Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 46, Issue 9, pp 1968–1981 | Cite as

Unstructured Socializing with Peers and Delinquent Behavior: A Genetically Informed Analysis

  • Ryan C. Meldrum
  • J. C. Barnes
Empirical Research

Abstract

A large body of research finds that unstructured socializing with peers is positively associated with delinquency during adolescence. Yet, existing research has not ruled out the potential for confounding due to genetic factors and factors that can be traced to environments shared between siblings. To fill this void, the current study examines whether the association between unstructured socializing with peers and delinquent behavior remains when accounting for genetic factors, shared environmental influences, and a variety of non-shared environmental covariates. We do so by using data from the twin subsample of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (n = 1200 at wave 1 and 1103 at wave 2; 51% male; mean age at wave 1 = 15.63). Results from both cross-sectional and lagged models indicate the association between unstructured socializing with peers and delinquent behavior remains when controlling for both genetic and environmental influences. Supplementary analyses examining the association under different specifications offer additional, albeit qualified, evidence supportive of this finding. The study concludes with a discussion highlighting the importance of limiting free time with friends in the absence of authority figures as a strategy for reducing delinquency during adolescence.

Keywords

Unstructured socializing Delinquency Selection effects Heritability Add Health 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Evelien Hoeben for helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. This study uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data files is available on the Add Health website (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth).

Funding

No direct support was received from grant P01-HD31921 for the current study.

Author Contributions

R.C.M. conceived of the study, drafted the introduction and literature review sections of the manuscript, and drafted portions of the discussion section; J.C.B. acquired the data for the analysis, conducted the statistical analysis, drafted portions of the methods, results, and discussion sections, and created the tables. All authors read, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

The procurement of the data required for this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Cincinnati.

Informed Consent

Consent for participation in the Add Health study was obtained from both the parents of the participants and the participants themselves at the time the study began in the 1990s.

References

  1. Anderson, A. L., & Hughes, L. A. (2009). Exposure to situations conducive to delinquent behavior: The effects of time use, income, and transportation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Augustyn, M. B., & McGloin, J. M. (2013). The risk of informal socializing with peers: Considering gender differences across predatory delinquency and substance use. Justice Quarterly, 30, 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes, G. M., Hoffman, J. H., Welte, J. W., Farrell, M. P., & Dintcheff, B. A. (2007). Adolescents’ time use: Effects on substance use, delinquency and sexual activity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 697–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes, J. C. (2013). Analyzing the origins of life-course-persistent offending: A consideration of environmental and genetic influences. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 519–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes, J. C., & Boutwell, B. B. (2013). A demonstration of the generalizability of twin-based research on antisocial behavior. Behavior Genetics, 43, 120–131.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnes, J. C., Boutwell, B. B., Beaver, K. M., Gibson, C. L., & Wright, J. P. (2014). On the consequences of ignoring genetic influences in criminological research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes, J. C., & Meldrum, R. C. (2015). The impact of sleep duration on adolescent development: A genetically informed analysis of identical twin pairs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 489–506.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Beaver, Kevin M. (2008). Nonshared environmental influence on adolescent delinquent involvement and adult criminal behavior. Criminology, 46, 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boisvert, D., Boutwell, B. B., Vaske, J., & Newsome, J. (2014). Genetic and environmental overlap between delinquent peer association and delinquency in adolescence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, L. E., Cantor, D., & Kluegel, J. R. (1981). Robbery victimization in the United States: An analysis of a nonrandom event. Social Science Quarterly, 62, 644–657.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeFries, J. C., & Fulker, D. W. (1985). Multiple regression analysis of twin data. Behavior Genetics, 15, 467–473.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dipietro, S. M., & McGloin, J. M. (2012). Differential susceptibility? Immigrant youth and peer influence. Criminology, 50, 711–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eaves, L., & Eysenck, H. (1975). The nature of extraversion: A genetical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 102–112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Felson, R. B., Osgood, W. D., Horney, J., & Wiernik, C. (2012). Having a bad month: General versus specific effects of stress on crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28, 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fleming, C. B., Catalano, R. F., Mazza, J. J., Brown, E. C., Haggerty, K. P., & Harachi, T. W. (2008). After-school activities, misbehavior in school, and delinquency from the end of elementary school through the beginning of high school: A test of social development model hypotheses. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 28, 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldstein, S. E., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2005). Parents, peers, and problem behavior: A longitudinal investigation of the impact of relationship perceptions and characteristics on the development of adolescent problem behavior. Developmental Psychology, 41, 401–413.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Greene, K., & Banerjee, S. C. (2009). Examining unsupervised time with peers and the role of association with delinquent peers on adolescent smoking. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 11, 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris, K. M. (2009). The national longitudinal study of adolescent health (Add Health), Waves I & II, 1994–1996; Wave III, 2001–2002; Wave IV, 2007–2009 [machine-readable data file and documentation]. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, K. M., Halpern, C. T., Whitsel, E., Hussey, J., Tabor, J., Entzel, P., & Udry, J. R. (2009). The national longitudinal study of adolescent health: Research design. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design.Google Scholar
  21. Haynie, D. L., & Osgood, D. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84, 1109–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Higgins, G. E., & Jennings, W. G. (2010). Is unstructured socializing a dynamic process? An exploratory analysis using a semiparametric group-based modeling approach. Criminal Justice Review, 35, 514–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoeben, E. M., Meldrum, R. C., Walker, D., & Young, Y. T. N. (2016). The role of peer delinquency and unstructured socializing in explaining delinquency and substance use: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 108–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoeben, E. M., & Weerman, F. M. (2014). Situational conditions and adolescent offending: Does the impact of unstructured socializing depend on its location? European Journal of Criminology, 11, 481–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobson, K. C., & Rowe, D. C. (1998). Genetic and shared environmental influences on adolescent BMI: Interactions with race and sex. Behavior Genetics, 28, 265–278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Janssen, H. J., Weerman, F. M., & Eichelsheim, V. I. (2017). Parenting as a protective factor against criminogenic settings? Interaction effects between three aspects of parenting and unstructured socializing in disordered areas. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54, 181–207.Google Scholar
  27. Kennedy, L. W., & Forde, D. R. (1990). Routine activities and crime: An analysis of victimization in Canada. Criminology, 28, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kohler, H., Behrman, J. R., & Schnittker, J. (2011). Social science methods for twins data: Integrating causality, endowments, and heritability. Biodemography and Social Biology, 57, 88–141.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Lotz, R., & Lee, L. (1999). Sociability, school experience, and delinquency. Youth & Society, 31, 199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maimon, D., & Browning, C. R. (2010). Unstructured socializing, collective efficacy, and violent behavior among urban youth. Criminology, 48, 443–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meldrum, R. C., Barnes, J. C., & Hay, C. (2015). Sleep deprivation, low self-control, and delinquency: A test of the strength model of self-control. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 465–477.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Meldrum, R. C., & Clark, J. (2015). Adolescent virtual time spent socializing with peers, substance use, and delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 61, 1104–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meldrum, R. C., Young, J. T. N., & Weerman, F. M. (2009). Reconsidering the effect of self-control and delinquent peers: Implications of measurement for theoretical significance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Messner, S. F., & Tardiff, K. (1985). The social ecology of urban homicide: An application of the “routine activities” approach. Criminology, 23, 241–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller, J. (2013). Individual offending, routine activities, and activity settings: Revisiting the routine activity theory of general deviance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 390–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Osgood, D. W., & Anderson, A. L. (2004). Unstructured socializing and rates of delinquency. Criminology, 42, 519–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Plomin, R., & Daniels, D. (1986). Genetics and shyness. In W. Jones, J. Cheek, and S. Briggs (Eds.), Shyness: Perspectives on Research and Treatment (pp. 63–80). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderheiser, J. (2013). Behavioral Genetics (6th Edn). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Polderman, T. J., Benyamin, B., De Leeuw, C. A., Sullivan, P. F., Van Bochoven, A., Visscher, P. M., & Posthuma, D. (2015). Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics, 47, 702–709.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Raine, A. (2013). The anatomy of violence: The biological roots of crime. New York, NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  42. Rodgers, J. L., & Kohler, H. (2005). Reformulating and simplifying the DF analysis model. Behavior Genetics, 35, 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rodgers, J. L., Buster, M., & Rowe, D. C. (2001). Genetic and environmental influences on delinquency: DF analysis of NLSY kinship data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17, 145–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taylor, J., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2000). Evidence for a genetic etiology of early-onset delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109(4), 634–643.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. TenEyck, M., & Barnes, J. C. (2015). Examining the impact of peer group selection on self-reported delinquency: A consideration of active gene–environment correlation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 741–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomas, K. J., & McGloin, J. M. (2013). A dual‐systems approach for understanding differential susceptibility to processes of peer influence. Criminology, 51, 435–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Turkheimer, E., & Harden, K. P. (2013). Behavior genetic research methods: Testing quasi-causal hypotheses using multivariate twin data. In H. T. Reis, C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Van den Berg, S. M., De Moor, M. H., McGue, M., Pettersson, E., Terracciano, A., Verweij, K. J., et al. (2014). Harmonization of neuroticism and extraversion phenotypes across inventories and cohorts in the genetics of personality consortium: An application of item response theory. Behavior Genetics, 44, 295–313.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Weerman, F. M., Wilcox, P., & Sullivan, C. J. (2017). The short-term dynamics of peers and delinquent behavior: An analysis of bi-weekly changes within a high school student network. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Onlinefirst Edition.Google Scholar
  50. Weerman, F. M., Bernasco, W., Bruinsma, G. J., & Pauwels, L. J. (2016). Gender differences in delinquency and situational action theory: A partial test. Justice Quarterly, 33, 1182–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weerman, F. M., Bernasco, W., Bruinsma, G. J., & Pauwels, L. J. (2015). When is spending time with peers related to delinquency? The importance of where, what, and with whom. Crime & Delinquency, 61, 1386–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wright, J. P., & Beaver, K. M. (2005). Do parents matter in creating self‐control in their children? A genetically informed test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s theory of low self‐control. Criminology, 43, 1169–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wright, J. P., Beaver, K. M., Delisi, M., & Vaughn, M. (2008). Evidence of negligible parenting influences on self‐control, delinquent peers, and delinquency in a sample of twins. Justice Quarterly, 25, 544–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wright, K. A., Kim, B., Chassin, L., Losoya, S. H., & Piquero, A. R. (2014). Ecological context, concentrated disadvantage, and youth reoffending: Identifying the social mechanisms in a sample of serious adolescent offenders. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1781–1799.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  2. 2.School of Criminal JusticeUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations