous carbonate aggregates produced in the St. Lawrence lowlands Part 2: proposed limits, rates of expansion, and microstructure of reaction products. Cem Concr Res 21:1069–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fournier B, Bérubé MA (1993) General notions on alkali-aggregate reactions. Petrography and Alkali-Aggregate Reactivity, CANMET, Ottawa, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  11. Golmakani F, Hooton RD (2019) Impact of pore solution concentration on the accelerated mortar bar alkali-silica reactivity test. Cem Concr Res 12:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Helmuth R (1993) Alkali-Silica reactivity: an overview of research. washington: strategic highway research program SHRP-C-342, National Research Council. Dent Glasser & Kataoka, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hooton RD, Rogers CA (1992) The development of the NBRI rapid mortar bar test leading to its use in north America. In: 9th international conference on Alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete, pp 461–467

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huang G, Zhang L, Li J, Hou Z (2018) "The influence of curing methods on the strength of MSWI bottom ash-based alkali-activated mortars: the role of leaching of OH and free alkali. Constr Build Mater 186:978–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jensen V (1996) Present experience with aggregate testing in Norway. In: 10th international conference on Alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete, pp 133–142

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kawabata Y, Yamada K, Sagawa Y, Ogawa S (2018) Alkali-wrapped concrete prism test (AW-CPT)–new testing protocol toward a performance test against alkali-silica reaction. J Adv Concr Technol 16:441–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khan M, Saha AK, Sarker PK (2021) Evaluation of the ASR of waste glass fine aggregate in alkali activated concrete by concrete prism tests. Constr Build Mater 266, Part B: Article 121121

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kuroda T, Inoue S, Yoshino A (2000) ASR expansion characteristics of mortar bars immersed in NaOH solution by autoclave method. In: 11th international conference on alkali aggregate reaction, pp 375–384

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kurtis KE, Collins CL, Monteiro PJ (2002) The surface chemistry of the alkali-silica reaction: a critical evaluation and x-ray microscopy. Concrete Sci Eng 4:11

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mahanama D, De Silva P, Kim T, Castel A, Khan MSH (2019) Evaluating effect of GGBFS in alkali-silica reaction in geopolymer mortar with accelerated mortar bar test. J Mater Civ Eng 31:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002804

  21. Multon S, Sellier A, Cyr M (2009) Chemo–mechanical modeling for prediction of alkali silica reaction (ASR) expansion. Cem Concr Res 39:490–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saha AK (2018) A comparative study between ASTM C1567 and ASTM C227 to mitigate alkali-silica reaction. Struct Concr 20(1):420–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. US Army Corps of Engineers (1994) Alkali–Silica aggregate reactions: standard practice for concrete for civil works. US Army Corps of Engineers Headquarters, Washington, DC, USA, EM 1110-2-2000

    Google Scholar 

  24. Visser JHM (2002) Fundamentals of alkali-silica gel formation and swelling: condensation under influence of dissolved salts. Cem Concr Res 105:18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang W, Noguchi T (2020) Alkali-silica reaction (ASR) in the alkali-activated cement (AAC) system: a state-of-the-art review. Constr Build Mater 252. Article 119105

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xie Z, Xiang W, Xi Y (2003) ASR potentials of glass aggregates in water-glass activated fly ash and Portland cement mortars. J Mater Civ Eng 15:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Martinez, A., Fournier, B., Soliman, A., Diab, S. (2023). Mortar Bar Test for Reactive Aggregate Detection: A Review. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 . CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 239. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0503-2_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0503-2_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0502-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0503-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics