Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of uranium hexavalent compounds using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) has applications in many fields ranging from development of thin films for semi-conductors to post failure analysis of organic coatings and structural adhesives. The current work expands on that versatility by applying XPS to the growing field of nuclear forensics. This was achieved by the synthesis and characterisation of several uranium compounds, predominantly in the hexavalent state associated with the nuclear fuel cycle, and by X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy analysis prior to XPS. Spectral characteristics for each compound are discussed, and interpretations made through observations in the binding energy of the U4f region as well as secondary energy loss features such as shake up satellites. The interpretation of such features is related to the stoichiometry, oxidation state and bonding structure of a range of uranium compounds. As XPS is typically insensitive to structural (crystallographic) variations, a rationale is provided for the relationship between structural variations, as measured by Raman and X-ray diffraction and compared to the open literature, and the XPS satellite to parent peak intensity of uranium compounds, providing a novel and useful approach for uranium compound characterisation. In addition to the novel approach described, Wagner chemical state plots have also been generated to provide another comparison tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The satellite features are nominally found at 4 and 10 eV from the parent peak and denoted as such, in this discussion 4 eV will be denoted as Sat 1 and 10 eV as Sat 2. This is to avoid confusion when comparing the shift of the satellites in greater detail.

References

  1. Neimeyer S, Koch L (2014) The historical evolution of nuclear forensics: a technical viewpoint. IAEA Plenary Sess 1A 218(117):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schwantes J, Marsden O, Reilly D (2018) Fourth collaborative materials exercise of the nuclear forensics international technical working group. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 315(2):347–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ravindran T, Arora A (2011) Study of Raman spectrum of uranium using a surface-enhanced Raman scattering technique. J Raman Spectrosc 42(5):885–887

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Watts JF, Wolstenholme J (2020) An introduction to surface analysis by electron spectroscopy, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ilton E, Bagus P (2011) XPS determination of uranium oxidation states. Surf Interface Anal 43(13):1549–1560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Allen G, Crofts J, Curtis M, Tucker P, Chadwick D, Hampson P (1974) X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy of some uranium oxide phases. J Chem Soc Dalton Trans 12:1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brisk M, Baker A (1975) Shake-up satellites in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 7(3):197–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson, P., 2001. The nuclear fuel cycle. Oxford [etc.]: Oxford University Press.

  9. Baer Y, Schoenes J (1980) Electronic structure and Coulomb correlation energy in UO2 single crystal. Solid State Commun 33(8):885–888

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jensen M (1967) Investigations on methods of producing crystalline ammonium uranyl carbonate and its applicability for production of uranium-dioxide powder and pellets. Riso Natl Lab 15(1):1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yi-Ming P, Che-Bao M, Nien-Nan H (1981) The conversion of UO2 via ammonium uranyl carbonate: study of precipitation, chemical variation and powder properties. J Nucl Mater 99(2–3):135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Katz J, Katz J, Rabinowitch E (1961) The chemistry of uranium. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Larsen R (1959) Dissolution of uranium metal and its alloys. Anal Chem 31(4):545–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sato T, Shiota S, Ikoma S, Ozawa F (1977) Thermal decomposition of uranyl chloride hydrate. J Biochem Toxicol 27(1):275–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sweet L, Henager C, Hu S, Johnson T, Meier D, Peper S, Schwantes J (2011) Investigation of uranium polymorphs. US Dep Energy 1(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kraiem M, Mayer K, Gouder T, Seibert A, Wiss T, Hiernaut J (2010) Filament chemistry of uranium in thermal ionisation mass spectrometry. J Anal At Spectrom 25(7):1138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Filippov T, Kovalevskiy N, Solovyeva M, Chetyrin I, Prosvirin I, Lyulyukin M, Selishchev D, Kozlov D (2018) In situ XPS data for the uranyl-modified oxides under visible light. Data Brief 19:2053–2060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bonato M, Allen G, Scott T (2008) Reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) on the surface of TiO2 anatase nanotubes. Micro Nano Lett 3(2):57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Allen G, Holmes N (1987) Surface characterisation of a-, p-, y-, and S-UO, using X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J Chem Soc Dalton Trans 12:3009–3015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chadwick D (1973) Uranium 4f binding energies studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Chem Phys Lett 21:293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fierro JLG, Salazar E, Legarreta JA (1985) Characterization of silica‐supported uranium–molybdenum oxide catalysts. Surf Interface Anal 7:97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kawai J, Satoko C, Gohshi Y (1987) Chemical effects of satellites on X-ray emission spectra—II. A general theory of the origin of chemical effects and its application to Cl Kα spectra. Spectrochimica Acta Part B At Spectrosc 42(6):745–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kawai J, Tsuboyama S, Ishizu K, Miyamura K, Saburi M (1991) Covalency of copper complexes determined by Cu 2p X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Anal Sci 7(Suppl):337–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bagus P, Illas F, Pacchioni G, Parmigiani F (1999) Mechanisms responsible for chemical shifts of core-level binding energies and their relationship to chemical bonding. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 100(1–3):215–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Podkovyrina Y, Pidchenko I, Prüßmann T, Bahl S, Göttlicher J, Soldatov A, Vitova T (2016) Probing covalency in the UO3 polymorphs by U M4edge HR-XANES. J Phys Conf Ser 712:012092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Di Pietro P, Kerridge A (2017) Ligand size dependence of U-N and U–O bond character in a series of uranyl hexaphyrin complexes: quantum chemical simulation and density based analysis. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19(11):7546–7559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Loopstra BO, Cordfunke HP (1966) On the structure of α-UO3. Recl Trav Chim Pays-Bas 95(2):135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vochten R, Blaton N (1999) Synthesis of rutherfordine and its stability in water and alkaline solutions. Neues Jahrb. Mineral., Monatsh., 372–384

  29. Debets PC (1966) The structure of β-UO3. Acta Cryst 21:598–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Holliday K, Siekhaus W, Nelson A (2013) Measurement of the Auger parameter and Wagner plot for uranium compounds. J Vac Sci Technol A Vac Surf Films 31(3):031401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Biesinger M, Lau L, Gerson A, Smart R (2012) The role of the Auger parameter in XPS studies of nickel metal, halides and oxides. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14(7):2434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Moretti G (1998) Auger parameter and Wagner plot in the characterization of chemical states by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: a review. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 95(2–3):95–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Snijders PC, Jeurgens LHP, Sloof WG (2005) Structural ordering of ultra-thin, amorphous aluminium-oxide films. Surf Sci 589(1–3):98–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart Dunn.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (DOCX 130 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dunn, S., Roussel, P., Poile, C. et al. Identification of uranium hexavalent compounds using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 331, 79–88 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-08085-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-08085-0

Keywords

Navigation