Abstract
In this article, we describe an innovative capstone course for preservice K-8 teachers integrating action research and a unifying theme in science (AAAS in Science for all Americans. Oxford University Press, New York, 1989; NRC in National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1996). The goals of the capstone course are to increase student knowledge of the unifying theme, improve written communication skills, and introduce students to educational research. We provide evidence that each of these goals is met. Student growth in theme knowledge is demonstrated through concept maps, questionnaires, and previously reported assessments. Improved writing ability is demonstrated using the spelling and grammar checking feature of Microsoft Word. The analysis of action research reports demonstrates that students are able to connect their action research project results to previous research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altrichter, H., Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2002). The concept of action research. The Learning Organization, 9, 125–131.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press. [Electronic version]. Retrieved January 1, 2008 from http://www.project2061.org/tools/sfaaol/sfaatoc.htm.
American Psychological Association (APA). (2001). Displaying your findings: A practical guide for creating figures, posters, and presentations. The publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Biddle, B. J., & Anderson, D. S. (1991). Social research and educational change. In D. S. Anderson & B. J. Biddle (Eds.), Knowledge for policy: Improving education through research (pp. 1–20). London: Falmer Press.
Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. (1992). Science for life and living. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Bryan, L., & Abell, S. (1999). Development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 121–139.
Everett, S., Luera, G. R., & Otto, C. A. (2007). Preservice elementary teachers bridge the gap between research and practice. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 1–17.
Everett, S., Luera, G. R., & Otto, C. A. (2008a, March). Investigating the pedagogical content knowledge of preservice elementary teachers concerning models. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD.
Everett, S., Luera, G. R., & Otto, C. A. (2008b). Improving preservice elementary teachers’ writing in a science context. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(6), 44–48.
Ferrance, E. (2000). Action research. Providence, RI: LAB Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratories at Brown University.
Gilbert, S., & Ireton, S. (2003). Understanding models in earth and space science. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. S. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 799–822.
Hallinan, M. T. (1996). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Sociology of Education, extra issue, 13, 1–134.
Hart, E., & Robottom, I. (1990). The science technology—society movement in science education: A critique of the reform process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 575–588.
Jenkins, E. W. (2000). What can physics teachers learn from research in physics education? Physics Education, 35, 245–250.
Kaestle, C. (1993). The awful reputation of education research. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 23–31.
Kennedy, M. M. (1997). The connection between research and practice. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 4–12.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1991). Science and behavioral research. In D. S. Anderson & B. J. Biddle (Eds.), Knowledge for policy: Improving education through research (pp. 87–102). London: Falmer Press.
Luera, G., Everett, S., & Otto, C. (2007, April). Progress towards developing a measure to assess the pedagogical content knowledge of preservice elementary teachers concerning models. Poster presented the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
Luera, G. R., & Otto, C. A. (2005). Development and evaluation of an inquiry-based elementary science teacher education program reflecting current reform movements. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 241–258.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Teachers Association. (1990). The role of research in science teaching. Retrieved January 1, 2008 from http://www.nsta.org/positionstatement&psid=30.
Noffke, S. E., & Stevenson, R. B. (Eds.). (1995). Educational action research: Becoming practically critical. New York: Teachers College Press.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
Richardson-Koehler, E. (1987). What happens to research on the way to practice? Theory into Practice, 26, 38–43.
Robertson, I. J. (2004). Assessing the quality of undergraduate education students’ writing about learning and teaching science. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1131–1149.
Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.
Staten, M. E. (1998). Action research study: A framework to help move teachers toward an inquiry-based science teaching approach. Milwaukee, WI: Milwaukee Public Schools.
Tabachnick, B., & Zeichner, K. (1999). Idea and action: Action research and the development of conceptual change teaching of science. Science Education, 83, 309–322.
Tillotson, J. W. (2000). Studying the game: Action research in science education. The Clearing House, 74, 31–34.
Tomanek, D., Talanquer, V., Novodvorsky, I., & Slater, T. F. (2003). Responding to the call for change: The new college of science teacher preparation program at the University of Arizona. Cell Biological Education, 2, 29–34.
Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2002). Students’ understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 357–368.
van Zee, E. (1998). Fostering elementary teachers’ research on their science practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 49, 245–254.
Weiss, C. H. (1995). The four “I’s” of school reform: How interests, ideology, information, and institution affect teachers and principals. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 571–592.
William, D. (2002, October). Linking research and practice: Knowledge transfer or knowledge creation? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Athens, GA.
Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. (2001). Introductory thermal concept evaluation: Assessing students’ understanding. Physics Teacher, 39, 496–504.
Yore, L. D., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (1999, January). Writing-to-learn science: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises. Paper presented at the international conference of the Association for Educating Teachers in Science, Austin, TX.
Acknowledgments
Federal support was critical for our development and implementation of science education reform. Without support from the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE; grant number P116B000759) and two National Science Foundation grants (DUE 9652117: revision of the science content of our education program and DUE 0402488: development and assessment of pre-writing activities), we would have been extremely limited in the scope and rate at which we could improve our program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Otto, C.A., Luera, G.R. & Everett, S.A. An Innovative Course Featuring Action Research Integrated with Unifying Science Themes. J Sci Teacher Educ 20, 537–552 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9146-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9146-7