Abstract
This article assesses the performance of a technology business incubator program, established by the French government to support innovative new science and technology-based firms (NSTBF) that seek to commercialize laboratory research results. With a resource-based view and an institutional approach, this study predicts why some incubators may be more successful than others in supporting the development of NSTBF. An original longitudinal data set represents the results of a public incubator program, funded following the passage of a 1999 French law on innovation and research. The findings refer to a sample of 25 operationally active incubators and their 1200 graduated new ventures. This study contributes to the literature on business incubation by showing the importance of various incubator resource inputs for aiding NSTBF projects. It thus provides useful and timely feedback for researchers and policy makers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Public incubators are technology-oriented structures that target government funding. According to the Agence Nationale pour le Développement et la Création des Entreprises (ANCE), in mid-1990s there were 210 business incubators in France, of which 100 were considered “true” business incubators (offering facilities and services) rather than property development ventures (OECD 1997). Another report estimated the number of incubators and pépinières in France at 314, of which 84 were business incubators ( www.mon-incubateur.com).
The DIANE Database contains comprehensive information on companies in France, including data about company accounts, ratios, activities, scanned annual reports, descriptive information, ownership, and management for more than 1.3 million companies.
That is, the number of companies that stated or disclosed that they took advantage of CIR.
Common structures of private/public research are closely and perennially associated with medium- and long-term public and private researchers’ skills, revolving around the issues of the partner company.
References
Aernoudt, R. (2004). Incubators: Tool for entrepreneurship? Small Business Economics, 23(1), 127–135.
Aerts, K., Matthyssens, P., & Vandenbempt, K. (2007). Critical role and screening practices of European business incubators. Technovation, 27(1), 254–267.
Allen, D. N., & McCluskey, R. (1990). Structure, policy, services and performance in the business incubator industry. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 61–77.
Anand, J., & Delios, A. (2002). Absolute and relative resources as determinants of international acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 23(1), 119–134.
Babero, J. L., Casillas, J. C., Wright, M., & Garcia, A. R. (2014). Do different types of incubators produce different types of innovations? Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(2), 151–168.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: A framework? Technovation, 28(1), 20–28.
Bigliardi, B., Dormio, A. I., Nosella, A., & Petroni, G. (2006). Assessing science parks’ performances: Directions from selected Italian case studies. Technovation, 26, 489–505.
Bodas Freitas, I. M., Geuna, A., & Rossi, F. (2013). Finding the right partners: institutional and personal modes of governance of university–industry interaction. Research Policy, 42(1), 50–62.
Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1989). Density delay in the evolution of organizational populations: A model and five empirical tests. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 411–430.
Chan, K. F., & Lau, T. (2005). Assessing technology incubator programs in the science park: the good, the bad and the ugly. Technovation, 25(10), 1215–1228.
Chen, C.-J. (2009). Technology commercialization, incubator and venture capital, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 93–103.
Corona, L., Doutriaux, J., & Mian, S. A. (2006). Building knowledge regions in North America: Emerging technology innovation poles. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Dettwiler, P., Lindelof, P., & Lofsten, H. (2007). Utility of location: A comparative survey between small new technology-based firms located on and off Science Parks—Implications for facilities management. Technovation, 26, 506–517.
Dew, A., Llewellyn, G., & Balandin, S. (2004). Post-parental care: A new generation of sibling-carers. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 29(2), 176–179.
DiGregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(1), 209–227.
Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Incubation of incubators: Innovation as a triple helix of university–industry–government networks. Science and Public Policy, 28(2), 115–128.
Etzkowitz, H., Mello, J. M. C., Almeida, M., & M, Almeida. (2005). Towards “meta-innovation” in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research Policy, 34(1), 411–424.
Ferguson, R., & Olofsson, C. (2004). Science parks and the development of NTBFs—Location, survival and growth. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 5–17.
Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2011). Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 40, 1113–1127.
Freel, M. (2003). Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation. Networking and Proximity, Research Policy, 32(5), 751–770.
Gardner, W., Mulvey, E. P., & Shaw, E. C. (1995). Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 392–404.
Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (2008). Clusters, knowledge spillovers and new performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(1), 405–422.
Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48.
Grimaldi, R., & Grandi, A. (2005). Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models. Technovation., 25(2), 111–121.
Haber, S., & Reichel, A. (2007). ‘The cumulative nature of the entrepreneurial process: The contribution of human capital planning and environment resources to small venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 119–145.
Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2004). A systematic review of business incubation research. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 55–82.
Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2008). Inside the black box of business incubation: study B—Scale assessment systems. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 439–471.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge: HarvardUniv. Press.
Hansen, M. T., Chesbrough, H. W., Nohria, N., & Sull, D. N. (2000). Networked incubators: hothouses of the new economy. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 74–84.
Hansson, F., Husted, K., & Vestergaard, J. (2005). Second generation Science Parks: from structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts of the knowledge society. Technovation, 25, 1039–1049.
Hausman, J., Hall, B. H., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52, 909–938.
Hunt, S. D. (2001). Commentary—A general theory of competition: Issues, answers and an invitation. European Journal of Marketing, 35(5/6), 524–548.
Lerner, M. (1989). Paternalism and entrepreneurship. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 83, 149–166.
Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2006). Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue. Research Policy, 35(10), 1441–1449.
Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13–22.
Lindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2003). Science Park location and new technology-based firms in Sweden—implications for strategy and performance. Small Business Economics, 20(3), 245.
Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2005). Opening the ivory tower’s door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of the U.S. spin-off companies. Research Policy, 34(3), 1106–1112.
Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34, 1043–1057.
Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2002). Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms—Academic–industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 3, 859–876.
Lumpkin, J. R., & Ireland, R. D. (1988). Screening Practices of New Business incubators: The evaluation of critical success factors. American Journal of Small Business, 12, 59–81.
McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2008). High tech start-ups in University Science Park incubators: The relationship between the start-up’s lifecycle progression and use of the incubator’s resources. Technovation, 28, 277–290.
Mian, S. A. (1996). The university business incubator: A strategy for developing new research/technology-based firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 7(2), 191–208.
Mian, S. A. (1997). Assessing and managing the university technology business incubator: an integrative framework. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 251–285.
Mian, S. A. (2011). University’s involvement in technology business incubation: What literature and practice tell us? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 13(2), 113–121.
Mian, S. A. (1994). U.S. university-sponsored technology incubators: An overview of management, policies and performance. Technovation, 14(8), 515–528.
Mian, S. A, Mchirgui, Z, Fayolle, A. & Lamine, W. (2011). The Performance determinants of technology business incubators: A resource based view. In 2011 Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference (BCERC), June 8–11, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Mian, S., Fayolle, A., & Lamine, W. (2012). Building sustainable regional innovation platforms for incubating science and technology businesses: Evidence from the US and French science and technology parks. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 13(4), 235–248.
Newbert, S. L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 121–146.
OECD (1997). http://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2101733.pdf.
O’Farrell, P. (1986). Entrepreneurs and industrial change: The process of change in Irish manufacturing. Dublin: IMI.
O’Neal, T. (2005). Evolving a successful university-based incubator: Lessons learned from the UCF technology incubator. Engineering Management Journal, 17(3), 11–25.
O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34, 994–1009.
Pavitt, K. (1998). The social shaping of the national science base. Research Policy, 27, 793–805.
Pena, I. (2004). Business incubation centers and new firm growth in the Basque country. Small Business Economics, 22, 223–236.
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.
Phan, P. H., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 165–182.
Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 291–311.
Ratinho, T., & Henriques, E. (2010). The role of science parks and business incubators in converging countries: Evidence from Portugal. Technovation, 30(4), 278–290.
Retis. (2011). ‘Annuaire du réseau français de l’innovation’, 2010–2011.
Rothaermel, F. T., & Thursby, M. (2005). University-incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance. Research Policy, 34(3), 305–320.
Schwartz, M., & Hornych, C. (2010). Cooperation patterns of incubator firms and the impact of incubator specialization: Empirical evidence from Germany. Technovation, 30, 485–495.
Scillitoe, J. L., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2010). The role of incubator interactions in assisting new ventures. Technovation, 30(3), 155–167.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sherman, H. D. (1999). Assessing the intervention effectiveness of business incubation programs on new business startup. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 117–133.
Siegel, S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: Performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640–660.
Siegel, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2003). Science parks and the performance of new technology based firms: a review of recent UK evidence and an agenda for future research. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 177–184.
Smilor, R. W. (1987). Managing the incubator system: Critical success factors to accelerate new company development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34(3), 146–155.
Soetanto, D., & Jack, S. (2013). Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(4), 432–453.
Squicciarini, M. (2008). ‘Science Parks’ tenants versus out-of-Park firms: Who innovates more? A duration model’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 45–71.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:73.0.CO;2-Z.
Udell, G. (1989). Loan quality, commercial loan review and loan officer contracting. Journal of Banking and Finance, 13(3), 367–382.
Voisey, P., Gornall, L., Jones, P., & Thomas, B. (2006). The measurement of success in a business incubation project. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(3), 454–468.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
Westhead, P. (1997). R&D inputs and outputs of technology based firms in science parks. R&D Management, 27(1), 45–62.
Wright, M., Birley, S., & Mosey, S. (2004). Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 235–246.
Wynarczyk, P., & Raine, A. (2005). The performance of business incubators and their potential development in the North East region of England. Local Economy, 20(2), 205–220.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Asma Guerfeli of University of Tunis for his technical assistance in the statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
M’Chirgui, Z., Lamine, W., Mian, S. et al. University technology commercialization through new venture projects: an assessment of the French regional incubator program. J Technol Transf 43, 1142–1160 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9535-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9535-y
Keywords
- Incubator
- Entrepreneurial university
- New science and technology-based firm
- Commercialization
- Resource-based view