Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of candidates for reactor produced radioactive materials in support of radiological training exercises

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bromine-82, Potassium-42 and Copper-64 have been successfully adopted as radioactive surrogates for outdoor large area contamination training. The goal of this project was to discover new materials that could supplement potassium bromide (KBr) and copper pellets in radiological dispersal device (RDD) training events to reduce the down time of the training fields and to broaden the toolbox of the RDD surrogates at Idaho National Laboratory. Of the ten different materials investigated, sodium nitrite, gallium metal, and gallium oxide presented the greatest promise due to their ability to meet or exceed selection criteria: half-lives (between 10 and 36 h), limited impurities (99.9%), and favorable National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) rating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harper FT, Musolino SV, Wente WB (2007) Realistic radiological dispersal device hazard boundaries and ramifications for early consequence management decisions. Health Phys 93:1–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coleman CN, Hrdina C, Bader JL, Norwood A, Hayhurst R, Forsha J, Yeskey K, Knebel A (2009) Medical response to a radiologic/nuclear event: integrated plan from the office of the assistant secretary for preparedness and response, department of health and human services. Ann Emerg Med 53:213–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Green AR, Erhardt L, Lebel L, Duke MJM, Jones T, White D, Quayle D (2016) Overview of the full-scale radiological dispersal device field trials. Health Phys 110:403–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shin H, Kim J (2009) Development of realistic RDD scenarios and their radiological consequence analyses. Appl Radiat Isot 67:1516–1520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Musolino SV, Harper FT (2006) Emergency response guidance for the first 48 hours after the outdoor detonation of an explosive radiological dispersal device. Health Phys 90:377–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Radiological attack: dirty bombs and other devices (2023) https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/prep_radiological_fact_sheet.pdf. Accessed April 19,

  7. Carney K, Finck M, McGrath C, Brush B, Jansen D, Dry D, Brooks G, Chamberlain D (2013) The development of radioactive sample surrogates for training and exercises. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296:769–773

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vavrek JR, Hines CC, Bandstra MS, Hellfeld D, Heine MA, Heiden ZM, Mann NR, Quiter BJ, Joshi, T H Y (2024) Surrogate distributed radiological sources II: aerial measurement campaign. IEEE Trans Nuclear Sci  https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2024.3351611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gwin J (2012) Technical justification for the TRACER program at the Nevada national security site, National Security Technologies

  10. Brown RL, Farfan EB, Jannik GT (2010) Assessment of F-18 use as a live radiological agent in field exercises. Savannah River National Laboratory

  11. Haslip DS, Mercier JR (2004) A NATO exercise on radiological sampling. Health Phys 87:S63–S67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cochran LD, Marianno CM (2018) Radionuclide selection for emergency response exercise at disaster city® using unsealed radioactive contamination. Health Phys 114:7–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baum EM, Ernesti MC, Knox HD, Miller TR, Watson AM (2010) Nuclides and isotopes: chart of the nuclides. Bechtel Marine Propulsion Corporation

  14. Squibb KS, Fowler BA (1983) In: Fowler BA (ed) Chapter 7 - the toxicity of arsenic and its compounds, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  15. Recommended list of common impurities for metallic fixed-point materials of the ITS-90 (2022) https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=832299. Accessed 11 Oct 2022

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick R. Mann.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1707 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heiden, Z.M., Hines, C.C., Mann, N.R. et al. Investigation of candidates for reactor produced radioactive materials in support of radiological training exercises. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 333, 1231–1241 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-024-09371-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-024-09371-3

Keywords

Navigation