Abstract
In this study, the thermal and flow characteristics of a nanofluid were evaluated numerically in a circular finned double-pipe heat exchanger. A 3D CFD model was employed to study the effects of nanofluid properties and fin configuration on the friction coefficient, Nu number and thermal performance. The effects of Al2O3 nanoparticles at the volume concentration of 1–2% were considered for both Newtonian and non-Newtonian turbulent flow in the annulus side with an insulated outer surface and constant heat flux inner tube. A numerical analysis is conducted for different values of Re numbers of 5000–100,000, fin heights (1, 2 and 3 mm) and fin pitches (80, 160 and 320 mm). The results showed that the use of circular fin increases the heat transfer 36% and 30% for Newtonian and non-Newtonian nanofluid, respectively. The Nu number was increased by enhancing Al2O3 volume concentration and Re number. A thermal performance evaluation was carried out to study the conflict between heat transfer and pressure drop. Although the simultaneous use of the fins and nanoparticles improves the thermal behavior of Newtonian fluid but decreases the thermal performance for non-Newtonian fluid due to a penalty in pressure drop. Therefore, in this research adding nanoparticles to non-Newtonian fluid is suggested without any inserts in the annulus.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- C 2 :
-
Model constant
- \(C_{\text{p}}\) :
-
Specific heat, J kg−1 K−1
- C μ :
-
Model parameter
- D :
-
Tube diameter, m
- D h :
-
Hydraulic diameter, m
- f :
-
Darcy–Weisbach friction factor
- h :
-
Fin height, m
- k :
-
Turbulent kinetic energy, m2 s−2
- K :
-
Consistency index, kg sn−2 m−1
- L :
-
Pipe length, m
- n :
-
Behavior index
- Nu:
-
Nusselt number
- p :
-
Pressure, Pa
- Pc:
-
Peclet number
- Pr:
-
Prandtl number
- q :
-
Heat flux, W m−2
- \(r^{*}\) :
-
Radios ratio
- Re:
-
Reynolds number
- S :
-
Fin pitch, m
- t :
-
Fin thickness, m
- T :
-
Temperature, K
- u :
-
Velocity component in flow direction, m s−1
- uʹ:
-
Root-mean-square turbulent velocity fluctuation, m s−1
- x, y, z :
-
Cartesian coordinates
- CFD:
-
Computational fluid dynamic
- CMC:
-
Carboxymethyl cellulose
- DPHE:
-
Double-pipe heat exchanger
- Δ:
-
Difference operator
- δ ii :
-
Dirac delta function
- ε :
-
Turbulent dissipation rate, m2 s−3
- η :
-
Thermal performance
- \(\eta^{\prime}\) :
-
Apparent viscosity
- θ :
-
Angular coordinate
- λ :
-
Thermal conductivity, W m−1 K−1
- μ :
-
Dynamic viscosity, kg ms−1
- ρ :
-
Density, kg m−3
- \(\sigma_{\uptau}\) :
-
Turbulent Prandtl number in energy equation
- \(\sigma_{\text{k}}\) :
-
Diffusion Prandtl number for k
- \(\sigma_{\upvarepsilon}\) :
-
Diffusion Prandtl number for ε
- ϕ :
-
Nanoparticles volume concentration
- b:
-
Bulk quantity
- bf:
-
Base fluid
- i:
-
Inner or inlet
- i, j, k:
-
General spatial indices
- nf:
-
Nanofluid
- o:
-
Outer or outlet
- S:
-
Smooth
- T:
-
Turbulent quantity
- w:
-
wall
References
Zhang G. Design charts for circular fins of arbitrary profile subject to radiation and convection with wall resistances. Open Thermodyn J. 2012;6:15–24. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874396X01206010015.
AbdelRazek A, Kazi SN, Alawi OA, Yusoff N, Sean Oon C, Ali H. Heat transfer and pressure drop investigation through pipe with different shapes using different types of nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08562-5.
Mahian O, Kolsi L, Amani M, Estellé P, Ahmadi G, Kleinstreuer C, et al. Recent advances in modeling and simulation of nanofluid flows-part I: fundamentals and theory. Phys Rep. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.004.
Sharma S. Fabricating an experimental setup to investigate the performance of an automobile car radiator by using aluminum/water nanofluid. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;133:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7224-9.
Bhattad A, Sarkar J, Ghosh P. Improving the performance of refrigeration systems by using nanofluids: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.097.
Purohit N, Khangarot B, Gullo P, Purohit K, Dasgupta MS. Assessment of alumina nanofluid as a coolant in double pipe gas cooler for trans-critical CO2 refrigeration cycle. Energy Procedia. 2017;109:219–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.048.
Pordanjani A, Aghakhani S, Afrand M, Mahmoudi B, Mahian O, Wongwises S. An updated review on application of nanofluids in heat exchangers for saving energy. Energy Convers Manag. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111886.
Garg K, Khullar V, Das SK, Tyagi H. Parametric study of the energy efficiency of the HDH desalination unit integrated with nanofluid-based solar collector. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7547-6.
Bahiraei M. Impact of thermophoresis on nanoparticle distribution in nanofluids. Results Phys. 2017;7:136–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2016.12.012.
Alirezaie A, Hajmohammad MH, Alipour A, Salari M. Do nanofluids affect the future of heat transfer? “A benchmark study on the efficiency of nanofluids”. Energy. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.060.
Sergis A, Hardalupas Y. Anomalous heat transfer modes of nanofluids: a review based on statistical analysis. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2011;6:391. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-6-391.
Rashidi S, Eskandarian M, Mahian O, Poncet S. Combination of nanofluid and inserts for heat transfer enhancement: gaps and challenges. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;135:437–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7070-9.
Han D, He W, Asif F. Experimental study of heat transfer enhancement using nanofluid in double tube heat exchanger. Energy Procedia. 2017;142:2547–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.090.
Zamzamian SA, Nasseri Oskouie S, Doosthoseini A, Joneidi Jafari A, Pazouki M. Experimental investigation of forced convective heat transfer coefficient in nanofluids of Al2O3/EG and CuO/EG in a double pipe and plate heat exchangers under turbulent flow. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2011;35:495–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2010.11.013.
Yassin M, Shedid M, Abd El-Hameed H, Basheer A. Heat transfer augmentation for annular flow due to rotation of inner finned pipe. Int J Therm Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.05.033.
El-Maghlany W, Hanafy A, Hassan A, El-Magid MA. Experimental study of Cu–water nanofluid heat transfer and pressure drop in a horizontal double-tube heat exchanger. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.05.015.
Sonawane S, Khedkar R, Wasewar K. Study on concentric tube heat exchanger heat transfer performance using Al2O3–water based nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2013;49:60–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2013.10.001.
Maddah H, Aghayari R, Mirzaee M, Ahmadi M, Sadeghzadeh M, Chamkha A. Factorial experimental design for the thermal performance of a double pipe heat exchanger using Al2O3–TiO2 hybrid nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2018;97:92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2018.07.002.
Mohammadi M, Abadeh A, Nemati-Farouji R, Passandideh-Fard M. An optimization of heat transfer of nanofluid flow in a helically coiled pipe using Taguchi method. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08167-y.
Noorbakhsh M, Zaboli M, Mousavi Ajarostaghi S. Numerical evaluation of the effect of using twisted tapes as turbulator with various geometries in both sides of a double-pipe heat exchanger. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08509-w.
Hosseinnejad R, Hosseini M, Farhadi M. Turbulent heat transfer in tubular heat exchangers with twisted tape. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7400-y.
Feyza Akyürek E, Geliş K, Sahin B, Manay E. Experimental analysis for heat transfer of nanofluid with wire coil turbulators in a concentric tube heat exchanger. Results Phys. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.02.067.
Ghanbari S, Javaherdeh K. Investigation of applying nanoporous graphene non-Newtonian nanofluid on rheological properties and thermal performance in a turbulent annular flow with perforated baffles. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08389-0.
Mozafarie S, Javaherdeh K. Numerical design and heat transfer analysis of a non-Newtonian fluid flow for annulus with helical fins. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.03.001.
Bahiraei M, Mazaheri N, Rizehvandi A. Application of a hybrid nanofluid containing graphene nanoplatelet–platinum composite powder in a triple-tube heat exchanger equipped with inserted ribs. Appl Therm Eng. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.12.072.
Kumar N, Panitapu B, Mulat Addis B, Syam Sundar L, Singh M, Sousa A. Heat transfer, friction factor and effectiveness analysis of Fe3O4/water nanofluid flow in a double pipe heat exchanger with return bend. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2017;81:155–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.12.019.
Omidi M, Farhadi M, Jafari M. Numerical study on the effect of using spiral tube with lobed cross section in double-pipe heat exchangers. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7579-y.
Hashemian M, Jafarmadar S, Sadighi Dizaji H. A comprehensive numerical study on multi-criteria design analyses in a novel form (conical) of double pipe heat exchanger. Appl Therm Eng. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.057.
Togun H. Turbulent heat transfer to separation nanofluid flow in annular concentric pipe. Int J Therm Sci. 2017;117:14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2017.03.014.
Siavashi M, Miri Joibary SM. Numerical performance analysis of a counter-flow double-pipe heat exchanger with using nanofluid and both sides partly filled with porous media. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7829-z.
Mansoury D, Ilami Doshmanziari F, Rezaie S, Mehdi Rashidi M. Effect of Al2O3/water nanofluid on performance of parallel flow heat exchangers: an experimental approach. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7286-8.
Raei B, Shahraki F, Jamialahmadi M, Peyghambarzadeh SM. Experimental study on the heat transfer and flow properties of γ-Al2O3/water nanofluid in a double-tube heat exchanger. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5868-x.
Akbarzadeh M, Rashidi S, Keshmiri A, Shokri N. The optimum position of porous insert for a double-pipe heat exchanger based on entropy generation and thermal analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08362-x.
Beriache Mh, Che Sidik NA, Noor Afiq Witri Muhammad Yazid M, Mamat R, Najafi G, Kefayati G. A review on why researchers apply external magnetic field on nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2016;78:60–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.08.023.
Shakiba A, Vahedi K. Numerical analysis of magnetic field effects on hydro-thermal behavior of a magnetic nanofluid in a double pipe heat exchanger. J Magn Magn Mater. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.11.039.
Bahiraei M, Hangi M. Investigating the efficacy of magnetic nanofluid as a coolant in double-pipe heat exchanger in the presence of magnetic field. Energy Convers Manag. 2013;76:1125–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.09.008.
Heyhat M, Kowsary F, Rashidi A, Momenpour MH, Amrollahi A. Experimental investigation of laminar convective heat transfer and pressure drop of water-based Al2O3 nanofluids in fully developed flow regime. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2013;44:483–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.08.009.
Js J, Mahajani S, Mandal J, Vijayan PK, Bhoi R. Experimental CFD estimation of heat transfer in helically coiled heat exchanger. Chem Eng Res Des. 2008;86:221–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2007.10.021.
Liu Z, Yue Y, She L, Fan G. Numerical analysis of turbulent flow and heat transfer in internally finned tubes. Front Energy Res. 2019;7:64. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00064.
Js J, Mahajani S, Mandal J, Iyer K, Vijayan PK. CFD analysis of single-phase flows inside helically coiled tubes. Comput Chem Eng. 2010;34:430–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.11.008.
Aly W. Numerical study on turbulent heat transfer and pressure drop of nanofluid in coiled tube-in-tube heat exchangers. Energy Convers Manag. 2014;79:304–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.12.031.
Launder B, Spalding DB. Mathematical models of turbulence, vol. 53. London: Academic Press; 1972.
Fluent 6.2 user guide. Lebanon: Lebanon, NH; 2005.
Rios-Iribe E, Cervantes M, Castro Eusiel R, Ponce-Ortega J, González-Llanes M, Reyes Moreno C, et al. Heat transfer analysis of a non-Newtonian fluid flowing through a circular tube with twisted tape inserts. Appl Therm Eng. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.03.052.
Fotukian SM, Nasr Esfahany M. Experimental study of turbulent convective heat transfer and pressure drop of dilute CuO/water nanofluid inside a circular tube. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2010;37:214–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2009.10.003.
Hojjat M, Gholamreza Etemad S, Bagheri R, Thibault J. Rheological characteristics of non-Newtonian nanofluids: experimental investigation. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2011;38:144–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.11.019.
Lin Y, Zheng L, Zhang X. Radiation effects on Marangoni convection flow and heat transfer in pseudo-plastic non-Newtonian nanofluids with variable thermal conductivity. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2014;77:708–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.06.028.
Sheikholeslami M, Gorji-Bandpy M, Domiri Ganji D. Experimental study on turbulent flow and heat transfer in an air to water heat exchanger using perforated circular-ring. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.09.002.
Mahian O, Kolsi L, Amani M, Estellé P, Ahmadi G, Kleinstreuer C, et al. Recent advances in modeling and simulation of nanofluid flows—part II: applications. Phys Rep. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.003.
Bergman TL, DeWitt DP, Incropera F, Lavine AS. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. New York: Wiley; 2011.
Sefid M, Izadpanah E. Developing and fully developed non-Newtonian fluid flow and heat transfer through concentric annuli. J Heat Transf. 2013;135:071702. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023882.
Manglik RM, Fang P. Thermal processing of viscous non-Newtonian fluids in annular ducts: effects of power-law rheology, duct eccentricity, and thermal boundary conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2002;45:803–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(01)00186-7.
Capobianchi M, Irvine TF. Predictions of pressure drop and heat transfer in concentric annular ducts with modified power law fluids. Wärme- und Stoffübertragung. 1992;27:209–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01589918.
Lundberg RE, McCuen PA, Reynolds WC. Heat transfer in annular passages. Hydrodynamically developed laminar flow with arbitrarily prescribed wall temperatures or heat fluxes. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1963;6:495–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(63)90124-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mozafarie, S.S., Javaherdeh, K. & Ghanbari, O. Numerical simulation of nanofluid turbulent flow in a double-pipe heat exchanger equipped with circular fins. J Therm Anal Calorim 143, 4299–4311 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09364-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09364-w