Skip to main content
Log in

Development of assay, isotopic and trace actinide measurements on solid plutonium and uranium samples by high resolution gamma spectrometry

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The precise analysis of sub-gram quantities of actinide materials for regulatory and specification requirements currently relies on destructive, wet chemistry methodologies. We report a high-resolution gamma spectrometry approach. Actinide samples were consistently produced in containment to a precise geometry. This allows analysis on actinide materials outside of gloveboxes, which has considerable advantages. The main challenge of the analysis is the precise assay of 240Pu to which we demonstrate approaches. The results show that despite not meeting the precision of other benchmark techniques, the approach is promising as a parallel, rapid, low cost methodology for sample analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tandon L, Hastings E, Banar J, Barnes J, Beddingfield D, Decker D, Dyke J, Farr D, FitzPatrick J, Gallimore D, Garner S, Gritzo R, Hahn T, Havrilla G, Johnson B, Kuhn K, LaMont S, Langner D, Lewis C, Majidi V, Martinez P, McCabe R, Mecklenburg S, Mercer D, Meyers S, Montoya V, Patterson B, Pereyra RA, Porterfield D, Poths J, Rademacher D, Ruggiero C, Schwartz D, Scott M, Spencer K, Steiner R, Villarreal R, Volz H, Walker L, Wong A, Worley C (2008) Nuclear, chemical, and physical characterization of nuclear materials. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 276(2):467–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-008-0528-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelwamondo AN, Colletti LP, Lindvall RE (2018) Uranium assay and trace element analysis of the fourth collaborative material exercise samples by the modified Davies-Gray method and the ICP-MS/OES techniques. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 315:379–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-5708-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mathew K, Kayzar-Boggs TM, Varga Z, Gaffney A, Denton J, Fulwyler J, Garduno K, Gaunt A, Inglis J, Keller R, Kinman W, Labotka D, Lujan E, Maassen J, Mastren T, May I, Mayer K, Nicholl A, Ottenfeld C, Parsons-Davis T, Porterfield D, Rim JH, Rolison J, Stanley F, Steiner R, Tandon L, Thomas M, Torres R, Treinen K, Wallenius M, Wende A, Williams R, Wimpenny J (2019) Intercomparison of the radio-chronometric ages of plutonium-certified reference materials with distinct isotopic compositions. Anal Chem 91(18):11643–11652. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mathew K, Bürger S, Ogt SV, Mason PMEM, Narayanan UI (2009) Uranium assay determination using Davies and Gray titration. Proceedings of the eighth international conference on methods and applications of radioanalytical chemistry (Marc Viii) Kailua- Kona, Hawaii. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 282:939–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-009-0186-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Waterbury GR, Metz CF (1959) Precise determination of plutonium by potentiometric titration. Anal Chem 31(7):1144–1148. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60151a022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayer K, Wallenius M, Ray I (2005) Nuclear forensics—a methodology providing clues on the origin of illicitly trafficked nuclear materials. Analyst 130:433–441. https://doi.org/10.1039/b412922a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. ASTM C1108–12, Standard Test Method for Plutonium by Controlled-Potential Coulometry.

  8. Mathew K, Stanley F, Thomas M, Spencer K, Colletti L, Tandon L (2016) Critical need for plutonium and uranium isotopic standards with lower uncertainties. Anal Methods 8:7289–7305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jakopič R, Aregbe Y, Richter S (2017) Verification measurements of the IRMM-1027 and the IAEA large-sized dried (LSD) spikes. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 311:1781–1791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-016-5123-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eppich GR, Mácsik Z, Katona R, Konegger-Kappel S, Stadelmann G, Köpf A, Varga B, Boulyga S (2019) Plutonium assay and isotopic composition measurements in nuclear safeguards samples by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J Anal At Spectrom 34:1154–1165. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9JA00047J

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rim JH, Kuhn KJ, Xu N, Porterfield DR, Worley CG, Thomas MR, Spencer KJ, Stanley FE, Lujan EJW, Garduno K, Trellue HR, Tandon L (2017) Determination of origin and intended use of plutonium metal using nuclear forensic techniques. For Sci Int 273:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.01.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reilly D, Ensslin N, Smith H Jr (1991) Passive nondestructive assay of nuclear materials (NUREG/CR--5550). Kreiner, S. (Ed.). United States

  13. Sampson TE, Kelley TA (1997) PC/FRAM: a code for the nondestructive measurement of the isotopic composition of actinides for safeguards applications. Appl Radiat Isot 48(10–12):1543–1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(97)00154-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stanley FE, Mathew KJ, Byerly BL et al (2017) Pursuing standards strategies in nuclear forensics: investigating extraction of progeny uranium in CRM-126a as a quality control material in Pu–U chronometry. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 311:1819–1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-016-5133-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Higginson M, Rim JH (2019) Gamma spectroscopy chapter, Plutonium Handbook Second Edition. ISBN: 978–0–89448–201–4

  16. Tandon L, Kuhn K, Decker D (2009) Plutonium metal standards exchange program for actinide measurement quality assurance (2001–2007). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 282:565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-009-0215-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Aigner HB, Kuhn R, Blohm-Hieber E, Mayer K, Guardini S, Pietri C, Rappinger B, Mitterrand B, Reed J, Mafra-Guidicini O, Deron S (2002) International Target Values 2000 for measurement uncertainties in safeguarding nuclear materials. ESARDA Bull 31:39–68

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

AWE plc is thanked for support in funding this research. Lav Tandon and Jung Ho Rim are thanked for their time and expertise reviewing the manuscript and giving expertise on the experimental design.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Higginson.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Higginson, M., Dawkins, B., Shaw, T. et al. Development of assay, isotopic and trace actinide measurements on solid plutonium and uranium samples by high resolution gamma spectrometry. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 330, 901–911 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-08043-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-08043-w

Keywords

Navigation