Skip to main content
Log in

On Independence and Determination of Probability Measures

  • Published:
Journal of Theoretical Probability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show that two probability measures defined on the same measure space having the same pairs of independent events are either purely atomic or equal. In the former case, either measures are trivial (taking values in \(\{0,1\}\)) and singular, or equivalent. We also characterize nonatomic measures having the same events independent of a fixed (nontrivial) event and provide sufficient condition on pairs on independent intervals to determine a probability measure on the real line.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Artstein, Z.: Yet another proof of the Lyapunov convexity theorem. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 108(1), 89–91 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Baryshnikov, Y.M., Eisenberg, B.: Independent events and independent experiments. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 118(2), 615–617 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, Z., Rubin, H., Vitale, R.A.: Independence and determination of probabilities. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 125(12), 3721–3723 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Diestel, J., Jerry U., Jr., J.: Progress in vector measures—1977–1983. Measure theory and its applications (Sherbrooke, Que., 1982). Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1033. Springer, Berlin, pp. 144–192 (1983)

  5. Edwards, W.F., Shiflett, R.C., Shultz, H.S.: Dependent probability spaces. College Math. J. 39(3), 221–226 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ionascu, E.J., Stancu, A.A.: On independent sets in purely atomic probability spaces with geometric distribution. Acta Math. Univ. Comenian. (N.S.) 79(1), 31–38 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Plachky, D., Rukhin, A.L.: Characterization of probability distributions by independence structures. Math. Methods Stat. 9(1), 90–105 (2000)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Székely, G.J., Móri, T.F.: Independence and atoms. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 130(1), 213–216 (2002) (electronic)

  9. Yurachkovskiĭ, A.P.: An axiomatic independence relation as an equivalent of probability measure. Akad. Nauk Ukrain. SSR Inst. Mat. Preprint, no. 6, 35 (1990)

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank R. A. Vitale for introducing me to the topic as well as for making useful comments and suggestions. I would also like to thank and A. P. Yurachkovskiĭ and A. L. Rukhin for sending me copies of [9] and [7], and an anonymous referee for comments and suggestions that greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iddo Ben-Ari.

Additional information

This work was partially supported by NSA Grant H98230-12-1-0225.

Appendix

Appendix

 Proof of Lemma 1

First, we observe that any event \(A\) with \(P(A)>0\) has an event with arbitrarily small but strictly positive measure. Indeed, let such \(A\) be given. Then, since \(P\) is nonatomic, there exists \(A_1\subset A\) with \(P(A_1) , P(A-A_1) >0\). Without loss of generality, \(P(A_1) \le P(A) /2\). Continue inductively. Given \(A_n \subset A\) with \(0< P(A_n) \le P(A)/2^n\), there exists \(A_{n+1}\subset A_n\), with \(0<P(A_{n+1}) < P(A_n)/2\).

We turn to the main claim. Fix \(\alpha \in (0,1)\), and let \(A_0\) be such that \(P(A_0) \in (0, \alpha )\). Continue inductively, assuming \(P(A_n) \in (0,\alpha )\). Let \(I_n = \{ B \subset A_n^c: P(B) \le \alpha - P(A_n)\}\). Choose \(B_{n+1} \in I_n\) that satisfies \(P(B_n) \ge (1- \frac{1}{n} ) \sup _{B \in I_n} P(B)\), and let \(A_{n+1} = A_n \cup B_{n+1}\). Note that the events \((B_n:n\in \mathbb{N })\) are disjoint. Therefore, \(P(B_n) \rightarrow 0\). Consequently, \(\sup _{B \in I_n} P(B) \rightarrow 0\). Let \(A_\infty = \cup _{n\in \mathbb{N }} A_n\). We continue the proof arguing by contradiction, assuming that \(P(A_\infty ) < \alpha \). Then, by the first paragraph, there exists \(B_\infty \subset A_\infty ^c\) satisfying \(0<P(B_\infty )<\alpha - P(A_\infty )\). Since \(A_\infty ^c \subset A_n^c\) for all \(n\in \mathbb{N }\), it follows that \( B_\infty \in I_n\) for all \(n\). But this contradicts the fact that \(\sup _{B\in I_n} P(B) \rightarrow 0\). \(\square \)

Proof of Corollary B

Let \(\epsilon = \min (\alpha ,1-\alpha )\). It is enough to show that if \(P(A)=P(B) \le \epsilon \), then \(Q(A)=Q(B)\). Without loss of generality, \(A \cap B= \emptyset \); otherwise, we will consider the pair \(A-(A\cap B)\) and \(B-(A\cap B)\) instead of \(A\) and \(B\). Since \(A \subset B^c\) and \(P(B^c) \ge \alpha \), by Lemma 1, there exists an event \(L\subset B^c\), with \(P(L)=\alpha \) and \(A\subset L\). But since \(P((L-A) \cup B)=P(L) - P(A) + P(B) = P(L)= \alpha \), it follows that \(Q((L-A) \cup B) =\alpha \). However, \( Q((L-A) \cup B) = Q(L) - Q(A) + Q(B) = \alpha - Q(A) +Q(B)\). Thus, \(Q(A)=Q(B)\). \(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-Ari, I. On Independence and Determination of Probability Measures. J Theor Probab 28, 968–975 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10959-013-0513-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10959-013-0513-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation