Abstract
Cu–Al–Ni shape-memory alloys are considered as high potential materials for high-temperature applications. The aim of this research was to evaluate the increasing strain value and Cr addition on martensite morphology, transformation temperatures, mechanical, and corrosion properties of Cu–Al–Ni alloy. To this purpose, thermomechanical treatment which includes successive hot rolling, annealing, and hydraulic pressing passes was applied. In addition, tensile test, differential scanning calorimetry, and potentiodynamic polarization were carried out to compare the properties of prepared samples. The results showed that by increasing the applied strain, morphological transition from wide laths to acicular martensite with monoclinic structure was occurred. The chromium element acts as a grain refiner in this alloy by restricting the grain growth. This element leads to microstructural embrittlement, diminishing the mechanical properties. Besides, the influence of applied strain and Cr content on corrosion resistance of Cu–Al–Ni alloy was reciprocal. Despite suitable effect of Cr on corrosion behavior, increasing the applied strain facilitated the corrosion rate. Another subtle point is that both Cr addition and higher strain value reduce austenite to martensite transformation temperatures and hysteresis temperature interval.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Karagoz Z, Aksu Canbay C. Relationship between transformation temperatures and alloying elements in Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;114:1069–74.
Gastien R, Sade M, Lovey FC. Interaction between martensitic structure and defects in β ↔ β′ + γ′ cycling in CuAlNi single crystals. Model for the inhabitation of γ′ martensite. Acta Mater. 2008;56:1570–6.
Bouabdallah M, Baguenane-Benelia G, Saadi A, Cheniti H, Gachon JC, Patoor E. Precipitation sequence during ageing in β1 phase of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;112:279–83.
Danoiu S, Rotaru P, Degeratu S, Rizescu S, Bizdoaca NG. Shape memory alloy-based smart module structure working under intense thermos-mechanical stress. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;118:1323–30.
Gastien R, Corbellani CE, Alvarez Villar HN, Sade M, Lovey FC. Pseudoelastic cycling in Cu–14.3Al–4.1Ni (wt%) single crystals. Mater Sci Eng A. 2003;349:191–6.
Gastien R, Corbellani CE, Sade M, Lovey FC. Thermal and pseudoelastic cycling in Cu–14.1Al–4.2Ni (wt%) single crystals. Acta Mater. 2005;53:1685–91.
Morris MA. Influence of boron additions on ductility and microstructure of shape memory Cu–Al–Ni alloys. Scr Metall Mater. 1991;25:2541–6.
Aksu Canbay C, Keskin A. Effects of vanadium and cadmium on transformation temperatures of Cu–Al–Mn shape memory alloy. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;118:1407–12.
Gastien R, Corbellani CE, Sade M, Lovey FC. A σ-T diagram analysis regarding the γ′ inhabitation in β ↔ β′ + γ′ cycling in CuAlNi single crystals. Scr Mater. 2006;54:1451–5.
Saud SN, Hamzah E, Abubakar T, Bakhsheshi-Rad HR, Zamri M, Tanemura M. Effects of Mn additions on the structure, mechanical properties, and corrosion behavior of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. J Mater Eng Perform. 2014. doi:10.1007/s11665-014-1134-1.
Recarte V, Perez-Landazabal JI, Rodriquez PP, Bocanegra EH, No ML, San Juan J. Thermodynamics of thermally induced martensite transformations in Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. Acta Mater. 2004;52:3941–8.
Colic M, Rudolf R, Stamenkovic D, Anzel I, Vucevic D, Jenko M, Lazic V, Lojen G. Relationship between microstructure, cytotoxicity and corrosion properties of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:308–17.
Yildiz K, Kok M, Dagdelen F. Cobalt addition effects on martensitic transformation and microstructural properties of high-temperature Cu–Al–Fe shape-memory alloys. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;120:1227–32.
Recarte V, Perez-Landazabal JI, Ibarra A, No ML, San Juan J. High temperature β phase decomposition process in a Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004;378:238–42.
Montecinos S, Cuniberti A, Romero R. Effect of grain size on the stress-temperature relationship in a β Cu–Al–Be shape memory alloy. Intermetallics. 2011;19:35–8.
Perez-Landazabal JI, Recarte V, Sanchez-Alarcos V, No ML, San Juan J. Study of the stability and decomposition process of the β phase in Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;438–440:734–7.
Yildiz K, Kok M. Study of martensite transformation and microstructural evolution of Cu–Al–Ni–Fe shape memory alloys. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;115:1509–14.
Recarte V, Perez-Saez RB, Bocanegra BH, No ML, San Juan J. Influence of Al and Ni concentration on the martensitic transformation in Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. Metall Mater Trans A. 2002;33:2581–91.
Perez-Landazabal JI, Recarte V, No ML, San Juan J. Determination of the order in γ1 intermetallic phase in Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy. Intermetallics. 2003;11:927–30.
Aksu Canbay C, Aydogdu A. Thermal analysis of Cu–14.82 wt% Al–0.4 wt% Be shape memory alloy. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;113:731–7.
Chentouf SM, Bouabdallah M, Gachon JC, Patoor E, Sari A. Microstructural and thermodynamic study of hypoeutectic Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. J Alloy Compd. 2009;470:507–14.
Chang SH. Influence of chemical composition on the damping characteristics of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. Mater Chem Phys. 2011;125:358–63.
Saud SN, Hamzah E, Abubakar T, Zamri M, Tanemura M. Influence of Ti additions on the martensitic phase transformation and mechanical properties of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;118:111–22.
San Juan J, No ML, Schuh CA. Superelastic cycling of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloy micropillars. Acta Mater. 2012;60:4093–106.
Lovey FC, Torra V. Shape memory in Cu-based alloys: phenomenological behavior at the mesoscale level and interaction of martensitic transformation with structural defects in Cu–Zn–Al. Prog Mater Sci. 1999;44:189–289.
Yildiz K. Oxidation of high-temperature Cu–Al–Fe shape memory alloy. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;123:409–12.
Recarte V, Perez-Saez RB, Bocanegra EH, No ML, San Juan J. Dependence of the martensitic transformation characteristics on concentration in Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 1999;273–275:380–4.
Sun YS, Lorimer GW, Ridley N. Microstructure and its development in Cu–Al–Ni alloys. Metall Mater Trans A. 1990;21:575–88.
Dagdelen F, Gokhan T, Aydogdu A, Aydogdu Y, Adiguzel O. Effects of thermal treatments on transformation behavior in shape memory Cu–Al–Ni alloys. Mater Lett. 2003;57:1079–85.
Badawy WA, El-Rabiee MM, Helal NH, Nady H. Effect of nickel content on the electrochemical behavior of Cu–Al–Ni alloys in chloride free neutral solutions. Electrochim Acta. 2010;56:913–8.
Kuo HH, Wang WH, Hsu YF, Huang CA. The corrosion behavior of Cu–Al and Cu–Al–Be shape memory alloys in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution. Corros Sci. 2006;48:4352–64.
Ismail KM, Badawy WA. Electrochemical and XPS investigations of cobalt in KOH solutions. J Appl Electrochem. 2000;30:1303–11.
Al-Kharafi FM, Badawy WA. Electrochemical behavior of vanadium in aqueous solutions of different pH. Electrochim Acta. 1997;42:579–86.
Wharton JA, Barik RC, Kear G, Wood RJK, Stokes KR, Walsh FC. The corrosion of nickel–aluminum bronze in seawater. Corros Sci. 2005;47:3336–67.
Bouabdallah M, Cizeron G. Caractérisation des changements de phase développés dans un alliage AMF du type Cu–Al–Ni, par dilatométrie de trempe et microcalorimétrie différentielle. Eur Phys J Appl Phys. 1998;1:163–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zare, M., Ketabchi, M. Effect of chromium element on transformation, mechanical and corrosion behavior of thermomechanically induced Cu–Al–Ni shape-memory alloys. J Therm Anal Calorim 127, 2113–2123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5839-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5839-2