Abstract
The present work addresses to analyse the heat transfer enhancement of unsteady laminar incompressible MHD flow of couple stress nanofluid through a rectangular squeezing channel with thermal radiation. The governing transport equations are reduced into an ordinary differential equation using relevant similar transformations and then solved numerically with the shooting method Runge–Kutta fourth-order scheme. The results are sketched as two-dimensional graphs and explained in detail for flow and heat transfer with non-dimensional physical parameters. Further calculated the skin friction and heat transfer rates at the upper plate. The axial velocity of engine oil/ethylene glycol has been increased by β and Da−1 towards the centre of the channel decreased for squeezing, and it is opposite for the separation case. The numerical results have good agreement with published work for temperature profile.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- h :
-
Origin-to-wall distance \(\left( {\text{m}} \right),\;H\sqrt {\left( {1 - \alpha t} \right)}\)
- α :
-
Wall motion parameter (s−1)
- \(v_{\text{w}}\) :
-
Velocity of the wall (m s−1)
- T r :
-
Reference temperature at the wall (℃)
- T 0 :
-
Temparature (℃) at y = 0
- ρ :
-
Density of the fluid (Kg m−3)
- p :
-
Pressure (Kg m s−2)
- μ :
-
Viscosity of the parameter (Kg m−1 s−1)
- υ :
-
Kinematic viscosity (m s−1)
- σ :
-
Electrical conductivity of the fluid (S m−1)
- B 0 :
-
Magnetic field strength (Wb m−2)
- c :
-
Specific heat constant (J Kg−1 K−1)
- k 1 :
-
Thermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1)
- \(\bar{J}\) :
-
Current density (A m−2),
- \(\bar{B}\) :
-
Magnetic field vector (T)
- \(\bar{E}\) :
-
Electric field (V m−1)
- \(\mu_{e}\) :
-
Magnetic permeability (NA−2)
- \(\rho_{\text{f}}\) :
-
Density of the base fluid
- \(\rho_{\text{p}}\) :
-
Density of the nanoparticle
- \(\rho_{\text{nf}}\) :
-
Density of the nanofluid
- \(\upsilon\) :
-
Kinematic viscosity
- \(\mu_{\text{f}}\) :
-
Dynamic viscosity of the nanofluid
- f:
-
Fluid
- p:
-
Solid
- nf:
-
Nanofluid
References
Gupta PS, Gupta AS. squeezing flow between parallel plates. Wear. 1977;45(2):177–85.
Bujurke NM, Achar PK, Pai NP. Computer extended series for squeezing flow between plates. Fluid Dyn Res. 1995;16(2–3):173.
Khan U, Ahmed N, Khan SI, Zaidi ZA, Xiao-Jun Y, Mohyud-Din ST. On unsteady two-dimensional and axisymmetric squeezing flow between parallel plates. Alex Eng J. 2014;53(2):463–8.
Mustafa M, Hayat T, Obaidat S. On heat and mass transfer in the unsteady squeezing flow between parallel plates. Meccanica. 2012;47(7):1581–9.
Shah RA, Anjum MN, Khan MS. Analysis of unsteady squeezing flow between two porous plates with variable magnetic field. Int J Adv Eng Man Sci. 2017;3(1):189.
Ahmed N, Khan U, Khan SI, Bano S, Mohyud-Din ST. Effects on magnetic field in squeezing flow of a Casson fluid between parallel plates. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2017;29(1):119–25.
Reddy GK, Yarrakula K, Raju CSK, Rahbari A. Mixed convection analysis of variable heat source/sink on MHD Maxwell, Jeffrey, and Oldroyd-B nanofluids over a cone with convective conditions using Buongiorno’s model. J Thermal Anal Calorim. 2018;132(3):1995–2002.
Stefan MJ. Versuch Uber die scheinbare adhesion, Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. Mathwmatisch–Naturwissenschaftliche. 1874;69:713–21.
Sheikholeslami M, Ganji DD, Ashorynejad HR. Investigation of squeezing unsteady nanofluid flow using ADM. Powder Techol. 2013;2013(239):259–65.
Pourmehran O, Rahimi-Gorji M, Gorji-Bandpy M, Ganji DD. Analytical investigation of squeezing unsteady nanofluid flow between parallel plates by LSM and CM. Alex Eng J. 2015;54(1):17–26.
Domairry G, Hatami M. Squeezing Cu–water nanofluid flow analysis between parallel plates by DTM—Padé Method. J Mol Liq. 2014;2014(193):37–44.
Lu L, Liu LH, Li XX. Investigation of Squeezing Unsteady Nanofluid Flow Using the Modified Decomposition Method, CMES: Comp. Mod Eng Sci. 2014;101(1):1–15.
Khan U, Ahmed N, Asadullah M, Mohyud-din ST. Effects of viscous dissipation and slip velocity on two-dimensional and axisymmetric squeezing flow of Cu-water and Cu-kerosene nanofluids. Propulsion Power Res. 2015;4(1):40–9.
Acharya N, Das K, Kundu PK. The squeezing flow of Cu-water and Cu-kerosene nanofluids between two parallel plates. Alex Eng J. 2016;55(2):1177–86.
Sheikholeslami M, Ghasemi A. Solidification heat transfer of nanofluid in existence of thermal radiation by means of FEM. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;2018(123):418–31.
Sheikholeslami Mohsen, Seyednezhad Mohadeseh. Simulation of nanofluid flow and natural convection in a porous media under the influence of electric field using CVFEM. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;2018(120):772–81.
Sheikholeslami M, Rizwan-ul H, Ahmad S, Li Z. Heat transfer behavior of nanoparticle enhanced PCM solidification through an enclosure with V shaped fins. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;2019(130):1322–42.
Sheikholeslami M. Finite element method for PCM solidification in existence of CuO nanoparticles. J Mol Liq. 2018;2018(265):347–55.
Sheikholeslami M, Jafaryar M, Li Z. Nanofluid turbulent convective flow in a circular duct with helical turbulators considering CuO nanoparticles. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;2018(124):980–9.
Sheikholeslami M. New computational approach for exergy and entropy analysis of nanofluid under the impact of Lorentz force through a porous media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2019;2019(344):319–33.
Atlas M, Haq RU, Mekkaoui T. Active and zero flux of nanoparticles between a squeezing channel with thermal radiation effects. J Mol Liq. 2016;2016(223):289–98.
Sheikholeslami M, Mikhail AS, Ahmad S, Iskander T. Simulation of nanoliquid thermogravitational convection within a porous chamber imposing magnetic and radiation impacts. Physica A Stat Mech Appl. 2020;146:124058.
Madaki AG, Roslan R, Mohamed M, Kamardan MG. Analytical solutions of squeezing unsteady nanofluid flow in the presence of thermal radiation. J Comput Sci Comput Math. 2016;2016(6):451–63.
Dogonchi AS, Divsalar K, Ganji DD. Flow and heat transfer of MHD nanofluid between parallel plates in the presence of thermal radiation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2016;2016(310):58–76.
Hayat T, Jabeen S, Shafiq A, Alsaedi A. Radiative squeezing flow of second grade fluid with convective boundary conditions. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(4):e0152555.
Hayat T, Qayyum A, Alsaadi F, Awais M, Dobaie AM. Thermal radiation effects in squeezing flow of a Jeffery fluid. Euro Phys J Plus. 2013;128(8):85.
Kandasamy R, Muhaimin I, Khamis AB, Bin RR. Unsteady Hiemenz flow of Cu-nanofluid over a porous wedge in the presence of thermal stratification due to solar energy radiation: Lie group transformation. Int J Ther Sci. 2013;2013(65):196–205.
Palaniammal S, Saritha K. Heat and mass transfer of a casson nanofluid flow over a porous surface with dissipation, radiation, and chemical reaction. IEEE Trans Nanotechol. 2017;16(6):909–18.
Kambhatla PK, Ojjela O, Das KS. Viscoelastic model of ethylene glycol with temperature – dependent thermophysical properties. J Anal Calorimer. 2019;135(2):1257–68.
Aman S, Khan I, Ismail Z, Salleh MZ. Impacts of gold nanoparticles on MHD mixed convection Poiseuille flow of nanofluid passing through a porous medium in the presence of thermal radiation, thermal diffusion and chemical reaction. Neural Comput Appl. 2018;30(3):789–97.
Hayat T, Sajjad R, Alsaedi A, Muhammad T, Ellahi R. On squeezed flow of couple stress nanofluid between two parallel plates. Results Phys. 2017;19(11):553–61.
Awad F, Haroun NAH, Sibanda P, Khumalo M. On couple stress effects on unsteady nanofluid flow over stretching surfaces with vanishing nanoparticle flux at the wall. J Appl Fluid Mech. 2016;9(4):1937–44.
Adesanya S, Ogunseye H, Falade J, Lebelo RS. Thermodynamic analysis for buoyancy-induced couple stress nanofluid flow with constant heat flux. Entropy. 2017;19(11):580.
Khan NA, Sultan F, Riaz F, Jamil M. Investigation of combined heat and mass transfer between vertical parallel plates in a two-layer flow of couple stress nanofluid. Open Eng. 2016;6(1):35–43.
Ramzan M. Influence of Newtonian heating on three dimensional MHD flow of couple stress nanofluid with viscous dissipation and joule heating. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):1–24.
Opanuga AA, Gbadeyan JA, Iyase SA. Second law analysis of hydromagnetic couple stress fluid embedded in a non-darcian porous medium. Int J Appl Math. 2017;47(3):159.
Wang CY. The squeezing of a fluid between two plates. J Appl Mech. 1976;1976(43):579–83.
Haq RU, Nadeem S, Khan ZH, Noor NFM. Convective heat transfer in MHD slip flow over a stretching surface in the presence of carbon nanotubes. Physica B Condens Matter. 2015;457:40–7.
Mittal RC, Pandit S. Numerical simulation of unsteady squeezing nanofluid and heat flow between two parallel plates using wavelets. Int J Therm Sci. 2017;2017(118):410–22.
Acknowledgements
One of the authors (A.R) is grateful to the Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Government of India for providing financial assistance in the form of Junior Research Fellowship (DIAT/F/Acad (PhD)/1613/15-52-09).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
See (Fig. 8).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raju, A., Ojjela, O. & Kambhatla, P.K. A comparative study of heat transfer analysis on ethylene glycol or engine oil as base fluid with gold nanoparticle in presence of thermal radiation. J Therm Anal Calorim 145, 2647–2660 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09757-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09757-x