Abstract
Grounded in Hallidayan perspectives on academic language, we report on our development of an educative science assessment as one component of the language-rich inquiry science for English-language learners teacher professional learning project for middle school science teachers. The project emphasizes the role of content-area writing to support teachers in diagnosing their students’ emergent understandings of science inquiry practices, science content knowledge, and the academic language of science, with a particular focus on the needs of English-language learners. In our current school policy context, writing for meaningful purposes has received decreased attention as teachers struggle to cover large numbers of discrete content standards. Additionally, high-stakes assessments presented in multiple-choice format have become the definitive measure of student science learning, further de-emphasizing the value of academic writing for developing and expressing understanding. To counter these trends, we examine the implementation of educative assessment materials—writing-rich assessments designed to support teachers’ instructional decision making. We report on the qualities of our educative assessment that supported teachers in diagnosing their students’ emergent understandings, and how teacher–researcher collaborative scoring sessions and interpretation of assessment results led to changes in teachers’ instructional decision making to better support students in expressing their scientific understandings. We conclude with implications of this work for theory, research, and practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberts, B. (2009). Redefining science education. Science, 323(5913), 437.
August, D., & Hakuta, K. (Eds.). (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Buxton, C., & Provenzo, E. (2011). “Natural philosophy” as a foundation for science education in an age of high-stakes accountability. School Science and Mathematics, 111(2), 49–56.
Buxton, C., Allexsaht-Snider, M., & Rivera, C. (2012). Science, language and families: Constructing a model of language-rich science inquiry. In J.Bianchini, V. Atkerson, A. Calebrese Barton, O. Lee, & A. Rodriguez (Eds.), Moving the equity agenda forward: Equity research, practice and policy in science education (pp. 241-259). New York: Springer.
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Supporting argumentation through students’ questions: Case studies in science classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 230–284.
Coxhead, A. J. (1998). An Academic Word List. English Language Institute Occasional Publication Number 18. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314.
Davis, E., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. (2008). Reading in secondary content areas: A language-based pedagogy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Critical perspectives on literacy and education. London: Falmer.
Gunel, M., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2007). Writing for learning in science: A secondary analysis of six studies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 615–637.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2002). On grammar in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, Vol. 1. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London and Washington, DC: Falmer.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
Hand, B., Wallace, C., & Yang, E. (2004). Using a science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh-grade science: Quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 131–149.
Hayes, J. R., & Hatch, J. A. (1999). Issues in measuring reliability. Written Communication, 16(3), 354–367.
Hohenshell, L., & Hand, B. (2006). Writing-to-learn strategies in secondary school cell biology: A mixed method study. International Journal of Science Education. (28)2–3, 261–289.
International Reading Association, & National Middle School Association. (2001). Supporting young adolescents’ literacy learning: A joint position statement of the International Reading Association and the National Middle School Association. Newark, DE: Authors.
Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Lee, O., & Buxton, C. (2010). Diversity and equity in science education: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296–316.
National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting themes, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Noble, T., Suarez, C., Rosebery, A., O’Connor, M., Warren, B., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2012). “I never thought of it as freezing”: How students answer questions on large-scale science test and what they know about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 778–803.
Perie, M., Grigg, W., & Dion, G. (2005). The nation’s report card: Mathematics 2005 (NCES 2006-4453). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2006). The challenges of academic language in school subjects. In I. Lindberg & K. Sandwall (Eds.), Språket och kunskapen: att lära på sitt andraspråk i skola och högskola (pp. 47–69). Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborgs Universitet Institutet.
Short, D., & Fitzsimmons, S. (2007). Double the work: Challenges and solutions to acquiring language and academic literacy for adolescent English language learners. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
Snow, C. E., Lawrence, J., & White, C. (2009). Generating knowledge of academic language among urban middle school students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 325–344.
Solano-Flores, G., & Trumbull, E. (2003). Examining language in context: The need for new research and practice paradigms in the testing of English language learners. Educational Researcher, 32(2), 3–13.
Zeng, L., Kolen, M. J., Hanson, B. A., Cui, Z., & Chien, Y. (2005). RAGE-RGEQUATE [Computer program]. Iowa City: University of Iowa. Program available at www.education.uiowa.edu/casma/EquatingLinkingPrograms.htm.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1019236.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Buxton, C.A., Allexsaht-Snider, M., Suriel, R. et al. Using Educative Assessments to Support Science Teaching for Middle School English-language Learners. J Sci Teacher Educ 24, 347–366 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9329-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9329-5