Abstract
A water bubbler system that can distinguish chemical forms of tritium was proposed for long-term tritium monitoring of the exhaust gas of a large fusion test device. The characteristics and performance of the water bubbler system were evaluated under operational conditions and confirmed to be suitable for tritium monitoring. For the tritium measurements, the water bubbler system determined the tritium activity and distinguished the chemical forms of tritium. The tritium activity and chemical forms in the exhaust gas provided helpful information to understand the tritium behavior in the large fusion test device.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Komori A, Yamada H, Imagawa S, Kaneko O, Kawahata K, Mutoh K, Ohyabu N, Takeiri Y, Ida K, Mito T, Nagayama Y, Sakakibara S, Sakamoto R, Shimozuma T, Watanabe KY, Motojima O, LHD Experiment Group (2010) Goal and achievements of large helical device project. Fusion Sci Technol 58:1–11
Takeiri Y (2018) Prospect towards steady-state helical fusion reactor based on progress of LHD project entering the deuterium experiment phase. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 46:1141–1148
Osakabe M, Takeiri Y, Morisaki T, Motojima G, Ogawa K, Isobe M, Tanaka M, Murakami S, Shimizu A, Nagaoka K, Takahashi H, Nagasaki K, Takahashi H, Fujita T, Oya Y, Sakamoto M, Ueda Y, Akiyama T, Kasahara H, Sakakibara S, Sakamoto R, Tokitani M, Yamada H, Yokoyama M, Yoshimura Y, LHD Experiment Group (2017) Current status of large helical device and its prospect for deuterium experiment. Fusion Sci Technol 72:199–210
IAEA (1991) Safe handling of tritium: review of data and experience. IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 324, Vienna
DOE Handbook (2009) Tritium handling and safe storage. DOE-HDBK-1129-2008, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington
Osborne RV (1974) Sampling for tritiated water vapour. In: Proceedings of the third international congress of the international radiation protection association, Washington D.C., 1973, CONF-730907-P2, pp 1428–1433
Shank KE, Easterly CE (1976) Tritium instrumentation for a fusion reactor power plant. ORNL/TM-5344
Östlund HG, Mason AS (1974) Atmospheric HT and HTO. Tellus 26:91–102
Okai T, Takashima Y (1989) Analytical method for atmospheric tritium with a portable tritium sampling system. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 130:399–407
Otlet RL, Walker AJ, Caldwell-Nichols CJ (1992) Practical environmental, working area and stack discharge samplers, passive and dynamic, for measurement of tritium as HTO and HT. Fusion Technol 21:550–555
Wood MJ, McElroy RGC, Surette RA, Brown RM (1993) Tritium sampling and measurement. Health Phys 65(6):610–627
Munyon WJ, Reilly DW, Webb J (2008) AGHCF gaseous-effluent tritium sampling system: design considerations and performance testing results. Health Phys 94(1):75–84
SDEC France, MARC 7000 tritium sampler. http://radioprotection.sdec-france.com/tritium-sampler-4-vials-marc-7000.html. Accessed 2 July 2018
Overhoff technology, TASC (tritium in air sample collector)-HTO-HT. http://www.overhoff.com/uploads/Chapter5.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2018
RCD lockinge, dynamic HTO/HT discriminating dry bed absorber sampler. http://rcd-lockinge.co.uk/equipment.htm. Accessed 2 July 2018
Uda T, Sugiyama T, Tanaka M, Munakata K, Momoshima N (2006) Developments of gaseous water, hydrogen and methane sampling system for environmental tritium monitoring. Fusion Eng Des 81:1385–1390
Tanaka M, Kato H, Yamamoto Y, Iwata C (2017) Development of an active tritium sampler for discriminating chemical forms without the use of combustion gases in a fusion test facility. Appl Radiat Isot 125:53–59
Duda JM, Goff PL, Leblois Y, Ponsard S (2018) Efficiencies of tritium (3H) bubbling systems. J Environ Radioact 189:236–249
Masaki K, Yagyu J, Arai T, Kaminaga A, Kodama K, Miya N, Ando T, Hiratsuka H, Saidoh M (2002) Wall conditioning and experience of the carbon-based first wall in JT-60U. Fusion Sci Technol 42:386–395
Isobe K, Nakamura H, Kaminaga A, Higashijima S, Nishi M, Konishi S, Nishikawa M, Tanabe T (2005) Tritium release behavior from JT-60U vacuum vessel during air exposure phase and wall conditioning phase. Fusion Sci Technol 48:302–305
Nakamura H, Higashijima S, Isobe K, Kaminaga A, Horikawa T, Kubo H, Miya N, Nishi M, Konishi S, Tanabe T (2004) Application of glow discharges for tritium removal from JT-60U vacuum vessel. Fusion Eng Des 70:163–173
Miya N, Nemoto M, Toyoshima N (1994) Tritium release from JT-60U vacuum vessel following high-power heated deuterium operations. Fusion Technol 26:507–511
Kaminaga A, Horikawa T, Nakamura H, Isobe K, Higashijima S, Arai T, Miya N, Nishi M, Tanabe T (2003) Analysis of exhausted gas in JT-60 deuterium operation. In: Proceedings of 20th IEEE/NPSS symposium on fusion engineering, San Diego, 14–17 Oct 2003
Kaminaga A, Nakamura H, Isobe K, Arai T (2005) Exhaust gas monitoring device of nuclear fusion experimental device. In: Proceedings of Tech2005, Osaka, Japan, 3–4 Mar 2005, p 83 (in Japanese)
ICRP (1990) Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 21(1–3)
Iwai Y, Sato K, Taniuchi J, Noguchi H, Kubo H, Harada N, Oshima Y, Yamashita T (2011) Room-temperature reactor packed with hydrophobic catalysts for the oxidation of hydrogen isotopes released in a nuclear facility. J Nucl Sci Technol 48(8):1184–1192
Uda T, Tanaka M, Munakata K (2008) Characteristics of honeycomb catalysts for oxidation of tritiated hydrogen and methane gases. Fusion Eng Des 83:1715–1720
Tanaka M, Suzuki N, Kato H, Kondo T, Yokosawa M, Kawamata T, Ikeda M, Meguro T, Tanaka T, Sonoi K (2018) Design and commissioning of the exhaust detritiation system for the large helical device. Fusion Eng Des 127:275–283
Tanaka M, Uda T, Shinozaki Y, Munakata K (2009) Hydrogen and methane oxidation performances of hybrid honeycomb catalyst for a tritium removal system. Fusion Eng Des 84:1818–1822
Isobe K, Nakamura H, Kaminaga A, Tsuzuki K, Higashijima S, Nishi M, Kobayashi Y, Konishi S (2006) Characterization of JT-60U exhaust gas during experimental operation. Fusion Eng Des 81:827–832
Roth J (2005) In: Clark EH, Reiter DH (eds) Nuclear fusion research; understanding plasma–surface interactions. Springer, Heidelberg
Grünhagen S, Brennan PD, Knipe S, Stagg R, Yorkshades J, Contributors JET-EFDA (2011) Analysis of hydrocarbons of the JET divertor cryogenic pump at the end of the carbon wall campaign using a micro gas chromatograph. Fusion Sci Technol 60(3):931–936
Grünhagen Romanelli S, Brezinsek S, Butler B, Coad JP, Drenik A, Giroud C, Jachmich S, Keenan T, Kruezi U, Mozetic M, Oberkofler M, Parracho A, Romanelli M, Smith R, Yorkshades J, Contributors JET-EFDA (2014) Gas analyses of the first complete JET cryopump regeneration with ITER-like wall. Phys Scr T159:014068
Nakano T, Kubo H, Higashijima S, Asakura N, Takenaga H, Sugie T, Itami K (2002) Measurement of the chemical sputtering yields of CH4/CD4 and C2Hx/C2Dx at the carbon divertor plates of JT-60U. Nucl Fusion 42:689–696
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the NIFS budget ULAA023 and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 17K06998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tanaka, M., Kato, H., Suzuki, N. et al. Determination of tritium activity and chemical forms in the exhaust gas from a large fusion test device. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 318, 877–885 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6075-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6075-y