Abstract
Nationally, many public universities have started to move into the online course and program market that is most often associated with for-profit institutions of higher education. Administrators in public universities make statements regarding benefits to students’ desire for flexibility and profit margins related to online courses. But do students attending a large public university want to take courses online especially science courses perceived to be difficult such as freshmen-level physics courses? This study took place at a large, public, Midwestern university and involved students enrolled in the first semester of a face-to-face, flipped physics course for engineering technology majors. Statements were collected from comments about online courses made by the university’s administration and students in the course. Twenty students sorted 45 statements. Two student views emerged with one rejecting online courses in general and the other primarily rejecting online math, science, and technology courses, including physics. Students’ descriptions of their previous online course experiences were used to inform the analyses and to assist in describing the two views that emerged in conjunction with the distinguishing statements. Consensus among the two views is also discussed. Overall, the results indicate a potential divergence between student views and what university administrators believe students want.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blumenstyk G (January 4th, 2016) How for-profit education is now embedded in traditional colleges. Chron High Educ. http://chronicle.com/article/How-For-Profit-Education-Is/234550
Brown SR (1980) Political subjectivity: applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press, New Haven
Escalada LT, Moeller JK (2006) The challenges of designing and implementing effective professional development for out-of-field high school physics teachers. AIP Conf Proc 818(1):11–14. doi:10.1063/1.2177011
Fies C, Marshall J (2006) Classroom response systems: a review of the literature. J Sci Educ Technol 15(1):101–109
Hollingsworth A (2013) Q methodology as a needs assessment tool for Biology graduate teaching assistants participating in an instructional training program. Dissertation. The University of Akron
Lasry N (2008) Clickers or flashcards: is there really a difference? Phys Teach 46(4):242–244. doi:10.1119/1.2895678
McKeown B, Thomas D (1988) Q methodology. Sage Publications, Newbury Park
Mestre JP, Dufresne R, Gerace WJ, Hardiman PT, Touger JS (1993) Promoting skilled problem-solving behavior among beginning physics students. J Res Sci Teach 30(3):303
National Center for Education Statistics (2014) Enrollment in distance education courses, by state: Fall 2012. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2014023
Newman I, Ramlo S (2010) Using Q methodology and Q factor analysis to facilitate mixed methods research. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (eds) Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 505–530
Perkins KK, Adams W, Dubson M, Finkelstein N, Reid S, Wieman C, LeMaster R (2006) PhET: interactive simulations for teaching and learning physics. Phys Teach 44(1):18–23. doi:10.1119/1.2150754
Ramlo S (2012) Determining faculty and student views: applications of Q methodology in higher education. J Res Educ 22(1):86–106
Ramlo S (2015a) Theoretical significance in Q methodology: a qualitative approach to a mixed method. Res Sch 22(1):68–81
Ramlo S (2015b) Student views about a flipped physics course: a tool for program evaluation and improvement. Res Sch 22(1):44–54
Ramlo S (2015c) Q methodology as a tool for program assessment. MidWest Educ Res 27(2):207–223
Ramlo S (2016) Mixed method lessons learned from 80 years of Q methodology. J Mix Methods Res 10:28–45. doi:10.1177/1558689815610998
Ramlo S, Newman I (2011) Q methodology and its position in the mixed methods continuum. Operant Subj Int J Q Methodol 34(3):173–192
Ramlo S, McConnell D, Duan Z, Moore F (2008) Evaluating an inquiry-based bioinformatics course using Q methodology. J Sci Educ Technol 17(3):219–225
Schmolck P (2002) PQMethod manual mirror. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved April 29, 2004 from http://www.rz.unibw-muenchen.de/~p41bsmk/qmethod/
Sokoloff DR, Thornton RK, Laws PW (2004) RealTime physics: active learning laboratories. Wiley, New York
Stephenson W (1953) The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Stephenson W (1961) Scientific creed, 1961: Philosophical credo. Abductory principles. The centrality of self. Psychol Rec 11:1–26
Stowell JR, Nelson JM (2007) Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teach Psychol 34(4):253
Thomas DD, Baas LR (1993) The issue of generalization in Q methodology: “Reliable Schematics” revisited. Operant Subj 16:18–36
Thornton RK (1993) Changing the physics laboratory: Using technology and new approaches to learning to create an experimental environment for learning physics concepts. In: Proceedings of the europhysics conference on the role of experiment in physics education. Skofja Loka, Slovenia, pp 12–31
U.S. News & World Report (January 7, 2015) U.S. news ranks best online programs. http://www.usnews.com/education/online-education/articles/us-news-ranks-best-online-programs
U.S. News & World Report (June 12, 2014) New government data sheds light on online learners. http://www.usnews.com/education/online-education/articles/2014/06/12/new-government-data-sheds-light-on-online-learners
Wieman CE, Adams WK, Perkins KK (2008) PhET: simulations that enhance learning. Science 332(5902):682–683
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramlo, S.E. Students’ Views About Potentially Offering Physics Courses Online. J Sci Educ Technol 25, 489–496 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9608-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9608-6