Abstract
The use of agricultural wastes for energy conversion has been widely studied as renewable and carbon neutral energy sources. This paper aims to evaluate the energetic potential of six agricultural wastes—sugarcane bagasse, bean pods, corn stover, pineapple crown leaves, white cotton and natural coloured cotton stalks, through their characterization and pyrolysis kinetic study. The energetic potential of biomasses was evaluated by ultimate and proximate analysis, higher heating value (HHV), apparent density, and kinetic parameters of conversion and apparent activation energy (Ea) determined by Model-Free kinetics though thermogravimetric analysis data. The results indicate energetic density for dry basis biomasses, such as moisture content less than 7%, volatiles higher than 77% and moderate ash content. The HHVs were higher for the biomass with low O:C ratio. The Ea values increased with increasing O:C ratio and were also influenced by the biomass ash content. Among the studied biomasses, PCL are less explored for energy application, although the results confirm its potential for application in thermochemical processes such as pyrolysis or combustion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bridgwater AV. Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;38:68–94.
Czernik S, Bridgwater AV. Overview of applications of biomass fast pyrolysis oil. Energy Fuels. 2004;18:590–8.
Suriapparao DV, Vinu R. Effects of biomass particle size on slow pyrolysis kinetics and fast pyrolysis product distribution. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2018;9:465–77.
Osorio J, Chejne F. Bio-oil production in fluidized bed reactor at pilot plant from sugarcane bagasse by catalytic fast pyrolysis. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2018;9:1877–2641.
Mohan D, Pittman CU, Steele PH. Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy Fuels. 2006;20:848–89.
Madhu P, Livingston TS, Kanagasabapathy H. Flash pyrolysis of lemon grass (Cymbopogon flexuosus) for biooil production in an electrically heated fluidized bed reactor. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2018;9:1037–46.
Zhang R, Wang H, You Z, Jiang X, Yang X. Optimization of bio-asphalt using bio-oil and distilled water. J Clean Prod. 2017;165:281–9.
Gil-Lalaguna N, Bautista A, Gonzalo A, Sánchez JL, Arauzo J. Obtaining biodiesel antioxidant additives by hydrothermal treatment of lignocellulosic bio-oil. Fuel Proc Technol. 2017;166:1–7.
Arazoa RO, Lunab MDG, Capareda SC. Assessing biodiesel production from sewage sludge-derived bio-oil. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2017;10:189–96.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Levantamento Sistemático de Produção Agrícola. Rio de Janeiro. 2017;30:1–81.
Capunitan JA, Capareda SC. Assessing the potential for biofuel production of corn stover pyrolysis using a pressurized batch reactor. Fuel. 2012;95:563–72.
Cunha JA, Pereira MM, Valente LMM, Piscina PR, Homs N, Santos MRL. Waste biomass to liquids: low temperature conversion of sugarcane bagasse to bio-oil. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35:2106–16.
Qian Y, Zhang J, Wang J. Pressurized pyrolysis of rice husk in an inert gas sweeping fixed-bed reactor with a focus on bio-oil deoxygenation. Bioresour Technol. 2014;174:95–102.
Alvarez J, Lopez G, Amutio M, Bilbao J, Olazar M. Bio-oil production from rice husk fast pyrolysis in a conical spouted bed reactor. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2014;128:162–9.
Huang Y, Chiueh P, Kuan W, Lo S. Microwave pyrolysis of rice straw: products, mechanism, and kinetics. Bioresour Technol. 2013;142:620–4.
Ramajo-Escalera B, Espina A, García JR, Sosa-Arnao JH, Nebra SA. Model-free kinetics applied to sugarcane bagasse combustion. Thermochim Acta. 2006;448:111–6.
Aboyade AO, Hugo TJ, Carrier M, Meyer EL, Stahl R, Knoetze JH, Görgens JF. Non-isothermal kinetic analysis of the devolatilization of corn cobs and sugarcane bagasse in an inert atmosphere. Thermochim Acta. 2011;517:81–9.
Braga RM, Melo DMA, Aquino FM, Freitas JCO, Melo MAF, Barros JMF, Fontes MSB. Characterization and comparative study of pyrolysis kinetics of the rice husk and the elephant grass. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;115:1915–20.
Braga RM, Costa TR, Freitas JCO, Barros JMF, Melo DMA, Melo MAF. Pyrolysis kinetics of elephant grass pretreated biomasses. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;117:1341–8.
Mishra RK, Mohanty K. Pyrolysis kinetics and thermal behavior of waste sawdust biomass using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2018;251:63–74.
Saad AE, Mohamed EM. Kinetic parameters determination of biomass pyrolysis fuels using TGA and DTA techniques. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2015;6:401–15.
Saldarriga JF, Aguado R, Pablos A, Amutio M, Olazar M, Bilbao J. Fast characterization of biomass fuels by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Fuel. 2015;140:744–51.
Cai J, Xu D, Dong Z, Yu X, Yang Y, Banks SW, Bridgwater AV. Processing thermogravimetric analysis data for isoconversional kinetic analysis of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: case study of corn stalk. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2018;82:2705–15.
Varma AK, Mondal P. Physicochemical characterization and kinetic study of pine needle for pyrolysis process. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;124:487–97.
ASTM Standard E 871-82. Standard test method for moisture analysis of particulate wood fuels, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Philadelphia, USA, 2006.
ASTM Standard 1755-01. Standard test method for ash in biomass, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Philadelphia, USA, 2007.
ASTM Standard E 872-82. Standard test method for volatile matter in the analysis of particulate wood fuels, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Philadelphia, USA, 2006.
Guozhan J, Nowakowski DJ, Bridgwater AV. A systematic study of the kinetics of lignin pyrolysis. Thermochim Acta. 2010;498:61–6.
Vyazovkin S. Model-Free kinetics Staying free of multiplying entities without necessity. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2006;1:45–51.
Vyazovkin S, Burnham AK, Criado JM, Pérez-Maqueda LA, Popecsu C, Sbirrazzuoli N. ICTAC Kinetics Committee recommendations for performing kinetic computations on thermal analysis data. Thermochim Acta. 2011;520:1–19.
Aquino FM, Melo DMA, Santiago RC, Melo MAF, Martinelli AE, Freitas JCO, Araújo LCB. Thermal decomposition kinetics of PrMO3 (M=Ni or Co) ceramic materials via thermogravimetry. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2011;104:701–5.
Serapiglia MJ, Mullen CA, Boateng AA, Cortese LM, Bonos SA, Hoffman L. Evaluation of the impact of compositional differences in switchgrass genotypes on pyrolysis product yield. Ind Crops Prod. 2015;74:957–68.
García R, Pizarro C, Lavín AG, Bueno JL. Characterization of Spanish biomass wastes for energy use. Bioresour Technol. 2012;103:249–58.
Braga RM, Queiroga TS, Calixto GQ, Almeida HN, Melo DMA, Melo MAF, Freitas JCO, Curbelo FDS. The energetic characterization of pineapple crown leaves. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:18987–93.
White JE, Catallo WJ, Legendre BL. Biomass pyrolysis kinetics: a comparative critical review with relevant agricultural residue case studies. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2011;91:1–33.
Morin M, Pécate S, Hemati M, Kara Y. Pyrolysis of biomass in a batch fluidized bed reactor: effect of the pyrolysis conditions and the nature of the biomass on the physicochemical properties and the reactivity of char. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2016;122:511–23.
Yildiz G, Ronsse F, Venderbosch R, Duren RV, Kersten SRA, Prins W. Effect of biomass ash in catalytic fast pyrolysis of pine wood. Appl Catal B Environ. 2015;168:203–11.
Black J. Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants, volume 1: bituminous coal and natural gas to electricity. Washington, DC (USA): National Energy Technology Laboratory; 2010.
Abnisa F, Arami-Niya A, Daud WMAW, Sahu JN, Noor IM. Utilization of oil palm tree residues to produce bio-oil and bio-char via pyrolysis. Energy Convers Manag. 2013;76:1073–82.
Wenhan C, Jun L, Leo L. Study on the ignition behavior and kinetics of combustion of biomass. Energy Procedia. 2017;142:136–41.
Zhezi Z, Mingming Z, Dongke Z. Pyrolysis characteristics of cellulose isolated from selected biomass feedstocks using a thermogravimetric analyser. Energy Procedia. 2017;142:636–41.
Stefanidis SD, Kalogiannis KG, Iliopoulou EF, Michailof CM, Pilavachi PA, Angelos A. A study of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis via the pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2014;1051:43–150.
Bakar MSA, Titiloye JO. Catalytic pyrolysis of rice husk for bio-oil production. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2013;103:362–8.
Quan C, Gao N, Song Q. Pyrolysis of biomass components in a TGA and fixed-bed reactor: thermochemical behaviors, kinetics, and product characterization. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2016;121:84–92.
Anca-Couce A, Berger A, Zobel N. How to determine consistent biomass pyrolysis kinetics in a parallel reaction scheme. Fuel. 2014;123:230–40.
Morais LC, Maia AAD, Guandique MEG, Rosa AH. Pyrolysis and combustion of sugarcane bagasse. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;129:1813–22.
Wang X, Hu M, Hu W, Chen Z, Liu S, Hu Z, Xiao B. Thermogravimetric kinetic study of agricultural residue biomass pyrolysis based on combined kinetics. Bioresour Technol. 2016;219:510–20.
Rocha EPA, Sermyagina E, Vakkilainen E, Colodette JL, Oliveira IM, Cardoso M. Kinetics of pyrolysis of some biomasses widely available in Brazil. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;130:1445–54.
Brown TL, Lemay HE, Bursten BE, Murphy CJ, Woodward PM. Chemistry: the central science. 12th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2012.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) for financial support, Central Analítica/NUPPRAR/UFRN and LabTam/NUPPRAR/UFRN for the facilities, and Estivas Louis sugar cane company for sugar bagasse samples and EMBRAPA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silva, J.E., Calixto, G.Q., de Almeida, C.C. et al. Energy potential and thermogravimetric study of pyrolysis kinetics of biomass wastes. J Therm Anal Calorim 137, 1635–1643 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08048-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08048-4