Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of tolerance limits of inorganic quenchers on  LED fluorimetric determination of uranium

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study reports the tolerance limits of a few inorganic quenchers on uranium fluorescence in presence of five different fluorescence enhancing reagents (FER) used in fluorimetric technique with LED (405 nm) as the excitation source. Fluorescence enhancing capacities of five different phosphate based reagents are compared. A 2 °C rise in temperature quenches the U fluorescence by 5% in all the FERs. Quenching effects of 11 ions in terms of their characteristic half concentration (C1/2) values were established. Based on the C1/2 values quenchers are classified as weak, moderate and strong.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El Gammal EM, Ahmed SH (2019) Comparison of four analytical techniques for determining uranium in different rock samples. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 322:1975–1982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rathore DPS (2008) Advances in technologies for the measurement of uranium in diverse matrices. Talanta 77:9–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fallatah O, Qutub MMT (2021) Radiochemical technique optimization to measure uranium and thorium by α-spectrometry. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 328:1077–1083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Santos JS, Teixeira LSG, Walter NL, dos Santos LVA, Godoy JM, Ferreira SLC (2010) Uranium determination using atomic spectrometric techniques: an overview. Anal Chim Acta 674(2):143–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tosheva Z, Stoyanova K, Nikolchev L (2004) Comparison of different methods for uranium determination in water. J Environ Radioact 72(1–2):47–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tarafder PK, Mondal RK, Chakrapani G (2020) Serious interference of dissolved organic compounds in the laser induced fluorimetric determination of uranium in water: an selective & sensitive method for the laser induced fluorimetric determination of uranium in water. Anal Methods 12:830–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ganesh S, Khan F, Ahmed MK, Velavendan P, Pandey NK, Mudali UK, Pandey SK (2011) Determination of ultra traces amount of uranium in raffinates of purex process by laser fluorimetry. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 292(1):331–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moulin C, Decambox P, Trecani L (1996) Direct and fast uranium determination in zirconium by time-resolved laser-induced fluorescence spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 321:121–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cho HR, Jung EC, Cha W, Song K (2013) Quantitative analysis of uranium in aqueous solutions using a semiconductor laser-based spectroscopic method. Anal Chem 85:4279–4283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Robbins JC, Castledine C, Kostiak W (1985) Analytical procedures for UA-3 uranium analysis-applications manual. Scintrex Limited, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  11. Campen W, Bachmann K (1979) Laser-induced fluorescence for the direct determination of small concentrations of uranium in water. Mikrochim Acta II 72:159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brina R, Miller AG (1992) Direct detection of trace levels of uranium by laser-induced kinetic phosphorimetry. Anal Chem 64(13):1413–1418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Burrows HD, Cardoso AC, Formosinho SJ, De Graçia M, Miguel M (1985) Photophysics of the excited uranyl ion in aqueous solutions. Part 4.—Quenching by metal ions. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1 Phys Chem Condens Phases 81(1):49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rathore DPS, Tarafder PK, Kayal M, Manjeet K (2001) Application of a differential technique in laser-induced fluorimetry: simple and a precise method for the direct determination of uranium in mineralised rocks at the percentage level. Anal Chim Acta 434:201–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Price GR, Ferretti RJ, Schwartz S (1953) Fluorophotometric determination of uranium. Anal Chem 25:322–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhoumik GK, Dasgupta K, Bapna RC, Sarkar SK, Ramanujam A (2002) Time resolved laser induced fluorescence in nuclear fuel cycle. Proc Indian Acad Sci Chem Sci 114:759–774

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tarafder PK, Ghosh PK, Chakrapani G (2015) Field method for the rapid determination of traces of uranium in rocks, soil and stream sediments by fluorescence measurements. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 306(2):357–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Veselsky JC, Kwiecinska B, Wehrstein E, Suschny O (1988) Determination of uranium in minerals by laser fluorimetry. Analyst 113:451–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tarafder PK, Ghosh PK, Pradhan SK (2017) A novel approach for trace to percentage level determination of uranium in rocks, soils and stream sediments by laser induced fluorimetry (LIF). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 313:353–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vazquez GJ, Dodge CJ, Francis AJ (2007) Interactions of uranium with polyphosphate. Chemosphere 70(2):263–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maji S, Sundararajan K, Viswanathan KS (2000) Correction for quenching in fluorimetric determinations using steady state fluorescence. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 56(7):1251–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Demnitz M, Hilpmann S, Lösch H, Bok F, Steudtner R, Patzschke M, Huittinen N (2020) Temperature-dependent luminescence spectroscopic investigations of uranyl(vi) complexation with the halides F− and Cl−. Dalton Trans 49(21):7109–7122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jackson VE, Gutowsky KE, Dixon DA (2013) Density functional theory study of the complexation of the uranyl dication with anionic phosphate ligands with and without water molecules. J Phys Chem A 117(36):8939–8957

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sowder AG, Clark SB, Fjeld RA (1998) The effect of sample matrix quenching on the measurement of trace uranium concentrations in aqueous solutions using kinetic phosphorimetry. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 234(1–2):257–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ling J, Qiu J, Sigmon GE, Ward M, Szymanowski JES, Burns PC (2010) Uranium pyrophosphate/methylenediphosphonate polyoxometalate cage clusters. J Am Chem Soc 132:13395–13402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Price GR, Ferretti RJ, Schwartz S (1945) Atomic energy commission document AECD-2282. IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  27. Veselsky JC, Ratsimandresy Y (1979) An investigation of quenching effects in the direct fluorimetric determination of uranium in minerals. Anal Chim Acta 104:345–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Haubitz T, Tsushima S, Steudtner R, Drobot B, Geipel G, Stumpf T, Kumke MU (2018) Ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy of UO22+ and [UO2Cl]+. J Phys Chem A 122(35):6970–6977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Premadas A, Saravanakumar G (2007) A comparative study of the uranium fluorescence behaviour in optical and laser fluorimetry in the presence of metals: uranium determination at trace level in lanthanum, cerium, yttrium and thorium. Expl for Atom Min 17:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kütahyali C, Cobos J, Rondinella VV (2010) Comparison of fluorescence-enhancing reagents and optimization of laser fluorimetric technique for the determination of dissolved uranium. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 287:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Radhamani R, Mahanta PL, Murugesan P, Chakrapani G (2010) Novel fusion method for direct determination of uranium in ilmenite, rutile, columbite, tantalite, and xenotime minerals by laser induced fluorimetry. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 285:287–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Wazer JR, Callis CF (1958) Metal complexing by phosphates. Chem Rev 58(6):1011–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors wish to thank Dr. D. K. Sinha, Director, Dr. T. S. Sunilkumar, Additional Director and Dr. Smeer Durani, Head, Chemistry Group of Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research (AMD) for their encouragement and support in carrying out research work and for permission to publish the paper. We are also thankful to Dr. Manjeet Kumar, former Head, Chemistry Group, AMD for the encouragement during the conceptualization of this work. Authors also wish to thank the engineers of M/s. Quantalase, Indore for their support and fruitful technical discussions during the course of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MK was instrumental in conceptualization of the study and carried out all experiments in collaboration with JG and interpreted the results. AAP contributed in overall presentation of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Krishnakumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krishnakumar, M., George, J. & Patwardhan, A.A. Estimation of tolerance limits of inorganic quenchers on  LED fluorimetric determination of uranium. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 332, 1795–1804 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-023-08897-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-023-08897-2

Keywords

Navigation