Correction to: Gamma spectrum analysis for in situ automatic monitoring of radioactivity in seawater

Correction to: Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08433-8

In the original publication of the article, legends in Figs. 4 and 5 were published incorrectly. The correct versions of Figs. 4 and 5 are provided in this correction.

Fig. 4

¹³¹I, ¹³⁷Cs and ⁵⁴Mn full-energy peak region fitting. The blue ‘+’ line is background. The dotted lines are ¹³¹I, ¹³⁷Cs and ⁵⁴Mn spectrum. The triangle lines are B(x) and L(x). The smooth lines are G(x)-¹³¹I, G(x)-¹³⁷Cs, G(x)-⁵⁴Mn

Fig. 5

⁶⁰Co and ⁴⁰K full-energy peak region fitting. The blue ‘+’ line is background. The orange dotted line is ⁶⁰Co and ⁴⁰K spectrum. The triangle green line is B₁(x) and L₁(x). Purple, green and light blue smooth lines are G₁(x), G₂(x) and G₃(x)

Under the section “Morphological peak searching”, the value “231” in the sentence “channel addresses corresponding to each forward count peak by the search were 39, 231, 376, 465, 641, 715, and 772.” should be read as “230”. The value “231” in the sentence “Nuclides corresponding to the positive counting peaks of channels 231, 376, 465, 641, 715, and 772 are ¹³¹I, ¹³⁷Cs, ⁵⁴Mn, ⁶⁰Co (1173 keV), ⁶⁰Co (1332.5 keV) and ⁴⁰ K respectively.” should be read as “230”.

Under the section “Nuclide activity calculation”, the sentence “Compared with the nuclide activity via simulation experiment, the maximum activity calculation error is 3%.” should be read as “Compared with the nuclide activity via simulation experiment, the maximum activity calculation error is within 3%.”.