Abstract
In recent decades, interest in the measurement of 10Be has increased due to its relevance in various fields of science. Trace amounts of 10Be produced from meteoric sources require sensitive accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) measurements and robust sample preparation. The extraction, separation, and preparation of the appropriate oxide form for AMS require extensive and careful laboratory processing and certified reference materials to validate the chemical performance of the protocols used and the calibration of the AMS system in the measurement. In this work, the meteoric 10Be concentrations in two certified reference materials are characterized to establish their suitability as internal control standards for laboratory chemical preparation and AMS measurements of this radioisotope in our laboratory and the whole AMS community.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
10Be is an ideal nuclide for numerous investigations in geosciences and cosmosciences, astrophysics, and nuclear sciences [1]. Meteoritic 10Be is a long-lived radionuclide (half-life = 1.38 ± 0.01 million years [2]) of beryllium formed in the upper atmosphere by the interaction of cosmic rays with the main component of the atmosphere: nitrogen and oxygen [3].
10Be has found a wide range of applications in many fields of science [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] and, after 14C, is the most measured radioisotope by AMS [11]. In recent years, more than 30,000 10Be samples have been measured by AMS worldwide. The advent of AMS [12, 13] has significantly improved detection sensitivity by several orders of magnitude, reducing sample size and the time required for sample preparation and analysis. Even though AMS is the most sensitive technique and, in some cases, the only option to quantify 10Be concentrations, it is essential to have tools that allow the validation and verification of results to carry out rigorous and reliable investigations [11]. Certified reference materials (CRMs), also known as laboratory standards, play a crucial role in this process by providing points of comparison and calibration for measurements and analysis [14]. CRMs have been recognized worldwide, and their use has become essential in ensuring the quality, safety, and reliability of measurements in various applications. With the development of more advanced analytical techniques, such as mass spectrometry and high-resolution spectroscopy, the accuracy and traceability of CRMs have improved. Few CRMs have determined the concentration of 10Be to validate its measurement by AMS. NIST 10Be SRM-4325 offers certified values of the 10Be/9Be isotope ratio but is no longer available, and CoQtz-N: a quartz reference material for in-situ 10Be determination. Currently, no reference material certifies the meteoric 10Be concentration. In this sense, the characterization of the meteoric 10Be in two different IAEA CRMs is proposed for use as an internal control standard in routine radiochemical processes at AMS Facilities.
Experimental
The characterization of meteoric 10Be concentration in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) certified reference materials Soil-6 and 385, which have been used to certify artificial radioisotopes, usually from nuclear accidents, was carried out.
Certified reference material Soil-6
The soil (topsoil to a depth of 10 cm) was collected near Ebensee in Austria (Oberosterreich) at an altitude of 1100 m above sea level. This material has certified the activity of 137Cs, 239Pu, 226Ra, and 90Sr [15].
Certified reference material IAEA 385
A sample of approximately 250 kg of sediment was collected from the Irish Sea (54.3° N, 3.7° W) by the Centre for Environmental, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Lowestoft, UK, in 1995. Activities were established for 40K, 137Cs, 226,228Ra, 230,232Th, 234,238U, 238, 239+240Pu, 241Am, 90Sr and 210Pb [16]
Sediment leaching
A two-step leaching process will be used to extract and purify meteoric 10Be adhered to the particle surface of the certified reference materials. The procedure was based on that reported by Padilla [17] and Jena [18]. Figure 1 shows a diagram with the outline of the method used. The leaching process results from optimizing the processes presented by Padilla [17] and Jena [18]. In contrast, the radiochemical process has been used in our laboratory based on the analyses presented by Padilla [3].
Aliquot about 1 g was taken in 50 mL centrifuge tubes. First, leaching was carried out in 40 mL acetate buffer at pH = 4.66 and placed in an ultrasonic cleaner at 80 °C for 2 h. Then, samples were centrifuged at 4500 r.p.m. for 15 min, and the supernatant was removed. The residue was leaching in a second leaching with 12 mL of Hydroxylamine hydrochloride (NH2OH.HCl) 0.04 M in 25% acetic acid solution and kept for sonication in an ultrasonic at 80 °C for six h to extract the Be from the solid, the sample was centrifuged, and the supernatant was separated for further treatment. 250 μL of standard carrier solution (1000 mg L−1 Be for ICP-OES, Certipur Brand) was added to the supernatant and brought to complete dryness. The residue was re-dissolved two or three times into 10 mL HNO3 8 M. The remaining sample was dried and recovered with 10 mL HCl 9 M. The dilution obtained from the leaching process was passed through an anion exchange resin (Dowex AG1-X8), where Be was collected with 20 ml of HCl 1 M. This fraction was evaporated and dissolved again in HCl 1 M and poured over a cation exchange resin (Dowex 50W-X8), where Be was eluted using 20 ml of HCl 1 M. Be was precipitated into ammonia and dissolved in a dilution of 0.4 M oxalic acid, which was poured into a cation exchange resin (Dowex 50W-X8), where Be was eluted with 16 ml of HNO3 0.5 M and 26 ml of HNO3 1 M. The dilution was evaporated and dissolved in water where Be is precipitated as Be(OH)2 by adding ammonia at pH = 10 [3]. The Be fraction was centrifuged at 4500 r.p.m for ten minutes, eliminating the supernatant. The residue was freeze-dried for 24 h and calcined at 1000 °C. BeO was obtained, mixed with 4 mg of Nb, pressed in aluminum cathodes, and measured by AMS at LEMA, Mexico.
AMS measurement
The samples were measured by the 1 MV AMS system at LEMA [19]. The negative ion beam was produced in a Cs-Sputter ion source on the low energy zone and injected into a magnetic filter, where the BeO− ions are mass-analyzed and separated. The ions are accelerated in the Tandetron accelerator at 1MV, where the Ar gas is used in the stripping process. Afterward, the beam is analyzed again for mass by a second magnetic filter and energy by an electrostatic analyzer (ESA) on the high-energy zone. Finally, the ions are counted and identified in a two-anode gas ionization detector [20]. The 10B isobar was separated using a silicon nitride degrader foil with thicknesses of 75 nm placed behind the high energy sector magnet [21].
The 10Be measurement was carried out in charge state + 1 after ESA. A complete description of the system tunning is described by De los Ríos [22]. The average currents obtained on the measurements in the high-energy zone were around 1 μA for 9Be + . A chemical blank was prepared for each block of 8 samples; its preparation was with 250 µL of pure 9Be following the same chemical process and measured together with the samples. The measured isotopic ratios 10Be/9Be were normalized with the 5.1 standard sample, isotopic ratio value 10Be/9Be = 2.7 × 10–11 [13]. The normalized isotopic ratios 10Be/9Be of blanks were between 2.7 × 10–14 and 3.9 × 10–14.
Statistical analysis, such as Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), average, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and coefficient of variation were performed using OriginPro 8.6
Results and discussion
CRMs IAEA-385 and SOIL-6 were characterized for meteoric 10Be concentrations. The results are expressed in the number of atoms g-1 dry weight. Each CRM was analyzed in 16 replicates, divided into two batches of 8 samples each, which two analysts processed. Tables 1 and 2 show the statistical data of the 10Be concentration of the eight samples that comprise the CRMs' batches. Figures 2 and 3 show the CRM Soil-6 and IAEA 385 data distribution in the two analyzed batches. The lines represent the individual data of the eight measurements that comprise each batch with their respective standard deviation (points and lines, respectively). At the same time, the box plot shows the distribution of the dataset of each batch.
The mean concentration of the 16 CRM SOIL-6 data was 611 ± 24 million atoms g−1 with a variation of 2.1% between data. Batches 1 and 2 of the CRM SOIL-6 show many similarities in the parameters reported in Table 1; they differ in that the uncertainty in batch 2 is lower, but both batches are acceptable, tend to be reproducible and repeatable, and it can be established that the concentration of 10Be in this CRM is 611 ± 24 million atoms g−1 with a minimum and maximum value of 591 and 641 millions atoms g−1, respectively.
The ANOVA analysis for the CRM SOIL-6 shows a significance level of p = 0.05, and there is no significant difference between the concentration in the two different batches processed by two different analysts (p = 0.79). Figure 2 shows schematically the two other groups with their respective data and uncertainties where it can be seen that the concentration values of 10Be meteoric in both batches are very similar, and it is corroborated that the concentration of 10Be meteoric in the SOIL-6 is 611 ± 24 million atoms g−1.
On the other hand, the mean concentration of the 16 CRM IAEA 385 data was 101 ± 6 million atoms g−1, with a 0.6% variation between the data.
CRM SOIL-6 batches 1 and 2 of the CRM IAEA 385 show significant similarity in the parameters reported in Table 2; even the coefficient of variation in both batches is almost identical, as is the mean meteoric 10Be concentration. The data tend to be reproducible and repeatable, and it can be established that the concentration of 10Be in this CRM IAEA 385 is 101 ± 6 million atoms g−1 with a minimum and maximum value of 97 and 102 million atoms g−1, respectively.
The ANOVA for the CRM IAEA 385, with a p = 0.91, accepts the null hypothesis and shows no significant difference between the two treatments (batch 1 and batch 2). Figure 3 schematically shows this comparison, where the mean 10Be concentration in both batches is practically the same, with a 101 million atoms g−1 value.
The wide repeatability and reproducibility of the data presented suggest that both CRMs analyzed in this research can be used as internal control standards in our laboratory and the entire AMS community for the routine analysis of extraction and measurement of the meteoric 10Be concentration in soil and sediment samples. It should be noted that the 10Be concentrations could depend on the leaching method used, so it is emphasized that the values presented are valid for the methodology described in this work and that it would be necessary to determine the influence of the amount of B present in CRMs.
Conclusions
The measurements of meteoric 10Be concentrations in two CRMs from IAEA were characterized in the 1MV AMS system at LEMA. The radiochemical procedure to extract and purify meteoric 10Be was successfully adopted to determine its concentration in soils and sediments. The preliminary results provided in this work are the first ones of meteoric 10Be concentration for these CRMs. The repeatability and reproducibility found suggest that they can be used as internal control standards for the extraction and measurement processes in our laboratory. CRMs SOIL-6 and IAEA-385 have been used for quality assurance and quality control of radionuclide analysis in marine sediments using techniques such as (ICP-MS, TIMS, AMS), specifically, AMS has been used to determine the concentration of Pu radionuclides (239, 240 and 241Pu) in IAEA 385. Their potential is also shown in developing and validating analytical methods for determining meteoric 10Be concentration. Comparison exercises with other facilities are suggested to verify the preliminary results obtained in this research and determine the concentration of B after radiochemical separation to establish the impact of B on the BeO prepared for measurement.
References
Simon KJ, Pedro JB, Smith AM et al (2013) Reprocessing of 10B-contaminated 10Be AMS targets. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 294:208–213
Korschinek G, Bergmaier A, Faestermann T et al (2010) A new value for the half-life of 10Be by heavy-ion elastic recoil detection and liquid scintillation counting. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 268:187–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2009.09.020
Padilla S, López-Gutiérrez JM, Manjón G et al (2019) Meteoric 10Be in aerosol filters in the city of Seville. J Environ Radioact 196:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.10.009
Knies DL, Elmore D, Sharma P et al (1994) 7Be, 10Be, and 36Cl in precipitation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 92:340–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(94)96031-3
Webber WR, Higbie PR, McCracken KG (2007) Production of the cosmogenic isotopes3H, 7Be, 10Be, and 36Cl in the Earth’s atmosphere by solar and galactic cosmic rays. J Geophys Res Space Phys 112:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012499
Ivy-Ochs S, Schlüchter C, Kubik PW et al (1996) The exposure age of an Egesen moraine at Julier Pass, Switzerland, measured with the cosmogenic radionuclides 10Be, 26A1 and 36Cl. Eclogae Geol Helv 89:1049–1063. https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-893680
Srinivasan G, Chaussidon M (2013) Constraints on 10Be and 41Ca distribution in the early solar system from 26Al and 10Be studies of Efremovka CAIs. Earth Planet Sci Lett 374:11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.03.048
Young NE, Schaefer JM, Briner JP, Goehring BM (2013) A 10Be production-rate calibration for the Arctic. J Quat Sci 28:515–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.2642
Graly JA, Bierman PR, Reusser LJ, Pavich MJ (2010) Meteoric 10Be in soil profiles—a global meta-analysis. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:6814–6829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.08.036
Berggren A-M (2009) Influence of solar activity and environment on 10Be in recent natural archives. PhD Thesis. ISSN 1651-6214. ISBN 978-91-554-7549-9. Faculty of Science and Technology, Uppsala Universitet
Fink D, Smith A (2007) An inter-comparison of 10Be and 26Al AMS reference standards and the 10Be half-life. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 259:600–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.299
Tuniz C (2001) Accelerator mass spectrometry: ultra-sensitive analysis for global science. Radiat Phys Chem 61:317–322
Nishiizumi K, Imamura M, Caffee MW et al (2007) Absolute calibration of 10Be AMS standards. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 258:403–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.297
Taylor PJ (2004) Certification and use of standard reference materials. Anal Bioanal Chem 379:985–992
Pszonieki L, Hanna AN, Suschny O. International Atomic Energy Agency (1984) Report on Intercomparison IAEA/SOIL-б of the Determination of Cs-137,. Pu-239, Ra-226, and Sr-90 in Soil
Pham MK, Sanchez-Cabeza JA, Povinec PP et al (2008) A new Certified Reference Material for radionuclides in Irish sea sediment (IAEA-385). Appl Radiat Isot 66:1711–1717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2007.10.020
Padilla S, López-Gutiérrez JM, Sampath DMR et al (2018) Determination of denudation rates by the measurement of meteoric 10Be in Guadiana river sediment samples (Spain) by low-energy AMS. J Environ Radioact 189:227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.04.016
Jena PS, Bhushan R, Shivam A et al (2021) Production rate variation and changes in sedimentation rate of marine core dated with meteoric 10Be and 14C. J Environ Radioact. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106678
Solís C, Chávez-Lomelí E, Ortiz ME et al (2014) A new AMS facility in Mexico. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 331:233–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2014.02.015
Calvo EC, Santos FJ, López-Gutiérrez JM et al (2015) Status report of the 1 MV AMS facility at the Centro Nacional de Aceleradores. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 361:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.02.022
Scognamiglio G, Lachner J, Chamizo E et al (2019) 10Be low-energy AMS with the passive absorber technique. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 438:113–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2018.07.005
De Los Rios K, Méndez-Garcia C, Padilla S et al (2018) Characterization of the LEMA isotope separator to measure concentrations of 10Be from atmospheric filters. In: Journal of physics: conference series, vol 1078. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1078/1/012009
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to all collaborators who contributed to this work. This research was funded by grants from the Dirección General Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México LEMA 2023 (LN – LEMA), and PAPIIT-UNAM IN112023. We thank Sergio Martínez, M.C. Karen De los Ríos, and Dr. Pedro Santa Rita for their support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Méndez-García, C.G., Rojas-López, G., Solís, C. et al. Characterization of meteoric 10Be in certified reference materials for use in internal control standards. J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-024-09557-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-024-09557-9