Skip to main content
Log in

Directed Subdifferentiable Functions and the Directed Subdifferential Without Delta-Convex Structure

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show that the directed subdifferential introduced for differences of convex (delta-convex, DC) functions by Baier and Farkhi can be constructed from the directional derivative without using any information on the delta-convex structure of the function. The new definition extends to a more general class of functions, which includes Lipschitz functions definable on o-minimal structure and quasidifferentiable functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baier, R., Farkhi, E.: The directed subdifferential of DC functions. In: Leizarowitz, A., Mordukhovich, B.S., Shafrir, I., Zaslavski, A.J. (eds.) Nonlinear Analysis and Optimization II: Optimization. A Conference in Celebration of Alex Ioffe’s 70th and Simeon Reich’s 60th Birthdays, Haifa, Israel, 18–24 June, 2008. AMS Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 513, pp. 27–43. AMS and Bar-Ilan University, Providence (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Baier, R., Farkhi, E.: Differences of convex compact sets in the space of directed sets, part I: the space of directed sets. Set-Valued Anal. 9(3), 217–245 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Baier, R., Farkhi, E.: Differences of convex compact sets in the space of directed sets, part II: visualization of directed sets. Set-Valued Anal. 9(3), 247–272 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Baier, R., Farkhi, E., Roshchina, V.: The directed and Rubinov subdifferentials of quasidifferentiable functions. Part I: definition and examples. Nonlinear Anal. 75(3), 1074–1088 (2012). Special Issue on Variational Analysis and Its Applications

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Baier, R., Farkhi, E., Roshchina, V.: The directed and Rubinov subdifferentials of quasidifferentiable functions. Part II: calculus. Nonlinear Anal. 75(3), 1058–1073 (2012). Special Issue on Variational Analysis and Its Applications

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Coste, M.: An introduction to o-minimal geometry. Notes, Institut de Recherche Matématiques de Rennes, 82 pages (November 1999)

  7. Daniilidis, A., Pang, J.C.H.: Continuity and differentiability of set-valued maps revisited in the light of tame geometry. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 83(3), 637–658 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Ioffe, A.D.: An invitation to tame optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 19(4), 1894–1917 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Baier, R., Farkhi, E., Roshchina, V.: On computing the Mordukhovich subdifferential using directed sets in two dimensions. In: Burachik, R., Yao, J.-C. (eds.) Variational Analysis and Generalized Differentiation in Optimization and Control. Springer Optim. Appl., vol. 47, pp. 59–93. Springer, New York (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Rockafellar, R.T.: Convex Analysis, 2nd edn. Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 28. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1972). First edition (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hiriart-Urruty, J.-B., Lemaréchal, C.: Convex Analysis and Minimization Algorithms I. Fundamentals. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 305. Springer, Berlin (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Demyanov, V.F., Rubinov, A.M.: Constructive Nonsmooth Analysis. Approximation and Optimization, vol. 7. Verlag Peter Lang, Frankfurt/Main (1995). Russian original “Foundations of Nonsmooth Analysis, and Quasidifferential Calculus” published in Nauka, Moscow (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Pallaschke, D., Urbański, R.: Pairs of Compact Convex Sets. Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 548. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Bolte, J., Daniilidis, A., Lewis, A.: Tame functions are semismooth. Math. Program., Ser. B 117(1–2), 5–19 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Drusvyatskiy, D., Ioffe, A.D., Lewis, A.S.: The dimension of semialgebraic subdifferential graphs. Nonlinear Anal. 75(3), 1231–1245 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Bochnak, J., Coste, M., Roy, M.-F.: Géométrie Algébrique Réelle. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3), vol. 12 [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)]. Springer, Berlin (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Rockafellar, R.T., Wets, R.J.-B.: Variational Analysis. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 317. Springer, Berlin (1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Mordukhovich, B.S.: Variational Analysis and Generalized Differentiation. I Basic Theory. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 330. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rockafellar, R.T.: Favorable classes of Lipschitz-continuous functions in subgradient optimization. In: Nurminski, E.A. (ed.) Progress in Nondifferentiable Optimization. IIASA Collaborative Proc. Ser. CP-82, vol. S8, pp. 125–143. Internat. Inst. Appl. Systems Anal. (IIASA), Laxenburg (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Clarke, F.H.: Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis. Classics in Applied Mathematics, vol. 5. SIAM, Philadelphia (1990). First edition published in Wiley, New York (1983)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research is partially supported by The Hermann Minkowski Center for Geometry at Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel and by the University of Ballarat ‘Self-sustaining Regions Research and Innovation Initiative’, an Australian Government Collaborative Research Network (CRN).

We would like to acknowledge the discussions with Jeffrey C.H. Pang starting in October 2009 about Lipschitz definable functions. During the communications he suggested a construction to illustrate the existence of Lipschitz functions which are not quasidifferentiable. This motivated us to consider Example 5.1 which is based on a well-known one-dimensional example of a function that is quasidifferentiable but not a DC function (see [4, Example 3.5]). The authors are also grateful to Aris Daniilidis and Dmitriy Drusvyatskiy for a helpful discussion on Lipschitz definable/semialgebraic functions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vera Roshchina.

Additional information

Communicated by René Henrion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baier, R., Farkhi, E. & Roshchina, V. Directed Subdifferentiable Functions and the Directed Subdifferential Without Delta-Convex Structure. J Optim Theory Appl 160, 391–414 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-013-0401-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-013-0401-x

Keywords

Navigation