Abstract
This paper uses an ecological perspective to explore the risk factors associated with bullying behaviors among a representative sample of adolescents aged 11–14 \( {\text{(}}n = 9816,\;\overline X = {\text{12}}{\text{.88}}, s = {\text{.9814)}}. \) Data derived from the Health Behavior in School Children: WHO Cross-National Survey were used to model the relationship between bullying and media effects, peer and family support systems, self-efficacy, and school environment. Overall, the results of this study suggest that bullying increases among children who watch television frequently, lack teacher support, have themselves been bullied, attend schools with unfavorable environments, have emotional support from their peers, and have teachers and parents who do not place high expectations on their school performance. In addition, we found an inverse relationship between being Asian or African American, feeling left out of school activities and bullying. Our results lend support to the contention that bullying arises out of deficits in social climate, but that social support systems mediate bullying behavior irrespective of the student’s racial/ethnic characteristics, parental income levels or media influences. Because the number of friends and the ability to talk to these friends increases the likelihood of bullying, we suggest that bullying is not simply an individual response to a particular environment but is a peer-group behavior. We conclude that limiting television viewing hours, improving student’s abilities to access family support systems and improving school atmospheres are potentially useful interventions to limit bullying behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
When proportionality is unrealistic, the partial proportional ordinal logistic model appropriately allows for the possibility that some of the estimated coefficients are the same for all values of j while others are not. As Lall et al. (2002) contend, “strikingly” different results can be obtained when using alternative ordinal models. An additional benefit is that this model is much more parsimonious than other models frequently employed when the proportional odds assumption is deemed invalid. Accordingly, the following was fit to the data
$$ {\begin{gathered} {\text{log}}\left[ {\frac{{{\text{Pr}}(Y \le y_j |X_{\text{1}} \cdots X_p )}} {{{\text{Pr}}(Y > y_j |X_{\text{1}} \cdots X_p )}}} \right] = \alpha _j + \left( {\left[ {\beta _{\text{1}} X_{\text{1}} + \gamma _{j1} T_{\text{1}} } \right] + \left[ {\beta _{\text{2}} X_{\text{2}} + \gamma _{j2} T_{\text{2}} } \right] + \left[ {\beta _q X_q + \gamma _{jq} T_q } \right] + \cdots + \left[ {\beta _p X_p }\right]} \right),j = {\text{1, 2}},...,M - {\text{1}} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} } $$where X 1, X 2,...,X p are the set of covariates, q of which are known to have proportional odds and p−q do not. In the parameterization of the partial proportional odds model used in this paper, each X has a constant component associated with it (see Table 4). In addition, each X can have M−2 gamma coefficients (entitled “Increment at cut-off points” in Table 4) where M = 5 (the number of categories in Y) (See Lall et al. 2002 for further explanation). The gamma coefficients represent deviations from the proportionality assumption, in other words if the gammas for a variable are all 0 then the variable meets the proportional odds assumption (Williams 2005).
References
Anderson, C. A., Berkowitz, L., Donnerstein, E., Huesmann, L. R., Johnson, J. D., Linz, D., Malamuth, N., & Wartela, E. (2003). The influence of media violence on youth. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 81–110.
Anderson, M., Kaufman, J., Simon, T., Barrios, L., Paulozzi, L., Ryan, G., Hammond, R., Modzeleski, W., Feucht, T., Potter, L. & the School-Associated Violent Deaths Study Group. (2001). School-associated violent deaths in the United States, 1994–1999. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 2695–2702.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Batsche, G. M., & Knoff, H. M. (1994). Bullies and their victims: Understanding a pervasive problem in the schools. School Psychology Review, 23, 165–174.
Borg, M. G. (1998). The emotional reactions of school bullies and their victims. Educational Psychology, 18, 433–444.
Bowers, L., Smith, P. K., & Binney, V. (1994). Perceived family relationships of bullies, victims and bully/victims in middle childhood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 215–232.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. (1998). The ecology of developmental process. The Handbook of Child Psychology, 1, 993–1029.
Brown, M. (2003). Bully-proof your school. Today’s School (3) 5. Dayton, OH: Peter Li Education Group.
Bushman, B. J., & Anderson C. A. (2002). Violent video games and hostile expectations: A test of the general aggression model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1679–1686.
Cesarone, B. (1994). Video games and children. ERIC Digest ED365477.
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1999). ‘Superiority’ is in the eye of the beholder: A comment on Sutton, Smith, Swettenham. Social Development, 8, 128–131.
DeLara, E. (2006). Bullying and violence in American schools. In N. E. Dowd, D. G. Singer, & R. F. Wilson (Eds.), Handbook of children, culture and violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Duncan, R. D. (1999). Peer and sibling aggression: An investigation of intra- and extra-familial bullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 871–886.
Duncan, R. D. (2004). The impact of family relationships on school bullies and their victims. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 227–244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Elsea, M., & Mukhtar, K. (2000). Bullying and racism among Asian schoolchildren in Britain. Educational Research, 42, 207–217.
Espelage, D. L., Holt, M. K., & Henkel, R. R. (2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescents. Child Development, 74, 205–220.
Espelage, D., & Swearer, S. (2004). Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fleming, M., & Towey, K. (2002). Educational forum on adolescent health: Youth bullying (pp. 4–16). Chicago: American Medical Association.
Garbarino, J., & deLara, E. (2002). And words can hurt forever. New York: The Free Press.
Gentile, D. A., & Walsh, D. A. (2002). A normative study of family media habits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 23, 157–178.
Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (2002). Ethnicity, peer harassment, and adjustment in middle school: An exploratory study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 22, 173–199.
Hartup, W., & Stevens, N. (1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 355–370.
Haynie, D. L., Nansel, T., Eitel P., Davis-Crump, A., Saylor, K., Yu, K., & Simons-Morton, B. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: Distinct groups of at-risk youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 29–49.
Johnson, J. G., Cohen, P., Smailes, E. M., Kasen, S., & Brooks, J. S. (2002). Television viewing and aggressive behavior during adolescence and adulthood. Science, 295, 2468–2471.
Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpela, M., Marttunen, M., Rimpela, A., & Rantenan, P. (1999). Bullying, depression, and suicidal ideation in Finnish adolescents: School survey. British Medical Journal, 319, 348–351.
Kuntsche, E. N. (2004). Hostility among adolescents in Switzerland? Multivariate relations between excessive media use and forms of violence. Journal of Adolescent Mental Health, 34, 230–236.
Lall, R., Campbell, M. J., Walters, S. J., & Morgan, K. (2002). A review of ordinal regression models applied on health-related quality of life assessments. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 11, 1–19.
Lickel, B., Schmader, T., & Hamilton, D. L. (2003). A case of collective responsibility: Who else was to blame for the Columbine High School shootings? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 194–204.
Limber, S. P. (2004). Implementation of the Olweus bullying prevention program: Lessons learned from the field. In D. Espellage, & S. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 351–363). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Limber, S. P. (2006). Peer victimization: The nature and prevalence of bullying among children and youth. In N. E. Dowd, D. G. Singer, & R. F. Wilson (Eds.), Handbook of children, culture and violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage Publications.
Merton, D. E. (1996). Visibility and vulnerability: Responses to rejection by nonaggressive junior high school boys. Journal of Early Adolescence, 16, 5–26.
Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Ruan, W. J., Scheidt, P., Simons-Morton, B., & Pilla, R. (2001). Bullying behaviors among U.S. youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 258, 2094–2100.
National Television Violence Study. (1998). Santa Barbara, Center for Communication and Social Policy, University of California.
Natvig, G. K., Albrektsen, G., & Qvarnstrøm, U. (2001). School-related stress experience as a risk factor for bullying behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 561–575.
Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among school children: Basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. In K. Rubin & D. Pepler (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411–488). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Olweus, D. (1997). Bully/victim problems at school: Knowledge base and an effective intervention program. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 18, 170–190.
Olweus D., Limber S. P., & Mihalic, S. (1999). The bullying prevention program: Blueprints for violence prevention, Vol. 10. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.
O’Moore, A. M., & Hillery, B. (1989). Bullying in Dublin schools. Irish Journal of Psychology, 10, 426–441.
O’Moore M., & Kirkham, C. (2001). Self-esteem and its relationship to bullying behaviour. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 269–283.
Ortega, R., & Lera, M. J. (2000). The Seville anti-bullying in school project. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 113–123.
Pearce, J. B., & Thompson, A. E. (1998). Practical approaches to reduce the impact of bullying. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 79, 528–531.
Pellegrini, A., & Bartini, M. (2000). A longitudinal study of bullying, victimization, and peer affiliation during the transition from primary school to middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 699–725.
Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807–814.
Rigby, K., & Cox, I. (1996). The contribution of bullying at school and low self-esteem to acts of delinquency among Australian teenagers. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 609–612.
Roberts, D. F., Henriksen, L., & Foehr, U. G. (2004). Adolescents and media. In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 487–521). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1991). Dimensions of interpersonal relation among Australian children and implications for psychological well-being. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 33–42.
Rodkin, P. C., & Hodges, E. V. (2003). Bullies and victims in the peer ecology: Four questions for psychologists and school professionals. School Psychology Review, 32, 384–400.
Seals, D., & Young, J. (2003). Bullying victimization: prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression. Adolescence, 38, 735–747.
Shields, A., & Cicchetti, D. (2001). Parental mistreatment and emotional dysregulation as risk factors for bullying and victimization in middle school children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 349–363.
Slee, P. T., & Rigby, K. (1993). The relationship of Eysenck’s personality factors and self-esteem to bully-victim behavior in Australian schoolboys. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 371–373.
Smith, P. K. (2004). Bullying: Recent developments. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 9, 98–103.
Smith, P., & Brain, P. (2000). Bullying in schools: Lessons from two decades of research. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 1–9.
Smith P., Sharp S. (Eds.). (1994). School bullying: Insights and perspectives. London: Routledge.
StataCorp (2003). Stata Statistical Software, Stata Coorporation College Station, TX.
Swearer, S. M., & Espelage, D. L. (2004). Introduction: A social-ecological framework of bullying among youth. In D. L. Espelage, & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools (pp. 1–12). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tritt, C., & Duncan, R. D. (1997). The relationship between childhood bullying and young adult self-esteem and loneliness. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 36, 35–44.
Underwood, M. K. (2002). Sticks and stones and social exclusion: Aggression among girls and boys. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 533–548). Blackwell: Oxford.
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A., DeWinter, A., & Verhulst, F.C. (2005). Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims and uninvolvled preadolescents. Developmetal Psychology, 41(4), 672–682.
Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35, 3–25.
WHO Organization. (2003). “Health behavior in school-aged children, 1997–1998.” [UNITED STATES] [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Calverton, MD: Macro International [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Williams, R. (2005). Gologit2: Generalized ordered logistic regression/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. Working Paper, University of Notre Dame (online at http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/gologit2/gologit2.pdf).
Wolke, D., & Samara, M. (2004). Bullied by siblings: Association with peer victimization and behavior problems in Israeli lower secondary school children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1015–1029.
Wolke, D., Woods, S., Bloomfield, L., Karstadt, L. (2001). Bullying involvement in primary school and common health problems. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 85, 197–201.
Zimmerman, F. J., Glew, G. M., Christakis, D. A., & Katon, W. (2005). Early cognitive stimulation, emotional support, and television watching as predictors of subsequent bullying among grade-school children. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 159, 384–388.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the United States Department of Justice—Office for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention and the Michigan Department of Human Services Grant #: 071B2001414 for funding this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barboza, G.E., Schiamberg, L.B., Oehmke, J. et al. Individual Characteristics and the Multiple Contexts of Adolescent Bullying: An Ecological Perspective. J Youth Adolescence 38, 101–121 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9271-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9271-1