Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of model predictions with measured proton-induced production of nickel and iridium isotopes

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Calculations were performed to support method development for simultaneous production of Ni and Ir isotopes. The work scope included development of the physical target, irradiation configuration, and post-irradiation radiochemical separations. The assumptions of predictive models previously developed were refined based upon the precise experimental configuration selected, including Os target material and a set of stacked targets for concurrent production of Ni and Ir isotopes. Model predictions of the reaction cross sections with EMPIRE 3.2 (Herman in Nuclear Data Sheets 108:2655–2715, 2007) and implied isotopic yields are compared with proton beam irradiation measurements to refine model parameters and guide future experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1:

adapted from Morison et al. [2]), not to scale. The depth of the recess holding the pressed OsCl4 and Ta beam tailor is 1 mm

Figure 2:
Figure 3:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herman M et al (2007) EMPIRE: nuclear reaction model code system for data evaluation. Nuclear Data Sheets 108:2655–2715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morrison EC, et al. “Stacked target irradiations and radiochemical separations for simultaneous production of short-lived Ni and Ir isotopes”, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, submitted

  3. Goorley T et al (2012) Initial MCNP6 release overview. Nuclear Technol 180:298–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Biersack J, Haggmark L (1980) A monte carlo computer program for the transport of energetic ions in amorphous targets. Nuclear Inst Methods 174:257–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eidelman S et al (2004) Review of particle physics. Phys Lett B 592:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ditroi F, Takacs S, Tarkanyi F, Smith RW (2011) Investigation of proton and deuteron induced reactions on cobalt. J Korean Phys Soc 59(2):1697–1700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liang H, Han Y, Shen Q (2011) Theoretical calculation and analysis of the p + 59Co reaction. Nuclear Inst Methods Phys Res B 269:1899–1909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hermanne A, Adam Rebeles R, Tárkányi F, Takács S (2015) Excitation functions of proton induced reactions on natOs up to 65 MeV: experiments and comparison with results from theoretical codes. Nuclear Inst Methods Phys Res B 345:58–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA). We thank PNNL staff Tom Brewer for assistance with helium leak checks, Ty Buckendorf and Ron Del Mar for logistics support, and Truc Trang-Le for gamma counting assistance.

Funding

The funding was provided by Defense Threat Reduction Agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Couture.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Couture, A., Wittman, R., Morrison, E.C. et al. Comparison of model predictions with measured proton-induced production of nickel and iridium isotopes. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 330, 603–607 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07997-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07997-1

Keywords

Navigation