Introduction

Ferrihydrite (Fe5HO8·4H2O) is a reddish-brown, poorly ordered iron oxyhydroxide, with variable and non-stoichiometric composition [13 and references therein]. The structure and properties of this nanomineral are still under debate [e.g., 412]. Currently two models of ferrihydrite structure compete. According to the classic multiphase model, Fe is exclusively octahedrally coordinated [9, 13], while in the second, so-called akdalite model, 20 % of iron atoms are coordinated tetrahedrally [4, 5]. Irrespective of the model, the number of broad peaks in the XRD pattern gives the descriptive names for the ferrihydrite varieties, with 2-line and 6-line ferrihydrite being the most common. Because of its low crystallinity, high surface area and surface reactivity, ferrihydrite plays significant role in, for example, inorganic weathering processes, biogeochemical cycling of iron and as a scavenger of trace metals and metalloids in various near-surface environments [13]. For this reason, substantial amounts of admixtures are present in ferrihydrite chemical composition. In nature, the most common and well-documented impurities include silicate, phosphate, arsenate, sulfate, calcium, aluminum and organic compounds [e.g., 13, 1416]. These ions affect ferrihydrite composition, surface chemistry, reactivity and sorption properties [14, 1722]. Silicate, the most important impurity, lowers crystallinity of this nanomineral and modifies its morphology, magnetic ordering and solubility [15, 2339], though the ferrihydrite structure itself is not directly altered [30]. Reducing crystallinity has been thought to result from the formation of soluble Fe–Si complexes during the oxyhydroxide precipitation. Such complexes delay the nucleation and growth of ferrihydrite crystallites [31]. It is also likely that surface adsorption of silicic acid occurs soon after ferrihydrite nucleation thus impeding crystal growth [30]. A decrease in both ferrihydrite particle size and crystallinity with increasing content of Si was found [17]. The opposite observation [27] suggested that enhanced adsorption of silicate ions to the ferrihydrite surface caused the increase in the nanoparticle dimensions. These ambiguous results might result from the character of the observed objects—Cismasu et al. [17] noted the decrease in individual ferrihydrite particle sizes, but the oxyhydroxide aggregates appeared more compact. Hence, Seehra et al. [27] might observe ferrihydrite aggregates rather than single crystallites. The character of silica association with ferrihydrite depends on Si/Fe molar ratio—at low values, monomeric silicate is adsorbed on the ferrihydrite surface, whereas the high ratio promotes polymerizing of silica to form a separate phase [19]. Therefore, at high Si contents, ferrihydrite particles are probably embedded in a siliceous matrix containing variable amounts of Fe [17]. A slight increase in specific surface areas of low-Si ferrihydrites in comparison with pure oxyhydroxide was also reported [26, 32], but high-Si ferrihydrites exhibited lower surface areas [22]. It may be explained by the increasing oxyhydroxide aggregation and the enhanced compactness of the aggregates, which permitted the penetration of nitrogen molecules during BET measurements.

Ferrihydrite is a metastable phase and a precursor of many iron oxides and oxyhydroxides. Usually, it transforms with time into stable minerals: goethite (α-FeOOH) and/or hematite (α-Fe2O3), through dissolution–reprecipitation and dehydration–rearrangement mechanisms, respectively [13]. At elevated temperatures, ferrihydrite converts into hematite but, despite many studies, the details of the process are still controversial and seem to depend on many factors [5, 33]. When pure oxyhydroxide is annealed, the conversion to α-Fe2O3 appears to proceed without any intermediates [2], but ligands adsorbed on the ferrihydrite surface complicate the transformation pathway and intermediate hydromaghemite or ferrimagnetic ferrihydrite forms [5, 33, 34]. The transformation of ferrihydrite to hematite is reflected by the sharp exotherm visible on DTA (or DSC) curves at approximately 300–350 °C, though the exact position of the peak depends on both the experimental conditions and the method of synthesis. In some cases, two [1, 35] or even three exotherms were recorded [36]. Three different thermal patterns of ferrihydrites, obtained by three different procedures, were argued to reflect various proportions of so-called f-phase in the standard multiphase structural ferrihydrite model [37].

The association of Si with ferrihydrite surface hindered thermal transformation to hematite [16, 3841]. This is an effect of the formation of Fe–O–Si layer, blocking the crystal growth sites [38]. These bonds must be broken prior to the formation of hematite [24]. In the most comprehensive study on Si-ferrihydrite thermal transformations [40], the presence of Si raised the temperature of ferrihydrite transformation up to 740 °C, at Si/(Si + Fe) molar ratio of 0.27. A clear reduction of hematite MCLs along both c and a axes was also observed when low-Si ferrihydrites were annealed, whereas heating of higher-Si ferrihydrites resulted in less developed reduction of the hematite dimensions. These authors concluded that some silica could be incorporated in the hematite during heating of low-Si ferrihydrites to 800 °C, and the Si caused deformation of hematite structure. At higher temperature, the Si was ejected from the structure [40]. Besides hematite, amorphous silica, which recrystallizes to cristobalite at higher temperature, has been often reported as a product of annealing of Si-ferrihydrite-rich materials [e.g., 16, 42, 43].

The aim of this work was to determine the influence of Si admixture in ferrihydrite on its thermal transformation processes and the properties of the products. These issues are important for the understanding of Si-ferrihydrite stability in past and present geochemical systems. Although Si-ferrihydrite was synthesized in many studies [e.g., 18, 39, 40], relatively little is known about its properties and even less about the properties of its transformation products [40]. Also, synthetic ferrihydrites analyzed so far exhibited usually low Si/Fe molar ratios, and the data for higher Si/Fe ratios are scarce [44]. The reason for this is probably a quite low silica content (up to several mass percent) in most of natural ferrihydrites [1, 25, 4548], but in some environments, such as modern seafloor hydrothermal vents, higher Si/Fe ratios (up to ca. 3) were reported [15, 16, 49, 50]. In our study, a much wider range of ferrihydrite Si/Fe molar ratios was applied; therefore, the results fill the gap in the knowledge of the geologically important silica-rich ferruginous materials. Moreover, we present here the evidence on more complex transformation routes of heated high-Si ferrihydrites in comparison with low-Si ferrihydrites, because prior to the hematite crystallization, epsilon and beta Fe2O3 polymorphs were encountered. These exclusively synthetic iron oxides [2, 51] are attractive (nano)materials for a wide range of applications [51, 52]. This particularly applies to ε-Fe2O3, which exhibits a giant room-temperature coercive field and the ability to absorb electromagnetic waves in gigahertz region. Due to a number of intermediate features, ε-Fe2O3 is a structural intermediate between maghemite and hematite, stable in a narrow temperature range, and the thermally induced structural transformation of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles to hematite is the best known process of ε-Fe2O3 preparation [51, 52]. Although ε-Fe2O3 was identified previously as a transient product of Si-ferrihydrite annealing [40], neither any explanation of its formation nor further comment or discussion was provided. The cubic β-Fe2O3 has been obtained by a wide range of techniques [51, 53], but has not been encountered during heating of ferrihydrite so far. Hence, annealing of high-Si ferrihydrite is a new way of preparation of these rare iron oxides and is here demonstrated to provide four Fe2O3 polymorphs, which previously was limited solely to ferric sulfate as a precursor.

Experimental

Sample preparation

A series of 2-line ferrihydrite samples with different Si/Fe molar ratios of 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00 and 1.50 (referred below as FHYD-000, FHYD-005, FHYD-010 and so on), was obtained by reaction of Fe2(SO4)3 with NaOH in the presence of Na2SiO3 at pH 8.2 [18, 23]. After 12 h of stirring, the samples were incubated for 96 h in room temperature and then dialyzed to remove excess of salts (SO 2−4 and Na+), which was checked by measurements of the suspension electrolytic conductivity. Finally, the precipitates were freeze-dried using Christ Alpha 1–2 LD apparatus. In order to avoid contamination of the samples by silica from glass, polyethylene vessels were used for preparation of the reagents and for the synthesis experiments. All the reagents involved in the synthesis, supplied by Avantor Performance Materials Poland, were of analytical grade.

Methods of sample characterization

The precipitates were characterized using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (FTIR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Then simultaneous thermal analyses (STA—DTA/TG) were performed. After heating to 1000 °C, all samples were evaluated using XRD, FTIR and SEM–EDS. Additionally, ferrihydrite samples were heated, using the same STA equipment, to various temperatures selected on the basis of the analysis of their thermal patterns. For this purpose, heating was terminated immediately after reaching the desired temperature and the sample was removed and cooled in air. The samples attained temperatures below 100 °C in 1–3 min, depending on the temperature to which they were annealed.

X-ray diffraction patterns were collected using Rigaku SmartLab instrument equipped with a graphite monochromator, rotation Cu anode, 45 kV and 200 mA generator settings, 2°–75°2Θ recording range, 0.05° step size and counting time of 1 s per step. Eliminating an influence of instrumental parameters on peak intensities was achieved by adjusting the primary beam value using plano-parallel plate cut from the highly crystalline quartz specimen prior to each analysis. The XRD patterns were evaluated by XRAYAN software using a diffraction pattern database of International Centre for Diffraction Data.

Scanning electron microscope analyses were carried out in low-vacuum mode, using a FEI 200 Quanta FEG microscope equipped with an EDS/EDAX spectrometer. The acceleration voltage was 15–20 kV and the pressure 60 Pa. The samples were not coated with conductive layer.

Thermogravimetric (TG) and differential thermal analysis (DTA) measurements were performed applying Netzsch STA 449F3 Jupiter apparatus. A sample mass of ca. 50 mg was placed in an alumina crucible and heated from 20 to 1000 °C, at 10 °C min−1 in flowing (synthetic) air (40 mL min−1). A preheated sample was used as inert material. Simultaneous analyses of the evolved gases were carried out using quadrupole mass spectrometer—Netzsch QMS 403C Aëolos. The thermal patterns were collected and processed using the Netzsch Proteus Thermal Analysis software. Five reference substances: indium, tin, bismuth, aluminum and gold were used for temperature calibration. The errors of DTA and TG measurements, estimated on the basis of repeated measurements of pure ferrihydrite, are <1 °C and <1 mass%, respectively.

Infrared spectra were collected using Bruker Sensor 27 spectrometer in the range 400–4000 cm−1. The spectra reported are the resultant of 64 scans at the resolution of 1 cm−1. Prior to analysis, KBr pellets were obtained by homogenizing 200 mg of ground KBr with 4 mg of the sample.

The magnetic susceptibility at the liquid nitrogen (77 K) and room temperature (RT) were measured in the magnetic field amplitude of 4.4 and 0.45 Oe, respectively, using a standard mutual inductance bridge operating at the frequency of 18.9 Hz. A Stanford SR 830 lock-in nanovoltmeter served both as a source for the AC current for the coil, which produced the AC magnetic field, and as a voltmeter of the bridge. The temperature was monitored by the Lake Shore temperature controller employing a chromel-gold—0.07 % Fe thermocouple with an accuracy of ±0.05 K for this experimental setup. Voltage measurement error was 0.1 μV at 77 K and 0.2 μV at RT, which translates into the error in magnetic susceptibility estimates of 1–2 × 10−8 m3 kg−1 and 2–4 × 10−7 m3 kg−1, respectively, depending on the sample mass.

Results and discussion

Properties of the initial ferrihydrites

For the discussion purposes, the samples were divided into three groups: pure ferrihydrite (PFh), low-Si ferrihydrites (LSFh; samples FHYD-005, FHYD-010 and FHYD-020) and high-Si ferrihydrites (HSFh, samples FHYD-050, FHYD-075, FHYD-100 and FHYD-150). A boundary between the groups of Si-ferrihydrites is 0.2 Si/Fe molar ratio, which is equal to the number of ferrihydrite adsorption sites, estimated to be 0.2 mol mol−1 Fe [19].

SEM, XRD and FTIR studies

Electron microscopic observations show cryptocrystalline homogenous materials obtained in all the syntheses [22]. Multiple EDS analyses of the ferrihydrites reveal that the actual Si/Fe molar ratios are close to those which were planned. Some sulfur impurities have been detected in FHYD-000 and FHYD-005 samples, while the HSFh exhibits sodium admixtures, increasing with increasing Si content.

XRD pattern of PFh is characterized by two broad bands at d ~ 2.5 and 1.50 Å, typical for the oxyhydroxide [1, 2]. Increasing silicon content results in a gradual broadening and a shift of the former toward lower two-theta angles. Similar features, observed for both synthetic [17, 18, 27] and natural [16, 41, 49] Si-ferrihydrites, indicate reducing crystallinity and/or lowering crystal size.

Ferrihydrite gives broad infrared absorption maxima at ca. 445 and 590 cm−1 (all the FTIR spectra are attached in supplementary file), resulting from the stretching Fe–O vibrations, and a shoulder at ca. 680–690 cm−1 [2]. The position and intensity of the band at 445 cm−1 remains roughly the same for all the samples, while the intensity of the 590 cm−1 band is gradually lowered with the increasing silica content, and in the HSFh spectra, the band is not recognizable. Intensive bands at ca. 3400 and 1635 cm−1 are assigned to the stretching and bending OH vibrations of the lattice and adsorbed water, respectively [16, 54, 55]. A slight shift of the former to higher wave numbers (up to ca. 3425 cm−1) for the highest-Si materials indicates some reduction in bond strength [56]. For all the samples containing Si, an additional band attributable to Si–O–Fe stretching [16, 25, 41] occurs. Its shift from 930 up to 1000 cm−1 with increasing Si/Fe molar ratio indicates partial silicate polymerization [25, 46]. Similar features were reported previously [18, 27, 40]. The bands at 975, 1050 and 1123 cm−1 are caused by the formation of binuclear surface complex between sulfate (originated from the reagent used in the synthesis) and ferrihydrite [18]. These features were not observed for the ferrihydrites exhibiting the Si/Fe molar ratio higher than 0.1. A doublet at 2360–2340 cm−1, as well as sharp peak at 668 cm−1 are related to stretching and antisymmetric stretching of the CO2 molecule, respectively [16], and are not an inherent feature of the samples.

Magnetic susceptibility measurements

Magnetic susceptibility (χ) values at 77 K decrease from 8.05 × 10−6 m3 kg−1 for FHYD-000 to as low as 8.10 × 10−7 m3 kg−1 for FHYD-150 (Fig. 1). This is an effect of increasing content of diamagnetic silica in the samples. Similar lowering of magnetic susceptibility was reported previously [20]. The RT χ measurements revealed values several times lower—from ca. 1.5 × 10−6 m3 kg−1 for FHYD-000 to ca. 3.7 × 10−7 m3 kg−1 for FHYD-150. Previous evaluations of 2-line ferrihydrite magnetic susceptibility provided results in the range of 1–2.7 × 10−6 m3 kg−1 [5, 20, 34, 57], and our data for PFh fit within these limits. However, because of a relatively large measurement error of magnetic susceptibility at RT, only the results of low temperature measurements (77 K) are discussed below.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Magnetic susceptibility values of unheated ferrihydrites and resulting hematites measured at 77 K. The ratio of ferrihydrite to hematite susceptibility is also shown

Thermal studies

DTA curve of Si-free ferrihydrite shows typical dehydration endotherm with a maximum at 136 °C and sharp exotherm at ca. 460 °C, related to hematite formation (Fig. 2). Although the latter peak has been usually observed at temperatures <400 °C [1, 2, 58], a higher-temperature exotherm was also obtained in several studies [37, 5961]. A small mass loss (ca. 2.2 mass%) recorded in the range of 600–800 °C, originates from decomposition of relic sulfate. This additional feature is not visible on thermal patterns of higher-Si materials, but very weak QMS signal of SO2 still exists (not shown). As evidenced from infrared spectra, sulfate ions are strongly adsorbed onto ferrihydrite surface, hence retarding hematite crystallization. This is reflected by the shift of transformation exotherm. It has been also shown recently that ferrihydrite obtained from sulfate salts is slightly more thermally stable than obtained from nitrate [32]. A total mass loss of FHYD-000 is 21.28 mass% and remains similar for all the samples studied. The losses are comparable with earlier measurements of both synthetic [5, 17, 35, 37, 39] and natural ferrihydrites [16, 25, 49], but are explicitly higher than theoretical water content (~17 mass%), due to a high amounts of physisorbed water. A bend on DTA curves of low-Si samples at ca. 680 °C is an effect of applying preheated hematite-rich sample as inert material, because this is the Néel point of the mineral [2, 58].

Fig. 2
figure 2

DTA–TG–DTG plots and XRD patterns of the sample FHYD-000 unheated and heated to different temperatures. QMS signals (not to scale, dashed lines) of H2O and SO2 are shown as well. The numbers denote temperatures of processes/reactions. The background raising visible in the XRD pattern at 350 °C derives from a glass plate used in sample preparation

The presence of Si in ferrihydrite hampers its conversion to hematite: A gradual weakening and broadening of the transformation exotherm is observed, as well as shifting of the peak position toward higher temperatures, up to ca. 900 °C for FHYD-150 (Figs. 39). For LSFh, a nearly linear relationship between Si content and the peak position exists (Figs. 35), which is in line with previous works [24, 40]. However, no such relation has been found in HSFh: For both FHYD-075 and FHYD-100 samples, the exotherm is located at 925 °C (Figs. 7, 8), and for FHYD-150, the peak is split into two broad maxima at 895 and 925 °C (Fig. 9). Additionally, some shifting of the low-temperature dehydration endotherm has been observed—HSFh appears to loose water at slightly higher temperatures than LSFh. The strong bend visible between approximately 600 and 900 °C in thermal patterns of high-Si ferrihydrites is not a real endotherm (Figs. 69), but is related to temperature-dependent differences in heat capacities and heat conductivities between the sample and the inert material.

Fig. 3
figure 3

DTA–TG–DTG plots and XRD patterns of the sample FHYD-005 unheated and heated to different temperatures. For explanations see Fig. 2

Fig. 4
figure 4

DTA–TG–DTG plots and XRD patterns of the sample FHYD-010 unheated and heated to different temperatures. C—cristobalite

Fig. 5
figure 5

DTA–TG–DTG plots and XRD patterns of the sample FHYD-020 unheated and heated to different temperatures. C—cristobalite

Fig. 6
figure 6

DTA–TG–DTG plots and XRD patterns of the sample FHYD-050 unheated and heated to different temperatures. C—cristobalite

Fig. 7
figure 7

DTA–TG–DTG plots and XRD patterns of the sample FHYD-075 unheated and heated to different temperatures. C—cristobalite

Fig. 8
figure 8

DTA–TG–DTG plots and XRD patterns of the sample FHYD-100 unheated and heated to different temperatures. C—cristobalite

Fig. 9
figure 9

DTA–TG–DTG plots and XRD patterns of the sample FHYD-150 unheated and heated to different temperatures. C—cristobalite

Hematites obtained by ferrihydrite annealing

Bulk properties—XRD, FTIR and magnetic susceptibility

X-ray diffraction patterns (Figs. 29) indicate that the sole product of thermal transformation of PFh and the main product of the transformation of all Si-ferrihydrites is hematite. All the Si-containing samples reveal the broadening of hematite reflections, indicating the decrease in its crystallinity. The broadening was most advanced in the FHYD-005 sample, and for LSFh, it clearly decreased with increasing Si/Fe ratio (is to be published elsewhere). For high-Si materials, the broadening is less evident. This is consistent with earlier results [40]. Increasing Si/Fe molar ratio (≥0.10) in the initial material took an effect also in the appearance of cristobalite (Figs. 49).

Infrared spectrum of annealed PFh reveals features at ca. 545, 472 and 440 cm−1, typical for hematite [24, 39]. With increasing Si/Fe ratio, a slight shift of the 545 cm−1 band toward lower wave numbers is observed. The intensity of the peak at 472 cm−1 decreases at the same time, and in the spectra of the samples FHYD-005 to FHYD-020, this band occurs as a shoulder of the 445 cm−1 band. The features reflect differences in hematite crystallite morphology, because the position of these IR bands of α-Fe2O3 are sensitive to the particle size and shape [2, 24, 40, 62]. It is also indicated by hematite SEM images (see below). For the hematites obtained from HSFh, a sharp peak ca. 790 cm−1 appears, due to siloxane (Si–O–Si) vibrations [24]. An intensive band at ca. 1080 cm−1, visible for all Si-containing samples, is an effect of Si–O stretching [24]. The feature has been reported as typical cristobalite band [54] as well as 615, 472 cm−1 bands and the shoulders at ~1050 and ~1200 cm−1, which can be found for HSFh.

Magnetic susceptibilities of annealed samples are substantially lower (1.37 × 10−7 m3 kg−1 for FHYD-000 to 6.73 × 10−7 m3 kg−1 for FHYD-150) than those measured for unheated samples (Fig. 1, compare the scales), which is consistent with previous works [2, 5, 20, 34]. However, the increasing Si/Fe ratio appears to increase magnetic susceptibility of the annealed product (Fig. 1).

Crystal sizes and shapes

Hematite originated from heating of Si-free ferrihydrite forms quite large (up to 1 μm in size) isometric and prismatic crystals (Fig. 10), which often exhibit hexagonal shape. Such a habit is typical for the oxide crystallizing in the absence of additives [2]. Almost identical images of hematite obtained by heating of (carbonated) 2-line ferrihydrite at 1000 °C were presented previously [55]. The oxide particles become twenty times smaller in the lowest-silicate material (Si/Fe = 0.05) and reveal spheroidal morphology (Fig. 10). However, hematites obtained by annealing FHYD-010 and FHYD-020 samples are distinctly larger than those originating from FHYD-005 sample (Figs. 10, 11), which is in line with XRD results. In higher-silicate products, the crystallites are embedded in cryptocrystalline silica and exhibit wider range of crystal habits—isometric grains, plates, rods and even needles were encountered (Fig. 10). Elongated crystallites (rods and needles) are more common in the highest-Si products, which are reflected by the increase in average aspect ratios. A distinct increase in the aspect ratio distribution, estimated by standard deviations, evidences increasing heterogeneity of hematite habits (Fig. 11) and suggests various transformation routes. These findings are contrasting with the previous data [24] that spheroidal hematite particles formed from Si-ferrihydrite, irrespective of the Si/Fe molar ratio. That work, however, involved narrower range of Si/Fe ratios (up to 0.75).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Secondary electron micrographs of hematite resulting from ferrihydrite annealing. The histograms of particle size distributions are shown in the insets (on the basis of the longer dimension in micrometers, n the number of measured particles; note different dimension scale for lower- and higher-Si samples)

Fig. 11
figure 11

Average longer dimensions (diamonds) and aspect ratios (crosses) of hematite particles versus Si/Fe molar ratio of initial ferrihydrites. Dimension and aspect ratio variability is expressed as standard deviations (whiskers)

Transformation pathways

Pure ferrihydrite

PFh heated to 350 °C reveals the increase in relative intensity and the decrease in FWHM of broad XRD peaks (Fig. 2). Due to dehydration and dehydroxylation, the intensities of IR bands at 3385 and 1635 cm−1 decrease. Additionally, the band at ca. 592 cm−1 becomes less intense and is shifted to ca. 570 cm−1. At 550 °C, highly disordered hematite is the sole transformation product (Fig. 2), which is evidenced by both XRD and FTIR. However, the bands at ~3400 and 1635 cm−1 as well as ~1130 and 980 cm−1, attributable to OH and SO4 vibrations, respectively, are still visible in the FTIR spectra. This is in agreement with thermal analysis, because at 550 °C, the plateau of H2O release is not yet attained and sulfates begin to decompose only at ca. 600 °C (Fig. 2). Therefore, the proper (stoichiometric) hematite is developed at higher temperatures [24, 40, 63]. Magnetic susceptibilities are gradually lowered in the temperature range of 25–550 °C, and then, i.e., after hematite crystallization, only slight further lowering is observed (Fig. 12).

Fig. 12
figure 12

Magnetic susceptibility values (measured at 77 K) of ferrihydrites annealed to different temperatures

Low-Si ferrihydrites (Si/Fe 0.05–0.20)

Similar LSFh transformations were found. After low-temperature dehydration, gradual increase in XRD peak intensities and gradual decrease in their widths are observed. Up to 500 °C, no distinct phase conversion is evidenced from XRD patterns. In FTIR spectra of FHYD-010 sample, a shift of the 935 cm−1 band to 980 cm−1 just before the transformation to hematite (600 °C) and to 1030 cm−1 just after the conversion (700 °C) indicates the breakup of Si–O–Fe linkages and subsequent formation of silica phase. In comparison with PFh, the most important difference is the distinct increase in temperature of transformation to hematite (Figs. 35). The just-formed α-Fe2O3 is initially poorly crystalline, but further heating results in the increase in crystallinity (Figs. 35). The formation of cristobalite takes place at high temperatures—in XRD patterns of FHYD-010 (Fig. 4) and FHYD-020 samples (Fig. 5) cristobalite is recognizable only at 1000 °C. This is confirmed by FTIR analysis. Interestingly, cristobalite is not present in FHYD-005 sample (or is below detection limit). Even at 1000 °C, only the background raising at 15–30 two-theta degrees is apparent (which is hardly visible in Fig. 3). Similar phenomenon observed previously during heating of relatively low-Si ferrihydrites was linked with the formation of extremely poorly crystalline Si–O–Fe phase [40].

Magnetic susceptibility value of the FHYD-010 sample slightly increases (from 3.28 to 3.88 × 10−6 m3 kg−1, measurements at 77 K) just before the conversion to hematite (Fig. 12). Then it drops significantly to approximately 1.5 × 10−6 m3 kg−1, when hematite forms, and to as low as ca. 1.5 × 10−7 m3 kg−1, after finishing of the heating. Therefore, according to previous studies [5, 20, 33, 64], anion-doping of ferrihydrite appears to enhance magnetic susceptibility of dehydrated oxyhydroxide prior to its conversion to hematite.

High-Si ferrihydrites (Si/Fe 0.50–1.50)

For the FHYD-050 sample, the transformation pathway is similar to LSFh up to at least 600 °C—the material still exhibits two-peak ferrihydrite-like XRD pattern (Fig. 6), and FTIR spectrum possesses similar features as FHYD-010 spectrum prior to transformation. X-ray diffractograms reveal virtually no phase transformations between 600 and 750 °C (Fig. 6), but magnetic susceptibility increases by almost order of magnitude, from ca. 1 × 10−6 m3 kg−1 at 600 °C up to 8.6 × 10−6 m3 kg−1 at 750 °C (Fig. 12) and further to 1.36 × 10−5 m3 kg−1 at 800 °C. In the FTIR spectra, two additional shoulders at ca. 570 cm−1 and ca. 1200 cm−1 become visible at the same time, and the band at ca. 1000 cm−1 is shifted to ca. 1060 cm−1. The shift as well as the appearance of shoulder near 1200 cm−1 is a result of amorphous silica release, which is also reflected in XRD pattern, where a small background raising between 20° and 30°2Θ is observed (Fig. 6). Therefore, some kind of phase transition is feasible at 700–750 °C. The formation of nanocrystalline maghemite or ‘ferrimagnetic ferrihydrite’ [5] seems likely, because both these phases bring on distinct increase in magnetic susceptibility and were previously noticed during heating of (anion-doped) ferrihydrite. Transient nanomaghemite was reported in the course of annealing of various SiO2–Fe2O3 mixtures and nanocomposites [e.g., 65, 66], and for extremely fine-sized particles only two broad diffraction maxima were observed at ca. 2.50 and 1.475 Å, i.e., exactly the same positions as in the case of FHYD-050 sample. Gradual rising of the band at ca. 570 cm−1 in the FTIR spectra also supports the presence of nanomaghemite.

In the XRD pattern of the FHYD-050 sample heated at 800 °C, nanomaghemite is replaced with a series of nanocrystalline hematite peaks (Fig. 6) and additional reflections, attributed to ε-Fe2O3 [67]. The transformation is also reflected in FTIR spectra—besides silica feature at ca. 800 cm−1, two new bands at 685 and 530 cm−1 appear at 800 °C and the additional shoulder ca. 600 cm−1 at 850 °C. Similar FTIR features were reported for ε-Fe2O3 [68]. Therefore, between 800 and 885 °C, two Fe2O3 polymorphs (alpha and epsilon) coexist in the sample. XRD pattern of the FHYD-050 sample annealed to 910 °C reveals the presence of cristobalite and hematite only (Fig. 6), hence the sharp exotherm on the DTA curve at 900 °C (Fig. 6) is related to the transformation of ε-Fe2O3 to α-Fe2O3. Above the temperature, hematite is the sole iron oxide present in the annealing product and the narrowing of XRD peaks due to improving of crystallinity is observed.

The general course of thermal transformations during annealing of higher-Si samples is similar to that of FHYD-050, but the reaction temperatures as well as some of the details are varying among the samples. The materials still exhibit two-peak ferrihydrite-like XRD pattern, but, in contrast to lower-Si samples, a broadening of the 110 peak toward lower two-theta angles is observed at 500–600 °C (Fig. 79). At the same time, an incremental shifting of Si–O band at ca. 1000 cm−1 toward higher wavenumbers up to ca. 1045 cm−1 appears in FTIR spectrum of FHYD-150 sample in this temperature range. A progressive release of silica from ferrihydrite explains these observations. Amorphous silica formation results in separation at 650–700 °C of formerly one broad band into two broad peaks at ca. 3.9 and 2.5–2.6 Å (Fig. 79). This is followed by the formation of nanocrystalline maghemite between 700 and 800 °C. In the XRD patterns, only a few very broad peaks are recognizable (Figs. 79), which is consistent with other works [e.g., 65, 68]. The formation of nanomaghemite results in substantial increase in magnetic susceptibility (Fig. 12). Lower χ values compared to 4–20 × 10−4 m3 kg−1 of pure maghemite [2] results from both poor crystallinity and lower Fe content in the sample.

Subsequently, nanomaghemite is transformed to ε-Fe2O3 at 800–850 °C, which is evidenced by both XRD (Figs. 79) and FTIR. ε-Fe2O3 is stable up to ca. 920 °C. In the samples of 0.75 and 1.0 Si/Fe ratios, further increase in temperature (>920 °C) results in ε-Fe2O3 conversion to hematite and crystallization of cristobalite (Figs. 7, 8). In turn, XRD patterns of annealed highest-Si sample (Si/Fe = 1.5) show also the presence of additional β-Fe2O3 phase between 907 °C and 930 °C. At 907 °C hematite appears, and ε-Fe2O3 vanishes by 930 °C (Fig. 9), so at the latter temperature, two Fe2O3 polymorphs (α and β) are present. Therefore, two exotherms on DTA curve at 895 and 925 °C (Fig. 9) could be explained by crystallization of β-Fe2O3 and recrystallization of ε-Fe2O3 to hematite, respectively. At 1000 °C, hematite is the sole iron oxide in all the products.

The role of Si in thermal transformation of ferrihydrite

In the case of the annealed Si-ferrihydrites, the major factor that appears to affect both the transformation routes and the properties of the products is Si content in pristine oxyhydroxide. Silicate stabilizes ferrihydrite structure and hampers its conversion to hematite. The shifting of the transformation reaction to higher temperatures is caused by the inhibiting effect of silicate on rearrangement processes within ferrihydrite particles which are necessary for structural ordering and conversion into the oxide [2]. For this reason, the hematite crystallinity is distinctly decreased as well. In our study, the lowest-Si ferrihydrite was converted into the smallest-sized hematite, and the increasing Si content appeared to increase the hematite particle dimensions (Figs. 10, 11). It was previously suggested [40] that small amounts of Si could enter the hematite structure during Si-ferrihydrite annealing, but were ejected when higher annealing temperature was achieved. It might be a reason for poor crystal development when hematite originated from conversion of low-Si ferrihydrite. Because Si is coordinated tetrahedrally, it is hardly possible to enter the structure of stoichiometric hematite, where all (iron) cations occupy octahedral positions. On the other hand, initially formed non-stoichiometric hematite is highly disordered and, as evidenced by thermal analyses and FTIR, still contains some hydroxyls and trace sulfates. Therefore, incorporation of silicate in such disordered lattice appears to be more plausible. When heating is prolonged to higher temperature, hydroxyls and silicates would be ejected from the structure and stoichiometric, but fine-crystalline hematite is formed.

Heating of HSFh runs differently, because silicate bound to the oxyhydroxide surface is gradually polymerized and crystallizes thus forming a kind of matrix, in which the particles of dehydr(oxyl)ated ferrihydrite and nanomaghemite are embedded. In the absence of such matrix, maghemite always undergoes the conversion to hematite [2, 51]. However, the matrix hampers the coalescence, avoids the agglomeration of the particles and keeps their sizes quite constant. Because, as it was hypothesized earlier, the phase conversion of γ-Fe2O3 to α-Fe2O3 takes place once the maghemite nanoparticles reach a critical size of 10–25 nm [51], the cristobalite-like mass would inhibit the hematite crystallization. Therefore, an analogue of SiO2-maghemite nanocomposite is formed, which has been reported to enhance maghemite thermal stability and favor its transformation to hematite via indirect mechanisms [51, 69, 70]. The specific conditions that are developed allow to the formation of rare polymorphic forms (i.e., ε-Fe2O3 and β-Fe2O3), impossible to stabilize otherwise [71]. These polymorphs exhibit different habits – transmission electron microscopic observations (to be presented elsewhere) reveal rods of epsilon phase and cubes of beta phase. Further annealing of the samples (above approximately 920–930 °C) causes the conversion of these intermediates into hematite, and the latter can inherit the precursor habits. For these reasons, the hematites obtained during annealing of HSFh exhibit various crystal shapes, reflected in, for example, the high variability of aspect ratios (Figs. 10, 11). However, particular mechanisms which control β-Fe2O3 formation besides ε-Fe2O3 remain unclear. It was hypothesized recently [72] that free energies of nanoparticles play dominant role here, but later works showed that the character of the starting compound and the synthesis conditions appeared to be more important [53].

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that silicate content retards ferrihydrite thermal transformation to hematite and affects crystallinity of the latter. The properties of resulting hematite, as well as transformation pathways, are highly dependent on Si/Fe molar ratio. In general, higher Si/Fe molar ratios result in more complex transformations. The most important observations and conclusions are as follows:

  1. 1.

    When Si admixture is lower than 0.2 mol mol−1 Fe, then ferrihydrite nanoparticles are stabilized by adsorbed silicate and the conversion to α-Fe2O3 is hindered. Magnetic susceptibility is slightly increased prior to the transformation, but no distinct intermediate is formed. The crystal size of all resulting hematites is distinctly reduced compared to the product of pure ferrihydrite annealing, but increases with increasing Si/Fe molar ratio.

  2. 2.

    When Si/Fe ratio in pristine ferrihydrite is higher, silicate progressively polymerizes with increasing temperature and forms a sort of matrix in which iron compounds are embedded. The aggregation of iron oxide nanoparticles is impeded, and the conditions favoring crystallization of intermediate phases arise. A distinct increase in magnetic susceptibility is observed at the same time.

  3. 3.

    The intermediates include nanocrystalline maghemite, followed by rare iron oxide polymorphs: ε-Fe2O3 and—in the case of the highest-Si material—also β-Fe2O3.

  4. 4.

    Hematite, which is the sole Fe2O3 polymorph at 1000 °C, can inherit the precursors’ habits, hence its shape and size range significantly.

  5. 5.

    To the best of the authors’ knowledge, ε-Fe2O3 and β-Fe2O3 have not been reported yet as a result of ferrihydrite heating (besides the short mention in [40]). Annealing of Si-ferrihydrites might therefore offer an alternative method of obtaining these rare polymorphs.

  6. 6.

    This work evidences that the formation of both epsilon and beta Fe2O3 is possible when siliceous ferrihydrites are heated to high temperature. Because Si-rich ferric (oxyhydro)oxide materials occur in some geological environments (e.g., in hydrothermal systems of mid-ocean ridges), the formation of these rare Fe2O3 polymorphs seems plausible if specific conditions are met.