Abstract
The purpose of this article is to explore how preservice elementary teachers (PSETs) interpreted their service-learning experiences within a pre-methods environmentally focused course and how their interpretations shaped their science teaching identities. Along a continuum of service-learning experiences were events that emphasized science learning, that focused on science teaching, and that were transitional, with elements of both science learning and science teaching. These various service-learning experiences were designed to be “boundary experiences” for professional identity development (Geijsel & Meijers in Educational Studies, 3(4), 419–430, 2005), providing opportunities for PSETs to reflect on meanings in cultural contexts and how they are related to their own personal meanings. We analyzed written reflections and end-of-course oral reflection interviews from 42 PSETs on their various service-learning experiences. PSETs discussed themes related to the meanings they made of the service-learning experiences: (a) experiencing science in relation to their lives as humans and future teachers, (b) interacting with elementary students and other PSETs, and (c) making an impact in the physical environment and in the community. The connections that PSETs were making between the discursive spaces (service-learning contexts) and their own meaning-making of these experiences (as connected to their own interests in relation to their future professions and daily lives) shows evidence of the potential that various types of science service-learning experiences have for PSETs in developing inbound science teaching identity trajectories (Wenger in Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998). The findings of this study point to positive outcomes for PSETs when they participate in structured service-learning experiences along a learning to teaching continuum (246).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269–287.
Ash, S., Clayton, P., & Moses, M. (2009). Learning through critical reflection: A tutorial for service-learning students [instructor version]. Raleigh, NC: Center for Excellence in Curricular Engagement.
Brown, T. (2006). Negotiating psychological disturbance in pre-service teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 675–689.
Butcher, J., Howard, P., Labone, E., Bailey, M., Smith, S. G., McFadden, M., … Martinez, K. (2003). Teacher education, community service learning and student efficacy for community engagement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 109–124.
Butin, D. W. (2003). Of what use is it? Multiple conceptualizations of service learning within education. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1674–1692.
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Retrieved from: http://bscs.org/bscs-5e-instructional-model
Calabrese Barton, A. (2000). Crafting multicultural science education with preservice teachers through service-learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(6), 797–820.
Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., Tan, E., O’Neill, T. B., Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2013). Crafting a future in science: Tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and space. American Education Research Journal, 50, 37–75.
Cartwright, T. J. (2012). Science talk: Preservice teachers facilitating science learning in diverse afterschool environments. School Science and Mathematics, 112(6), 384–391.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.
Cobern, W. W., & Loving, C. C. (2002). Investigation of preservice elementary teachers’ thinking about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1016–1031.
Cone, N. (2009). A bridge to developing efficacious science teachers of all students: Community-based service-learning supplemented with explicit discussions and activities about diversity. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 365–383.
Cone, N. (2012). The effects of community-based service learning on preservice teachers’ beliefs about the characteristics of effective science teachers of diverse students. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 889–907.
Costa, V. B. (1995). When science is “another world”: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79(3), 313–333.
Cox-Petersen, A. M., Spencer, B. H., & Crawford, T. J. (2005). Developing a community of teachers through integrated science and literacy service-learning experiences. Issues in Teacher Education, 14(1), 23–37.
Davis, E. A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 281–301.
Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607–651.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Eick, C. J. (2009). Tailoring national standards to early science teacher identities: Building on personal histories to support beginning practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 135–156.
Eick, C. J., & Reed, C. J. (2002). What makes an inquiry-oriented science teacher? The influence of learning histories on student teacher role identity and practice. Science Education, 86, 401–416.
Frykholm, J. (2004). Teachers’ tolerance for discomfort: Implications for curricular reform in mathematics. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 19(2), 125–149.
Fusco, D. (2001). Creating relevant science through urban planning and gardening. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 860–877.
Geijsel, F., & Meijers, F. (2005). Identity learning: The core process of educational change. Educational Studies, 3(4), 419–430.
Griffith, G., & Scharmann, L. (2008). Initial impacts of no child left behind on elementary science education. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20, 35–48.
Hatcher, J. A., Bringle, R. G., & Muthiah, R. (2004). Designing effective reflection: What matters to service-learning? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 11(1), 38–46.
Holland, D. C., Lachicotte, W. J., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2011). The constructionist analytics of interpretive practice. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 341–357). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hurd, P. D. (2002). Modernizing science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 3–9.
Jung, M. L., & Tonso, K. L. (2006). Elementary preservice teachers learning to teach science in science museums and nature centers: A novel program’s impact on science knowledge, science pedagogy, and confidence teaching. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 18, 15–31.
Katz, P., McGinnis, J. R., Riedinger, K., Marbach-Ad, G., & Dai, A. (2012). The influence of informal science education experiences on the development of two beginning teachers’ science classroom teaching identity. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(8), 1357–1379.
King, D., & Ritchie, S. M. (2012). Learning science through real-world contexts. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (Vol. 1, pp. 69–79). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Headrick Taylor, K. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34, 329–394.
Luehmann, A. L. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91, 822–839.
Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995). Rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 311, 109–112.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction: What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984–2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2008). Unit standards in effect 2008. Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/Standards/UnitStandards/UnitStandardsinEffect2008/tabid/476/Default.aspx
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. In R. Wisniewski & J. A. Hatch (Ed.), Life history and narrative. Washington, DC: Falmer.
Price, J. F., & McNeil, K. L. (2013). Toward a lived science curriculum in intersecting figured worlds an exploration of individual meanings in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(5), 501–525.
Reynolds, J. A., & Ahern-Dodson, J. (2010). Promoting science literacy through research service-learning—An emerging pedagogy with significant benefits for students, faculty, universities, and communities. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(6), 24–29.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Settlage, J., Southerland, S. A., Smith, L. K., & Ceglie, R. (2009). Constructing a doubt-free teaching self: Self-efficacy, teacher identity, and science instruction within diverse settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 102–125.
Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.
Smagorinsky, P., Cook, L. S., Moore, C., Jackson, A. Y., & Fry, P. G. (2004). Tensions in learning to teach: Accommodation and the development of a teacher identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1), 8–24.
Spencer, B. H., Cox-Petersen, A. M., & Crawford, T. (2005). Assessing the impact of service-learning on preservice teachers in an after-school program. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(4), 119–135.
Timoštšuk, I., & Ugaste, A. (2010). Student teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1563–1570.
Wallace, C. S. (2013). Promoting shifts in preservice science teachers’ thinking through teaching and action research in informal science settings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 811–832.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, R. E., & Kittleson, J. (2012). The role of struggle in pre-service elementary teachers’ experiences as students and approaches to facilitating science learning. Research in Science Education, 42(4), 709–728.
Windschitl, M. (2006). Why we can’t talk to one another about science education reform. The Phi Delta Kappan, 87(5), 348–355.
Wolcott, H. F. (2001). Writing up qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, R.E., Bradbury, L.U. & McGlasson, M.A. Integrating Service-Learning Pedagogy for Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Science Identity Development. J Sci Teacher Educ 26, 319–340 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9425-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9425-4