Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of alpha-emitting therapeutic radiopharmaceutical Ra-223 dichloride injection by close/far S-D γ-spectrum method

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To accurately measure 223Ra dichloride injection by HPGe γ spectrometry, three calibration sources, including mixed mono-energy γ nuclide, 133Ba, and 226Ra, were used to calibrate efficiency at close/far source/sample-detector (S-D) distance. The results show that the efficiency calibration at a far S-D distance can reduce the coincidence effect of the 133Ba and 223Ra simulation source, both far and close S-D are applicable to the 226Ra simulation source; Using 269.48 keV, 271.23 keV and 351.03 keV γ-ray full energy peaks for analysis, the deviation of the results between the simulation sources method and the mono-energy γ nuclide source method is less than 1%. The influence of γ-ray emission probabilities, the selection of full energy peak, and coincidence effect and other factors on the 223Ra measurement results was also studied, the γ-ray emission probabilities from different nuclear databases can cause up to 30% deviation in the measurement results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parker C, Nilsson S, Heinrich D (2013) Alpha emitter radium-223 and survivalin metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 369(3):213–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stabin MG, Siegel JA (2015) Radiation dose and hazard assessment of potential contamination events during use of 223Ra dichloride in radionuclide therapy. Health Phys 109(3):212–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Keightley J, Pearce A, Fenwick A (2013) Standardisation of 223Ra by liquid scintillation counting techniques and comparison with secondary measurements. Appl Radiat Isot 95:114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kossert K, Bokeloh K, Dersch R (2015) Activity determination of 227Ac and 223Ra by means of liquid scintillation counting and determination of nuclear decay data. Appl Radiat Isot 95:143–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cessna JT, Zimmerman BE (2015) Standardization of radium-223 by liquid scintillation counting. Appl Radiat Isot 68:1523–1528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Collins SM, Pearcea AK, Ferreira KM (2015) Direct measurement of the half-life of 223Ra. Appl Radiat Isot. 99:46–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simoes RFP, da Silva CJ, da Silva RL (2021) Standardization of 223Ra by live-time anticoincidence counting and gamma-ray emission determination. Appl Radiat Isot 170:109559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Collins SM, Pearce AK, Regan PH (2015) Precise measurements of the absolute γ-ray emission probabilities of 223Ra and decay progeny in equilibrium. Appl Radiat Isot 102:15–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maroulia M, Luttera G, Pommé S (2019) Measurement of absolute γ-ray emission probabilities in the decay of 227Ac in equilibrium with its progeny. Appl Radiat Isot 144:34–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Y, Ma Q, Cai J, Xiao W, Lin B, Ji Y (2014) Application of sourceless efficiency method in measuring 227 Ac in rare earth products. Nuclear Electr Detect Technol 34(8):1024–1028

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu-sheng MA, Zheng GAO, Jiang-hua LUO (2007) The efficiency calibration and measurement of coincidence factors of an HPGe detector. Nuclear Electr Detect Technol 27(04):737–740

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heath RL (1998) Gamma-ray Spectrum Catalogue- Ge ( Li) Spectrometry 4th Edition [R]. USAEC Report ANC-1000.

  13. Yunwu Du (2017) Method for measuring the activity of 152Eu, 133Ba, and 60Co with γ-ray cascade by HPGe spectrometer. Radiat Protect 37(2):116–120

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen-xi X, Jian-zhoug N, Gong-shuo Y (2019) Simulation of the angular correlation impact on HPGe detector coincidence summing effect by Geant4. Mod Appl Phys 10(1):010201–1–010201–7.

  15. Feng-qun Z, Yi-min Z, Jun-hua L (2007) Investigation of the correction for cascade radiation coincidence summing in the measurement of gamma spectrometry. High Energy Phys Nuclear Phys 31(5):487–491

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng ZHOU, Xiao-ping LIU (2012) Analysis of coincidence effect on natural radionuclides radium-226 measuring by γ spectrometry. Nuclear Electr Detect Technol 32(11):1336–1339

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xiaobing L, Yijun X, Xiangguan L (1992) Coincidence summing correction in the measurement of gamma-rays intensity. Nuclear Techn 15(7):428–435

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xu XU, Jiaqing LIU, Jingbin LU (2018) Recognition of spectrum in 152Eu source and analysis of sum peak characteristics. J Isot 31(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xiaodi LI (1994) Measurements of the gamma-ray emission probabilities of 134Cs and a simple method of correction for coincidence summing. Atomic Energy Sci Technol 28(3):265–268

    Google Scholar 

  20. Canberra industries (2006) Inc. Genie 2000 Spectroscopy Software Customization Tools Manual [M]. Genie 2000 V3.1.

  21. Gordon R (2008) Gilmore, Practical Gamma-ray Spectrometry 2nd Edition [M]. Nuclear Training Services Ltd Warrington, UK.

  22. Pang Jufeng (1990) γ-ray Spectrum Data Analysis. Xi’an: Shanxi Science and Technology Press.

  23. Gu Xianbao Yu, Qin GD (2016) The correction of γ nuclide analyzing results for fukushima nuclear accident emergency monitoring aerosol sample. Atomic Energy Sci Technol 50(4):720–724

    Google Scholar 

  24. CENDL, The Database of Nuclear Physics. <http://www.nuclear.csdb.cn/texing.html>

  25. ENSDF, XUNDL-February 2015, <https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensdf/>.

  26. LNE-LNHB/CEA, 223Ra-Comments on evaluation of decay data by V. P. Chechew. <http://www.lnhb.fr/nuclear-data/nuclear-data-table/>.

  27. JEND L, JENDL-5, Nuclear Decay Data in the MIRD Format <https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat3/mird/>.

  28. LNE-LNHB/CEA, Table of Radionuclide 223Ra. http://www.nucleide.org/DDEP_WG/Nuclides/Ra-223_tables.pdf

  29. LNE-LNHB/CEA, Table of Radionuclide, 219Rn. http://www.nucleide.org/DDEP_WG/Nuclides/Rn-219_tables.pdf

  30. LNE-LNHB/CEA, Table of Radionuclide, 211Pb. http://www.nucleide.org/DDEP_WG/Nuclides/Pb-211_tables.pdf

  31. LNE-LNHB/CEA, Table of Radionuclide, 211Bi. http://www.nucleide.org/DDEP_WG/Nuclides/Bi-211_tables.pdf

  32. Tomarchio E, Rizzo S (2011) Coincidence-summing correction equations in gamma-ray spectrometry with P-type HPGe detectors. Radiat Phys Chem 80(3):318–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Qiong SU (2000) Simple introduction and evaluation about correction methods of coincidence summing effect of γ-γ cascade radiation in γ spectrometry. Nuclear Techn 23(10):746–752

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guobing Yu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gu, X., Xu, P., Wang, Y. et al. Measurement of alpha-emitting therapeutic radiopharmaceutical Ra-223 dichloride injection by close/far S-D γ-spectrum method. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 332, 1435–1443 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08681-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08681-8

Keywords

Navigation