Sintering behavior and thermal expansion of zirconia–titanium composites

  • Paula Łada
  • Aleksandra Miazga
  • Katarzyna Konopka
  • Mikołaj Szafran
Open Access
Article

Abstract

The dilatometric and thermogravimetric methods were used to investigate the sintering conditions of 3Y–ZrO2 and 3Y–ZrO2–Ti composites. For the materials preparation, the nanometric zirconia stabilized by 3 mol% Y2O3 powder and micrometric titanium powder (3 and 10 vol%) were used. The green body samples were formed by slip casting method. The morphology of samples microstructures was determined by SEM observations. The stereological analysis of zirconia and zirconia–titanium composites was carried out using computer program. The density was measured using the Archimedes method. The hardness of sinters was also investigated. Addition of Ti into ZrO2 influenced the sintering behavior and thermal expansion of obtained composites. The analysis of the sintering process and characteristic temperatures confirmed the increase of onset and final temperature of shrinkage with the increase in Ti content. The changes of the thermal expansion curves for the pure zirconia and 3Y–ZrO2–Ti composites were the result of the αTi → βTi transformation and the transition temperature of the zirconia m → t transformation. The zirconia and composite samples were characterized by relative density about 98%, close to theoretical density. The slight growth of zirconia grains was observed.

Keywords

Zirconia Titanium Composites Dilatometry Thermal expansion Stereology 

Introduction

Due to the properties, such as high strength, chemical stability, high thermal shock resistance, advanced biocompatibility, and high fracture toughness, yttria-stabilized zirconia is very popular ceramic material with the wide range of application in science and technology [1, 2, 3]. They are used as oxygen sensors, thermal barrier coatings, or medical implants and prosthesis [4, 5, 6].

Production of the composites with zirconia matrix is the response to the research for new materials with better, innovative properties. One of the solutions is the addition of metal particles into zirconia [7, 8]. Titanium is characterized by high chemical resistance, biocompatibility, high fatigue resistance, low thermal and electrical conductivity, no magnetic properties, and also high melting point (1667 °C) [9, 10]. Due to these properties, it is a good component for the zirconia-based composites, especially for the biomedical applications. Additionally, the addition of Ti to zirconia ceramic materials decreases hardness and stiffness of composite material but it also increases fixation of the implant in the bone [11, 12, 13].

Determination of sintering temperature for the 3Y–ZrO2–Ti composites is one of the important steps to obtain the material characterized by high relative density. Furthermore, reaction between components may vary depending on the temperature. The study of reaction between zirconia and titanium was subject of the many researches. The first studies of the ZrO2–Ti system were carried out for the stabilization of zirconia by various kinds of dopants and the reaction of liquid titanium and its alloys due to the problem with ceramic molds for casting [14, 15]. The observations of the reaction between titanium and ZrO2 led to further studies at temperatures below the melting point of titanium [16, 17]. In results, Lin et al. [16] indicated the influence of the heating temperature of the reaction at the interface between zirconia and titanium. The temperature influences on the microstructure, composites phase composition, and the grain growth of zirconia. Moreover, the new phases from Zr–Ti–O system were identified [18].

Pure zirconia ceramics exhibit a phase transformation between monoclinic (m-ZrO2) to tetragonal (t-ZrO2) phases. The temperature of the m → t transformation during the heating is close to 1400 °C. The zirconia stabilization by the 3 mol% Y2O3 eliminated the reverse t → m transformation during the cooling. However, the titanium addition could affect the changes of m → t transformation temperatures and the amount of monoclinic phase in the sintered material [3, 19, 20].

In the literature, data are many papers about the thermal behavior of yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramic [21, 22, 23]. The zirconia composites with Ti particle are still the new materials, which require the investigation of the thermal behavior during the sintering process. The aim of this work was the preparation of 3Y–ZrO2–Ti composites with different content of titanium particles. The forming method was slip casting. The thermal expansion and physical properties were the subject of the investigation. The result will allow designing composites of 3Y–ZrO2–Ti system. Conducting this type of research will allow to consciously designing materials from 3Y–ZrO2–Ti system.

Materials and experimental procedure

The starting materials were commercial zirconia powder stabilized by 3 mol% Y2O3 (Tosoh, Japan) and pure titanium powder (Alfa Aesar, USA). Powders were characterized by the density of 5.92 and 4.45 g cm−3, respectively. The densities of powders were determined by a helium pycnometer AccuPyc 1340 II. The average particle diameters were measured by using SEM and were lower than 100 nm (3Y–ZrO2) and about 8–11 µm (Ti), respectively.

The green bodies were formed by the slip casting method. The slip casting slurry was consisted of zirconia and titanium powders with the distillate water as a solvent (55 vol%) and diammonium hydrocitrate as a deflocculant (0.3 mass%—with respect to the mass of solid phase). The preparation of the slip casting slurries based on own earlier research. The detailed description of the procedure and characterization of slip casting slurries were presented in the paper [24]. Titanium powder content in the composite samples was 3 and 10 vol%, respectively. Moreover, for comparative purposes, the pure zirconia samples were prepared.

The thermal analysis has been done for 3Y–ZrO2–Ti green body samples. Differential thermal analysis (DTA) and thermogravimetric (TG) curves were obtained by using Netzsch STA 449C coupled with Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer Netzsch QMS 403C. The final temperature was 1450 °C, and the heating rate was 10 °C min−1 in the constant flow of two gases: argon 10 mL min−1 (protective gas) and argon 60 mL min−1 (measurement gas). Mass spectrometer was set to detect m/z values in mass range 10–300.

The cylindrical green bodies (h = 10 mm, d = 8 mm) prepared by slip casting method were tested in a differential dilatometer (Netzsch Dil 402E with the graphite furnace). The characteristic sintering temperatures were observed during the heating with heating rate of 10 °C min−1 in helium atmosphere. The temperature measurement range was 40–1450 °C.

Selected physical properties were measured by Archimedes method. The hardness of the samples was determined by using Vickers hardness tester HVS-30T, Huatec Group Corporation.

The morphology of samples cross section was studied by SEM Hitachi SU-70. For observation, the samples were coated with a thin layer of carbon. The grain growth measurement was conducted for samples after thermal etching at 1350 °C (100 °C lower than sintering temperature), during the 30 min. Thermal etching allowed to determine zirconia grain size. The samples were also coated with a thin layer of carbon for observation after thermal etching. The first step was SEM observations of the zirconia matrix microstructure. The next step was stereological analysis on the image from SEM, which was conducted by using computer program MicroMeter [25]. The zirconia grains were described by the equivalent diameter (d 2) (diameter of a circle having the same area as the surface of grain).

The sintered cylindrical samples were tested to obtain the thermal expansion curves from test with heating rate of 10 °C min−1. The temperature measurement range was 40–1450 °C by using a differential dilatometer in helium atmosphere.

All research was conducted with the using of inert gas atmosphere (helium and argon). For the preparation of zirconia–titanium composite, very necessary is the kind of sintering atmosphere. Titanium is characterized by high affinity for oxygen, nitrogen, and hydrogen. For the limited the reaction of these elements with Ti particle during the sintering process, the inert atmosphere should be used.

Results and discussion

Reaction sintering process

Figure 1 shows the temperature plots characterized by variation in mass (TG curve) and thermal flow (DTA curve) during heating of selected samples—3Y–ZrO2–10 vol% Ti. The samples were prepared by slip casting method with the addition of deflocculant in the water solution. Heating of the powder up to 1450 °C is followed by increase in its mass by 0.45%. The small mass loss was observed for temperature range of 400–600 °C, which corresponded with the degradation of the slip casting additives. The results of mass spectrum measurement showed the existence of the peaks with m/z = 18, 28, and 44 in the mass spectrum taken within this temperature range, which were attributed to the molecules H2O, CO, and CO2, respectively, released from the powder sample. Removal of the slip casting additives did not result in peaks on the DTA curves. The DTA curve showed one exothermic effect at 838.6 °C. These thermal changes were associated with a titanium oxidation and αTi → βTi phase transformation. The αTi → βTi transformation temperature for Ti is 882.5 °C [26].
Fig. 1

TG/DTA curves of 3Y–ZrO2 + 10 vol% Ti composite powder with the slip casting additions

Figure 2 shows the variation in the shrinkage rate of zirconia and 3Y–ZrO2–Ti samples as a function of heating temperature. The characteristic temperatures of the samples sintering are included in Table 1. The maximum densification rate for the samples under study falls at the m → t transformation temperature about 1300 °C and increases together with the increase of Ti content. The most valuable information is the onset temperature of macroscopic shrinkage. That is, the minimum temperature corresponding to starting of sudden decrease in the sample length due to the beginning of bulk sintering. The onset temperature of sintering increases with an increase of titanium content. The titanium content also had the influence on the shrinkage value of the samples. The lowest values of the shrinkage were observed for the pure zirconia sample. The addition of titanium gives the increase of the shrinkage. Figure 2 presented also the plot for dL/dt versus temperature which corresponds with the microscopic sintering, where the shrinkage taking place within an agglomerate of powders.
Fig. 2

Shrinkage versus temperature recording during the heating part of cycle (solid line—dL/Lo) and derivative versus temperature of the curves (dotted line—dL/dt) for ceramic 3Y–ZrO2 (a) and composites samples 3Y–ZrO2–3 vol% Ti (b) and 3Y–ZrO2–10 vol% Ti (c)

Table 1

Characteristic sintering temperatures and shrinkage during the heating

 

Sample

Onset temperature of sintering/°C

Finish temperature of shrinkage/°C

Temperature of maximum shrinkage rate/°C

Linear shrinkage/%

A

3Y–ZrO2

1127

1290

1290

16.64

B

3Y–ZrO2 + 3 vol% Ti

1184

1378

1291

17.71

C

3Y–ZrO2 + 10 vol% Ti

1197

1365

17.28

Materials characterization

Table 2 shows the selected physical properties of zirconia and zirconia–titanium composites. Although the green densities of sample series were significantly differed, the relative density of the sinters was similar and close to theoretical densities for pure zirconia ceramic and 3Y–ZrO2–Ti composites. The addition of titanium did not influence on density of final material. Furthermore, the 3Y–ZrO2–3 vol% Ti composite was characterized by similar hardness to pure zirconia, but the addition of 10 vol% Ti slightly decreased the composite hardness. The open porosity was low and similar for all samples.
Table 2

Selected physical properties and hardness of the 3Y–ZrO2 and 3Y–ZrO2–Ti composites

  

Green density/%

Relative density/%

Open porosity/%

HV10/GPa

A

ZrO2

53.14 ± 1.98

98.74 ± 1.30

0.21 ± 0.12

11.87 ± 0.36

B

ZrO2 + 3 vol% Ti

61.24 ± 2.01

98.59 ± 1.61

0.46 ± 0.09

12.11 ± 0.24

C

ZrO2 + 10 vol% Ti

56.81 ± 1.81

98.56 ± 1.56

0.29 ± 0.08

10.92 ± 0.36

The cross sections of samples were presented in Fig. 3 (a–c—for pure zirconia and zirconia–titanium composites, respectively). Slip casting method allowed forming composites with the homogeneous distribution of Ti-rich particles. The microstructures of pure zirconia and zirconia matrix of the composite samples after thermal etching were presented in Fig. 3a1, b1, c1.
Fig. 3

Microstructure of the 3Y–ZrO2 and 3Y–ZrO2–Ti composites (cross section): dark contrast—Ti-rich particles (ac) and microstructure of the 3Y–ZrO2 and 3Y–ZrO2–Ti composites (cross section) after thermal heating: 3Y–ZrO2 (a1) and 3Y–ZrO2 matrix in the composites (b1 and c1, respectively), SEM

The addition of titanium did not affect the zirconia particles’ size distribution in the samples (Fig. 4). The mean grain size slightly increased with the increase of Ti content (Table 3). This can be related to the process of forming a new phase between Ti–ZrO2 and therefore formation of zirconia with reduced oxygen content. Such changes of new phases from Ti–Zr–O system were observed in the literature earlier [16, 17, 18].
Fig. 4

Analysis of the zirconia grain size distribution—for 3Y–ZrO2 sample (a) and the zirconia matrix in the 3Y–ZrO2–Ti composites samples (b, c)

Table 3

Equivalent average diameter of zirconia and zirconia matrix grains

 

Sample

Equivalent average diameter d 2/µm (± SD)

A

3Y–ZrO2

0.28 ± 0.11

B

3Y–ZrO2 + 3 vol% Ti

0.32 ± 0.11

C

3Y–ZrO2 + 10 vol% Ti

0.33 ± 0.11

The thermal expansion and shrinkage curves of the studied materials are plotted in Fig. 5. The linear dimension for all samples, pure zirconia and 3Y–ZrO2–Ti composites, was increased during the heating. However, the character of changes was different. The shrinkage for pure zirconia was linear up to 1300 °C. For the composite samples the curves of shrinkage were diffrent. The 3Y–ZrO2 − 3 vol.% Ti composite sample was characterized by shrinkage close to linear curve at temperatures range of 50–1200 °C and significant increase above 1200 °C. The shrinkage curve of 3Y–ZrO2 − 10 vol.% Ti increased in non linear way.
Fig. 5

Thermal expansion curves of 3Y–ZrO2 (a) and 3Y–ZrO2–Ti (b, c) composites (α thermal expansion line: curve I—solid and curve II—dotted) on heating and shrinkage versus temperature (intermittent line—dL/Lo)

Pure zirconia and 3Y–ZrO2–3 vol% Ti samples were characterized by similar thermal expansion curve at temperature range of 50–1200 °C with α ~ 11 × 10−6 K−1. The small difference was observed for the temperature of 550 °C (α ~ 8.2 × 10−6 K−1) which could correlate with the beginning of the titanium oxide changes [26, 27]. At about 1300 °C, the pure zirconia thermal expansion coefficient was decreased, which is related to the m → t transformation and the linear dimension changes (curve I) [28]. Course of the second (II) curve was different at temperatures higher than 1300 °C. The thermal expansion coefficient slightly increased. At the same temperature, the thermal expansion coefficient of the composite with 3 vol% Ti was increased which was associated with the small addition of Ti and the transition temperature conversion of m → t transformation (curve I) [29, 30]. The slightly lower increase was observed for the second curve (II).

In the samples with upper Ti additive (10 vol%) in the composite samples, the significant differences were observed. At the temperature range of 50–1200 °C, the thermal expansion curve (I) was closed to linear with two characteristic points at 650 °C and 1000 °C. At 650 °C, the small decrease in the thermal expansion coefficient was observed (about − 2.5 × 10−6 K−1). This range of temperature could correspond with the titanium oxides transformation [26, 27]. At the second temperature point (below 1000 °C), the thermal expansion coefficient was higher, about 10 × 10−6 K−1. This point could associate with high addition of Ti (10 vol%) which reveal in the αTi → βTi transformation [26]. Likewise, the curve at the temperature above 1200 °C had different characteristics. At the temperature range of 1200 °C and 1400 °C, the rapid growth of thermal expansion was detected because of the m → t zirconia transformation. In the range of temperature 1300–1450 °C, the same rapid decrease of thermal expansion was observed in all samples. The second thermal expansion curve (II) was more stable in the whole range of temperature without one characteristic point about 400 °C which was corresponded with the beginning of the titanium oxidation.

Conclusions

Addition of Ti into ZrO2 strongly influenced the sintering behavior and thermal expansion of composites.

The thermal expansion curves were different for the pure zirconia and 3Y–ZrO2–Ti composites. The changes were the result of the existing αTi → βTi transformation and the transition temperature conversion of zirconia m → t transformation.

The data obtained from the mass spectrometer coupled with the thermobalance reveal that the predominant gaseous products released from the samples during thermal treatment are H2O, CO2, and CO in the case of the measurements carried out in Ar atmosphere. At 838.6 °C, probably the exothermic reaction of αTi → βTi was observed.

Selected temperature of fabrication of ZrO2–Ti composites was 1450 °C. The analysis of the sintering process and characteristic temperatures confirmed the influence of the Ti addition on the onset and final temperature of shrinkage which increased with the increase of Ti content. The maximum shrinkage temperatures were about 1300 °C.

Using the slip casting method allowed producing the zirconia and composite samples with the relative density about 98%, close to theoretical density. The addition of titanium did not significantly decrease the material hardness. The microstructure observations showed the homogeneous distribution of the Ti-rich phase areas in the composite samples. The zirconia grain size slightly increased with the increase of Ti content.

Determining sintering conditions and its effect on the properties of zirconia–titanium composites are the basis for further analyses. The next step of investigation should be the phase analysis of composites and description the microstructure on the particle–matrix interface.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was done in frame of the project financed by National Science Centre (NCN), Project DEC-2013/11/B/ST8/00309.

References

  1. 1.
    Bowen P, Carry C. From powder to sintered pieces: formation, transformation and sintering of nanostructured ceramic oxides. Powder Technol. 2002;128:248–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miller RA. Current status of thermal barrier coatings: an overview. Surf Coat Technol. 1987;30:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chevalier J, Gremillard L, Virkar AV, Clarke DL. The tetragonal—monoclinic transformation in zirconia: lesson learned and future trends. J Am Ceram Soc. 2009;92(9):1901–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zender H, Leistner H, Searle H. ZrO2 materials for applications in the ceramic industry. Int Ceram. 1990;39(6):33–6.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vogt T, Hunter BA, Thornton J. Structural evolution of thermal-sprayed yttria-stabilized ZrO2 thermal barrier coatings with annealing: a neutron diffraction study. J Am Ceram Soc. 2001;84(3):678–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kosmac T, Oblak C, Marion L. The effects of dental grinding and sandblasting on ageing and fatigue behaviour of dental zirconia (Y–TZP) ceramic. J Eur Ceram Sci. 2008;28:1085–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wildan M, Edrees HJ, Alan H. Ceramic matrix composites of zirconia reinforces with metal particles. Mater Chem Phys. 2002;75(1–3):276–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bartolome JF, Gutierrez-Gonzalez CF, Pecharroman C, Moya JS. Synergistic toughening mechanism in 3Y–TZP/Nb composites. Acta Mater. 2007;55:5924–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Niinomi M. Mechanical properties of biomedical titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng. 1998;A243:231–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boyer R, Collings EW, Welsch G. Materials properties handbook: titanium alloys. ASM Int. 1994;1–55.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mehrali M, Shirazi FS, Mehrali M, Metselaar HSC, Kadri NAB, Osman NAA. Dental implants from functionally graded materials. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101(10):3046–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gain AK, Zhang L, Quadir MZ. Composites matching the properties of human cortical bones: the design of porous titanium zirconia (Ti–ZrO2) nanocomposites using polymethyl methacrylate powders. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016;662:258–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaliaraj GS, Kirubaharan K, Pradhaban G, Kuppusami P, Vishwakarma V. Isolation and characterization of biogenic calcium carbonate/phosphate from oral bacteria and their adhesion studies on YSZ-coated titanium substrate for dental implant application. Bull Mater Sci. 2016;39(2):385–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weber BC, Garrett HJ, Mauer FA, Schwartz MA. Observation on the stabilization of zirconia. J Am Ceram Soc. 1956;39(6):197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ruh R, Tallan NM, Lipsitt HA. Effect of metal additions on the microstructure of zirconia. J Am Ceram Soc. 1964;47(12):632–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin KL, Lin CC. Zirconia-related phases in the zirconia/titanium diffusion couple after annealing at 1100–1550°C. J Am Ceram Soc. 2005;88(10):2928–34.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin KL, Lin CC. Effects of annealing temperature on microstructural development at interface between zirconia and titanium. J Am Ceram Soc. 2007;90(3):893–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin KL, Lin CC. Ti2ZrO phases formed in the titanium and zirconia interface after reaction at 1550°C. J Am Ceram Soc. 2005;88(5):1268–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matsui K, Yoshida H, Ikuhara Y. Grain-boundary structure and microstructure development mechanism in 2–8 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia polycrystals. Acta Mater. 2008;56:1315–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Munoz-Tabares JA, Jimenez-Pique E, Reyes-Gasga J, Anglada M. Microstructural changes in ground 3Y–TZP and their effect on mechanical properties. Acta Mater. 2011;59:6670–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ding LX, Wang L, Nagashima M, Hayakawa M. A dilatometric study of the martensitic transformation of zirconia containing 1.8–2.0 mol% yttria. Mater Trans. 2001;42(3):450–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Surzhikov AP, Ghyngazov SA, Frangulyan TS, Vasil’ev IP, Chernyavskii AV. Investigation of sintering behaviour of ZrO2 (Y) ceramic green body by means of non-isothermal dilatometry and thermokinetic analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;128(2):787–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lopez-Lopez E, Baudin C, Moreno R. Thermal expansion of zirconia–zirconium titanate materials obtained by slip casting of mixtures of Y–TZP–TiO2. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2009;29:3219–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lada P, Falkowski P, Miazga A, Konopka K, Szafran M. Fabrication of ZrO2–Ti composites by slip casting method. Arch Metall Mater. 2016;61(2B):1095–100.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wejrzanowski T, Pielaszek R, Opalinska A, Matysiak H, Łojkowski W, Kurzydłowski KJ. Quantitative methods for nanopowders characterization. Appl Surf Sci. 2006;253:204–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wahlbeck PC, Gilles PW. Reinvestigation of the phase diagram for the system titanium–oxygen. J Am Ceram Soc. 1966;49(4):180–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Teng LD, Wang FM, Li WC. Thermodynamics and microstructure of Ti–ZrO2 metal–ceramic functionally graded materials. Mater Sci Eng. 2000;A293:130–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Basu B, Vleugels J, Van Der Biest O. Transformation behaviour of tetragonal zirconia: role of dopant content and distribution. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004;366(2):338–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Domagala RF, Lyon SR, Ruh R. The pseudobinary Ti–ZrO2. J Am Ceram Soc. 1973;56(11):584–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Teng LD, Li WC, Wang FM. Effect of Ti content on the martensitic transformation in zirconia for Ti–ZrO2 composites. J Allloys Compd. 2001;319:228–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula Łada
    • 1
  • Aleksandra Miazga
    • 1
  • Katarzyna Konopka
    • 1
  • Mikołaj Szafran
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Materials Science and EngineeringWarsaw University of TechnologyWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Faculty of ChemistryWarsaw University of TechnologyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations