Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of curing time on the hydration and material properties of cold-bonded high-calcium fly ash–Portland cement lightweight aggregate

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Artificial aggregates, such as fly ash lightweight aggregates, can be used as eco-friendly alternatives to natural aggregates. This work aims to investigate the effect of curing time on the hydration and material properties (voids, shrinkage, crushing strength and pH) of cold-bonded high-calcium fly ash–Portland cement lightweight aggregate. Fly ash was used as a lightweight material (at 90% by mass), and Portland cement was used at 10% by mass. A 100% FA lightweight aggregate was also prepared for comparison. Thermogravimetry (TG) and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) were performed at three different curing times (0, 3 and 28 days). Shrinkage test specimens were kept in sealed bags and exposed to air curing conditions and were measured at 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days. Calcium silicate hydrate, calcium hydroxide and calcium carbonate were observed in both mixes (100FA and 90FA10PC). The TG showed that the calcium silicate hydrate phase increased when 10% Portland cement was used compared to that of the 100FA mix. Furthermore, with increasing curing time, the calcium silicate hydrate phase increased while the calcium hydroxide phase decreased due to pozzolanic and hydration reactions. The shrinkage of fly ash lightweight aggregate with 10% Portland cement had a lower value than that of the 100FA mix for different curing conditions due to the effect of pore refinement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Toniolo N, Boccaccini AR. Fly ash-based geopolymers containing added silicate waste. Ceram Int. 2017;43(17):14545–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baig Moghal AA. State-of-the-art review on the role of fly ashes in geotechnical and geoenvironmental applications. J Mater Civ Eng. 2017;29(8):04017072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ASTM C 618-01. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use as a mineral admixture in concrete. 2001.

  4. Giergiczny Z. The hydraulic activity of high calcium fly ash. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2006;83:227–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hulan T, Trnik A, Kaljuvee T, Uibu M, Stubna I, Kallavus U, Traksmaa R. The study of firing of a ceramic body made from illite and fluidized bed combustion fly ash. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;127:79–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Damdelen O. Investigation of 30% recycled coarse aggregate content in sustainable concrete mixes. Constr Build Mater. 2018;184:408–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Owens PL, Newman JB. Lightweight aggregate manufacture. In: Newman JB, Choo BS, editors. Advanced concrete technology: constituent materials. Oxford: Elsevier; 2003. p. 244–55.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chandra S, Berntsson L. Lightweight aggregate concrete. New York: William Andrew; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mehta PK, Monteiro PJM. Concrete: microstructure, properties, and materials. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yliniemi J, Nugteren H, Illikainen M, Tiainen M, Weststrate R, Niinimäki J. Lightweight aggregates produced by granulation of peat-wood fly ash with alkali activator. Int J Miner Process. 2016;149:42–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tajra F, Elrahman MA, Stephan D. The production and properties of cold-bonded aggregate and its applications in concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater. 2019;225:29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Geetha S, Ramamurthy K. Environmental friendly technology of cold-bonded bottom ash aggregate manufacture through chemical activation. J Clean Prod. 2010;18(15):1563–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Colangelo F, Messina F, Cioffi R. Recycling of MSWI fly ash by means of cementitious double step cold bonding pelletization: technological assessment for the production of lightweight artificial aggregates. J Hazard Mater. 2015;299:181–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tuncel EY, Pekmezci BY. A sustainable cold bonded lightweight PCM aggregate production: its effects on concrete properties. Constr Build Mater. 2018;181:199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gesoglu M, Ozturan T, Guneyisi E. Effects of fly ash properties on characteristics of cold-bonded fly ash lightweight aggregates. Constr Build Mater. 2007;21(9):1869–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baykal G, Doven AG. Utilization of fly ash by pelletization process; theory, application areas and research results. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2000;30(1):59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gesoglu M, Guneyisi E, Oz HO. Properties of lightweight aggregates produced with cold-bonding pelletization of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag. Mater Struct. 2012;45:1535–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Narattha C, Chaipanich A. Phase characterizations, physical properties and strength of environment-friendly cold-bonded fly ash lightweight aggregates. J Clean Prod. 2018;171:1094–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Narattha C, Chaipanich A. Thermal analysis and phase formation of eco-friendly cold-bonded high-calcium fly ash–calcium hydroxide lightweight aggregate at various curing time. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;138:2123–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. ASTM C 642-97. Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. 1997.

  21. BS 812-110. Testing aggregates, part 110: methods for determination of aggregate crushing value (ACV). 1990.

  22. Sukmak P, De Silva P, Horpibulsuk S, Chindaprasirt P. Sulfate resistance of clay-Portland cement and clay high-calcium fly ash geopolymer. J Mater Civ Eng. 2015;27(5):04014158-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilinska I, Pacewska B. Influence of selected activating methods on hydration processes of mixtures containing high and very high amount of fly ash. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;133:823–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mendoza O, Tobon JI. An alternative thermal method for identification of pozzolanic activity in Ca(OH)2/pozzolan pastes. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;114:589–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang Q, Ye G. Quantitative analysis of phase transition of heated Portland cement paste. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;112:629–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vessalas K, Thomas PS, Ray AS, Guerbois JP, Joyce P, Haggman J. Pozzolanic reactivity of the supplementary cementitious material pitchstone fines by thermogravimetric analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;97:71–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ipavec A, Gabrovsek R, Vuk T, Kaucic V, Macek J, Meden A. Carboaluminate phases formation during the hydration of calcite-containing Portland cement. J Am Ceram Soc. 2011;94(4):1238–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bizzozero J, Scrivener KL. Limestone reaction in calcium aluminate cement–calcium sulfate systems. Cem Concr Res. 2015;76:159–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun J, Shen X, Tan G, Tanner JE. Compressive strength and hydration characteristics of high-volume fly ash concrete prepared from fly ash. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;136:565–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramezanianpour AA. Cement replacement materials. Heidelberg: Springer; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Scrivener K, Snellings R, Lothenbach B. A practical guide to microstructural analysis of cementitious materials. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Papadakis VG. Effect of fly ash on Portland cement systems part II. High-calcium fly ash. Cem Concr Res. 2000;30(10):1647–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sheng G, Li Q, Zhai J, Li F. Self-cementitious properties of fly ashes from CFBC boilers co-firing coal and high-sulphur petroleum coke. Cem Concr Res. 2007;37:871–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ropp RC. Encyclopedia of the alkaline earth compounds. Oxford: Elsevier; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rodriguez ET, Garbev K, Merz D, Black L, Richardson IG. Thermal stability of C–S–H phases and applicability of Richardson and Groves’ and Richardson C–(A)–S–H(I) models to synthetic C–S–H. Cem Concr Res. 2017;93:45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Siddique R, Khan MI. Supplementary cementing materials. Berlin: Springer; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang Q, Ye G. Dehydration kinetics of Portland cement paste at high temperature. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;110:153–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Goodwin RW. Combustion ash residue management. 2nd ed. Oxford: William Andrew; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  39. De Weerdt K, Ben Haha M, Le Saout G, Kjellsen KO, Justnes H, Lothenbach B. Hydration mechanisms of ternary Portland cements containing limestone powder and fly ash. Cem Concr Res. 2011;41(3):279–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dueramae S, Tangchirapat W, Chindaprasirt P, Jaturapitakkul C, Sukontasukkul P. Autogenous and drying shrinkages of mortars and pore structure of pastes made with activated binder of calcium carbide residue and fly ash. Constr Build Mater. 2020;230:116962.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wongkeo W, Thongsanitgarn P, Ngamjarurojana A, Chaipanich A. Compressive strength and chloride resistance of self-compacting concrete containing high level fly ash and silica fume. Mater Des. 2014;64:261–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hogancamp J, Grasley Z. The use of microfine cement to enhance the efficacy of carbon nanofibers with respect to drying shrinkage crack resistance of portland cement mortars. Cem Concr Compos. 2017;83:405–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ma XW, Liu JH, Wu ZM, Shi CJ. Effects of SAP on the properties and pore structure of high performance cement-based materials. Constr Build Mater. 2017;131:476–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The funding provided by Chiang Mai University under the CMU 50th Anniversary PhD Grant (PHD/015/2556) is acknowledged. The authors would like to thank the Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University. The authors also acknowledge the Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) formerly known as the Thailand Research Fund for the Research Scholar Award given to Assoc. Prof. Dr. Arnon Chaipanich. This research work was partially supported by Chiang Mai University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnon Chaipanich.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Narattha, C., Chaipanich, A. Effect of curing time on the hydration and material properties of cold-bonded high-calcium fly ash–Portland cement lightweight aggregate. J Therm Anal Calorim 145, 2277–2286 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09730-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09730-8

Keywords

Navigation