Skip to main content
Log in

“Predator and Prey” Model Revisited – Influence of External Fluxes and Noise

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The well-known predator-prey model is modified in two ways. First, the regular adding or regular deleting of preys or/and predators is considered. The steady-state and stability diagram are found. Second, random fluctuations of the birthrate and other kinetic coefficients are studied, and the parabolic law of a random walk in the (X,Y)-space is found and proved for small deviations from the steady state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Haken, Advanced Synergetics: Instability Hierarchies of Self-Organizing Systems and Devices, Springer Sci. & Business Media, New York, 2012.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Edelstein-Keshet, Mathematical Models in Biology, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: with Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018.

  4. A. S. Mikhailov and A. Yu. Loskutov, Foundations of Synergetics, Vols. I, II, Springer, Berlin, 1994, 1996.

  5. L. Arnold, W. Horsthemke, and J. Stucki, “The influence of external real and white noise on the Lotka– Volterra model,” Biometrical J., 21, 451–471 (1979).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. J. I. Tello and D. Wrzosek, “Predator-prey model with diffusion and indirect prey-taxis,” Math. Mod. .Meth. Appl. Sci., 26, 2129–2162 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. X. Tang, Xiaosong, Y. Song, and T. Zhang, “Turing-Hopf bifurcation analysis of a predator-prey model with herd behavior and cross-diffusion,” Nonlin. Dynam., 86, 73–89 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Zu, J. Daqing, and D. O’Regan, “Conditions for persistence and ergodicity of a stochastic Lotka–Volterra predator-prey model with regime switching,” Comm. Nonlin. Sci. Numer. Simul., 29, 1–11 (2015).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Z. Erdélyi, M. Pasichnyy, V. Bezpalchuk, J. J. Tomán, B. Gajdics, and A. M. Gusak, “Stochastic kinetic mean field model,” Computer Phys. Comm., 204, 31–37 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Gusak, T. Zaporozhets, and N. Storozhuk, “Phase competition in solid-state reactive diffusion revisitedstochastic kinetic mean-field approach,” J. Chem. Phys., 150, 174109 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Z. Khasminskii and F. C. Klebaner, “Long term behavior of solutions of the Lotka-Volterra system under small random perturbations,” Ann. Appl. Probab., 11, 952–963 (2001).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaroslav Huriev.

Additional information

Translated from Ukrains’kiĭ Matematychnyĭ Visnyk, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 536–556 October–December, 2019.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huriev, Y., Gusak, A. “Predator and Prey” Model Revisited – Influence of External Fluxes and Noise. J Math Sci 246, 648–663 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-020-04770-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-020-04770-9

Keywords

Navigation