Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is Academic Agency Relevant for the School-to-Work Transition of Lower Attainers? Evidence from Canada and England

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Academic agency is recognized as an important predictor of higher education attainment among the general population during the school-to-work transition. However, there is little evidence on whether (a) academic agency is associated with higher education attainment among young people facing education difficulties (i.e., lower attainers), (b) academic agency is associated with a smooth entry in a meaningful job among lower attainers, and (c) these associations vary across educational contexts. This study draws on longitudinal data from lower attainers in the province of Québec (Mage = 16.31, SD = 0.98; 48% females) and in England (Mage = 15.86, SD = 0.72; 42% females), two regions with similar education systems, yet different vocational training provision. In both samples, fewer than one in four participants reach higher education by age 20. Also, in both countries academic agency is associated with a greater likelihood of being in higher education compared to other employment and education outcomes at age 20, but not with rapid entry into meaningful employment. Thus, focussing on higher education attainment and academic-related factors such as academic agency is of limited relevance for understanding lower attainers’ success over school-to work transitions. For them, understanding this transition also requires considering rapid entry in meaningful employment, as well as non-academic forms of agency supporting such work-oriented outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The measurement model reached metric invariance but not scalar invariance. Considering that the main goal of the study is not to compare latent means but rather to compare coefficients across groups, metric invariance is sufficient (Putnick & Bornstein, 2016).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Elizabeth Olivier (Université de Montréal) for her support for the statistical analyses.

Funding

Guillaume Descary was supported by scholarhips from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC # 752-2022-1077), the Fonds de recherche du Québec Société et Culture (FRQSC # 304460), Mitacs Globalink (# IT32734), the Institut universitaire Jeunes en difficulté (IUJD), the Centre de recherche en santé publique (CReSP), and the Groupe de recherche sur les environnements scolaires (GRES). Véronique Dupéré received funding to support data collection (Canadian sample) from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC # 430-2013-000015, 435-2016-0838); the Canada Research Chairs program (# 954-232437); the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS # 27205, 28816), the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Société et culture (FRQSC # 164645, 178837), and the Centre de recherche en santé publique (CReSP). Ingrid Schoon received funding from the Nuffield Foundation (# 3295826) that supported the preparation of this article.

Data Sharing Declaration

The data of the Parcours project will not be deposited. The LSYPE data are available from the UK Data Archive, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.D. designed the study, drafted the manuscript and performed the statistical analysis; V.D. provided one of the datasets, participated in the interpretation of the data and helped to draft the manuscript; S.H. participated in the interpretation of the data and helped to draft the manuscript; I.S. participated in the design of the study, in the interpretation of the data and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guillaume Descary, Véronique Dupéré, Sophie T. Hebert or Ingrid Schoon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

Compliance with ethical standards was ascertain by the Department for Education and NHS Research Ethics Committees for the LSYPE study, and by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Montréal for the Parcours study. The primary ethical issue arising from this secondary analysis is to maintain participants’ confidentiality and anonymity. The analysis of the data does not provide any information relating specifically to an identifiable individual or household; does not attempt to identify individuals or to provide any findings that might identify individuals; does not use the information of individuals or household in the data for the public use. The data has only been used for the purpose of this research, confidentiality and anonymity research of participants has been maintained and there has been no attempt to identify them in any stage of the research.

Informed Consent

Written informed consent have been obtained from every participant in the Parcours study and from every participant and caregiver in the LSYPE study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Descary, G., Dupéré, V., T. Hebert, S. et al. Is Academic Agency Relevant for the School-to-Work Transition of Lower Attainers? Evidence from Canada and England. J. Youth Adolescence 52, 2509–2525 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01843-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01843-1

Keywords

Navigation