Abstract
The apparent tendency to underestimate the uncertainty of experimentally determined half-life values of radionuclides is discussed. It is argued that the uncertainty derived from a least-squares analysis of a decay curve is prone to error. As it is quite common for a series of activity measurement results to be autocorrelated, the prerequisite of randomness of data for common statistical tests to apply is not fulfilled. In this work, an alternative data analysis method is applied that leads to a more realistic uncertainty budget. The uncertainty components are being subdivided in three categories according to the relative frequency at which they occur, an appropriate uncertainty propagation formula applied and then the total uncertainty obtained from an independent sum. An attempt is made to apply the protocol to problematic cases in literature, yet it is clear that the reporting is usually incomplete for a full uncertainty analysis. Suggestions are made for a concise but more complete reporting style, for the sake of traceability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Macmahon, A. Pearce, P. Harris, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 60 (2004) 275.
M. J. Woods, S. M. Collins, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 60 (2004) 257.
S. Pommé, in: Applied Modeling and Computations in Nuclear Science, T. M. Semkow, S. Pommé, S. M. Jerome, D. J. Strom (Eds), ACS Symposium Series 945, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 2007, p. 282.
R. Van Aammel, S. Pommé, G. Sibbens, Half-life measurement of 55Fe, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 64 (2006) 1412.
R. Vaninbrouckx, G. Grosse, W. Zehner, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 32 (1981) 589.
F. Lagoutine, J. Legrand, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 33 (1982) 711.
H. Schrader, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 60 (2004) 317.
M. P. Unterweger, D. D. Hoppes, F. J. Schima, Nucl. Instr. Meth., A312 (1992) 349.
R. H. Martin, K. I. W. Burns, J. G. V. Taylor, Nucl. Instr. Meth., A390 (1997) 267.
J. W. Hammer, Z. Phys., 216 (1968) 355.
F. Lagoutine, Y. L. Gallic, J. Legrand, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 19 (1968) 475.
W. H. Zimmer, R. E. Dahl, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 32 (1968) 132.
J. P. Boulanger, Thesis, Univ. Paris, 1968; CEA-R-3590, 1969.
P. J. Cressy Jr., Nucl. Sci. Eng., 55 (1974) 450.
C. A. Huh, L. F. Liu, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 246 (2000) 229.
H. Houtermans, O. Milosevic, F. Reichel, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 31 (1980) 153.
D. D. Hoppes, J. M. R. Hutchinson, F. J. Schima, M. P. Unterweger, NBS-Spec. Publ., 626 (1982) 85.
J. Morel, M. Etcheverry, M. Vallée, Nucl. Instr. Meth., A339 (1994) 232.
N. I. Karmalitsyn, T. E. Sazonova, A. V. Zanevsky, S. V. Sepman, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 49 (1998) 1363.
U. Schötzig, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 53 (2000) 469.
K. F. Waltz, K. Debertin, H. Schrader, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 34 (1983) 1191.
J. R. Gum, M. L. Pool, Phys. Rev., 80 (1950) 315.
H. Leutz, K. Schneckenberger, H. Wenninger, Nucl. Phys., 63 (1965) 263.
B. Hyland et al., J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys., 31 (2005) S1885.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pommé, S., Camps, J., Van Ammel, R. et al. Protocol for uncertainty assessment of half-lives. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 276, 335–339 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-008-0508-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-008-0508-y