Skip to main content
Log in

Modification of MCM-41 type structures by carbon deposition and acid washing for CO2 adsorption

  • Original Paper: Sol-gel and hybrid materials for energy, environment and building
  • Published:
Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A modification of the MCM-41 mesoporous materials through carbon deposition followed by acid washing has been studied for application in carbon dioxide adsorption. Two routes were used to prepare pure silica (Si-MCM-41) and Al-containing (Al-MCM-41) samples, through hydrothermal synthesis at 150 °C for 24 h. The post-synthesis treatment took place in two stages: carbon deposition using commercial glucose, in the mass ratio of 1 g (support): 2.2 g (glucose): 3.5 g (water), followed by washing with 0.2 M hydrofluoric acid solution at 65 °C for 2 h. The samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction, dispersive energy X-ray spectrometry, nitrogen adsorption–desorption, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, thermal analyzes, and scanning electron microscopy. CO2 adsorption tests were performed on a thermogravimetric balance at 40 °C under atmospheric pressure. Carbon deposition led to a drastic reduction in the surface area and pore volume values of MCM-41 samples, possibly due to deposits of carbonaceous species blocking part of the mesopores and defect sites in the pore wall as self-assembled monolayers. After acid washing, part of these deposits was removed, as well as the occurrence of structural silicon leaching. The post-synthesis treatment allowed the generation of structures with a bimodal pore system, providing a substantial increase in the CO2 adsorption capacity compared to the as-synthesized mesoporous materials (~66% for pure silica and 44% for Al-containing MCM-41 sample), representing a significant improvement in the adsorbents performance for CO2 capture.

Highlights

  • Hydrotermal synthesis of the MCM-41 mesoporous materials (pure silica and Al-containing).

  • Post-synthesis treatment promotes in generation of structures with a bimodal pore system.

  • Post-synthesis treatment results an increase of 44% and 66% in the CO2 adsorption capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Edmonds J, Reilly JM (1983) Global energy and CO2 to year 2050. Energy J 8(6):419–432

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yang ST, Kim J, Ahn WS (2010) CO2 adsorption over ion-exchange zeolite beta with alkali and alkaline earth metal ions. Micropor Mespor Mater 135(1–3):90–94

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Oliver JGJ, Janssens-Maenhout G, Muntean M, Peters JAHW (2013) Trends in global CO2 emissions. PBL Publisher, Hague

    Google Scholar 

  4. Song C (2006) Global challenges and strategies for control, conversion and utilization of CO2 for sustainable development involving energy, catalysis, adsorption and chemical processing. Catal Today 115(1–4):2–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Figueroa JD, Fout T, Plasynski S, McIlvried H, Srivastava RD (2008) Advances in CO2 capture technology—the U.S. Department of Energy’s Carbon Sequestration Program. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2(1):9–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu X, Song C, Miller BG, Scaroni AW (2005) Adsorption separation of carbon dioxide from flue gas of natural gas-fired boiler by a novel nanoporous molecular basket adsorbent. Fuel Process Technol 86(14–15):1457–1472

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li B, Duan Y, Luebke D, Morreale B (2013) Advances in CO2 capture technology: a patent review. Appl Energy 102:1439–1447

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Serna-Guerrero R, Belmabkhout Y, Sayari A (2010) Modeling CO2 adsorption on amine-functionalized mesoporous silica: 1. A semi-empirical equilibrium model. Chem Eng J 161(1–2):173–181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu Z, Teng Y, Zhang K, Chen H, Yang Y (2015) CO2 adsorption performance of different amine-based siliceous MCM-41 materials. J Energy Chem 24(3):322–330

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jang HT, Park YK, Ko YS, Lee JY, Margandan B (2009) Highly siliceous MCM-48 from rice husk ash for CO2 adsorption. Int J Greenh Gas Control 3(5):545–549

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yıldıza MG, Davran-Candan T, Günay ME, Yıldırım R (2019) CO2 capture over amine-functionalized MCM-41 and SBA-15: exploratory analysis and decision tree classification of past data. J CO2 Util 31:27–42

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xu X, Song C, Andresen JM, Miller BG, Scaroni AW (2003) Preparation and characterization of novel CO2 “molecular basket” adsorbents based on polymer-modified mesoporous molecular sieve MCM-41. Micropor Mesopor Mater 62(1–2):29–45

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuwahara Y, Kang DY, Copeland JR, Bollini P, Sievers C, Kaegawa T, Yamashita H, Jones CW (2012) Enhanced CO2 adsorption over polymeric amines supported on heteroatom-incorporated SBA-15 silica: impact of heteroatom type and loading on sorbent structure and adsorption performance. Chem Eur J 18(52):16649–16664

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin L, Lin W, Zhu YX, Zhao BY, Xie YC, Jia GQ, Li C (2005) Uniformly carbon-covered alumina and its surface characteristics. Langmuir 21(11):5040–5046

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Błachnio M, Staszczuk P, Grodzicka G, Lin L, Zhu YX (2007) Adsorption and porosity properties of carbon-covered alumina surfaces. J Therm Anal Calorim 88:601–606

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Y, Lin L, Zhu BS, Zhu YX, Xie YC (2008) Different dispersion behavior of glucose and sucrose on alumina and silica surfaces. Appl Surf Sci 254(20):6560–6567

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nascimento RCS, Silva AOS, Meili L (2018) Carbon-covered mesoporous silica and its application in rhodamine B adsorption. Environ Technol 39(9):1123–1132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Silva AE, Ribeiro LMO, Silva BJB, Costa TPM, Meneguetti SMP, Silva AOS (2015) Synthesis and characterization of mesoporous materials containing cerium, lanthanum and praseodymium by nonhydrothermal method. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 75:413–423

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ozawa T (1965) A new method of analyzing thermogravimetric data. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 38(11):1881–1886

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ozawa T (1966) A new method of quantitative differential thermal analysis. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 39(10):2071–2085

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Flynn J, Wall L (1966) General treatment of the thermogravimetry of polymers. J Res Nat Bur Stand 70A(6):487–523

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pedrosa AMG, Souza MJB, Melo DMA, Araujo AS (2006) Cobalt and nickel supported on HY zeolite: synthesis, characterization and catalytic properties. Mater Res Bull 41(6):1105–1111

    Google Scholar 

  23. Beck JS, Vartuli JC, Roth WJ, Leonowicz ME, Kresge CT, Schmitt KD, Chu CTW, Olson DH, Sheppard EW, McCullen SB, Higgins JB, Schlenker JL (1992) A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates. J Am Chem Soc 114(27):10834–10843

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kostova NG, Kraleva E, Spojakina AA, Godocikova E, Balaz P (2007) Effect of preparation technique on the properties of Mo-containing Al-MCM-41. J Mater Sci 42:3321–3325

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brahmi L, Ali-Dahmane T, Hamacha R, Hacini S (2016) Catalytic performance of Al-MCM-41 catalyst for the allylation of aromatic aldehydes with allyltrimethylsilane: comparison with TiCl4 as Lewis acid. J Mol Catal A—Chem 423:31–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vaschetto EG, Pecchi GA, Casuscelli SG, Eimer GA (2014) Nature of the active sites in Al-MCM-41 nano-structured catalysts for the selective rearrangement of cyclohexanone oxime toward?-caprolactam. Micropor Mesopor Mater 200:110–116

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Taib NI, Endud S, Katun MN (2011) Functionalization of mesoporous Si-MCM-41 by grafting with trimethylchlorosilane. Int J Chem 3(3):2–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen H, Wang Y (2002) Preparation of MCM-41 with high thermal stability and complementary textural porosity. Ceram Int 28(5):541–547

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Na J, Liu G, Zhou T, Ding G, Hu S, Wang L (2013) Synthesis and catalytic performance of ZSM-5/MCM-41 zeolites with varying mesopore size by surfactant-directed recrystallization. Catal Lett 143:267–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. La-Salvia N, Lovón-Quintana JJ, Lovón ASP, Valença GP (2017) Influence of aluminum addition in the framework of MCM-41 mesoporous molecular sieve synthesized by non-hydrothermal method in an alkali-free system. Mater Res 20(6):1461–1469

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibrahim M, Alaam M, El-Haes H, Jalbout AF, Leon A (2006) Analysis of the structure and vibrational spectra of glucose and fructose. Eclética Química 31:15–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Souza MJB, Silva AOS, Aquino JMFB, Fernandes Jr VJ, Araújo AS (2004) Kinetic study of template removal of MCM-41 nanostructured material. J Therm Anal Calorim 75:693–698

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Örsi F (1973) Kinetic studies on the thermal decomposition of glucose and fructose. J Therm Anal 5:329–335

    Google Scholar 

  34. Muchan P, Saiwan C, Nithitanakul M (2020) Investigation of adsorption/desorption performance by aminopropyltriethoxysilane grafted onto different mesoporous silica for post-combustion CO2 capture. Clean Energy 4(2):1201–131

    Google Scholar 

  35. Santos TC, Bourrelly S, Llewellyn PL, Carneiro JWM, Ronconi CM (2015) Adsorption of CO2 on amine-functionalised MCM-41: experimental and theoretical studies. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:11095–11102

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rao N, Wang M, Shang Z, Hou Y, Fan G, Li J (2018) CO2 adsorption by amine-functionalized MCM-41: a comparison between impregnation and grafting modification methods. Energy Fuels 32:670–677

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Uyen M, Le T, Lee S-Y, Park S-J (2014) Preparation and characterization of PEI-loaded MCM-41 for CO2 capture. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:12340–12346

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang X, Guo Q, Zhao J, Chen L (2015) Mixed amine-modified MCM-41 sorbents for CO2 capture. Int J Greenh Gas Control 37:90–98

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kamarudin KSN, Alias N (2013) Adsorption performance of MCM-41 impregnated with amine for CO2 removal. Fuel Process Technol 106:332–337

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu Z, Teng Y, Zhang K, Cao Y, Pan W (2013) CO2 adsorption properties and thermal stability of different amine-impregnated MCM-41 materials. J Fuel Chem Technol 41(4):469–476

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Shen SC, Chen X, Kawi S (2004) CO2 adsorption over Si-MCM-41 materials having basic sites created by postmodification with La2O3. Langmuir 20:9130–9137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support of the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), through a research grant and to CENPES/PETROBRAS and ANP for the financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno J. B. Silva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silva, D.P.S., Solano, J.R.S., Sousa, L.V. et al. Modification of MCM-41 type structures by carbon deposition and acid washing for CO2 adsorption. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 97, 382–392 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-020-05432-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-020-05432-7

Keywords

Navigation