Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Cu content in CeO2 nanoparticles on their antibacterial properties

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The CeO2 nanoparticles (NPs) with different Cu contents were synthesized, and their antibacterial activity was evaluated quantitatively. It was performed for two of the antibiotic-resistant microorganisms that require urgent attention. The materials were synthesized by co-precipitation method in an alkaline medium (pH 9) using a concentration of 20 mM of Cerium nitrate with three different amounts of Copper nitrate (1, 3, and 5 wt%) content. Polyvinylpyrrolidone was used as a dispersing agent, and ammonium hydroxide was used as a precipitant. The obtained NPs were characterized using different techniques to determine the change in properties due to the Cu dopant amount. The X-ray diffraction, electron microscope techniques, and BET method were used to know the particle’s structure, morphology, and porosity. From diffraction patterns, all samples showed a cubic CeO2 structure and no additional peaks belonging to Cu or CuO phases. The crystal size and lattice parameters obtained by Rietveld refinement of XRD patterns decrease slightly according to Cu content, and the d-space of (1 1 1) plane is agreed with the shifting of this intensity toward low angles (2θ). The SEM images show agglomerated particles with sizes between 0.2 and 4 μm, and the TEM images show spherical shape particles with sizes between 7 and 9 nm. The elemental mapping analysis revealed that the Cu atoms are dispersed in the CeO2 particles. All samples show a specific surface area between 90 and 130 m2/g, and there are ink-bottle-shaped mesopores. The quantitative antibacterial test was evaluated according to the ASTM E2149-20 standard procedure. The highest inhibition against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) was 72%, with the sample containing 3 wt% Cu. Meanwhile, the antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) was 48% with the highest Cu Content (5 wt%) with 48 μg/mL of NPs. A significant difference was observed between the antibacterial activity of pure CeO2 and Cu-doped CeO2 NPs. However, increasing the Cu content in the CeO2 NPs or increasing the concentration of NPs for the evaluation is necessary to find adequate inhibition for this bacterium.

Graphical Abstract

The graphical abstract describes the main steps of this research. Firstly, the CeO2 NPs synthesized with different amounts of Cu salt precursor. Then, their characterization by different techniques let us know the physicochemical properties. Finally, the quantitative antibacterial test against two strains was carried out.

Highlights

  • The co-precipitation method allows for obtaining nanoparticles with high surface area.

  • The size of the CeO2 nanoparticle changes according to Cu content.

  • Copper atoms were dispersed homogeneously in the CeO2 nanoparticles.

  • The CeO2 nanoparticles enhanced their antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus depending on the Cu quantity content.

  • The influence of Cu content in CeO2 on antibacterial activity was evaluated quantitatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nyoka M, Choonara YE, Kumar P, Kondiah PPD, Pillay V (2020) Synthesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles using various methods: Implications for biomedical applications. Nanomaterials 10:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dhall A, Self W (2018) Cerium oxide nanoparticles: a brief review of their synthesis methods and biomedical applications. Antioxidants. https://doi.org/10.3390/ANTIOX7080097

  3. Gupta A, Das S, Neal CJ, Seal S (2016) Controlling the surface chemistry of cerium oxide nanoparticles for biological applications. J Mater Chem B 4:3195–3202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar KM, Mahendhiran M, Diaz MC, Hernandez-Como N, Hernandez-Eligio A, Torres-Torres G, Godavarthi S, Gomez LM (2018) Green synthesis of Ce3+ rich CeO2 nanoparticles and its antimicrobial studies. Mater Lett 214:15–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang M, Zhang C, Zhai X, Luo F, Du Y, Yan C (2019) Antibacterial mechanism and activity of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Sci China Mater 62:1727–1739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. OMS (2017) WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed. Accessed 7 Mar 2023

  7. Li X, Gu N, Huang TY, Zhong F, Peng G (2022) Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a typical biofilm forming pathogen and an emerging but underestimated pathogen in food processing. Front Microbiol 13:1114199. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMICB.2022.1114199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bintsis T (2017) Foodborne pathogens. AIMS Microbiol 3:529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Araos R, D’Agata E (2020) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Other Pseudomonas Species. In: Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 9th edn. p 1–4176

  10. Pochtovyi AA, Vasina DV, Kustova DD, Divisenko EV, Kuznetsova NA, Burgasova OA, Kolobukhina LV, Tkachuk AP, Gushchin VA, Gintsburg AL (2021) Contamination of hospital surfaces with bacterial pathogens under the current COVID-19 outbreak. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(17):9042. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH18179042/S1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Li C, Shi X, Shen Q, Guo C, Hou Z, Zhang J (2018) Hot topics and challenges of regenerative nanoceria in application of antioxidant therapy. J Nanomater 2018:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4857461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Parimi D, Sundararajan V, Sadak O, Gunasekaran S, Mohideen SS, Sundaramurthy A (2019) Synthesis of positively and negatively charged CeO2 nanoparticles: investigation of the role of surface charge on growth and development of Drosophila melanogaster. ACS Omega 4(1):104–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang L, Lv H, Li B, Zhao Y, Sun L (2018) Synthesis and antibacterial activity of Ag/CeO2 hybrid architectures. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 88:654–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chatzimentor I, Tsamesidis I, Ioannou ME, Pouroutzidou GK, Beketova A, Giourieva V, Papi R, Kontonasaki E (2023) Study of biological behavior and antimicrobial properties of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Pharmaceutics 15:2509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Plocon C, Evanghelidis A, Enculescu M, Isopencu G, Oprea O, Bacalum M, Raileanu M, Jinga S, Busuioc C (2023) Development and characterization of electrospun composites built on polycaprolactone and cerium-containing phases. Int J Mol Sci 24(18):14201. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang M, Liu M, Shen G, Gong Y, Wang Z, Ji D, Li J, Yuan M, Wang Q (2023) Preparation and characterization of an antibrowning nanosized Ag-CeO2 composite with synergistic antibacterial ability. Mater (Basel) 16:5505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rubio L, Annangi B, Vila L, Hernández A, Marcos R (2016) Antioxidant and anti-genotoxic properties of cerium oxide nanoparticles in a pulmonary-like cell system. Arch Toxicol 90:269–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parvathy S, Venkatraman BR (2017) Synthesis and characterization of various metal ions Doped CeO2 nanoparticles derived from the azadirachta indica leaf extracts. 6:513–522

  19. Killivalavan G, Charles Prabakar A, Chandra Babu Naidu K, Sathyaseelan B, Rameshkumar G, Sivakumar D, Senthilnathan K, Baskaran I, Manikandan E, Rao BR (2020) Synthesis and characterization of pure and Cu doped CeO2 nanoparticles: photocatalytic and antibacterial activities evaluation. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry 10(2):5306-5311 https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC102.306311

  20. Chithradevi R, Surendhiran S, Balamurugan A, Bhoopathy P, Kandasamy K, Khadar YAS (2022) Evaluation of antibacterial activity and anticorrosive inhibition behaviour of copper doped cerium oxide nanoparticles (Cu-CeO2NPs). In: AIP Conference Proceedings p 20002

  21. Zhang S, Zhao C, Liu Y, Li W, Wang J, Wang G, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Zhao H (2019) Cu doping in CeO2 to form multiple oxygen vacancies for dramatically enhanced ambient N2 reduction performance. Chem Commun 55:2952–2955

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Norbert A, Alappatt SM, John SS, Shaji S, Remillard SK, Deshpande UP, Reena Philip R (2023) Phytosynthesized Cu-Doped cerium oxide nanoparticles for antibacterial application. Phys Status Solidi 220:2200731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ranjith KS, Dong CL, Lu YR, Huang YC, Chen CL, Saravanan P, Asokan K, Rajendra Kumar RT (2018) Evolution of visible photocatalytic properties of Cu-doped CeO2 nanoparticles: role of Cu2+-mediated oxygen vacancies and the mixed-valence states of Ce ions. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:8536–8546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumari K, Aljawfi RN, Chawla AK, Kumar R, Alvi PA, Alshoaibi A, Vij A, Ahmed F, Abu-samak M, Kumar S (2020) Engineering the optical properties of Cu doped CeO2 NCs for application in white LED. Ceram Int Ceram Int 46:7482–7488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang ZQ, Liu HH, Wu XP, Hu P, Gong XQ (2022) Hydride generation on the Cu-doped CeO2(111) surface and its role in CO2 hydrogenation reactions. Catalysts 12:963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khan H, Yerramilli AS, D’Oliveira A, Alford TL, Boffito DC, Patience GS (2020) Experimental methods in chemical engineering: X-ray diffraction spectroscopy—XRD. Can J Chem Eng 98:1255–1266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lábár JL (2008) Electron diffraction based analysis of phase fractions and texture in nanocrystalline thin films, part I: principles. Microsc Microanal 14:287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lábár JL (2009) Electron diffraction based analysis of phase fractions and texture in nanocrystalline thin films, part II: Implementation. Microsc Microanal 15:20–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lábár JL, Adamik M, Barna BP et al. (2012) Electron diffraction based analysis of phase fractions and texture in nanocrystalline thin films, part III: application examples. Microsc Microanal 18:406–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lábár JL (2005) Consistent indexing of a (set of) single crystal SAED pattern(s) with the ProcessDiffraction program. Ultramicroscopy 103:237–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bautin VA, Seferyan AG, Nesmeyanov MS, Usov NA (2018) Properties of polycrystalline nanoparticles with uniaxial and cubic types of magnetic anisotropy of individual grains. J Magn Magn Mater 460:278–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Paraguay-Delgado F, Paraguay-Delgado F (2020) Técnicas de microscopía electrónica usadas en el estudio de nanopartículas. Mundo Nano Rev Interdiscip Nanociencias Nanotecnol 13:101–131

    Google Scholar 

  33. Goodarz Naseri M, Saion E, Khalil Zadeh N (2013) The amazing effects and role of PVP on the crystallinity, phase composition and morphology of nickel ferrite nanoparticles prepared by thermal treatment method. Int Nano Lett 2013 31 3:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kumar R, Umar A, Kumar G, Nalwa HS (2017) Antimicrobial properties of ZnO nanomaterials: a review. Ceram Int 43:3940–3961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cychosz KA, Thommes M (2018) Progress in the physisorption characterization of nanoporous gas storage materials. Engineering 4:559–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gun’ko VM (2021) Morphological and textural features of various materials composed of porous or nonporous nanoparticles differently packed in secondary structures. Appl Surf Sci 569:151117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Eka Putri G, Rilda Y, Syukri S, Labanni A, Arief S (2021) Highly antimicrobial activity of cerium oxide nanoparticles synthesized using Moringa oleifera leaf extract by a rapid green precipitation method. J Mater Res Technol 15:2355–2364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Temmerman R, Goethals K, Garmyn A, Vanantwerpen G, Vanrobaeys M, Haesebrouck F, Antonissen G, Devreese M (2020) Agreement of quantitative and qualitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing methodologies: the case of enrofloxacin and avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. Front Microbiol 11:570975

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Cunliffe AJ, Askew PD, Stephan I, Iredale G, Cosemans P, Simmons LM, Verran J, Redfern J (2021) How do we determine the efficacy of an antibacterial surface? A review of standardised antibacterial material testing methods. Antibiot 10:1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Slavin YN, Asnis J, Häfeli UO, Bach H (2017) Metal nanoparticles: understanding the mechanisms behind antibacterial activity. J Nanobiotechnol 15:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

LEPJ acknowledges to CONAHCYT for her Ph.D. graduate fellowship with support number 803759. Thanks to Luis de la Torre Sáenz and Andrés Isaak González Jacquez for their technical help at CIMAV. Thanks to the Micology Lab at UACH and Cindy Villalba for their help with the antibacterial tests. Thanks to the Semiconductors Lab CICTAT at UJAT for the facilities to carry out the materials synthesis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. LEPJ performed the experimental synthesis and the first draft. Conceptualization, formal analysis of characterization techniques results and general supervision were performed by ERM, LRB and FPD. The antibacterial test and the formal analysis of antibacterial activity section were performed by LNMC. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Paraguay-Delgado.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pérez-Jiménez, L.E., Ramírez-Morales, E., Muñoz-Castellanos, L.N. et al. Influence of Cu content in CeO2 nanoparticles on their antibacterial properties. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-024-06363-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-024-06363-3

Keywords

Navigation